Printable View
[QUOTE=Cincyjim; 1186914]Hey everyone,
I'm seeing a new provider later today. If I decide to post a review, where do I need to send it to have it reviewed. I don't want to be subjected to attacks and flames for posting information contrary to others experience.[/QUOTE]Personally, I would advise you to wash the sand out of your vagina and stop acting like words on the internet mean anything.
This will be my last post on the subject since we are giving way too much air play to this issue. But to close my comments: Any experience had with a provider over a year old is not valid. Not that it was not disappointing to you or that it didn't happen they way you said. Anyone starting out in a new field has sometimes much to learn. To put forth a bare comment without context is my problem. I would have had less a problem if you would have put it into context as to how long ago it had occurred. The comment was left to the interpretation of the reader. And at this point we all understand.
At one time I remember when a Japanese car would rust almost as soon as it was driven off the lot. If I were to say that Japanese cars are trash because of an experience that long ago, I'd get flamed almost anywhere. Let's get back to a civil discussion and agree to disagree. Like gentleman can most assuredly do.
OK, I cannot hold back anymore.
What would possess someone to post a report on a visit that occurred TWO YEARS AGO?
CincyJim, whatever defense you offer, it is LAME and IGNORANT.
In other words, you have NO defense. None.
Best zip it and waddle away.
But you all are sure wasting a bunch of bandwidth over one guys opinion; even if you didn't like or agree with his comments. And who cares that the visit was over a yr ago. Apparently it happened, he wanted to comment on it and that is his right to do so.
The guy is entitled to his opinion and he should be able to express it w / o all the bashing he has received in this thread. All the personal barbs back and forth just denigrates the forum.
And CincyJim, to answer your earlier question about where do you post your next experience. RIGHT HERE. The very fact that he has to ask such a question proves the point that the treatment he has received may inhibit him or others from posting their experiences. And who does that hurt? Yep, everyone. Lets move on.
Cincyjim's recent post about Girl No. 1 concerned an encounter two years ago.
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1184284]I saw (edit delete) and was not impressed.[/QUOTE]Cincyjim offered his opinion because Girl No. 1 was being touted by others as exceptional.
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1186188](edit delete) I only posted about my poor experience with her, because so many others were saying how great she was when someone asked who to see with a "once in lifetime" windfall of cash. (edit delete)[/QUOTE]Cincyjim is still at it.
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1186210](edit delete) As far as Girl No. 2 goes, at this time I can't say anything positive about her other than she appears to have two breast and possibly a vagina. I'd say more but I had enough flaming for the week. CincyJim[/QUOTE]Nothing good is being accomplished. Guys don't like it when girls they like get trashed. The point of exchanging information is to make things better. This approach isn't working. Besides, every negative review of a girl says as much negative about the reviewer as it does the girl. It's best for this topic of discussion to end.
Cincyjim,
We have hashed this around a bit too much, haven't we! Good God! To other board members, sorry about that! As I previously had said, you have an opinion and needs to be heard by all, but I did read with interest your views and reasoning and I did read out of context what you were saying to Jay about being her pimp, and I didn't think I was name calling. Bottom line, let's all put this to rest. I still side with Jay and Sara, but again, that is my opinion!
WM.
P. S. I was not the one who started the escorts defense. That was my brother from a different mother. Whodeyman! And it was created NOT just for Sara, but for all of the other providers out there.
P.S.S. Put your post up on here (in the right section) about your new find! Your intel is still a valuable asset to this board! (Palm leaves are offered!!)
[QUOTE=Cincyjim; 1186914]Wingman Todd,
Show me where I called Jay a pimp?
Please learn to read;
I wrote.
"Should I "call you out" for questioning my honest post, by suggesting you are Sara's pimp, she provided a free or reduced session to make this post, or perhaps that you are an alternative screen name she created to pump up reviews. I DON"T THINK ANY OF THESE ARE THE CASE." (emphasis added)
I then went on to point out that he obviously had has a better experience with her than I. I don't question that he did. Why should he, you, or anyone else question that I did not? What would motivate someone to resort to name calling and calling someone out who did not share the same opinion. Opinions differ, move on.
The lackluster time was on my end, thats why I was disappointed.
You've known her since 11/09. You created a special forum for her, called Escorts Defense back in 3/10. I had seen her a few months prior to the creation of that forum. So most likely it was in '09. Possibly even before 11/09. Reviewing the date clarified for me the time frame in which I saw her. I remember thinking at the time that section was created that, if any provider was going to be criticized for the service she provided she could be among them. I'm now wondering why, since she has a special section to respond to criticism she doesn't use that forum, but has chosen to clutter up this forum.
I most like one of her early customers, but that does not change the fact that I was disappointed with the service she provided then. Heck maybe you and others have taught her few tricks and have improved the level of service she now provides.
