Printable View
[QUOTE=DarkRoomDaddy;5973933]I went over to F&C but it looked a little sketchy. So I walked across the street to go to Starbucks and I noticed a little place called Vt Spa. Has anyone tried it out?[/QUOTE]Did they add lights in the hallway? I couldn't tell if it looked sketchy because it was so dark so I couldn't tell sketchy or not.
[QUOTE=Slammer6008;5974293]Actually it's only three hands!! Lisa has a prosthetic arm.[/QUOTE]There was a one legged gal working there when I went. Kinda cute. Ilene was her name.
[QUOTE=Bronco;5974697]There was a one legged gal working there when I went. Kinda cute. Ilene was her name.[/QUOTE]And.
No shit!! I was I could of tried her!! I'm.
[QUOTE=Slammer6008;5974730]And.
No shit!! I was I could of tried her!! I'm.[/QUOTE]It looks like I'm just talking gibberish.
[QUOTE=Bronco;5974697]There was a one legged gal working there when I went. Kinda cute. Ilene was her name.[/QUOTE]Ilene!! LOL.
Haven't been in the scene for couple of months and you guys have some funny stories.
Example, Happy went thru few renovation including new owners and name changes over the years. It was foot massage place (6 ?) with one station for body massage and now six body massage and zero foot massage station.
Price for one hour foot massage was $15/ suggested tip $5 and body massage $30. Happy pre-covid was $40 for modified services time.
Changes do happen with new owners and down time for renovation. Post COVID less foot massage stations. Renovation of some body massage station are just bad design, too narrow space.
[QUOTE=DarkRoomDaddy;5974608]Actually, SH, Bali and other shops seem to have girls 10-15 years younger than the BW ladies. BW has had a good product, but they are a bit like the 2019 Dodgers. They need to bring in some fresh talent if they want to keep winning the penant. Their pitching rotation is getting tired, and they don't have the bullpen. They could also modernize, clean up, and put some wood and drywall between the "work" rooms. Any business that's stagnant will be overtaken by newer more energetic competitors.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sound7;5974966]...Price for one hour foot massage was $15/ suggested tip $5 and body massage $30. Happy pre-covid was $40 for modified services time.[/QUOTE]I was regularly paying $15 everywhere on Valley Blvd in SG, 2009-2014 or so. Slowly they started opening more places in Westminster. I think I paid $20 - a little more expensive but a much shorter drive. Even BW was $20. This photo is identified as 2017, but I was going there around that time, and they may have risen their prices by then. Now we are living in a $35-50 world for the same or lesser service.
[QUOTE=RBFSyndrome;5974266]I find it a bit strange you guys find bw ladies attractive.
And mindy? Dude. Do I just have higher standards? Bc it's beeen a long time since I've seen remotely attractive there.
It's good for the price yeah but all you fawning over them is a bit interesting.[/QUOTE]Andy is attractive, but she's probably in her mid 40's. Anna is plain looking, but what she provides and her overall attitude and personality make her attractive. There's more to attractive than just face value. One of those things that's hard to explain, but she has a certain allure to her that keeps you coming back. Jessica is cute, arguably the most attractive one there, and she gives arguably the best massage and tease, but also gives the least access. Charlie is attractive by AMP standards. You wouldn't single her out in a club but she's well above average based on what you normally find in these places, and her clothes come off fairly easily, and what's underneath the clothes is pretty nice. So yea, I agree that most of these girls aren't ones who would have guys lining up for them at a club, they're still reasonably attractive and provide exceptional service for the price.
[QUOTE=Grimmy23;5975212]Andy is attractive, but she's probably in her mid 40's. Anna is plain looking, but what she provides and her overall attitude and personality make her attractive. There's more to attractive than just face value. One of those things that's hard to explain, but she has a certain allure to her that keeps you coming back. Jessica is cute, arguably the most attractive one there, and she gives arguably the best massage and tease, but also gives the least access. Charlie is attractive by AMP standards. You wouldn't single her out in a club but she's well above average based on what you normally find in these places, and her clothes come off fairly easily, and what's underneath the clothes is pretty nice. So yea, I agree that most of these girls aren't ones who would have guys lining up for them at a club, they're still reasonably attractive and provide exceptional service for the price.[/QUOTE]Andie is older but I would be surprised is she's mid 40's. I'm thinking late 30's but who knows. Anna though is much older, mid fifties maybe. Both are wonderful but kind of on the older side but service is great.
[QUOTE=KammyMike;5974627]Does anyone have intel on TLC Service in CM?[/QUOTE]It leads you to the gated apartment next to huge shopping mall in Costa Mesa.
It has nothing to do with massage. It's just FS service. With the roses you spend and rushy attitude, I would rather pay a little more for GFE Korean BBFS package.
[QUOTE=KammyMike;5974627]Does anyone have intel on TLC Service in CM?[/QUOTE]TLC day spa. Newport BLV. . CM. - Overpriced Nuru.
TLC. Used to be at Fairview / Warner. Santa Ana. Moved to the Enclave Apartments. CM. Average FS.
[QUOTE=Slammer6008;5974730]And.
No shit!! I was I could of tried her!! I'm.[/QUOTE]Clear your box Slammer.
[QUOTE=Grimmy23;5975212]Andy is attractive, but she's probably in her mid 40's. Anna is plain looking, but what she provides and her overall attitude and personality make her attractive. There's more to attractive than just face value. One of those things that's hard to explain, but she has a certain allure to her that keeps you coming back.[/QUOTE]Your statements about their attractive personalities are correct but they can't be figured into their attractiveness, the first time you see them. I think the arguments given were also about physical attractiveness. By just their looks, they would generally be passed on in a setting outside of an AMP. Their value is their service. You are pretty much guaranteed to bust a nut and know how much it will cost compared to girls met at a club or on a date. Overall, AMP girls a cheaper and more reliable.
Visited 5* in WM walk in and got Tina. Decent massage and HJ. Big boogies with full access. Bigger menu but not interested age wise.
[QUOTE=Caribe;5975567]Your statements about their attractive personalities are correct but they can't be figured into their attractiveness, the first time you see them. I think the arguments given were also about physical attractiveness. By just their looks, they would generally be passed on in a setting outside of an AMP. Their value is their service. You are pretty much guaranteed to bust a nut and know how much it will cost compared to girls met at a club or on a date. Overall, AMP girls a cheaper and more reliable.[/QUOTE]So who do you think is the most physically attractive girl there? Grimmy seems to think Jessica and I think Sally is pretty sexy. I take it kid Kevin has his nuts tagged by Andie.