H5044 - Text of Amendment to laws in Rhode Island
This was passed by the House Judiciary Committee on 4/30 by a vote of 8 to 4 with 3 members not present. Since there will likely be a lot of comment about it, here it is for your perusal.
One of the major questions is what effect this will have on Providence Strip Clubs...if you look closely at the definition of "sexual conduct" you will see references to the acts of sexual stimulation included. Will this be interpretable as making a "good grind" illegal? Did they leave a little bitty loophole that will allow the strip club business to continue as it was before FS became the norm in so many clubs? Also, if you look at the section that is aimed at mongers, they use the term "sexual acts" rather than the already defined "sexual conduct" - is that sloppy law writing or is there some other reason for that?
It will also be interesting to hear assessments of just how vigorously lil' Rhody will enforce this!
2009 -- H 5044 SUBSTITUTE A
=======
LC00032/SUB A/6
=======
S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2009
____________
A N A C T
RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES - PROSTITUTION AND LEWDNESS
Introduced By: Representatives Giannini, E Coderre, Melo, Gemma, and Fellela
Date Introduced: January 08, 2009
Referred To: House Judiciary
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 11-34 of the General Laws entitled "Prostitution and Lewdness" is 1
hereby amended by adding thereto the following sections: 2
11-34-1.1. Definitions. – For purposes of this section: 3
(1) “Sexual conduct” means sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, anal intercourse, 4
any digital intrusion or intrusion by any object into the genital opening or anal opening of another 5
person's body, or the stimulation by hand of another's genitals for the purposes of arousing or 6
gratifying the sexual desire of either person. 7
(2) “Fee” means anything of monetary value, including but not limited to money, given 8
as consideration for sexual acts. 9
11-34-12. Prostitution. -- (a) A person is guilty of prostitution when such person 10
engages or agrees or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee. 11
Any person found guilty under this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be 12
subject to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six (6) months, or to a fine of not less than two 13
hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both. 14
(b) Any person found guilty of a subsequent offense under this section shall be subject to 15
imprisonment for a term of not more than one year, or a fine of not less than five hundred dollars 16
($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both. 17
(c) Any proceeds derived directly from a violation of this section are subject to seizure 18
and forfeiture and further proceedings shall be had for their forfeiture as is prescribed by law in 19
2
chapter 21 of title 12. 1
(d) In any prosecution for a violation under this section it shall be an affirmative defense 2
if the accused was forced to commit a commercial sexual activity by: 3
(1) Being threatened or, subjected to physical harm; 4
(2) Being physically restrained or threatened to be physically restrained; 5
(3) Being subject to threats of abuse of law or legal process; 6
(4) Being subject to destruction, concealment, removal or confiscation, of any passport or 7
other immigration document, or any other actual or purported governmental identification 8
document; or 9
(5) Being subject to intimidation in which the accused’s physical well being was 10
perceived as threatened. 11
11-34-13. Procurement of sexual acts for a fee. -- (a) A person is guilty of procuring or 12
attempting to procure sexual acts for the payment of a fee if they engage or seek to engage in 13
sexual acts for any type of fee and/or pay or agree to pay any type of fee for sexual acts, 14
regardless of the time, place or location of the procurement, attempted procurement, payment, 15
attempted payment or act. Any person found guilty under this section shall be deemed guilty of a 16
misdemeanor and shall be subject to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six (6) months, or to 17
a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars 18
($1,000), or both. 19
(b) Any person found guilty of a subsequent offense under this section shall be subject to 20
imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or a fine of not less than five hundred dollars 21
($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both. 22
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. 23
=======
LC00032/SUB A/6
========
3
EXPLANATION BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
OF A N A C T RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES - PROSTITUTION AND LEWDNESS
***
This act would define the crime of prostitution to include any location, would create 1
punishments for individuals who would attempt to procure the services of a prostitute. 2
This act would take effect upon passage. 3
=======
LC00032/SUB A/6
=======
If this passes in the complete House (and Senate, I guess)....
[QUOTE=Viejo]Also, if you look at the section that is aimed at mongers, they use the term "sexual acts" rather than the already defined "sexual conduct" - is that sloppy law writing or is there some other reason for that?[/QUOTE]
.....there's going to be years of debate on what it actually says and what the intent is.
Personally, I don't see it becoming law, but I'm not a Rhode Island resident, either.
