If you want a real laugh?
[QUOTE=OhnoWitson;4918193]You read the gun laws twice a year? Well. Read them again want to be lawyer. It is a crime to use a firearm "in the commission of a felony" not a crime, very big difference.[/QUOTE]Read OhnoWitson's posts from a few years ago where She / He / IT was seeking a good attorney? Then later She posted that she was herself an attorney? Of course, most of her posts are deleted because she is a drama queen trying to piss mongers off and?
I've never engaged in prostitution.
Last I checked the Florida Statutes, there is no law prohibiting someone from compensating a woman for her time.
I've never solicited sex, or sexual acts, from a female in exchange for money. No communication between myself (phone or texting) ever mentions sexual acts of any nature.
Florida Statutes 812.13 robbery / strong arm robbery are felonies.
Florida Statutes 776.012, 776.013, 776.031, 776.032 outline a person's rights to defend oneself from felony robbery.
To the member who quoted me and indicated he brings a folding knife because it can't be traced back to him. Don't think for a minute that the girl you contacted doesn't have your texts on her phone and that there are not CCT cameras all over the place these days. If you kill or injured someone then flee the scene you will be found and you will have some serious explaining to do. Hopefully you will never be in a situation where you realize that you just brought a knife to a gunfight.
Whiskey.
[QUOTE=RobinStPete;4915777]All of you know that self defense isn't a valid defense with your CCW when engaged in this activity, right?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JohnnieCox;4917564]You can not carry concealed into a "house of ilrepute". Using a firearm in commission of a crime is a felony of the 3rd degree. Gun laws state nothing about your right to defend yourself being negated by the fact that you were engaged in the act of prostitution, and yes because you're the customer or even the driver or pimp, the prostitution charges applies to you too. So that's a fine line and there are no case studies online showing precedence to it. I read the gun laws twice a year, and research things as needed. So in the end, its how the case is argued and how the judge or jury perceives the case facts at hand.
For instance, you are not allowed to handle firearms while drinking alcohol or intoxicated but case study shows that people have been acquitted of self defense while they had alcohol in their system but no legally tested to be intoxicated.[/QUOTE]