Escort Reports

Wow!

That is how you research! Point taken.

[QUOTE=BMoreDog69;4049999]Whoa there big fella! Yup, I'm newer to this board than you are. That means what, exactly? If you read my comment, I didn't call you a newbie. I said, "It's bad enough when newbies are too lazy to seach (sic) first. " The implications of my comment are for others to decide.

On EB, there are only two ladies named Jewel, and only one says she is the "hostess with the most".

[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/[/URL]#baltimore / info /4108149563/21147700.

[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/[/URL]#baltimore / info /4437044592/22618512.

She also happens to be on EA, them, AL & CGX:

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.baltimore.listcrawler.com/post/27089211/jewel[/URL]

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/jewel-escort-baltimore-125048[/URL]#erotic.

[URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/1079086?skip_terms=1[/URL]

[URL]https://cityxguide.com/escorts/early-morning-special-east-baltimore-slim-brown-and-beautiful-240693/[/URL]

All this took just a few seconds with the information provided in the original post: Baltimore Jewel "hostess with the most".

IMO, newbies are defined more by their behavior, than by the number of their posts.

Have fun, and stay safe, y'll.[/QUOTE]

It used to be seen a lot here. The new folks coming on will be carrying this site in the future so we shouldn't discourage posts but encourage them with RTFF. I like to say give before you get.

I thought this site was to provide info for all to consider. It seems that some would rather lecture on and on vs just giving a helpful answer. Sure if someone is so lazy with a bunch of questions about basically the same thing, let the board handle um by simply not offering help, not lecturing. They will need to do their research then and will if they want the answer. I'm a Senior but I don't post much, I use PM's. I to had years of good and bad encounters way before I came to this board as a Regular member. I love reading the posts, a lot of them are helpful, some are funny and some are sad (providers passing) but the Better than thou posts, SMH, not helpful. No argument here just my humble opinion.

"Can't we all just get along?

Monoxide.

[QUOTE=Ebdawgg;4048697]She used to advertise on Eros so, beyond suggesting he do more research before asking, I think this is a proper question. She's not going to answer on twitter whether a USAG monger saw her.

But really dude (OP). It's probably better to do a search before a query. You'd be surprised what has already been posted on these many many pages.[/QUOTE]Lately I have found the search engine here does not go back far enough. I searched for Monica. Remembering many Monicas who have been discussed here not to mention the infamous Columbia based Indian girl monica with large tatas you would think all Monicas from past would come up try it. Also I think that many of you should pause and think that many of us are researching not under the best of circumstances and it is easier to ask then browse thru numbers. Some people have more time and maybe less people around then others. My wife looking over my shoulder now like give a guy a break especially now.

[QUOTE=Monoxide;4050820]I thought this site was to provide info for all to consider. It seems that some would rather lecture on and on vs just giving a helpful answer. Sure if someone is so lazy with a bunch of questions about basically the same thing, let the board handle um by simply not offering help, not lecturing. They will need to do their research then and will if they want the answer. I'm a Senior but I don't post much, I use PM's. I to had years of good and bad encounters way before I came to this board as a Regular member. I love reading the posts, a lot of them are helpful, some are funny and some are sad (providers passing) but the Better than thou posts, SMH, not helpful. No argument here just my humble opinion.

"Can't we all just get along?

Monoxide.[/QUOTE]Most here are happy to get along. I know I am.

Perhaps a post suggesting someone RTFF might occasionally seem rude but lots of guys here did lots of stuff and reported on it. Plenty of guys spent money, did research, took risks and once in a while got ripped off. They share that stuff regularly, readily and feely. When someone with one post asks the equivalent of "Could give me info that's readily available if I just scroll a little bit?" it's going to bring some bad reactions.

Many quality posters have helped plenty of newbies with specifics as well as detailed posts from when they experienced something. Those one post tell me everything requests are kind of like that person in your office who, after you have done a lot of work and committed your work to writing for his benefit and sent a detailed e-mail or memo, asks "Could you please tell me everything that you took all that time to write and send?

Lots of people really do want to help and most are mostly nice about it. Even better, they contributed literally thousands of pages of reports and experiences to help anyone who needs it. The help is all there; it just needs to be collected. It's sitting and waiting for anyone who needs it.

You bet; every once in a while someone has a question that can't be answered easily by reading but since most answers are there for the taking, posters who don't read first are likely to be directed to the answers that are sitting there waiting to be utilized. People who don't read first are like people walking past free money lying in the street.

