Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy

[QUOTE=ChiHappiness;5268662]Couldn't have said it better myself.[/QUOTE]2nd amendment is not only about self defense. It's also about being a way for citizens to protect themselves from the government. Sex trafficking is terrible. However, when two people decide to have sex in exchange for money. The government shouldn't be involved. However, there are some people that say, we need common sense laws regarding prostitution. Because it is so hard to distinguish between a willing participant and someone forced to have sex for money (either because of their environment or "grooming" it's only "common sense" to ban all prostitution.

2nd amendment exists. Yes, there will be bad instance of it being misused. But it is to help you defend yourself when there are government people kicking down your doors in the middle of the night to put you in a "re-education" camp or make you disappear. If you don't understand this. If you think your government knows best and think it's okay to lay down your arms because the government "knows best" than why are you in this hobby? The government has stated for the majority of people here, what you people are doing his wrong. If you think having ar15's, cannot fight against against a "modern government"; is it better than having nothing?

P.S. The Virginia tech killer; killed more people with standard size magazines. Not "large" magazines.

Boom! Couldn't have said it better myself! Well done!

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5266484]One crazy cracker with a semi automatic large clip can kill a lot more people versus using a knife. Common sense gun laws make sense. No the libs aren't out to take your guns away. We just want sensible guns laws to prevent nutjobs from killing our children in school, places we work, and businesses that we patronize.[/QUOTE]Please inform us what those common sense gun laws should be and what lives they would have saved? Was that a crazy cracker that shot up that party on the south side a week or two ago? Isn't cracker considered a racist term? FWIW I am not offended by it but I am so anxious to hear about common sense gun laws.

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5268515]The people who can't abide any denunciation of "woke-ness" or "SJWs" will be along to say thay they know "what time you're on" or whatever. But you're right.

Seems like it's ok to say anything about white people and whiteness. Think I'm wrong?

[URL]https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/coca-cola-slammed-for-blatant-racial-discrimination/2YZ3FEERKSTODU2TY5T6MWCD44/[/URL]

See attached.

This shit is a fucking industry.

Think that's a one-off? Think again:

[URL]https://video.foxnews.com/v/6233893549001[/URL]#sp=show-clips.

Everyone feel free to dismiss it, before investigation, just because it's fox news.[/QUOTE]It's other white people who perpetuate this lunacy, not minorities. Yes, there are some but they are encouraged and pressured into doing so by lunatic white people.

[QUOTE=RonM;5267059]With this incident being within our field of play people need a way to vent their frustration and anger about what happened. As long as it's about the incident itself. Not about turning that.

Anger towads the person expressing their opinions.[/QUOTE]Right said.

[QUOTE=Moejoo;5269131]Please inform us what those common sense gun laws should be and what lives they would have saved? Was that a crazy cracker that shot up that party on the south side a week or two ago? Isn't cracker considered a racist term? FWIW I am not offended by it but I am so anxious to hear about common sense gun laws.[/QUOTE]Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.

Who is this "we" you're talking about? I believe you when you say *you* don't want to take the guns, but if you think there aren't lots of Leftists that want every American disarmed, you haven't been paying attention. They *all* say they want "common sense" laws, but me and them have nothing in common and they don't have any sense.

"Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47" - "Beto" O'Rourke.

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. 'Mr. And Mrs. America, turn 'them all in,' I would have done it. ".

-- Dianne Feinstein.

Feinstein is a particularly egregious case, as she carried a revolver for her own protection when she felt the need, but wants to deny everyone else the same right. I guess not all lives matter, after all.

There's plenty more where those came from.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5266484]One crazy cracker with a semi automatic large clip can kill a lot more people versus using a knife. Common sense gun laws make sense. No the libs aren't out to take your guns away. We just want sensible guns laws to prevent nutjobs from killing our children in school, places we work, and businesses that we patronize.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ApplePiePussy;5269688]It's other white people who perpetuate this lunacy, not minorities. Yes, there are some but they are encouraged and pressured into doing so by lunatic white people.[/QUOTE]I agree. The white SJWs are the most insane. They are as anti-white as can be. The shit I was referring to was whipped up by a white woman, Robin DiAngelo.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5269904]Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.[/QUOTE]I doubt you've seen a single deer hunter your entire life, so how would you know in a country of 328 million people (plus untold millions of illegal non USA Citizens) what gun owners uses on a regular basis?

