Sugar Daddy Sites

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6573559]I've been in touch w / her for a week since rejoining. Pretty but quirky. Was supposed to meet this morning, I think she was trying to avoid it, suggested doing a picnic lunch. Not on my schedule, already had a lunch M&G.

Anyone else have any luck w / her?[/QUOTE]"I'm educated, gorgeous and looking for a man who appreciates me as I would appreciate him. ".

"I am well educated, a model part-time, and they work in tech".

That combined with she is definitely not 32. Closeup on her hands and face / eyes -- my guess is 40+. Quick guess is she was very hot when she was late 20's. Still thinks that.

My $0. 01.

[QUOTE=SteveTandberg;6573618]"I'm educated, gorgeous and looking for a man who appreciates me as I would appreciate him. ".

"I am well educated, a model part-time, and they work in tech".

That combined with she is definitely not 32. Closeup on her hands and face / eyes -- my guess is 40+. Quick guess is she was very hot when she was late 20's. Still thinks that.

My $0. 01.[/QUOTE]I can read her profile and did so before I got engaged in messaging w / her. I was asking if anyone else had experiences in doing the latter, so we could compare notes. I think she might be on the spectrum, and has a hard time relating to people. There is a hint of that on the profile too.

Is seeking trying to force Verification on anyone else?

[QUOTE=Dsteezy;6574781]Is seeking trying to force Verification on anyone else?[/QUOTE]IDK if they forced it on me but I am verified.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;6574790]IDK if they forced it on me but I am verified.[/QUOTE]Well, I've never been. Now I got a notice saying my account is temp suspended until I get verified. Never done it nor have I been interested in it. I know it helps users verify you're an actual person and I'm sure it helps get more engagement but I've never struggled getting responses from individuals on there. So I've never cared for it.

Not sure it's something I want to do.

Just wanted to share a renewal code good for 33% off. It worked for me two days ago: VWO33 COM. No space between 33 and COM when adding promo code to Seeking.

[QUOTE=Dsteezy;6574995]Well, I've never been. Now I got a notice saying my account is temp suspended until I get verified. Never done it nor have I been interested in it. I know it helps users verify you're an actual person and I'm sure it helps get more engagement but I've never struggled getting responses from individuals on there. So I've never cared for it.

Not sure it's something I want to do.[/QUOTE]I'd say you are hosed if you want to maintain opsec. I got one of my profiles suspended maybe 6 months ago, for a completely bass-ackward reason. I reported a girl who said she wanted Venmo to pen her private pics, and she reported my for 'soliciting sex for $' when I told her she was violating TOS.

I was required to watch a video and read the TOS and check a box that I agreed to it. This was a profile that has been on the site 5+ years. I presume I am also on probation, and any new violation means an automatic suspension.

I guess your profile had less status than mine, so they came down on you harder for whatever you did to attract their attention.

Never never do anything to attract attention from the mods on seeking. I don't change my profile, my pics, my tagline. They will check it, and then they may find something they don't like and you are screwed.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6575246]I'd say you are hosed if you want to maintain opsec. I got one of my profiles suspended maybe 6 months ago, for a completely bass-ackward reason. I reported a girl who said she wanted Venmo to pen her private pics, and she reported my for 'soliciting sex for $' when I told her she was violating TOS.

I was required to watch a video and read the TOS and check a box that I agreed to it. This was a profile that has been on the site 5+ years. I presume I am also on probation, and any new violation means an automatic suspension.

I guess your profile had less status than mine, so they came down on you harder for whatever you did to attract their attention.

Never never do anything to attract attention from the mods on seeking. I don't change my profile, my pics, my tagline. They will check it, and then they may find something they don't like and you are screwed.[/QUOTE]I know it's been spoken about before. But my opinion... never report anyone and never get into any negative conversations. The moment any girl says anything ridiculous just politely move on or ghost or block. Sometimes a girl will get under your skin or push a button. Let them. No big deal. Just move on. For whatever reason seeking is heavily weighted to the girls side of things. That is not going to change.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;6575987]I know it's been spoken about before. But my opinion... never report anyone and never get into any negative conversations. The moment any girl says anything ridiculous just politely move on or ghost or block. Sometimes a girl will get under your skin or push a button. Let them. No big deal. Just move on. For whatever reason seeking is heavily weighted to the girls side of things. That is not going to change.[/QUOTE]This. And this again.