All things considered I think this forum is usually pretty congenial. Most of the time no one calls out people who need real help. I have given and received a number of times. But "Please summarize everything from the past 3 k pages so I don't have to read. " are going to bring about a snarky response on this, or any board, every time.

Sometimes we're to quick to jump at someone for the simplest of things (I'm guilty). As many have said, this site is to share info and keep us all out of trouble. When I see someone post something I don't agree with, I try to tell myself, you know, there will come a time when they have info I'd like to have and if I blast them now, they will remember and not share it with me LOL. Most times it works, but sometimes it doesn't LOL. I've been in this game almost 25 years, only been on this site for a few years, but I was one of the original members on the oThER site. I actually used to score in AOL chat rooms to tell you how far I go back. Anyways, let's all try to approach this as if we give some help, someone will be there to help us when we need it. Maybe it'll be a different person, but who cares. ...

[QUOTE=Ebdawgg;4051057]Most here are happy to get along. I know I am.

Perhaps a post suggesting someone RTFF might occasionally seem rude but lots of guys here did lots of stuff and reported on it. Plenty of guys spent money, did research, took risks and once in a while got ripped off. They share that stuff regularly, readily and feely. When someone with one post asks the equivalent of "Could give me info that's readily available if I just scroll a little bit?" it's going to bring some bad reactions.

Many quality posters have helped plenty of newbies with specifics as well as detailed posts from when they experienced something. Those one post tell me everything requests are kind of like that person in your office who, after you have done a lot of work and committed your work to writing for his benefit and sent a detailed e-mail or memo, asks "Could you please tell me everything that you took all that time to write and send?

Lots of people really do want to help and most are mostly nice about it. Even better, they contributed literally thousands of pages of reports and experiences to help anyone who needs it. The help is all there; it just needs to be collected. It's sitting and waiting for anyone who needs it.

You bet; every once in a while someone has a question that can't be answered easily by reading but since most answers are there for the taking, posters who don't read first are likely to be directed to the answers that are sitting there waiting to be utilized. People who don't read first are like people walking past free money lying in the street.

All things considered I think this forum is usually pretty congenial. Most of the time no one calls out people who need real help. I have given and received a number of times. But "Please summarize everything from the past 3 k pages so I don't have to read. " are going to bring about a snarky response on this, or any board, every time.[/QUOTE]

Yea let me amend my post.

The 1st line "I thought this site was to provide info for all to consider".

It should have said.

" I thought this site was to provide info for all to consider and for the most part it is".

[QUOTE=VanillaDeviant;4048684]Anyone heard from Lynette lately. Me and her were actually kinda chill so I've just been wondering if she's alright.[/QUOTE]She resurfaced back in Aug or so, but there were some reports of her robbing or ripping off mongers along with her bf, including one from here. Also remembered she was sprinkling in fake pics and changed to using the name Heather too. Hit up the search button for Lynette in this topic to find a bit more of the details. It seemed to be a very YMMV situation. Good luck and stay safe if you do somehow end up reconnecting.

For those that wonder about google searches. In my post below, initially I got a direct hit on EB, but that direct hit was gone less than a few hours later, but gave direct hits on EA. I tried adding "escort" to the search query with limited improvement. My basic query started as 'Baltimore Jewel "hostess with the most" which were all clues in the original post.

Sometimes I try adding a specific site modifier such as "[URL]escortalligator.com.ba[/URL]ltimore. [URL]listcrawler.com[/URL]", which only gives hits for EA. I think the issue with the original search has more to do with the relationship between these sites, which steal / share each others ads. Who know where she actually posted her ad, originally. I got a little hung up looking for EB results, as indicated in the original report. Sometimes a search can be too restrictive.

Regardless, the google search results showed the direct text "hostess with the most", and included her name and phone number. From there I search her phone number (or email if that is provided), and get all the results I want.

I hope I didn't sound like a hard ass; I didn't want to. Quite the opposite, I wanted to invite all of the newcomers to dive into and enjoy a wealth of knowledge and experience and to show great respect and appreciation for those that took the time to give it to all.

This place is the Star Wars droid of pu $$¥ info delivery systems. If I could paraphrase "Many mongers have been $ucked to bring you this information. ".

Like I said, it's all there for the taking.

And sorry for the typos.

[QUOTE=Satya;4049416]I think the heat would use better pictures than that, there are connoisseurs of thick women no doubt and ups to 'them, pics of thinner women would attract more and some of those fore mentioned. That is a rather special bait, no?[/QUOTE]Satya!

