I am sorry that I am such an old, jaded ASSHOLE,
But when I got this PM from a fellow monger about a recent post of mine, it broke me:
[I][b][u]flake and shake[/u][/b]
I agree. I didn't post my last visit, but it was the same. She was on something for sure. I should have posted but due to time constraints, I never got to it.[/I]
I am afraid to write negative reports anymore. Many providers won't see me anymore. [B] From now on, I will leave the name out of the review, and only fill in the blanks for those who actually share intel.[/B]
Sorry to be such an asshole. I'm sure you really care what I think ( [U][i]that was sarcastic[/i][/U]).
Kj.
Kenwood Jack is not a pimp
[QUOTE=DNut;2054162]KJ, with all due respect, you are doing the board a disservice by posting "reviews" with no names. It doesn't do anyone any good since reviews are supposed to identify the good, and the bad. If a person has concerns about a particular provider, what you posted wouldn't do him any good since even if he made a concerted effort to do a search for information, your "review" wouldn't come up.
Your review looks more like an ad, with you in the role of the handler. You might as well say, "I have a girl, great skills, but you will need t go through me to get to see her. That's the same job description as Buddha and Steve of EE.
You want to post a review, then post it, good or bad. You want to be a handler, then say so.
But this no naming names, unless you approve of them, well, that's being petty and a bit of a power trip.[/QUOTE]Or wannabe pimp. There are some other "reviewers" on here I have my doubts about. Not him. I understand his reason for not posting names, though I think it's a bad idea and will likely stop soon because people will stop paying attention if he keeps it up. The one review I'd seen to this effect that was of interest to me I (and apparently others) could pretty well figure out by context anyway. If I'm really dying for the info and can't figure it out, I suppose I'd ask him. Hasn't happened yet.