I've been saying this for years on this thread.

People who try to win conversations with crazy girls and pat themselves on the back because they got the last word in are idiots. Some girls are awful. You will encounter them. If you just politely excuse yourself from the conversation you don't get the smug satisfaction of the last word, but you also won't be posting here asking about alternatives to Seeking because you got banned. Just politely say "you seem great but we want different things and I wish you all the best. You deserve it and some guy will be lucky to have you. " And then move on. I've personally done this maybe 50 times and never once regretted it later. I don't even remember the girls anymore, but I'm still doing my thing. That's the point.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6575246]I'd say you are hosed if you want to maintain opsec. I got one of my profiles suspended maybe 6 months ago, for a completely bass-ackward reason. I reported a girl who said she wanted Venmo to pen her private pics, and she reported my for 'soliciting sex for $' when I told her she was violating TOS.

I was required to watch a video and read the TOS and check a box that I agreed to it. This was a profile that has been on the site 5+ years. I presume I am also on probation, and any new violation means an automatic suspension.

I guess your profile had less status than mine, so they came down on you harder for whatever you did to attract their attention.

Never never do anything to attract attention from the mods on seeking. I don't change my profile, my pics, my tagline. They will check it, and then they may find something they don't like and you are screwed.[/QUOTE]I will add (in response to myself) that I always write as though I assume some moderator might read my message. And I always want to to be clear I was a total gentleman, even when the girl was pushy, rude, etc.

Does anyone use Sugardaddyforme?

Sent around 50-60 messages and have yet to receive a single response.

The site seems like it was designed in the 1990's. Pics look low quality, can't see a baby's join date or last active date / time. Can't sort by newest, most recent active, distance, etc.

Is this site still legit, do you hunt on here?

See quite a few of these on Seeking profiles. Are people paying girls to type them bullcrap and send over blurred undie pics?

[QUOTE=TopGun9;6576725]Does anyone use Sugardaddyforme?

Sent around 50-60 messages and have yet to receive a single response.

The site seems like it was designed in the 1990's. Pics look low quality, can't see a baby's join date or last active date / time. Can't sort by newest, most recent active, distance, etc.

Is this site still legit, do you hunt on here?[/QUOTE]Why would you use that site instead of SA?

[QUOTE=PantyPatrol1;6576737]See quite a few of these on Seeking profiles. Are people paying girls to type them bullcrap and send over blurred undie pics?[/QUOTE]Yep as the kids nowadays like to say, simps! I usually filter out on my search girls that have platonic in their profile. But once in a while even a girl that has platonic can be convinced to fuck. Usually the younger girls, 18-20, which is what I concentrate on sometimes maybe might not really know the definition of platonic and just choose it for their profile. The other one that was changed recently from Friends with Benefits to now just Friends is another selection that the younger girls sometimes don't know the true definition of being is that the benefits are fucking.

[QUOTE=TopGun9;6576725]Does anyone use Sugardaddyforme?

Sent around 50-60 messages and have yet to receive a single response.

The site seems like it was designed in the 1990's. Pics look low quality, can't see a baby's join date or last active date / time. Can't sort by newest, most recent active, distance, etc.

Is this site still legit, do you hunt on here?[/QUOTE]I just got back on SA after being banned again for who's knows what, not sure about Sugardaddyforme, but if you have to send out that many messages probably not legit.

What are the top 3 sites? Opinions please.

[QUOTE=Murrican;6576573]This. And this again.

I've been saying this for years on this thread.

People who try to win conversations with crazy girls and pat themselves on the back because they got the last word in are idiots. Some girls are awful. You will encounter them. If you just politely excuse yourself from the conversation you don't get the smug satisfaction of the last word, but you also won't be posting here asking about alternatives to Seeking because you got banned. Just politely say "you seem great but we want different things and I wish you all the best. You deserve it and some guy will be lucky to have you. " And then move on. I've personally done this maybe 50 times and never once regretted it later. I don't even remember the girls anymore, but I'm still doing my thing. That's the point.[/QUOTE]If I even bother to reply these are my usuals or something close to it.