Now, cynically reading that last question of yours, if taken literally aren't all the legislators exposed to prosecution? After all, to them graft, abuse of power, etc. gives them a prurient thrill - aren't those really "sexual acts" in that case??
Looking for 3 girls for their advice
Anyone know of Shayann, Sweet Kim or Champagne?
A gentleman contacted me with very few posts because of a review of me and stacy lyns 3-some in waterbury, ct. Could be l. E. But he told me to contact those three ladies listed above because he has been with them. My email is [email]coco. Cheenatyahoo.com[/email], please let me know.
Thanks,
Coco
Indoor prostitution question
I am not from RI, so I do not get your local news. Can someone please tell us if "Indoor Prostitution" was outlawed in RI? An update wold be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
Should be a summer of love
[QUOTE=P Austin]Forest, nothing has changed yet. The loop hole still exists!
Peace.[/QUOTE]
I sense the end is near. I intend to take advantage of this summer, just in case.
If not, and the "loop hole" (which was undoubtedly engineered by some horny politicians) continues, I have lost nothing!
R.I. prostitutes speak out against bill to close loophole
This made it in the newspapers out in Iowa. Did not see any of you guys posting so figured you may like to know. Looks like they want all these women to collect unemployment.
There is no pretending here. Is it a bad thing or a good thing that prostitution is legal in Rhode Island, indoors?
[quote]The women gathered at this Providence community center are prostitutes. And they are here, early this Sunday morning, because they want to keep their jobs.
"No one here is under any force to be working in this field, " said Sunyo Williams through an interpreter. "We are willing to answer one by one and testify that this is our own choice."
Williams sat in a circle of more than 30 Korean spa workers — most wearing hooded sweatshirts or winter jackets, jeans and designer sneakers — drawn to this plain room with cinderblock walls to learn how and why the General Assembly may outlaw their source of income this week.
A large bowl of white rice sat on a table in the corner of the room. No one was eating. Some scribbled notes as the handful of state lawmakers in attendance outlined the situation.
"Prostitution will be criminalized, " said a sympathetic state Sen. Rhoda E. Perry, D-Providence, who was joined by Providence Democrats Rep. David A. Segal and Rep. Edith H. Ajello at the meeting hosted by the advocacy group Direct Action for Rights and Equality. "And there will be fines for this behavior. And potential prison time. This needs to be known."
Indeed, while the details have yet to be finalized, the legislature this week plans to close a nearly 30-year-old loophole in the state prostitution laws that has made Rhode Island the only place in the country, except for certain counties in Nevada, where prostitution is legal as long as it occurs indoors.
The new law would target the men who pay for sex, landlords who "knowingly" allow prostitution, and women such as Williams, a 53-year-old single mother who uses money from prostitution to help finance her daughter's college education.
"I do not want anything to happen until she finishes school," Williams said of her 20-year-old daughter, a junior at the University of Rhode Island. "If I get arrested, my children get hurt."
Williams, who speaks broken English, moved to Rhode Island from Arkansas seven years ago because she heard "the schools were good here." A mother of two, with little education, she quickly found employment in a Pawtucket spa that offered sex for money.
It was only last year, she says, that she learned indoor prostitution was legal. "Everybody found out last year, " she said. "Before, we don't know. We were very careful."
Williams works in the Pawtucket spa with three other women. She says that each has a separate tax identification number and pays taxes.
"My customers, they all come from Massachusetts, " Williams said. "We're making money and spending it in Rhode Island."
Just a handful of the other women spoke or asked questions of the lawmakers, or representatives of advocacy groups such as the Rhode Island Coalition Against Human Trafficking, who attended Sunday's 8:30 am Meeting.
A woman who later identified herself only as Jasmine was among the most vocal.
Through a translator, she said she fell into prostitution three years ago after answering a newspaper ad.
"I was very hungry. That's why I started, " said Jasmine, a petite woman of "older than 40" who wore a Ralph Lauren winter coat and now works at a Providence spa. "It's better than stealing, or breaking the law. This is a way of life. There are people dependent on this."
As Sunday's meeting progressed, a collective sense of fear and frustration grew as the women realized an unwelcome political reality.
Many had hoped for a compromise that would protect them from jail. Jasmine suggested increased taxes on spas.
"For reasons that are hard for me to understand, the legislation is more harsh than we would like for the women, " Segal responded. "There's still a small chance that the severity could be lessened. But you need to understand that's a small chance."