You want to ban ban ban. Alright why don't we ban heroin / fentanyl, meth and crack? Why don't we ban trafficking women? OH We do. And anyone can get that 24/7 can't they?

There isn't a simple answer. The quicker the side that wants guns banned understands that banning won't work as I pointed out above, a solution that hasn't been thought of will arise. You're not taking away millions of gun owners stuff.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5269904]Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.[/QUOTE]First, POC are represented in the mass shootings. You just don't hear about it because that doesn't fit the narrative.

Second, they're not "high capacity" magazines. They are typically [B]standard[/B] capacity magazines. That's typically what the guns come with.

Third, there ain't shit in the Second Amendment about hunting.

Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".

When the Second Amendment was written, the rifles used by civilians and military were the same. We can infer from this that the framers did not intend for the People to have only weapons that are unsuitable for or alien to those used by the military.

[QUOTE=ApplePiePussy;5267200]

You can hate the CCP all you want. I hate them too... You can also hate on the fraudulent, deceptive, and dishonest business dealings of Chinese companies (Luckin coffee etc.) That's all fair game. Where you become an ignorant pos no better than the pos in Atlanta is when you project that hatred onto individual Asian-Americans or Asian immigrants who have nothing to do with the things you hate

[/QUOTE]And I agree with that.

But we've known for *days* now that this had nothing to do with the race of the victims, it was about their profession. The killer felt he was a sex addict and "needed" to eliminate sources of temptation. That doesn't make him any less of a POS, but we can stop flagellating ourselves over anti-asian racism.

But that doesn't fit the narrative. Why let facts get in the way of a good story?

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5270203]First, POC are represented in the mass shootings. You just don't hear about it because that doesn't fit the narrative.

Second, they're not "high capacity" magazines. They are typically [B]standard[/B] capacity magazines. That's typically what the guns come with.

Third, there ain't shit in the Second Amendment about hunting.

Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".

When the Second Amendment was written, the rifles used by civilians and military were the same. We can infer from this that the framers did not intend for the People to have only weapons that are unsuitable for or alien to those used by the military.[/QUOTE]Actually the vast majority of gun massacres in the USA are done by white males. A good number of them done by white nationalists and militia men. The good news is that the majority of folks want common sense gun laws. Soon the Senate filibuster will be removed and things will slowly change. Cheers!

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5270203]
Fourth, assault rifles are already virtually banned, because an assault rifle is a full automatic weapon. An "assault weapon" is a different, made up category roughly meaning "any gun a Leftist doesn't like".
[/QUOTE]Correct, an assault rifle, like a soldier would have, is capable of semi-automatic and fully automatic at the flip of the switch. So when the first ban came into effect, the NRA was quick to point out that without a very special license and in only a few states, a citizen couldn't own fully automatic weapons. So the gun banners and the media started to call things like an AR-15 an "assault style weapon". Meaning it looked like military without being military. So besides full auto, what's the difference? Politicians banned a tripod mount, bayonet mount, folding stocks, etc.

Oh yeah, and I love handjobs.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5269904]Just another massacre by another white guy. Killed 10 people. How about universal background checks with no loopholes? How about banning assault rifles? How about banning high capacity magazines? I don't see many deer hunters using assault weapons.[/QUOTE]What are the loopholes you see with the form 4473? Heroin coke, and hookers are illegal to own why do you think that banning a type of gun will make it so difficult to get? How many people do you see Deer hunting and what types of guns do they use? In case you were unaware the 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. Maybe you didn't hear about it but 13 black people were shot by a black guy a week ago on the South side I wonder if he hates black people. Other than the fact that he was a poor shot how is that any different than Atlanta?

[QUOTE=PghTraveler;5265704]He was a fucked up religious wacko who went to AMPs. It's racially motivated to the extent that a lot of guys believe the myth that Asian women are a special variety of pussy, "me love you long time," etc. He could have lit up a bunch of orange tanned strippers but he didn't.[/QUOTE]While I agree that many guys specifically like Asian pussy and consider it a category itself, we definitely have no information that he specifically liked Asian pussy over other pussy and therefore went to Asian parlors for that reason.

