Korean Agency BB

All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.

Back in the day the BBFS apartment K-girls had to compete with some massage parlors with high quality K-girls. Specifically, in Inglewood that had several places with younger K-girls. Oriental Acupressure on Manchester just east of the 405 had young K-girls willing to offer BBFS for a 100 tip with the house fee of 80 (I think) for the hour. Nearly the same service minus the privacy of an apartment and the higher standard of the space (I. E. Bed, shower, etc). Now days K-girl MPs all seem to be staffed by the old timers and most MPs seem to be staffed by Chinese girls either providing only rub-and-tugs or they are laundry lady cum dumpsters trying to hit loads per day quotas set by their boss.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;6008569]All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.[/QUOTE]Those pics are from a Korean model's Instagram (e_seoa). What does Shani really look like?

[QUOTE=RandySteel;6008466]I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.[/QUOTE]Seems hella easy to waste $400 these days.

[QUOTE=Kent747;6007740]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.[/QUOTE]How ironic. Bay area has a higher cost of living too. Yet they get cheaper girls.

I'm voting with my wallet. I haven't seen a girl in just over 6 months. Just masturbating for free in the meantime.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;6005500]That new girl Angel at M must be stocky, judging by the amount of photoshop distortion in the photos.[/QUOTE]Not stocky. Not super thin like Miso, but not a dough ball either. More curvy. Cute girl. Didn't blow me away with service, but left satisfied. Could see others repeating if there was good chemistry.

[QUOTE=Pussypoety;6004232]For a bit of context, I am new to this whole K-BB scene, having fucked only 3 girls now: here and I like it.
[/QUOTE]Great honest review. Just had a session with Remi. Tits on a stick describes her well. Youngish and submissive but lacks any personality whatsoever. Hard to make a connection for a memorable experience. Also highly doubtful she's Korean from the looks, accent, darker skin. Could be a mix of Thai or Philippino. Just guessing though. Based on your review Tiana is more my cup of tea. Now to get the PO to reply back!!

I believe joah / joa booked by sfk and m initially may have gone back to the norcal market. Overall she was a very sweet and cute girl, I think she lacked clients down here. Her as popped up at caddygirl site for a few days then it went down. M delisted her pics awhile back but I think sfk just doesn't update their site as it still shows leah but she's gone too.

[QUOTE=GardenBae;6008513]I asked because SFK still has Joah on their list. When I asked about her, booker said she was gone. Like not even on vacation gone. Thought maybe the OP had inside info but yeah, imma just ask the booker myself.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RandySteel;6008512]Remi is another provider I am trying to see with this booker. Timing was not my friend for Remi, Yara was recommended by the booker. This lower price comforts my chance in seeing someone with low reviews. Pleasantly surprised with Yara and our DFK fest led to a passionate experience. There was action from the minute we entered her room. I had to pee and did not realize her restroom was located just outside the room. She escorted me and wiped me clean after. Girls should Escort us more often. Her pleasing attitude continued and she gave me a naughty wink during BBBJ. 2 pops and I think she would have gone for 3 if time permitted. Great time for the price and I would return.[/QUOTE]Does yara face look better than mini? Mini got puffing face, more like Vietnamese / Abg looks.

Any reviews on June? I've seen some on TER but I'm not sure if they are reliable or not, they range from very good to very bad.

I am seeing a few non Kgirls being advertised on the websites with other Kgirls but I haven't gone to see any of them.

Lia looks pretty hot but I am not sure if she is offering BBFS.

Has anyone sampled the non Kgirls?

So I have been searching for something new to replace Nicole, doesn't seem like she is coming back from OC anytime soon, its been over a month. Loved her tits, her attitude and tight pussy, face might be a 6 or 7 but totally do-able since everything else was a 8 or 9.

I see that two new girls pops up on KGLA name Miso, or CG Misa, and Ivy on M / CG.

Miso / Misa 5'3", 102 lbs, 32 D, from KGLA / CG, same stats on both.

Ivy 5'3", 105 lbs, C, from M / 5'2", 99 lbs, 34 C from CG.

Both seems new, both use very common name and generic pictures, which I feel that they purposely do it so people can't find reviews on them and that tells me they might be rebrands or not that good so they want to blend in.

Any thoughts or feedbacks?

[QUOTE=NoRubber;6009006]I am seeing a few non Kgirls being advertised on the websites with other Kgirls but I haven't gone to see any of them.

Lia looks pretty hot but I am not sure if she is offering BBFS.

Has anyone sampled the non Kgirls?[/QUOTE]No, none K girls on k-bookers are GEF only, never seen any advertised with BBFS, if any of those Latin or eastern Europe beauty goes BBFS, I would be 1st in line. For 320, LOL.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6009201]So I have been searching for something new to replace Nicole, doesn't seem like she is coming back from OC anytime soon, its been over a month. Loved her tits, her attitude and tight pussy, face might be a 6 or 7 but totally do-able since everything else was a 8 or 9.

I see that two new girls pops up on KGLA name Miso, or CG Misa, and Ivy on M / CG.

Miso / Misa 5'3", 102 lbs, 32 D, from KGLA / CG, same stats on both.

Ivy 5'3", 105 lbs, C, from M / 5'2", 99 lbs, 34 C from CG.

Both seems new, both use very common name and generic pictures, which I feel that they purposely do it so people can't find reviews on them and that tells me they might be rebrands or not that good so they want to blend in.

Any thoughts or feedbacks?[/QUOTE]I wish I could tell you something useful, but my track record and other poster's track record haven't been good as of late. That's not say she could be good, I wish she was but I'll put my money that it's an average MILF. That's how it's been lately.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6009219]I wish I could tell you something useful, but my track record and other poster's track record haven't been good as of late. That's not say she could be good, I wish she was but I'll put my money that it's an average MILF. That's how it's been lately.[/QUOTE]IMOm the current offerings are dragging the average down. There are always a few gems in the mix but they're harder to find and you have to dig through a lot of ugly rocks to find them.