Printable View
Hey guys, I've been curious about these two girls. Luna Bella has been on the board for some time to have so little reviews IMO. Her pics look better than half the chicks on this site but I've found very minimal information. Lisa just started advertising. She is the chocolate girl with triple D's! She started with Rhonda but I suppose she's solo now. Please PM me if you have any info on these two girls.
Thanks,
DHD
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1608448]Most of the escorts that are upscale, like Dawn, Molly, and Dixie.[/QUOTE]I think you might be confused on the term "upscale."
The examples you cite, are wonderful, lovely ladies, but they are not upscale in most hobby terms. They are fantastic providers, but hardly upscale. There are other boards (some now defunct) that either specialize in, or have completely different and dedicated areas to actual upscale ladies. Some boards use a variety of terms such as "High Dollar Hotties," or "Diamonds" etc, but even those boards do not go off the physical appearance as much as they do the price range.
Using the examples you provide and filtering it through the average price range that you are suggesting in boards that either specialize or categorize such levels, none of these ladies would fit that definition. The more exclusive, or upscale as you put it will not even see you for an hour. Most require a minimum of a 2 Hour session. The price just to get in the door will be over $600. The average session will actually run you over the thousand dollars threshold.
Now for that price, you may get what you define as beautiful, but you will also get a special skill set. I used to play in the ballpark before I retired. I used to have the luxury of not needing to appraise price and the value of that service for that price. Now that I am on a more fixed income, I have had to diversify my pursuit in the hobby. Yet, I would hardly call it bargain basement shopping, either. The reality is, you can find wonderful ladies that are both beautiful and skilled at a fraction of the price. WALDT is the ruling factor here. It depends on what you are looking for. I no longer need a woman that looks stunning in a small black dress at a business dinner that can discuss literature, politics, economics, and order in French, as well as absolutely seduce me behind closed doors. Some of these ladies claim to be more exclusive in who they see, but not all of them are really that honest. In fact I remember a few of us tuxedos, back in the day compared notes and found that they were doing just as many session as the average provider did, so the promise of exclusivity is actually pretty elusive unless you are in a sugardaddy relationship where you can insist on that to some degree, but to be honest I hobby so that we can have a great time, and then they leave!
Don't get me wrong, the ladies you mention are all attractive, intelligent, conversant, amicable, and downright wild cats in bed, but that would not put them in the upscale end of the spectrum in the hobby. That puts them in the middle of the market. I should also let you in on a little secret: "there really isn't much difference other than the price you pay." Unless you have a need for a lady that can escort you to a dinner party and do all the things that blow your whistle and ring your bell while also reading the the Iliad and Odyssey to you in the original Latin, why would you pay that price?
Furthermore, why would you want to make that delineation here? All it will do is cause a flood of ladies to increase their price for a short time until your grand experiment fails. They will realize they can't run their business in such a manner effectively, because the market simply won't bear it. There are not enough high rollers in this geographic area to make it worth their time and energy to market themselves at that end of the spectrum. In the end you will simply create artificial inflation with this silly notion. In other words, if you persist, you will screw up the hobby for the rest of us, because you want to bang your drum about provider looks, and force your agenda of "what is beautiful" down our throats because you fail to grasp the concept of WALDT and are too damned lazy to do what the rest of us do: research.
The reality is, you have in your mind what makes the perfect provider. Some of us feel that you have a very narrow definition. Since you are the outlier, you will need to adjust, not the other way around. Now if you would like to pay Molly, Dawn, etc more money at the end of the session for meeting your tough criteria, have at it. I am sure they won't object to a generous tip. For that matter, most of the guys will thank you. If you pay some of these ladies more per session, they might be able to afford to offer more specials and then the rest of us can afford to see them more often-on your dime. I am all for the redistribution of wealth if it looks like that in hobbyland!
