Printable View
Friend of mine has been contacted by her and needs a 411 on her as he doesn't know her but she has a web site. Any help would be appreciated. PM would be best. Happyendings. Rare-playmate. Com is her web site but since I haven't seen her or know anything about her I can't say one way or the other for him. Hopefully some of the seniors might be able to help.
[QUOTE=Puntang Man;1610237]Friend of mine has been contacted by her and needs a 411 on her as he doesn't know her but she has a web site. Any help would be appreciated. PM would be best. Happyendings. Rare-playmate. Com is her web site but since I haven't seen her or know anything about her I can't say one way or the other for him. Hopefully some of the seniors might be able to help.[/QUOTE]Well, considering there's a freakin kid on the bed in one of the pics on her site, I would stay away. I've seen her post on BP before though. Not same pics, but definitely her.
Rojo
[QUOTE=Puntang Man;1610237]Friend of mine has been contacted by her and needs a 411 on her as he doesn't know her but she has a web site. Any help would be appreciated. PM would be best. Happyendings. Rare-playmate. Com is her web site but since I haven't seen her or know anything about her I can't say one way or the other for him. Hopefully some of the seniors might be able to help.[/QUOTE]The lady is no longer under consideration for visitation due to bad responses and her choice of meeting place Sville Have a good weekend and will continue my never ending search for the "perfect storm" BCDs and plan to see a lady in Cincy soon. She does things that gives me goose bumps or might when we meet. Thanks again for all the responses and the honest feedback.
[QUOTE=TheCatholicGuy;1609487]I had an outstanding time! Brooke is warm, personable and very talented![/QUOTE]What did the priest say? What do you get for banging an escort?
Did he get really into alot of description like dear forum letter?
Just wondering.
We already have Senoir citizens.
We have regular members.
Pimps.
How bought hmmmm.
Long members
Hooded members.
Shit covered members.
Just a thought
USASG, I had a very nice dream with Sasha, a new girl with Buddah. Take home message: I had a great time; one of the best I have had in the hobby.
Incall was in the Eastgate area, and setup was easy working through Buddah who is always straightforward and professional.
Now to the good stuff, beginning with a cliche': Sasha looks better in person than her pics. Why? She is taller in person and most importantly, she has great eyes-eyes that look so good while they look into yours during her very good, teasing bls and BBBJ.
So the pics are her. Good looking girl. What they can't show is her great attitude which might be summarized as "I'm horny for you and want to have a great time fucking you silly." Menu is what is stated in her ad; I also know that mpop is available, and what's more not all girls can get me there, but Sasha had no problem.
Last, she is smart. I'm a guy who can quickly lose interest if his partner is an idiot. Sasha is smart and working on an advanced education-so you can make fun jokes that would go over the head of many girls and enjoy talking with her before she wears you out, again. Repeat? What do you think? Sasha and I already spoke about some kinky fun we might try next time.
And then I woke up in my crappy cubicle. But nice dream, yo.
Stay safe and smart,
Crazykev
[blue][Commercial Message deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted because it appeared to be a commercial message and/or it contained links to a commercial website. Please post reports consisting primarily of a commercial nature and/or reports with links to commercial websites in the Classified Advertisement section of the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines and the Forum's FAQ for further information.[/blue]
[QUOTE=Randyman1501;1610486]Just as a heads up to EloquentEven, Paris is probably not the absolute best choice of stage names for one of your new girls at this point, given the discussion on the BP thread, and given lack of photos posted.[/QUOTE]I checked out the link he posted for the site it says she changed her name. And man she is sexy.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1608267]I am wondering if it would be helpful to segregate the ads: One group for the higher-end ladies who are younger, slender and generally fit the "traditional concept of female beauty." Then there could be a second category for the BBWs, etc.[/QUOTE]I'm not local to you there in Cincinnati, but I'm going to voice my thoughts anyway. (:
I would not support such a scheme. Aside from my finely tuned ability to discriminate for myself, and the fact that my jones may change based on mood, available time, available funds, etc, I can think of three reasons off the top of my head:
1. I don't think there are enough different ads that are different enough to to warrant the additional effort it's going to take me to look for reviews or ads. I might think differently if there were 50+ girls in each category, but as it stands, it would just waste my time.
2. If Jackson or some board member / admin is going to do the categorization, I can see providers being upset when they perceive they are shuffled into the wrong category. Result: needless drama from those providers so slighted.
3. If the providers are going to be doing their own categorization, I can see patrons being upset at being "forced" to look at "inappropriate" ads in whichever forum. Result: needless drama from mongers all up in arms about "stupid" providers putting ads in the "wrong" place.
In the end, I think that one category of ads,"provider" is sufficient. Like I said, I can generally see which is which from the ad, and I can skip those that don't interest me that day.
[noparse]/[/noparse]z
[QUOTE=Zomby; 1610529]I'm not local to you there in Cincinnati, but I'm going to voice my thoughts anyway. (:
I would not support such a scheme. Aside from my finely tuned ability to discriminate for myself, and the fact that my jones may change based on mood, available time, available funds, etc, I can think of three reasons off the top of my head:
1. I don't think there are enough different ads that are different enough to to warrant the additional effort it's going to take me to look for reviews or ads. I might think differently if there were 50+ girls in each category, but as it stands, it would just waste my time.
2. If Jackson or some board member / admin is going to do the categorization, I can see providers being upset when they perceive they are shuffled into the wrong category. Result: needless drama from those providers so slighted.
3. If the providers are going to be doing their own categorization, I can see patrons being upset at being "forced" to look at "inappropriate" ads in whichever forum. Result: needless drama from mongers all up in arms about "stupid" providers putting ads in the "wrong" place.
In the end, I think that one category of ads,"provider" is sufficient. Like I said, I can generally see which is which from the ad, and I can skip those that don't interest me that day.
[noparse]/[/noparse]z[/QUOTE]Very well reasoned and stated.
Does it look like somethings wrong with her right are to anyone else? You can barely see it in just one pic.
[QUOTE=Chasbot;1610286]What did the priest say? What do you get for banging an escort?[/QUOTE]I don't see a need to confess it. I don't consider it a sin, and there's nothing in the original Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek texts which specifically refers to premarital sex. Thus, no condemnation of it.