I'll keep that in mind. (my most commonly used reply)

I'll let you know if I want to treat myself sometime.

So worth it, but just not in my budget right now.

I just found what I was looking for, and I know you will too.

As pretty as you are I believe it, blah blah blah

I've actually had girls thank me for being nice when I reject their offer (as so many guys get angry). And if they counter offer I just tell them I don't negotiate because they deserve what ever they are asking and I don't want them to be unhappy when we are together. Never been booted in 15+ years.

I also never talk specifically about sex on the site. Move to txt asap. But I never go to txt until the $ amount is agreed upon. So it's still not a done deal some of the time. And expectations will still need to be discussed even if they "get it". And for the ones that don't get it, well they may just move on or ask for more $.

[QUOTE=MrBlueSea;6576976]I just got back on SA after being banned again for who's knows what, not sure about Sugardaddyforme, but if you have to send out that many messages probably not legit.

What are the top 3 sites? Opinions please.[/QUOTE]Seeking, seeking and seeking. They really do have a lock on it. SD4me was good way way back like maybe 10+ years ago. Now its a joke. I used to work for the owner 25 years ago when he had another biz. Super rich guy, I think they have a staff of like 5 people. Total joke now.

[QUOTE=PantyPatrol1;6576737]See quite a few of these on Seeking profiles. Are people paying girls to type them bullcrap and send over blurred undie pics?[/QUOTE]I doubt it. But think about it from her perspective: if she can convince a few simps that it's totally normal to send money to some girl for nothing, it's a big win. It costs her nothing to create a profile and ask guys for this nonsense.

[QUOTE=Murrican;6576756]Why would you use that site instead of SA?[/QUOTE]I do use SA, along with SB.

Trying to explore new and different hunting grounds.

[QUOTE=TopGun9;6577547]I do use SA, along with SB.

Trying to explore new and different hunting grounds.[/QUOTE]On a different thread I read that creating a Tinder profile but specifically alluding to your sugar intentions also works.

How is SB? You need to write a review on that.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6575246]I'd say you are hosed if you want to maintain opsec. I got one of my profiles suspended maybe 6 months ago, for a completely bass-ackward reason. I reported a girl who said she wanted Venmo to pen her private pics, and she reported my for 'soliciting sex for $' when I told her she was violating TOS.

I was required to watch a video and read the TOS and check a box that I agreed to it. This was a profile that has been on the site 5+ years. I presume I am also on probation, and any new violation means an automatic suspension.

I guess your profile had less status than mine, so they came down on you harder for whatever you did to attract their attention.

Never never do anything to attract attention from the mods on seeking. I don't change my profile, my pics, my tagline. They will check it, and then they may find something they don't like and you are screwed.[/QUOTE]Was able to reach out to their customer service department and get it sorted out. My profiles been around for a decent amount of time at least this one. I keep it pretty simple on my profile and in chats. Nothing to give any sort of suspicion.

Customer service said it was a report from another user. Which I think it might have been this girl I saw about 2 weeks ago and been ghosting ever since, she's been blowing up my Alt #.

Either way lesson learned, anyone I cut off after 1 date I typically block incase the realize I no longer want to meet up and get upset. Don't think it happens with every girl but it only takes 1.

[QUOTE=Murrican;6577552]On a different thread I read that creating a Tinder profile but specifically alluding to your sugar intentions also works.[/QUOTE]My absolute all time favorite came from Tinder. She was 19, fresh and hot, just got into town for her freshman year. Saw her for about a year and a half but over time she started to see more and more "uncles" until she finally priced out of my range.

I only had one other hit off Tinder, it was way more time consuming with less result than SA.

[QUOTE=Murrican;6577552]On a different thread I read that creating a Tinder profile but specifically alluding to your sugar intentions also works.

How is SB? You need to write a review on that.[/QUOTE]If using Tinder, be discrete in your description. Use terms like mentoring. The girls seeking bags will find you quickly. Being too descriptive will get you banned.

