Rants Opinions and Totally Pointless Bullshit

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615;2486747]O so now we resort to calling names? That is when I know I WON and you lost.

And I do speak as poorly as I write and yes people do still understand since I have a high end job and wouldn't be able to have it without being understood. I hate writing and my job doesn't require me to write a lot so I just type as I go and don't worry about corrections. Its obviously you understood what I wrote so I must be doing a good job, well hold on since I have a low IQ maybe you do to since you were able to understand me. Have a good day. I'm done, hopefully you with being having a high IQ would be able to understand that. Then again how does 1 with a High IQ fall to meth addiction? I never touched drugs because I know of the consequences so I guess my IQ is higher then yours. Anyways congrats on the sobriety and keep up the good work! Have a good one, I'm done with this.

E.[/QUOTE]RW, you've said before that you're an alcoholic (I can link the post if necessary).

So, other than drug of choice, how would that differ from A2's past?

-Jeepster1.

It's funny how this started out as someone saying something to the effect that someone else had no clue what they were talking about. Adm. 2 then corrected RW, quite colorfully, I might add, in how he, RW, did not not know what he was talking about. And it was on then! I won't pretend to know the facts as each presented them in regards to criminalization of prostitution and its consequences. What I do know, in my limited intelligence, is that BOTH made grammatical errors. RW's are very obvious, Adm2's are not. I'm just glad it's over and nobody got hurt.

I'll probably get mine chewed out. Please, please pkease, don't do it Adm2. We all make grammatical mistakes. Heck, this rant has probably got a few in it as well.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2486929]I will have to use smaller words. Get somebody to help you with the math. As usual you are speaking from a place of ignorance not knowledge.

[URL]https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201010/why-intelligent-people-use-more-drugs[/URL]

I do have one more question, what exactly did you win?[/QUOTE]I am glad that I subscribe to the "never say never" theory. I never would have guessed that I'd find myself in agreement with A2 in a battle on here LOL. But I do. I suppose we are all liars, etc. , so always best to move on, hoping those who have lied, etc. Have matured enough to move on and hopefully not repeat those prior patterns.

[QUOTE=Lookee;2488352]I am glad that I subscribe to the "never say never" theory. I never would have guessed that I'd find myself in agreement with A2 in a battle on here LOL. But I do. I suppose we are all liars, etc. , so always best to move on, hoping those who have lied, etc. Have matured enough to move on and hopefully not repeat those prior patterns.[/QUOTE]Along the lines of the Mark Twain quote: "Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel" would be: "Why get into a pissing match with the admin who can ban your argumentative ass?

[QUOTE=Jerry1235;2487412]It's funny how this started out as someone saying something to the effect that someone else had no clue what they were talking about. Adm. 2 then corrected RW, quite colorfully, I might add, in how he, RW, did not not know what he was talking about. And it was on then! I won't pretend to know the facts as each presented them in regards to criminalization of prostitution and its consequences. What I do know, in my limited intelligence, is that BOTH made grammatical errors. RW's are very obvious, Adm2's are not. I'm just glad it's over and nobody got hurt.

I'll probably get mine chewed out. Please, please pkease, don't do it Adm2. We all make grammatical mistakes. Heck, this rant has probably got a few in it as well.[/QUOTE]Please illuminate me. Seriously this is me not being a dick. I'm always willing to learn something new.

Truth be told, Jax is the grammar Nazi not me. Vocabulary, not grammar, is my strong suit.

I reckon I probably shouldn't get into shit like I did here, not because it's unprofessional, we run a pussy board, how professional can we be expected to be? I shouldn't because it's a waste of my time.

People who spout ignorance as if it's fact just piss me off.

A2

[QUOTE=HornDawgs;2488394]Along the lines of the Mark Twain quote: "Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel" would be: "Why get into a pissing match with the admin who can ban your argumentative ass?[/QUOTE][BLUE]When I post in blue ink like this I'm acting as the admin, that guy will in fact ban your ass.[/BLUE]

If you notice all my posts in this exchange were in black ink. When I do that I'm just posting as another asshole. I have never banned or thrown a flag at anybody for shooting back at me when I was posting in black ink.

Well, unless they said they were going to fucking kill me or something.

A2.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2487067]RW, you've said before that you're an alcoholic (I can link the post if necessary).

So, other than drug of choice, how would that differ from A2's past?

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I don't remember saying that unless it was sarcasm. I'm no where near an alcoholic.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2487067]RW, you've said before that you're an alcoholic (I can link the post if necessary).

So, other than drug of choice, how would that differ from A2's past?

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Admin2;2488684]Please illuminate me. Seriously this is me not being a dick. I'm always willing to learn something new.

Truth be told, Jax is the grammar Nazi not me. Vocabulary, not grammar, is my strong suit.

I reckon I probably shouldn't get into shit like I did here, not because it's unprofessional, we run a pussy board, how professional can we be expected to be? I shouldn't because it's a waste of my time.

People who spout ignorance as if it's fact just piss me off.

A2[/QUOTE]Your grammar is off! Wasn't you chewing me out for it but now your doing it as well. I will give you a hint. You have a run on sentence. Please don't spill grammar talk and chew the people out when in fact, your doing the same thing and suck at grammar just as much.

[blue]You needed to say you're doing the same thing not your.

I had a run on because I didn't proof what I wrote, you use your for you're because you don't know they aren't the same thing.

Sad

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615;2489226]I don't remember saying that unless it was sarcasm. I'm no where near an alcoholic.[/QUOTE]Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

[URL]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?4169-Streetwalker-Reports&p=1884699&highlight=alcoholic#post1884699[/URL]

-Jeepster1.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2490305]Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

[URL]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?4169-Streetwalker-Reports&p=1884699&highlight=alcoholic#post1884699[/URL]

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Snap! I think there are varying definitions of an alcoholic. But I'd say anybody who goes to the beer store almost every day, and not to mention openly calls himself an alcoholic, probably meets one or more definitions. Judging by his attitude on this site, RoadWarrior615 definitely has the ego of an alcoholic. And I say that as a recovered alcoholic and drug addict. But I'm still a untreated pussy addict! LOL.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2490305]Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

[URL]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?4169-Streetwalker-Reports&p=1884699&highlight=alcoholic#post1884699[/URL]

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Wow so you took the time to look through all my post. Just wow.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2490305]Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

[URL]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?4169-Streetwalker-Reports&p=1884699&highlight=alcoholic#post1884699[/URL]

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Yes it was sarcasm even though I do drink alot.

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615;2492215]Wow so you took the time to look through all my post. Just wow.[/QUOTE]Not really much of a feat. It took about 15 seconds to search the Nashville forums for the word "alcoholic. ".

-Jeepster1.

Should Megan Barry become Nashville's mayor, which scenario is more likely?

1. Stereotypical social reformer crusades to save providers from themselves, or.

2. Stereotypical enlightened libertarian lets adults make adult decisions about their bodies?

Not trying to troll. Just haven't followed the arc of her career in a while.

-Jeepster1.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2581697]Should Megan Barry become Nashville's mayor, which scenario is more likely?

1. Stereotypical social reformer crusades to save providers from themselves, or.

2. Stereotypical enlightened libertarian lets adults make adult decisions about their bodies?

Not trying to troll. Just haven't followed the arc of her career in a while.

-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I think Nashville will just continue on with the trajectory that was started by Dean during the Bredesen administration no matter who is elected. A new mayor isn't a clean slate across the board. You still have all of the other officials or higher-ups who've been there forever who will keep doing what they know best.