Long I have read your wisdom on these pages, guiding newer mongers such as myself. But never have I been more at odds with you than on this. Do you really mean to suggest that this specimen is not up to the standards of our fine friend LEO? And so, is special? Is to laugh!

Personally I find this "Nordic blonde" more than enticing enough, and my own research -- and newbies and hard asses alike should be doing this research as well -- reverse image searching her photos turns up nothing but the suggestion "selfie" and a number of other ads in regions easily reached from this one. However, her phone number turns up several names and photos that are not her. Based on prior experience and Spidey-sense, I'm betting this one is a real ad but not necessarily real pics. If she were closer, I might try to find out tonight.

Be safe all, and definitely lead with the homework. It's paid off for many thus far.

Finally made a visit to Kreme after a few weeks of not being able to successfully schedule. It was a fantastic time where it was $ for hh for "first time client. " I'm really glad I went and saw her and there were several things that impressed me despite the crappy low end motel.

-She looks better than her pictures, a small belly but her size is very nice.

-Tits were massive and looked fantastic.

-Ass is wonderfully firm and round, another fantastic site.

-Skin was clean, smooth, soft, and blemish free.

-Very sexy and CLEAN feet, always a delight to me and nice nails too.

-Not a trace of smoke anywhere.

-Very friendly and inviting, totally comfortable with her.

Now, I explored her body while we got acquainted and talked a bit. She doesn't do anal but did mention she has been warming up to trying. Her husband most likely has first crack at that I'd imagine, but she doesn't mind fingers in there so I helped myself. Pussy was impeccably clean, fresh, and pink. Her BBBJ skills are upper upper tier. Very sloppy with spit bubbles, deep throat and lots of wonderful sucking. As mentioned I would agree she defaults to not a lot of hand use, but once I encouraged her she performed well with both hands, tongue, and mouth. She also does a great job of mixing it up and at no time was it boring or uninspired cock sucking. I had to bend her over and fucked her doggy for a while which was great then flipped her over for mish. After a bit she pulled her legs up and held her legs with her hands and put her feet directly in my face where I absolutely lost it and exploded in the bag. I had no intention of finishing like that as I wanted to return to more oral servicing for her to perform, but those sexy feet crippled me.

We talked a bit and discussed future meeting arrangements and said good bye.

Other notes: Her phone did ring loudly once during but she ignored it. No assistance with clean up after so I helped myself with that. After the deed she did immediately start checking the phone. I will repeat.

Want to see candy young! Ain't trying to get jammed up'd! Looks to good to be true. Know it's hot out in that area. Don't see any reports on eb. I know this is a team sport. But I ain't trying to get knocked out,. By the knockers! Any intel?

[QUOTE=SymptomAddict;4051482]Satya!

Long I have read your wisdom on these pages, guiding newer mongers such as myself. But never have I been more at odds with you than on this. Do you really mean to suggest that this specimen is not up to the standards of our fine friend LEO? And so, is special? Is to laugh!

Personally I find this "Nordic blonde" more than enticing enough, and my own research -- and newbies and hard asses alike should be doing this research as well -- reverse image searching her photos turns up nothing but the suggestion "selfie" and a number of other ads in regions easily reached from this one. However, her phone number turns up several names and photos that are not her. Based on prior experience and Spidey-sense, I'm betting this one is a real ad but not necessarily real pics. If she were closer, I might try to find out tonight.

Be safe all, and definitely lead with the homework. It's paid off for many thus far.[/QUOTE]Thank you for that nice warm up before you took your shot.

I will restate my point for you. I do not believe the law would use those pictures, it is that simple. They use pictures of women who are more appealing to the greatest number of suckers. I can't see anyone using those pics but her. I mentioned to the monger that I thought she was safe to visit. Those who like heavier women are fine with me.

Haven't seen this one reviewed anywhere but exchanged texts and she sent some gorgeous pics over a couple weeks so I went for it and TOFTT. Saw Nikki a month ago or so. Very very hot sexy stripper body. Big breasts and super duper pretty like woah. Unfortunately we didn't connect very well. She did what she was supposed to but seemed like an energy was missing. Might have just been cause it was my first time with her. Seems like she's just going through the motions with a neutral to dispassionate attitude. Meh. Convenient downtown location.

Firm 100 ss.

YMMV.

[URL]https://escortindex.com/ad/baltimore/443-607-2777/3/1348302[/URL]