Printable View
[QUOTE=JustDreaming;5174789]Been wanting to check this lady out. Especially during here AM hours.
Anyone ever sampled?
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/washington/seattle/58046496/[/URL][/QUOTE]FYI, she is a major pain to communicate with. Do not be surprised if you set something up with her & then ghosts you after the initial text.
[QUOTE=JustDreaming;5175136]Saw a little traffic on her. Seems legit and nothing negative besides location. Thanks for the reply. I'll make plans to give her a visit.[/QUOTE]I saw her a while ago, her fantasy and mine matched up BBBJTC. Well endowed in the chest, not a spinner, not bbw. I had a nice time.
She was a fun tall blonde that was not a safety girl. Does anyone know how to contact her?
There seem to be a lot of new ads for these girls with "THANKS TO CASEY TYLER" but not a lot of concrete reports here.
For example: [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?510713-ChasityAngel[/URL].
I'd love to see a group to rival the old "Kirkland Group" - decent girls offering BBFS.
They all seem like good potential for GFE / CFS at least.
Any recommendations? CIM / COF / PSE?
[QUOTE=Leftai2000;5175253]I saw her a while ago, her fantasy and mine matched up BBBJTC. Well endowed in the chest, not a spinner, not bbw. I had a nice time.[/QUOTE]I saw her a couple weeks ago. She is looking rough over last year. Lots of bruises all over her body. She has those weird dents in her upper arm I see some meth users get. BBBJCIM was good. She used to go bare but wouldn't. I would refrain from that with her now anyway.
[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5175625]There seem to be a lot of new ads for these girls with "THANKS TO CASEY TYLER" but not a lot of concrete reports here.
For example: [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?510713-ChasityAngel[/URL].
I'd love to see a group to rival the old "Kirkland Group" - decent girls offering BBFS.
They all seem like good potential for GFE / CFS at least.
Any recommendations? CIM / COF / PSE?[/QUOTE]I have seen several of these girls and they have all been dissapointing, including Casey Tyler. None of them were GFE, Casey was alright looking, but no kissing. Others were dog-faced. I think a lot of their reviews are faked, and you end up with a lifeless fish. No longer worth my time.
[QUOTE=HolderSpace;5175700]I have seen several of these girls and they have all been dissapointing, including Casey Tyler. None of them were GFE, Casey was alright looking, but no kissing. Others were dog-faced. I think a lot of their reviews are faked, and you end up with a lifeless fish. No longer worth my time.[/QUOTE]Good information. I hadn't realized that the Casey Tyler thing was a group but I don't pay much attention to such things. I had an appointment set up with CiraShine (a "Casey Tyler" girl) who was only in town for a day or two back in November. When I showed up she didn't respond to texts. After 20 minutes or so, she finally wrote back and said, "didn't you get my message, I had a family emergency and had to leave early". Oh well, bullet dodged I guess.
I've seen a few. Two of them match what your describing here, but one was a absolutely stunning 19 year old with high energy and everything short of BBFS. Probably a top 5 experience. Based on how they recruit, there's going to be a large range of quality.
[QUOTE=HolderSpace;5175700]I have seen several of these girls and they have all been disappointing, including Casey Tyler. None of them were GFE, Casey was alright looking, but no kissing. Others were dog-faced. I think a lot of their reviews are faked, and you end up with a lifeless fish. No longer worth my time.[/QUOTE]I saw CatieFlowers the other day on short notice. Pictures are her, although pretty dolled up. PJs for my session, but that didn't bother me. Kissing, DATY, BBBJCIM, and MSOG were all on the menu but I guess YMMV. A couple odd things. One was that when I entered she said that she hoped the room was ok because she heard I was allergic to smoke. Apparently, the booker made a mix up, but the whole thing had me nearly walk out because I didn't realize, stupidly so, that I was talking to a booker anyway. Glad I didn't because I did enjoy the services. I had also asked about MSOG prior to the session and I could tell she was a bit surprised that I wanted another round, though she complied. I probably won't repeat because I don't like getting information from one source who isn't really confirming with the provider. It's too messy for me.
[QUOTE=EvanTurner;5175440]She was a fun tall blonde that was not a safety girl. Does anyone know how to contact her?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?1930061-NEW-to-TNA-BELLEVUE-WELL-REVIEWED[/URL]!-425-332-7871&p=12868547&highlight=#post12868547.
s
Is this her?
Here is what was said about her previously. ChloeKeys. Absolute hard no, asked me to leave in session for asking
Thanks for sharing details on her, guys. I'm planning to sample her and will report back on the details.
[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5175625]There seem to be a lot of new ads for these girls with "THANKS TO CASEY TYLER" but not a lot of concrete reports here.
For example: [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?510713-ChasityAngel[/URL].
I'd love to see a group to rival the old "Kirkland Group" - decent girls offering BBFS.
They all seem like good potential for GFE / CFS at least.
Any recommendations? CIM / COF / PSE?[/QUOTE]I see that CatarinaRose is back, and part of the CT group. She was lame and I had to concentrate and finish so I could get out of such a disappointing performance. Only one of her pics is accurate.
If you are looking for a recommendation, the SLU group is much better at delivering what you are looking for.
Katie Rose was GFE and PSE, BBFS when she knew you. She says she will be back.
Kya and Brooke Catalina (Brooke do it all, funny enough, was from the KG group) give it up BBFS.
Skye is CFS, but still a GFE experience.
Their pictures are all accurate, what you see is what you get.
And they deliver on the service.
I agree the agent who books the calls posts fake or mis leading pics girls are not that hot and not really GFE like promised since you are not texting with the girl. Only exception was Cindy Lin so fucking tight and hot with great service but she just retired with last trip in Portland so the agent says since these girls never post adds or text with clients.
[QUOTE=HolderSpace;5177246]I see that CatarinaRose is back, and part of the CT group. She was lame and I had to concentrate and finish so I could get out of such a disappointing performance. Only one of her pics is accurate.
If you are looking for a recommendation, the SLU group is much better at delivering what you are looking for.
Katie Rose was GFE and PSE, BBFS when she knew you. She says she will be back.
Kya and Brooke Catalina (Brooke do it all, funny enough, was from the KG group) give it up BBFS.
Skye is CFS, but still a GFE experience.
Their pictures are all accurate, what you see is what you get.
And they deliver on the service.[/QUOTE]Does Sexy Blair from the SLU do BBFS also? I got a feeling she does but only saw her once.
I've seen 2 or 3 of the girls. Pics are accurate. No hint of BBFS. I would say decent GFE service but nothing special. And TBH, I'm so jaded that if service isn't special, I'm not repeating.
For the most part, I doubt I'll will see more of this group.
[QUOTE=DrSnatch;5176130]I saw CatieFlowers the other day on short notice. Pictures are her, although pretty dolled up. PJs for my session, but that didn't bother me. Kissing, DATY, BBBJCIM, and MSOG were all on the menu but I guess YMMV. A couple odd things. One was that when I entered she said that she hoped the room was ok because she heard I was allergic to smoke. Apparently, the booker made a mix up, but the whole thing had me nearly walk out because I didn't realize, stupidly so, that I was talking to a booker anyway. Glad I didn't because I did enjoy the services. I had also asked about MSOG prior to the session and I could tell she was a bit surprised that I wanted another round, though she complied. I probably won't repeat because I don't like getting information from one source who isn't really confirming with the provider. It's too messy for me.[/QUOTE]