Jay,
False statements about Sara? This began when you "called me out" for saying I had seen her and had a disappointing experience. Please point out the false part of my statement. Point out what is inaccurate. Do you really think you are in a position to question my disappointment? I don't doubt that you and others have had a fantastic time with her. Why is it so problematic for someone to accept that I did not? If I told you didn't like scotch but enjoyed drinking vodka, would you see the need to vilify me.
You say name calling and personal attacks aren't acceptable. Then why do you resort to such tactics?
Treating people with respect? Calling me out, suggesting that I have posted incorrect information and that I lied about seeing her is respect? Please keep your respect to yourself in the future.
You saying that "calling you out was not getting into the gutter with name-calling as [I] Seem to relish. Where did I call you a name? Please learn to read. As I pointed out to Wingman Todd, I wrote:
"Should I "call you out" for questioning my honest post, by suggesting you are Sara's pimp, she provided a free or reduced session to make this post, or perhaps that you are an alternative screen name she created to pump up reviews. I DON"T THINK ANY OF THESE ARE THE CASE." (emphasis added)
Now when did I crawl into the gutter and resort to name calling?
Now I've read the rules regarding this forum for posting and I can't seem to find any limitation on posting a report within a certain time frame. In fact, someone just requested contact information for a provider that fell off the radar over 6 months ago. Under your rule, no one should post that information. Also if you look at the ripoff reports people post information regarding providers that span years of mongering. Also the reports regarding Dusty and Eastside massage provider predate my joining this forum by years. In fact you might even find post regarding Dusty on the old worldsexguide. Org site.
While it may seem from reading the forum that have seen TT over the past year seem to be unanimous in the experience and opinion, that is not the case. I have received PM's from other forum members who do not share your opinion but do not want to be the subjected to attacks from Sara and her ardent supporters.
Sara,
I saw you back before you were active on this site and at a time you did no screening. I really don't understand what your beef is. You have multiple people posting how great you are and one that says he was disappointed? By attacking those who post something you consider unflattering you undermine the credibility of this site. An intelligent reader is going to wonder that since you are so quick to attack the messenger when you don't like the the post how many other people have refrained from posting. Also my original post would not be noticed it would be like shining like a candle next to campfire. Now you and others have flamed me so much, it like you through a 5 gallons of gas on that candle.
You had a special forum created, just so you could respond to post like mine. You had it named Escort Defense. You should have move your rant there and quit cluttering up this forum with response to my post.
-
Hey everyone,
I'm seeing a new provider later today. If I decide to post a review, where do I need to send it to have it reviewed. I don't want to be subjected to attacks and flames for posting information contrary to others experience. [/QUOTE]
I agree with Varoom. He just stated his opinion (rather respectfully imo) and it's just his opinion (no one else's). Clearly he's outnumbered here but I think it's worth posting. People have had different experiences with a lot of favorites on here. She may have had a bad day, just didn't feel well, or maybe Jim was a jerk. Who knows? We can all decide for ourselves what to think of her and the more information the better IMO.
For the cruisers of BP. If you come across Miss Christy. She also went by chloe winters. She's cute but only carries hand lotion.
This is my final post on this matter because I have things to do- like alphabetize my dictionary. Bottom line is, I never came on here to criticize Cincyjim for a negative review about me- I criticized him for leaving a false review.
I originally posted this because what he posted is untrue because I have never met Cincyjim. I have always been good at keeping track of what's going on and I know who I have seen and I have never met Cincyjim. If we had met and he left unhappy and wanted to share his negative experience then if it were his true thoughts then that would be one thing, but for Cincyjim to repeatedly claim we met when we never did is what has myself and others annoyed.
I have been in this just a little over a year now since Dec 3rd. 09 and I have always tried to treat others with the same respect I would like to receive in return by being dependable, considerate of their time, and serious about taking as many precautions as I can to ensure everyone's safety. In order to ensure the safety of those I have already met I have to decline many and I lose a lot of business in the process and if someone wants to take a decline personal because they didn't have the type of references I will accept and leave a false review and say we met when we never did- well then that speaks a lot about that person.
I am not trying to put words in the mouth of others, but in my opinion a lot of these people aren't rushing to my defense because you left a negative review about me- it's because you have left a false review about someone they know who is and always has been a tough screener and who is on top of what's going on with who she has and hasn't seen. After knowing me and the safety measures I take very seriously, they are not criticizing you for a negative report, but questioning the truth of your report. Again, you are not in my phone directory for a reason. When the first guy I saw back in "09" calls me I know right away who it is calling me. I have always been on top of what's going on as far as that goes.