To be honest, your posting smack of that arrogant guy named Richard that often calls in to WLW 700 to complain about all the riff-raff he has to rub shoulders with when he attends the Reds games. The overwhelming response to that guy is the same most of us will pour on you if you proceed:
"If you want to avoid the common folk, then buy Diamond seats and get the valet package. You can drive up to the velvet ropes, give the valet your keys, and be whisked away to your private viewing both with an army of ushers to protect you from ever meeting an ordinary person as you enjoy your baseball game."
If you need links on where to find such an experience, PM me and I will give you links to boards that specialize in the area you would like to hobby in, but make sure you have a constant stream of revenue, because you will be shocked at the sticker price.
[QUOTE=Cincyeast52;1608432]Bad idea, in my opinion. Keep it simple.[/QUOTE]Exactly. I don't understand the point or the benefit.
[QUOTE=Cintixtreme; 1608436]It would never work for a few reasons.
First, I'm guessing that just because an escort is older or a little heavier, that doesn't mean she want to be lumped in with the streetwalkers and / or junkies. Not that you probably care since you have no intention of seeing them and have no problem telling them how little they belong, but that comparison is still a little low, even for you.
Second, some of the streetwalkers are going to fit into your young and fit category. Junkies at the beginning of their slide might even fit into the "traditional concept of physical beauty". Doesn't mean they aren't shooting up, popping pills, or hitting the pipe.
Third, there isn't anyone who is going to set those standards or enforce them on this board and then there is going to be a ton of drama about this one shouldn't be posting in that category, etc.
You are a guy who goes primarily on looks, and who also expects a certain level of service. However, you are suggesting categorizing women only by their looks and ignoring the service aspect. And that happens to be a big problem among some of the younger girls who jump into this for quick cash. They are lookers, but they don't have half the skills they think they do and have absolutely no customer service abilities.
This board has always fluctuated back and forth in terms of quality. In fact, you have been making this exact same argument for years. However, I would say that we have a pretty good current crop of regular ladies. The fact that some of them don't post as much anymore probably (and I am just postulating here) has more to do with the way the guys behave than with the influx of new talent, or with the fact that they have more than enough business without posting ads.
About the only thing I could see that would work in voluntary differentiation would be to have a thread based upon price. Maybe over $200 and under $200. Anything else would be unworkable and result in too much nonsense.[/QUOTE]I made a comment earlier that I thought was just talking about how to bring more providers to this board but after reading more I see I was wrong. I agree with your post and also everyone has different taste on appearance but I do be leave that service should be number one. Do you want to be with a 20 year old that wants to get you in and out or a women that wants to have a good time satisfy you and be given a good time as well!
I don't understand why you have to separate "fit" and "BBW". By fit I'm assuming you mean nasty skinny girls most likely crack addicts. All men do not like skinny women and saying that you should separate the skinny girls from the thick / chubby ones and put the thick / chubby ones in the bad category is dumb. You should be putting the freakishly skinny ones in the bad category since they are probably on drugs. Real men like some meat on their women and are not intimidated and know how to handle it. Trust me, it is a lot more fun with a real woman.
Peace!
It looks like we'll meet either tomorrow or the next day. She looks hot in the pics and her voice sounds sexy.
If you read my post on the "traditional" idea of beauty, and were confused on the book titles I listed I apologize. It looks like the built in filters did not like those titles because of some of the words int hem, and tried to use synonyms. If you would like the name of the authors and books, please PM me and I will share them with you-they are fascinating reads, especially for those that consider themselves aficionados of this hobby.
PD
[QUOTE=TWolfLCMint; 1608681]I don't understand why you have to separate "fit" and "BBW". By fit I'm assuming you mean nasty skinny girls most likely crack addicts. All men do not like skinny women and saying that you should separate the skinny girls from the thick / chubby ones and put the thick / chubby ones in the bad category is dumb. You should be putting the freakishly skinny ones in the bad category since they are probably on drugs. Real men like some meat on their women and are not intimidated and know how to handle it. Trust me, it is a lot more fun with a real woman.
Peace![/QUOTE]Buddy to each his own. I have seen sexy women in all sizes. Why are you attacking the skinny girls and the men who lust them?
