TMeister You have to be the dumbest liberal I've ever heard.
[QUOTE=TMeister;4900222]Which is why America will be cheering LOUDLY when Mighty Joe makes good on his promise to take Pussy Spurs Trump behind the gym and beat the shit out of him LOL.
We Democrats always assert our dominance over you weak and low IQ right wing retards. Big Bad Joe Biden will teach you that painful lesson soon.[/QUOTE]Yep, can't fix stupid.
If you believe even 10% of the drivel you put out there, then there is no hope for you.
As my granny would say "bless his heart, He just doesn't know any better".
So whoever filled your head with all that nonsense, did you a disservice.
I think you just try to get a rise out of normal people.
Cause you cant be that ignorant or blind
Well there are 2 senate reports on it. +15-20 articles ect
[QUOTE=TMeister;4900219]So show me one credible report where WMD's were found in Iraq that were being prepared for imminent use against the United States.[/QUOTE]You said dubya lied about it, he clearly didn't.
[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20071225161422/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/iraq.htmlhere[/URL] is a copy and paste from the 512 page report.
[URL]https://embeds.foreignpolicy.com/protected-iframe/83f1e24885ea45ac5d6fd2fe13a1e54f-71129472-137264894[/URL]
General conclusions on intelligence relating to Iraq's WMD and ties to terrorist.
The report's first conclusion points to widespread flaws in the October 2002 NIE, and attributes those flaws to failure by analysts in the intelligence community:
Most of the major key judgments in the Intelligence Community's October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), Iraq's Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction, either overstated, or were not supported by, the underlying intelligence reporting. A series of failures, particularly in analytic trade craft, led to the mischaracterization of the intelligence.
Subsequent conclusions fault the intelligence community for failing to adequately explain to policymakers the uncertainties that underlay the NIE's conclusions, and for succumbing to "group think," in which the intelligence community adopted untested (and, in hindsight, unwarranted) assumptions about the extent of Iraq's WMD stockpiles and programs. The committee identified a failure to adequately supervise analysts and collectors, and a failure to develop human sources of intelligence (HUMINT) inside Iraq after the departure of international weapons inspectors in 1998. It also cited the post-9/11 environment as having led to an increase in the intensity with which policymakers review and question threat information.
It was just as I said it was the Intelligence bureaucracy that lied. Now did they have an underlying reason to do so? I don't know, but looks like they are up to their old tricks, and the odd thing is it ONLY happens when a republican is in office.
But now I know that's way above your common sense capability, but doesn't change the facts.
Of course I am NOT joking.
Main Stream media is basically conservative. I'll give you maybe centrist but nothing more. The facts are on my side. What you call liberal is NOT liberal, only LESS conservative. Several years ago, Public radio, which has been labeled left leaning because it tends to stick to factual matters and and not opinion, did some research regarding its news broadcasts. The result? Over the course of a year, conservative speakers had more air time than the so-called Liberal or main stream speakers and interviewees. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but not the facts. You are a victim of the propaganda machines, the same one that wants you to believe the "trickle down" theory.
ARG
[QUOTE=HobbyMan51;4899528]When is the last time you watched CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, any local affiliate, or read Rolling Stone, Huffington Post, Yahoo News, Mother Jones, The NYTimes, The New Yorker, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlanta Journal Constitution, the LA Times, The Atlantic, Cosmopolitan, etc, etc, etc. ? Even Fox News morning and afternoon lineups have people on who would fit right in with CNN and MSNBC and you are trying to say with a straight face that 95% of the media is to the right of center? The liberal media is a product of ultra right propaganda? Ridiculous, utterly and incredibly ridiculous. Talk about propaganda. You would make Joseph Goebbels proud. C'Mon. Man![/QUOTE].
Media is almost completely left wing.
[QUOTE=Niteluvr;4901637]Couldn't agree more. I'm the type that used to watch CNN religiously since it's inception, but it's so far to the left now I can't find any politically-neutral news stories anymore.[/QUOTE]Glad to see others posting common sense truth about the media, it's not about republicans or democrats, the news, uhummm I mean media is well over 90 percent radical leftwing to include CNN, NBC, MSNBC, etc, there is ONLY 1 conservative news station in the whole damn country and that's FOX, and even they have some leftwing people on the air.