Ajello chimed in: "This is a huge rock you are looking to push up a very steep hill, " she said, encouraging the women to attend a State House committee hearing Tuesday at 4 pm Where the prostitution bill could be amended. "I think you should try. The most positive thing would be to put a human face on the issue."
The women, however, were worried about being recorded at the televised hearing. Cameras weren't allowed in Sunday's gathering. Some suggested testifying while wearing large hats and sunglasses.
Williams wasn't sure whether she'd attend the hearing. If the law is changed, however, she said she'd have to leave the state.
"I need a little more time to help my daughter, " she said.
Jasmine also said she'd probably leave Rhode Island if the Assembly closed the loophole. And she's frustrated.
"Honestly, after being in this world for three years, I've come to learn that it's all around the United States, " she said through a translator. "Yeah, it's illegal. But it happens everywhere. It's not like you can stop it, even if this law gets passed."[/quote]
RI indoor prostitution made illegal? what now?
What are the indoor providers going to do? Will many of then bolt back to vegas or the big cities?
Also. Will this drive down prices for indoor illegal? I notice in las vegas and RI the rates are much higher than where it is against the law.
Also. Will this affect the SW scene at all?
Thanks in advance
What are you fellows doing?
My travels will take me down to RI tomorrow and I'm contemplating a visit to one of the many fine spas I've seen reviewed here.
BUT: What are you fellows doing? Is this a good/bad/indifferent week to visit? On the plus side, I'm thinking that this week may be more or less business as usual.... on the down side, spas may be crowded by those of us who want to enjoy what could turn out to be a 'last hurrah' with our favorite, juicy little Spinner.. and finally, as soon as the new legislation is passed, TV trucks may converge on the spas to tape us going in and out for the evening news.
All things considered, I'm inclined to pass... but some of your reviews are pretty enticing.
What say you?
You're right - to a point.
[QUOTE=RickyRicardo]I just gave up looking for some recent reviews because this board is flooded with bullshit. Get over your stupid law. There are always going to be places to go.
RR[/QUOTE]
RR - you are right, the MP forum should be used for reports but I think many are just laying very low and I doubt you will see much for a while. Even if folks are active, the reports, if any, will hopefully be brief and discreet to protect the providers - many of whom some of us know on a somewhat personal level as well. And, TBH, this is how it should be now. No sense giving the moral nazis directions to places that try to stay open (or new places) allowing the women to make a living.
I readily admit that I am probably one of the biggest offenders in the ongoing discussion on the MP forum - that is why I moved your comment here but, while I can't speak for all, I think many are angry about the injustice of this law. This is a big issue - its not just about sex. It is a matter of personal freedom between consenting adults, civil rights, hypocrisy, lies, prejudice, bias, political grandstanding, separation of church and state, and even the constitution. Many are angry. I think people are just venting this anger on the MP forum as that is the area that may see the biggest impact in the short term.
Hopefully all further discussion on the impact and fallout of the new law will move here to General Topics (is this the right place, Jackson?) but I don't think the subject should be dropped. We need to stay informed on this issue as things progress (such as the first bust, the first lawsuit??) to see where we go from here.
Oh, and while you say there are always going to be places to go, for some reason spas are being targeted all over. Besides RI going nazi see Springfield, MA forum and MA General topics - another recent bust in Watertown, MA. Could be just coincidence. I'm not sure what the hell is going on but its going to be dodgy all over NE for a while it seems.
Stay safe, cheers!
First bust in Rhode Island
Looks like the first people have been arrested under the new law. Be careful.
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2009/12/state-police-arrest-14-under-s.html[/url]
List of U.S. paper money for the newbie's
Just a list to help out some people with the CORRECT people on the bills so they know what value's we're talking about in the posts.
President on $1 bill: George Washington
President on $2 bill: Thomas Jefferson
President on $5 bill: Abraham Lincoln
Face on $10 bill: Alexander Hamilton.
President on $20 bill: Andrew Jackson
President on $50 bill: U.S. Grant.
Face on $100 bill: Benjamin Franklin
President on $500 bill: William McKinley
President on $1,000 bill: Grover Cleveland
President on $5,000 bill: James Madison
Face on $10,000 bill: Salmon P. Chase
President on $100,000 bill: Woodrow Wilson
$1,000,000 dollar bill - does not exist - only promotional copies