I am not claiming to be perfect, and I never have claimed to be. I think I have learned a lot along the way as far as bcd activities. I can tell you one thing though, no one can honestly say I rushed them and this is another reason many are coming to my defense and questioning the velocity of your report. In fact, all that have actually seen me can tell you that I always ask if they need me to slow down or stop for a minute because I value their full time. I do not want them to stay 10 minutes and leave unhappy- it's not who I am and what I'm about and others know this of me. I take great pride in being dependable and professional and the best that I can be, so for you to do this with false intentions, yes, it is mean-spirited of you.
Cincyjim, as I said before, even from the beginning I am fully aware of who I have and have not seen and you and I both know we have never met and I will just leave it at that.
Keep telling yourself that your never saw me and perhaps in your mind it will be true. I left disappointed and chose at that time NOT to share the experience. How many posts do you have to make before you stop repeating the same rant.
It was only when others suggested that you were the one to see with a once in a lifetime windfall that I posted that I had seen you and was disappointed. That's not false. It wasn't posted with a "mean-spirited" intent. I posted it for MRRRD's benefit. I thought he should know that not everyone who has seen you thought as highly as those that were promoting you. You give yourself far too much credit if you think that you meet the criteria of someone that I would have the slightest inclination to be mean towards.
Instead of alphabetizing your dictionary, you should use your dictionary and look up the meaning of the word "velocity."
Again a special forum "Escort's Defense" was created at your request so you rant as much as want and not clutter up other sections.
[QUOTE=Tonguetwister; 1187240]This is my final post on this matter because I have things to do- like alphabetize my dictionary. Bottom line is, I never came on here to criticize Cincyjim for a negative review about me- I criticized him for leaving a false review.
I originally posted this because what he posted is untrue because I have never met Cincyjim. I have always been good at keeping track of what's going on and I know who I have seen and I have never met Cincyjim. If we had met and he left unhappy and wanted to share his negative experience then if it were his true thoughts then that would be one thing, but for Cincyjim to repeatedly claim we met when we never did is what has myself and others annoyed.
I have been in this just a little over a year now since Dec 3rd. 09 and I have always tried to treat others with the same respect I would like to receive in return by being dependable, considerate of their time, and serious about taking as many precautions as I can to ensure everyone's safety. In order to ensure the safety of those I have already met I have to decline many and I lose a lot of business in the process and if someone wants to take a decline personal because they didn't have the type of references I will accept and leave a false review and say we met when we never did- well then that speaks a lot about that person.
I am not trying to put words in the mouth of others, but in my opinion a lot of these people aren't rushing to my defense because you left a negative review about me- it's because you have left a false review about someone they know who is and always has been a tough screener and who is on top of what's going on with who she has and hasn't seen. After knowing me and the safety measures I take very seriously, they are not criticizing you for a negative report, but questioning the truth of your report. Again, you are not in my phone directory for a reason. When the first guy I saw back in "09" calls me I know right away who it is calling me. I have always been on top of what's going on as far as that goes.
I am not claiming to be perfect, and I never have claimed to be. I think I have learned a lot along the way as far as bcd activities. I can tell you one thing though, no one can honestly say I rushed them and this is another reason many are coming to my defense and questioning the velocity of your report. In fact, all that have actually seen me can tell you that I always ask if they need me to slow down or stop for a minute because I value their full time. I do not want them to stay 10 minutes and leave unhappy- it's not who I am and what I'm about and others know this of me. I take great pride in being dependable and professional and the best that I can be, so for you to do this with false intentions, yes, it is mean-spirited of you.
Cincyjim, as I said before, even from the beginning I am fully aware of who I have and have not seen and you and I both know we have never met and I will just leave it at that. [/QUOTE]
If your looking for more than hand lotion my friend told me that Lauren the Asian who posted a recent ad on this site provides more than that. If time permits I'm going to try and see her before she leaves town.
[QUOTE=Pal138;1187138]For the cruisers of BP. If you come across Miss Christy. She also went by chloe winters. She's cute but only carries hand lotion.[/QUOTE]
How about both sides of the argument agree to disagree and we all move on.
Somehow I don't think further auguring is going to resolve anything. When all is said and done we're all here for a common goal which can only be achieved by co-operation so this constant conflict does nothing but hurt everyone.
Just my 2 cents.
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1187629]If your looking for more than hand lotion.......[/QUOTE]It rubs on the lotion on its skin or it gets the hose again.
PUT THE FUCKING LOTION IN THE BASKET!
Buffalo Bill / Senior Member / 304, 213 Posts
Nacnud
I agree with you. This is not serving the greater purpose for the board. It appears there is two headstrong voices, and it is better to let it pass into the dark! Agree to disagree is the right approach. I know TT is done with this nonsense! CincyJim, put it to rest as well! Tell us more about Lauren!
[QUOTE=Nacnud; 1187694]How about both sides of the argument agree to disagree and we all move on.
Somehow I don't think further auguring is going to resolve anything. When all is said and done we're all here for a common goal which can only be achieved by co-operation so this constant conflict does nothing but hurt everyone.
Just my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]