It seems to me anyway that the quality on sa has fallen off. Most ladies are pay4 play which is nice sometimes or just complete scammers making it hard to find a beneficial arrangement any other mongers notice this frustrating trend.
Printable View
It seems to me anyway that the quality on sa has fallen off. Most ladies are pay4 play which is nice sometimes or just complete scammers making it hard to find a beneficial arrangement any other mongers notice this frustrating trend.
[QUOTE=IcabodStud;3844154]It seems to me anyway that the quality on sa has fallen off. Most ladies are pay4 play which is nice sometimes or just complete scammers making it hard to find a beneficial arrangement any other mongers notice this frustrating trend.[/QUOTE]I noticed the same thing. I rejoined a couple of weeks when my last sb flaked out on me and nothing. I see guys complaining about a decrease in activity on the escort forum also. I blame it on the hot economy. The girls are finding good jobs and not needing the extra income from us.
JJ.
She is now doing porn in LA. Former stripper at Cheeks and in Columbus. Search for her vids using Meko Lilly. They are nothing special.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/ff6c48e7-356b-4858-99f0-08126771ac39[/URL]
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;3850208]She is now doing porn in LA. Former stripper at Cheeks and in Columbus. Search for her vids using Meko Lilly. They are nothing special.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/ff6c48e7-356b-4858-99f0-08126771ac39[/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like she's the new darling of the "family therapy" line. Guess she really was looking for a daddy. LOL.
Was curious to find out about this one. Sometimes the MILFs are the best ones.
In short, her communications with me were quite terse, to the point of unfriendly. Her response to my first PM asking what she was looking for was: "Weekly arrangement a weekly meeting with allowance 300 and you provide accommodations". We traded 2 more sets of PMs and her responses were equally terse including the comment that she doesn't want to waste time. My final question as to her evenings being free resulted in a "no, the kids are in sports" and then I was blocked.
I'm guessing she has had a hard time with us fellers but I found her attitude to be a bit off-putting.
This is mostly as an FYI. Maybe some of you have had better luck than I.
[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;3850208]She is now doing porn in LA. Former stripper at Cheeks and in Columbus. Search for her vids using Meko Lilly. They are nothing special.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/ff6c48e7-356b-4858-99f0-08126771ac39[/URL][/QUOTE]Her SA profile is down now.
This one is somewhat typical of the younger girls. She was immediately all about what was I willing to offer. This was in the second PM. Her concern was that she might have to bump one of the other SDs to make room for me. One of her more amusing comments was she didn't want to spend much time texting with no results. That was what her "guy friends were for". ROTFL.
I congratulated her on her stable of SDs and made no mention of the irony of her SA handle. Needless to say, I declined her offer of meeting up with me and wished her well.
Some of these girls have ridiculous attitudes. Unfortunately, to some extent at least, we SDs / mongers have to accept responsibility for enabling this BS.
Nonetheless, on with the hunt.
[QUOTE=Frakka00;3842297]Meant batgirlangel. As stated by others messy apt and kinda eh. But was in a pinch. BBBJ just was ok but upgraded to FS for 60. Qv of course. On for more detail if interested.[/QUOTE]She is offering a threesome with a friend today for those who have her contact info.
Her profile is still active. Check your url or maybe she blocked you.
[QUOTE=SDaddy9;3850855]Her SA profile is down now.[/QUOTE]
So, here's what I've learned recently:
SugarCutie11 out of Columbus.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/9f466d1f-a009-4c44-9eea-8a04ebd34b8e[/URL]
GPS.
Wants $300 a meet and you to supply the accommodations.
Tiny.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/996fc65b-8b33-56e2-6883-8f21996cb72a[/URL]
GPS.
Wants $500 a week. Went straight to the money with little getting to know each other.
Sugar Baby.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/3cdd1358-8130-4011-8750-7320e192b25f[/URL]
$200 and she hosts (more on that in a minute).
She is a parapalegic, but can have sexual pleasure and orgasms. She wants you to come to her in her assisted living facility. The attendents would get her ready and she'd be naked in the bed when you arrive.
Initially the idea of check "wheelchair bound" off my list seemed tempting, but the idea of the staff knowing what I am there to do and cleaning my cum off her face just made Mr. Happy less so.
If you'd like to try it, and don't have a problem with the knowing staff, she's eager as hell and I probably offered her too much because she bit into it like snapping turtle. She'd fetish friendly and has a dirty mind but I try to keep a low profile so nyet!
Hi guys,
Looking for 411 on Sweetangel74.
Good conversation so far. Got a dirty mind. I like that. Acts like this is all new but I've heard that before from experienced pros playing sb. Anyone seen her?
Thanks,
C.
Some of you had expressed interest in digits. PM if you are still interested.
[QUOTE=JLZ61;3841246]Met and had fun as outcall. Nice girl. 35 and cute, local cheerleader look. (Not quite as cute as pic but cute enough.) No kids; little bit of a belly but overall pretty nice and firm body. Smokes but didn't smell like it (hint of taste, though). Not a huge cuddler but def GFE in all other ways. No indication of addiction. Lives in NKY but can travel, if needed.
On time. Not clock watcher. Not pro at all. More like an innocent UTR. Doesn't like some of the vulgar approaches some on SA take; prefers more sweet and kind. Could def take out for dinner with no issues. Nice BBBJ. Very nice. Definite submissive tendencies.
One of the better experiences I've had. Gave 2 bills. Would repeat.
PM if questions.[/QUOTE]
The whole point of looking around on SA for me is to get away from the pros. Here's the troubled Dallas doing her thing on the site. At least she made it easy to spot a pro.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/704be29b-5189-4315-ae5f-23e0aa9092de[/URL]
[QUOTE=Wielic;3852503]The whole point of looking around on SA for me is to get away from the pros. Here's the troubled Dallas doing her thing on the site. At least she made it easy to spot a pro.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/704be29b-5189-4315-ae5f-23e0aa9092de[/URL][/QUOTE]The best thing to do is report them. That way they will eventually give up and it will be easier to hunt for the real ones.
She is a hot mess. Not sure she is even real. I wasted two or three days on her. Texting. I'm done with her after she sent the same exact messages to my second burner phone as the first.
[QUOTE=JLZ61;3850861]This one is somewhat typical of the younger girls. She was immediately all about what was I willing to offer. This was in the second PM. Her concern was that she might have to bump one of the other SDs to make room for me. One of her more amusing comments was she didn't want to spend much time texting with no results. That was what her "guy friends were for". ROTFL.
I congratulated her on her stable of SDs and made no mention of the irony of her SA handle. Needless to say, I declined her offer of meeting up with me and wished her well.
Some of these girls have ridiculous attitudes. Unfortunately, to some extent at least, we SDs / mongers have to accept responsibility for enabling this BS.
Nonetheless, on with the hunt.[/QUOTE]