I never knew how much I liked Asians until I went to several massage parlors and they all had Asians working! Only a couple years later did I find some Euro and Latina places. So those places may have just been convenient for his sexual needs.

[QUOTE=SamSpade;5270288]Correct, an assault rifle, like a soldier would have, is capable of semi-automatic and fully automatic at the flip of the switch. So when the first ban came into effect, the NRA was quick to point out that without a very special license and in only a few states, a citizen couldn't own fully automatic weapons. So the gun banners and the media started to call things like an AR-15 an "assault style weapon". Meaning it looked like military without being military. So besides full auto, what's the difference? Politicians banned a tripod mount, bayonet mount, folding stocks, etc.

Oh yeah, and I love handjobs.[/QUOTE]The ban expired in 2004. And assault weapons can be semi-automatic Military assault rifles are automatic, civilian assault rifles are semi-automatic.

Wow, the title of this thread is really accurate.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5270248]

Actually the vast majority of gun massacres in the USA are done by white males.
[/QUOTE]You know, I keep hearing this asserted as undisputed truth. This time, I decided to check. I'm glad I did, thank you. Like so much else asserted by Leftists as undisputed truth, this turns out to be complete bullshit.

I pluggged the following into Google:

Statistics mass murderers by race.

The first 5 or 6 links that came up came up with figures of around 60% of mass murderers being non-hispanic whites. This is close to their proportion of the population, so it's unsurprising. Yes, it's "most" of the mass murderers, no it's not disproportionate. It certainly is *not* a "vast" majority". The same holds for blacks and latinos.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5270248]
A good number of them done by white nationalists
[/QUOTE]Well, hard to argue with a vague crap like "a good number". Doesn't matter anyhow.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5270248]
and militia men.
[/QUOTE]This is a separate set. If you mean "3 percenters" or Oath Keepers, I call bullshit.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5270248]
The good news is that the majority of folks want common sense gun laws. Soon the Senate filibuster will be removed and things will slowly change. Cheers![/QUOTE]You think one party gaining complete control is a good thing because it's "your" guys. The Democratic Party is well on the way achieving permanent political dominance through their sponsorship of illegal immigration and election fraud. If they succeed in making America a single party state, I guarantee that you won't like the eventual results.

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. " - Lord Acton.

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5271001]You think one party gaining complete control is a good thing because it's "your" guys. The Democratic Party is well on the way achieving permanent political dominance through their sponsorship of illegal immigration and election fraud. If they succeed in making America a single party state, I guarantee that you won't like the eventual results..[/QUOTE]There has never been widespread election fraud. Yes there is voter suppression to stop people of color from voting. Trump lost fair and square by millions of votes. Just last weekend a Florida state republican was arrested for election fraud. Cheers!

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5271211]
There has never been widespread election fraud.
[/QUOTE]Fine. If you think it's cool when more votes are counted than the number of registered voters for a given locale, good for you.

If you think it's reasonable for 1000's or 100,000's of votes in a row to be counted and one canidate gets all of them, good for you.

If you think there is some legitimate way a candidate's count can *decrease* during counting, goodfor you.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5271211]
Yes there is voter suppression to stop people of color from voting. T
[/QUOTE]You are a Liberal cliche machine. We have to show I. D. To get on a plane, to buy booze, to check into a motel, to open a bank account, and yes! To buy guns. But try to establish that people voting are actually legally entitled to do so, and the bullshit you just said pops up like a reflex.

And you're racist, too: you're saying minorities are too dumb to get I'd. They cost nearly nothing. In lots of place, they cost actually nothing if you don't have it.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5271211]
Trump lost fair and square by millions of votes. Just last weekend a Florida state republican was arrested for election fraud. Cheers!

[/QUOTE]See above.

