Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=Jbjb1983;5988140]I'm thinking previous customers Jizz, that's why it was a turnoff unless you're into that cuckhold stuff.[/QUOTE]Yea. If I ever saw that I would be done. Instant flaccid.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;5985717]Just want to do a Stacy survey.

Do you think stacy's nose is uglier than this? All crooked and shit?

What about overall face- better or worse than this?

You all can see how this face is ugly, right?[/QUOTE]Stacy is not ugly by any means, she is just average and not as pretty as some other girls. The girl in the photo you posted is actually ugly, lol.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5985726]Ivy which looks to be real pictures but shopped. Nothing new.

Clara with real pictures that looks pretty touched up.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/Yb77hNMuHTjK[/URL]

Anyone from up north recognize any of them?[/QUOTE]Ivy is still advertised as Addy with kdolls in SD.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5987472]A bit torn, definitely younger, great body, but horrible breath and biz was dripping out during position change. Huge turn off for me. I need a clean partner. No, I require a clean partner.[/QUOTE]How much jizz can a girl really clean out between sessions? Few girls will douche, for various reasons I'm sure, the least of which to make her next appointment at ease.

So who saw Flora?

[QUOTE=SinfullyKorean;5987456]M's girls charge 380 now??[/QUOTE]No, but here's an explanation. M is in the leagues of agencies who usually don't have an upcharge. SFK and a few others I forgot are usually known to have BB and no upcharge. I go to these since I do not agree with paying more for the same service. As with M, she's just another agency with girls that are usually non upcharge, she claims they are all independent and hence set their own prices for her to tell us how much they are. This particular girl wants this rate and it's up to you to decide if it's worth it to you.

Anyone knows if she's coming back? I miss that girl and her tits!

[QUOTE=Member#2210;5988893]Anyone knows if she's coming back? I miss that girl and her tits![/QUOTE]I've been waiting to see her, since there's no one else worth seeing that I haven't seen before.

Maybe she got deported.

[QUOTE=JoyTraveller;5986936]SFK- [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL].

Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

Kbliss- [URL]https://kbliss.net[/URL].

Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.[/QUOTE]I'm assuming by the lack of reviews, Lina ain't worth seeing? Any new feedback?

I mean her face is not bad, although she doesn't give off a nympho vibe.

Under 5 ft tall, makes your dick look big, and no cavernous pussy, I'd imagine.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5987472]A bit torn, definitely younger, great body, but horrible breath and biz was dripping out during position change. Huge turn off for me. I need a clean partner. No, I require a clean partner.[/QUOTE]Sounds like the booker didn't give enough time between appointments. I've seen Baby a few times, and she was always clean with one of the best booty's in the business.

[QUOTE=Member#2210;5988893]Anyone knows if she's coming back? I miss that girl and her tits![/QUOTE]Based on the booker's remarks, looks like she either decided to extend the vacation or decided against coming back.

[QUOTE=JoyTraveller;5983626]Trying to draw on the limited well of non-upcharge K-BB, took the plunge with Lucy. The girl who opened the door was not the airl in the pictures but rather a very attractive, roughly 40 year old cougar; very pretty face with a mischievous smile, 5'7" tall, fit body dressed in black lingerie and heels. DFK while chuckling put a smile on my face as well. Her fit body, attractive face, and smile have me enthralled.

Reflection: Ideally women would use real pictures but for obvious reasons that's not happening. Alternatively, women should use accurate photos in terms of representing age, looks, etc. In this case that was not happening (age), and yet the session was stellar.[/QUOTE]I concur with a lot of this review above. I do not think her face is as attractive, obviously looks are subjective.

F: 6 - Marginally attractive to me, def 40's, pointy features, lips that jut out a bit. Soft lips.

B: 6. 5 - Toned, and great for a 40 year old. Not much of an ass, but again, pretty toned. Not ripped by any means. Smooth skin. Small Bs, bigger nipples. Tallish - 5'6" prob.

A: 9 - Wanted to please, and is quite the talker if you can communicate with her. DFK all you want (not really great at it). Tried her best in everything she did.

S: 9 - Milked 2 pops out of my 1 pop ass. Aurally pleasing. CG grinding 8. 5/10 - she can do it well but not too fast because she keeps cumming. Flexible. DFK was dart-ey kinda. BBBJ was pretty above average.

E: Not much.

Repeat: Yes, service makes up for a lot. Attitude was a plus. Not the best looker but wouldn't be unhappy seeing her again, however probably won't sneak into my rotation.

Does anyone else have a hard time getting consistent responses from this Booker? It's very hit or miss. I want to become a regular so I don't want to keep following up but sometimes it's radio silent for weeks. Any advice? Thanks.

[QUOTE=OCpyro;5989038]Sounds like the booker didn't give enough time between appointments. I've seen Baby a few times, and she was always clean with one of the best booty's in the business.[/QUOTE]Is Baby new or a rebrand? The pictures seem new to me.

Saw her a while back. She's ok, nothing to write home about. Skills were decent. The standout for me was she's pretty tight and BJ was above average too.

[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;5985175]I been seeing the link for [URL]kbliss.net[/URL] thrown around a bit, the girls stats look amazing if not too good to be true. Any info?

Gigi for instance is listed at 4'9, 90 lbs, 33 D-23-33. Sounds unbelievable, but amazing if true. The other girls listed are similar. Any info would be great.[/QUOTE]