Back then guys would argue over Kgirls and defend them like their girlfriends. I never understood that. A 7 or below is a bad review no matter what you said. You would be BL if that booker figured you out. A popular booker panic contacted me to review because of a single review out of three that had 7 for performance and 9 for looks. The other two reviews were in the 9s and 10s. I read the "bad" review and told the booker that was actually a good review and the girl would be all right. I also had girls asking to me to give 10/10. That really put me in a bind, man. I didn't want to lie but I also liked the girl.
Those were the reasons I didn't like to review back then. I hate to give a score even now. That's why I am going to use the YMMV as an excuse LOL.
[QUOTE=HobbyVeteran;4423205]I've always rarely posted reviews good or bad over the years. Before the implosion if The othEr Review location I was white listed with 2 and had a total of 16 reviews, primarily the kgirls. I do it if I feel motivated or perhaps I was asked to review if I enjoyed the time I spent. I'm just discreet and lazy but I'm always 100% honest. For instance I've given a legendary kgirl a 10 for looks and a 7 for performance. I then explained it's not that I disliked this girl it's just that I prefer GFE over pse and she was 100% raw pse. Got a lot of hecklers for that review, especially because she had consistent 10/10. Anyways, point is I post exactly how I feel and what I think in these reviews. Although I'll confess that recent legal changes have made me far more concerned, conservative, and far more secretive. What this means now is if I post a review it was either A. Mind blowing even by kgirl standards or B it was so exceptionally awful I wouldn't touch her with yours.
Just how I see it.
Side note: working on getting the cash together for a second to at Cona and Lucia. Hope thar remains a thing for a bit longer.[/QUOTE]