Yes, I know what the title of the page is. I'm still confused why on a sex site anyone is discussing guns and elections.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5270248]Actually the vast majority of gun massacres in the USA are done by white males. A good number of them done by white nationalists and militia men. The good news is that the majority of folks want common sense gun laws. Soon the Senate filibuster will be removed and things will slowly change. Cheers![/QUOTE][URL]https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/[/URL] I believe that that chart very closely follows the racial makeup of he country. If anyone has opposing information other than what they are told by CNN than I would like to see it. I believe everyone in the country wants common sense gun laws but strongly disagree on what they should be. 99.99999999 percent of gun owners don't shoot anyone. They don't believe that they should be penalised for what the other. 00000000001 percent do.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5271211]There has never been widespread election fraud. Yes there is voter suppression to stop people of color from voting. Trump lost fair and square by millions of votes. Just last weekend a Florida state republican was arrested for election fraud. Cheers![/QUOTE]No election fraud? Why don't you ask some Bernie Sanders voters what they think about Hillary in 2016 and Biden / Harris 2020.

Harris dropped out of presidential race because she was in single digits. I can't remember how many cars were honking at those Biden get out the vote rallies but it seemed like about 20 cars. Trump had people that couldn't fit in those huge venues for his appearances but somehow Biden pulls off win with swing states that changed their laws without their legislatures approval:

Michigan Court of Claims Chief Judge Christopher Murray ruled that the Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated Michigan's Administrative Procedures Act with an October 6 order to change the signature verification process for absentee ballots:

[URL]https://americanpatriotdaily.com/latest/a-swing-state-judge-just-delivered-the-voter-fraud-ruling-trump-was-waiting-for/[/URL]

Smiley Sam how about expanding your horizons and read, watch or listen to more than what major media is parroting. It's all the same day in and day out.

[QUOTE=Ump1969;5271867]Yes, I know what the title of the page is. I'm still confused why on a sex site anyone is discussing guns and elections.[/QUOTE]Folks bored. Others still believe that Trump won and are mighty angry about it. Guess storming the capital killing and injuring police officers wasn't enough. Cheers!

Heading down to Playa del Carmen next week for a solo trip. Hoping to find some interesting action!

The International side of this site doesn't seem to offer a ton of info.

Any tips are welcomed, otherwise I'll be sure to report anything useful.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5271211]There has never been widespread election fraud. Yes there is voter suppression to stop people of color from voting. Trump lost fair and square by millions of votes. Just last weekend a Florida state republican was arrested for election fraud. Cheers![/QUOTE]"To stop people of color from voting" dude stop the hard drugs and make an appointment with a shrink stat.

[QUOTE=StanKost;5272123]"To stop people of color from voting" dude stop the hard drugs and make an appointment with a shrink stat.[/QUOTE]I'm good although thanks for the concern! No hard drugs but I do enjoy a nice cool beer on occasion. Cheers!

[URL]https://populist.press/[/URL]

[URL]https://redstate.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.dailywire.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.conservativenews.com/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Ump1969;5271867]Yes, I know what the title of the page is. I'm still confused why on a sex site anyone is discussing guns and elections.[/QUOTE]It's quite funny actually. We have one fellow saying "Cheers!" every post LOL. The fact is no one is going to change anyone else's mind posting about politics. I'll always be a conservative Republican and others on here will always be liberal Democrats and that's fine by me.

[QUOTE=PreggoBoobies;5272389][URL]https://populist.press/[/URL]
[URL]https://redstate.com/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dailywire.com/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.conservativenews.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]Here are some other goodies:

[URL]https://www.msnbc.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.cnn.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.democrates.org/[/URL]

Cheers!

[QUOTE=PreggoBoobies;5271917]No election fraud? Why don't you ask some Bernie Sanders voters what they think about Hillary in 2016 and Biden / Harris 2020.[/QUOTE]I would ask them if they would be willing to cry harder.

This is why I make a rule wherever I work or socialize that politics are not discussed, (I have friends on both sides of the fence and don't need to crap all over that).

As a melanin-challenged person, I find the c-word highly offensive. Don't be racist.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;5266484]One crazy cracker with a semi automatic ...
[/QUOTE]

Voter suppression is a myth. There are more ways for blacks to vote than ever before but the leftists want to tell you that requiring identification is voter suppression.

Please explain how in the 21st century getting an I'd is some sort of ju ju white man's trick to stop a black person from doing anything. As the previous well thought out post explains all citizens are required to have identification. You can't exist without some form of I'd.