Anyone else having issue upgrading membership with SDM?

I tried Vanilla Prepaid card, Visa credit card, and Discover card. Nothing goes through.

This is the error message I got.

"We were unable to process your subscription. Please make sure your bank authorizes this transaction. ".

I sometimes get girls sending me videos on my burner #. I would like to get those off my phone and onto my computer for viewing and archiving (they are big and take up a lot of memory. Sometimes I need to purge that stuff from the phone).

Within the webpage for GV, I was able to do a download. The format of the file that was created (it is 3. 4 MB) is ". Mhtml". Is there a way to save directly in standard video format? That file, I tried to open it w / a browser, it was junk.

A lot of posts here stress the need for opsec with regard to communications, burner phone, photos, payments, etc.

But what about STD testing? Is there a way to do that anonymously / securely?

Probably can avoid some part of a paper trail by paying cash, but the real issue is I believe most (all?) testers want to see I'd?

Nightmare scenario would be a positive result. I believe some are notifiable, I. E. SO would potentially be informed, if you give real info?

[QUOTE=LimpAndSmall;6582669]A lot of posts here stress the need for opsec with regard to communications, burner phone, photos, payments, etc.

But what about STD testing? Is there a way to do that anonymously / securely?

Probably can avoid some part of a paper trail by paying cash, but the real issue is I believe most (all?) testers want to see I'd?

Nightmare scenario would be a positive result. I believe some are notifiable, I. E. SO would potentially be informed, if you give real info?[/QUOTE]There's an existing thread already covering this. Check in the thread called "actual private std testing?".

[QUOTE=Lexx1;6582673]There's an existing thread already covering this. Check in the thread called "actual private std testing?".[/QUOTE]Thanks. I only checked in this forum.

But my experience is contrary to some of what is posted there about using an online STD testing company, simply using a fake "hobby" I'd / persona and address. I did that, paid, and got an appointment at a local testing center. Only to be told I would need to present I'd when I arrived for the test. So, money down the drain. That approach did not work.

Meanwhile the Arani option mentioned in that thread is very expensive - starts at about 800 or 900, and goes from there, depending on number of tests!

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6581022]I sometimes get girls sending me videos on my burner #. I would like to get those off my phone and onto my computer for viewing and archiving (they are big and take up a lot of memory. Sometimes I need to purge that stuff from the phone).

Within the webpage for GV, I was able to do a download. The format of the file that was created (it is 3. 4 MB) is ". Mhtml". Is there a way to save directly in standard video format? That file, I tried to open it w / a browser, it was junk.[/QUOTE]I am an OCD downloader and archive addict. I download everything on my phone. About 7 years ago I picked a screenrecorder app. The one I eventually liked is so good that I bought the ad-free version. So many options. I can just shake the phone real quick and it instantly records whatevs on the screen, including any PornHub video you are jacking off to. And the Settings option are limitless. You can save anything on any file format to any folder of your choice. It automatically records all my phone calls.

Fair warning. It will record EVERYTHING on your screen, including the cute battery level icon on top, the date and time, and if you happen to go to the home page, even the desktop background of you and your wife smiling and kissing at the Grand Canyon. Go to the App Store and check out the free versions.

[QUOTE=LimpAndSmall;6582684]Thanks. I only checked in this forum.

But my experience is contrary to some of what is posted there about using an online STD testing company, simply using a fake "hobby" I'd / persona and address. I did that, paid, and got an appointment at a local testing center. Only to be told I would need to present I'd when I arrived for the test. So, money down the drain. That approach did not work.

Meanwhile the Arani option mentioned in that thread is very expensive - starts at about 800 or 900, and goes from there, depending on number of tests![/QUOTE]I did this in the past year, don't often need more frequently.

[URL]stdcheck.com[/URL]

You can pay in advance w / a prepaid debit card. They send you to a local Quest for a blood draw and pee in a cup. I have never been asked for I'd, I have a form I printed out from the website. W / all my fake monger info.

Been a bit more than a few years now. But I used to get tested for free at Hollywood Presbyterian. At the mens clinic and I believe there is a bit of anonymity. Like I said, can't recall all the details but I remember it was free. If you park in the back it's in the bldg on the left, maybe the 5th floor?