Real Peace
[QUOTE=Thorbane;1607754]Ok HotSquirt I never seen you never will so I have no stake in this. But do you really expect us hobbyists to believe that he paid you 300 for a BJcim? But how far did you have to reach around and pull that story out of your ass. And to note if he did pay you that amount? I pretty sure you would not be avoiding his text. More like you couldn't answer fast enough.[/QUOTE]She would be calling all the time like a review I read about her a couple months back. Sorry but I have seen some not so good reviews and the good reviews are from out of the blue never postd before or again posters if I'm not mistaken. And sorry squirt your attitude about this whole situation is defintly not maken you shine a good light upon yourself. Just my observation not that it means jack. Take it or leave it I don't care.
[QUOTE=TheCatholicGuy;1608691]It looks like we'll meet either tomorrow or the next day. She looks hot in the pics and her voice sounds sexy.[/QUOTE]Know a few members from ********* when I was a active member of that site seen her. And there was nothing but glowing reviews. So you will be pleased.
[QUOTE=Thorbane;1608872]Know a few members from ********* when I was a active member of that site seen her. And there was nothing but glowing reviews. So you will be pleased.[/QUOTE]I've read a lot of reviews. Not a bad one in the bunch.
[QUOTE=TWolfLCMint; 1608681]I don't understand why you have to separate "fit" and "BBW". By fit I'm assuming you mean nasty skinny girls most likely crack addicts. All men do not like skinny women and saying that you should separate the skinny girls from the thick / chubby ones and put the thick / chubby ones in the bad category is dumb. You should be putting the freakishly skinny ones in the bad category since they are probably on drugs. Real men like some meat on their women and are not intimidated and know how to handle it. Trust me, it is a lot more fun with a real woman.
Peace![/QUOTE]I must say I am a petite skinny girl however just because femalea are skinny does not necessarily mean they are crack addicts are on drugs. Some females, as myself, are just blessed with high metabolism and we are unable gain much weight. Petite women are real women as well and just because skinny does not in any way mean we all are intimidated and don't know how to handle it. I will speak for myself on I know how workmy body and handle things.
[QUOTE=Lexi33;1608593]I made a comment earlier that I thought was just talking about how to bring more providers to this board but after reading more I see I was wrong. I agree with your post and also everyone has different taste on appearance but I do be leave that service should be number one. Do you want to be with a 20 year old that wants to get you in and out or a women that wants to have a good time satisfy you and be given a good time as well![/QUOTE]Lexi33 is right. Experience rules! Of course, having experienced her, I would agree with ANYthing she says cause she rocks my world so well! .
Quating Todd in Cincy.
"Even Buddha, a perceptive businessman who responds to the call of the market, seems to have gotten the message and is not offering near the caliber of ladies that he was in 2004.
We seem to moving toward a clientele who:
- Doesn't care about age / weight (I. E. Is fine with BBW)
- Is more focused on girls who "swallow" than on high-quality, model-type looks.
- Doesn't want to pay more than $100 per session."
I didn't drive down the rates. If you look back to just last year this board was full of post by seniors who said things like."It is your money! If these girls want to try and chrage 200+ then do not see them! She will learn soon enough that it is our money and we spend it wisely"
Anyone remember these posts?
Now, what has happened is you have every other hobbyist on here meeting SW quality girls off the street or at the drake and bringing them to the board. They post the ads for these girls. So the flood of lower end girls is due to everyone wanting either a special rate with the girl for posting for them or the thrill of introducing a new find whatever the quality may be.
Last year I had Tess at 200 and she only saw 3 people. Why? That girl was a 2010 Ms. Teen (blank state)!
I had to keep it quite because I didn't want to end up on the View! LOL.
But the high quality was there. The hobbyist were not!
As for my Chubby girls. Men like that! Maybe not everyone but a lot do! Also, you will notice when I put a end to hiring druggies the girls got thicker!
I can bring on super sexy chics like Jasmine (my new girl) but if no one shells out the cash to see her I will lose her. You pay for what you want. So see the hotties and pay the extra buck!
Jmho.
B