You can't get cigarettes, beer / alcohol, food stamps / snap benefits / welfare, a motel room, an apartment, a job, unemployment, a checking account, social security, have a prescription filled, get a fishing license, drive a car, buy a car, rent a car, get on an airplane, get married, buy a gun, go in a casino, adopt a pet or a hundred other things. But leftist tell you it's voter suppression to require identification to participate in who will make policy, laws and decide in what direction the united states of America will proceed.

All of the cnn, msnbc, pbs etc. "News" articles go into gobblty gook explanations about how voter suppression disproportionately targets democratic and black voters and how its racist, how it's sick without coming out and plainly stating it's about having an I'd when you go to your local place to vote.

How come the Asians and native Americans can do this simple requirement but your leftist democrat media and leaders say blacks can't? You are brain dead to believe your politicians and have no business coming out of your homes on election day.

The below was a good post:

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5271823]Fine. If you think it's cool when more votes are counted than the number of registered voters for a given locale, good for you.

If you think it's reasonable for 1000's or 100,000's of votes in a row to be counted and one canidate gets all of them, good for you.

If you think there is some legitimate way a candidate's count can *decrease* during counting, goodfor you.

You are a Liberal cliche machine. We have to show I. D. To get on a plane, to buy booze, to check into a motel, to open a bank account, and yes! To buy guns. But try to establish that people voting are actually legally entitled to do so, and the bullshit you just said pops up like a reflex.

And you're racist, too: you're saying minorities are too dumb to get I'd. They cost nearly nothing. In lots of place, they cost actually nothing if you don't have it.

See above.[/QUOTE]

The most non-pussy topic I could think of. My lawn is a Fkn mess! I don't know anything about landscaping, gardening, no green thumb.

Anyone out there with some tips? I could easily pay a crew to sod for me, but am looking for an excuse to spend some time outdoors, literal "get my hands on the mud".

My guess is this will be a total redo project. Mix up the soil, aírate or something. Then seed or sod. Any guys or gals with info, hit me up.

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5273797]As a melanin-challenged person, I find the c-word highly offensive. Don't be racist.[/QUOTE]I'm Blasian and I find the C-word offensive!

I am concerned about the lack of good sex on the street. I don't give a damn when I am reading this site what Bernie Sanders thinks, Donald Trump, Joe Biden or their followers. I think this entire page should be eliminated. When you are getting your penis serviced, is that what you guys are worried about, what Bernie Sanders thinks? Personally, that would shrivel my think to the point it could never again be used.

First, let me say that I am as about anti-SJW, anti-Woke as you can get. I don't believe that rich white kids crying about socialism and social justice is anything more than them looking for approval from a bunch of self-policing thought police assholes. But I am also an armchair historian and know what Japanese Comfort Women is all about. And I find an advertisement playing off of it. Amazingly stupid.

[URL]https://chicago.rubratings.com/211514[/URL]

[QUOTE=SamSpade;5276064]First, let me say that I am as about anti-SJW, anti-Woke as you can get. I don't believe that rich white kids crying about socialism and social justice is anything more than them looking for approval from a bunch of self-policing thought police assholes. But I am also an armchair historian and know what Japanese Comfort Women is all about. And I find an advertisement playing off of it. Amazingly stupid.

[URL]https://chicago.rubratings.com/211514[/URL][/QUOTE]If they are there against their will then the advertising is correct.

[QUOTE=SamSpade;5276064]First, let me say that I am as about anti-SJW, anti-Woke as you can get. I don't believe that rich white kids crying about socialism and social justice is anything more than them looking for approval from a bunch of self-policing thought police assholes. But I am also an armchair historian and know what Japanese Comfort Women is all about. And I find an advertisement playing off of it. Amazingly stupid.

[URL]https://chicago.rubratings.com/211514[/URL][/QUOTE]This is the 2188 Asian Apartment. They've had obnoxious and hilarious ads for years now. While I agree this is not in good taste, none of them in general have been in good taste. But what can you say? These are Asian people writing these ads. Specifically, they are Chinese who, like the Koreans, suffered immensely under Japanese imperialism.

So maybe this is another example of why people shouldn't get offended on behalf of other cultures, races, religions etc. Maybe it's time we all lighten the fuck up.