I am not sure why, I did have some recent negative interactions with some girls on SA. Is deleted the same as banned? I messaged support to get more answers but doubt I will hear back.

[QUOTE=MidnightDabber;6584199]I am not sure why, I did have some recent negative interactions with some girls on SA. Is deleted the same as banned? I messaged support to get more answers but doubt I will hear back.[/QUOTE]Yes banned pretty much. As HG has mentioned countless times here you have to be very careful what you say to the girls on SA. Most of the girls know what the site is about already and what is expected from them. So no need to talk about specifics such as PPM or sex details on the site itself. Once you've established something that may be going somewhere with a girl. You take those conversations off the site and discuss specifics through text, email, phonecall or facetime chat. So that the girl can't report you on the site or the algorithm SA uses doesn't catch those "taboo" keywords in your conversations.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;6584307]Yes banned pretty much. As HG has mentioned countless times here you have to be very careful what you say to the girls on SA. Most of the girls know what the site is about already and what is expected from them. So no need to talk about specifics such as PPM or sex details on the site itself. Once you've established something that may be going somewhere with a girl. You take those conversations off the site and discuss specifics through text, email, phone call or facetime chat. So that the girl can't report you on the site or the algorithm SA uses doesn't catch those "taboo" keywords in your conversations.[/QUOTE]When messaging on seeking I like to say I am spontaneous. Practically a synonym for sex. Or I ask them if they like kissing or are they submissive or naughty, pretty harmless. I never ask for sex directly on the site, but the point is made. If they say they do not like kissing you can assume they are more of a pro and depending on how hot they are choose to proceed or not.

If they pressure me for an answer on seeking about sex I just say I am looking for an intimate date. That could mean anything and has never gotten me in trouble.

As far as money talk I tell them I pay for "dates". That's it. If they want to know what happens on a date they can txt me. If they want to know how much I tell them it's less than most guys, so if they are looking for top dollar I am not interested, and if they are not interested that's fine and politely move on if we are not on the same page. At this point they will usually throw out a number or let me know they are either expensive or reasonable. This also gives them the option to just not reply, delete or block me. No problem. On to the next one.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;6584321]When messaging on seeking I like to say I am spontaneous. Practically a synonym for sex. Or I ask them if they like kissing or are they submissive or naughty, pretty harmless. I never ask for sex directly on the site, but the point is made. If they say they do not like kissing you can assume they are more of a pro and depending on how hot they are choose to proceed or not.

If they pressure me for an answer on seeking about sex I just say I am looking for an intimate date. That could mean anything and has never gotten me in trouble.

As far as money talk I tell them I pay for "dates". That's it. If they want to know what happens on a date they can txt me. If they want to know how much I tell them it's less than most guys, so if they are looking for top dollar I am not interested, and if they are not interested that's fine and politely move on if we are not on the same page. At this point they will usually throw out a number or let me know they are either expensive or reasonable. This also gives them the option to just not reply, delete or block me. No problem. On to the next one.[/QUOTE]Good stuff as always HG. That last one is a hard rule some don't follow. You have to set a hard max for yourself of what you are willing to spend. I usually do PPM not monthly arrangements. At the most I go is weekly arrangement but I prefer PPM. It keeps the girl honest that she won't show up or flake. And if weekly I provide the cash at the end of the week not the beginning. Like a regular job where you work first and get paid later. I've had to raise my hard max since the non-pro days on Craigslist which was 200 then. The average back then though was 100, alot of times less and that was for all the beautiful colors / ethnicities of girls. But because of all the GPS / PPS, that's platinum pussy syndrome for the OGs that know. PPS are chics that go super crazy with there money expectations and is higher than GPS. So set a hard max you are comfortable with and stick to it. I've turned away super hot girls because they wanted to much. I don't care how hot a girl is. You need to think with your big head not the little head.

Iirc didn't someone have their account restored after emailing support and having to do some CYA course online about not being explicit or something? The site was kinda getting stale but I was planning to take a break for a month or 2. When I come back I don't want to drop $80-110 bucks just to be banned / deleted again. How do I come back safely? Anyone else banned and come back?

[QUOTE=Lexx1;6584415] I've turned away super hot girls because they wanted to much. I don't care how hot a girl is. You need to think with your big head not the little head.[/QUOTE]And as we all have learned, whether pro, semi-pro or civilian, hotness does not necessarily mean they are good in the FC. Or out of it for that matter.

[QUOTE=GiddenLade;6584534]And as we all have learned, whether pro, semi-pro or civilian, hotness does not necessarily mean they are good in the FC. Or out of it for that matter.[/QUOTE]Which is something I touched on earlier. As a low baller even if the session isn't all that, I can never really get too upset about it. But if I was paying a lot and didn't get what I was looking for? I mean there is a balance between looks and performance for sure. I find that to get that low ball agreement sometimes I am going to dip a bit on looks, but I am not willing to take much of a dip on their body. Ever since my teens I have always been more drawn to a hot body and been more forgiving on looks. But not to the point where I can say I am not attracted.

The one playboy or Cali 10 in looks & body I had as an actual GF was pretty average in the skills dept. Killer personality though which kept me around, but at this stage of the game, I would never accept that from a girl I was spending good money on. My current out of town GF isn't all that in skills (and she knows it) but she is very willing to please (actually has a pleasing kink) and takes direction to the T, so I am teaching her, and I am fine with that.

But if you mostly date the younger ones you have to be a bit forgiving. I mean some do have amazing god given talent but like anything it's something you get better at over time. But aside from all that if its gonna go beyond a one or two nite stand they would have to be of the sweet and very submissive variety or I wouldn't really be interested in them at all. And since I met my new GF I have really lost interest in any girl if they have any brattiness at all. If they're cute enough it's cute for a while, but the older I get the less patience I have for it.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;6584307]Yes banned pretty much. As HG has mentioned countless times here you have to be very careful what you say to the girls on SA. Most of the girls know what the site is about already and what is expected from them. So no need to talk about specifics such as PPM or sex details on the site itself. Once you've established something that may be going somewhere with a girl. You take those conversations off the site and discuss specifics through text, email, phonecall or facetime chat. So that the girl can't report you on the site or the algorithm SA uses doesn't catch those "taboo" keywords in your conversations.[/QUOTE]That's surprising. I have been using the site for years and have always said "and then we will go back to my hotel for the night" and I've never had a problem. It's clear I'm talking about sex. Sometimes they ask if intimacy is expected and I say yes and intimacy is also a word that clearly means sex.

I will say, and I've preached this a lot on this board, that I am and you should always be polite. Even if a girl is crass, trash, stupid, pushy. Always assume some admin or moderator might read your messages and you always want to be the gentleman. Even if she calls you a John, cheap, etc, the only response is something like "we probably aren't looking for the same thing. You are worth what you are asking, and more, and I want to respect your expectations so we will part ways here. All the best to you. You will make some guy very lucky. " I've said shit like that to the most trashy trash girls. Never once been reported.

[QUOTE=Murrican;6585238]That's surprising. I have been using the site for years and have always said "and then we will go back to my hotel for the night" and I've never had a problem. It's clear I'm talking about sex. Sometimes they ask if intimacy is expected and I say yes and intimacy is also a word that clearly means sex.

I will say, and I've preached this a lot on this board, that I am and you should always be polite. Even if a girl is crass, trash, stupid, pushy. Always assume some admin or moderator might read your messages and you always want to be the gentleman. Even if she calls you a John, cheap, etc, the only response is something like "we probably aren't looking for the same thing. You are worth what you are asking, and more, and I want to respect your expectations so we will part ways here. All the best to you. You will make some guy very lucky. " I've said shit like that to the most trashy trash girls. Never once been reported.[/QUOTE]Shouldn't be surprising. What you said about going back to room and intimacy is tame compared to what some dudes talk about explicitly directly on the site with some of the girls. That's what I was referring to and what gets dudes in trouble on SA. Your terms are not explicit and while they are assuming sex you are not specifically saying sex or any other explicit details. Which can be talked about off the site.