Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Thegentleman]I saw the "real Annie" twice awhile ago, along with others here, and myself and others here were indeed invited with a text to see the "new Annie", or whoever she is. So we have seen the old Annie and have been invited to see the new Annie. Can you clarify what you are saying or am I missing something?[/QUOTE]

Just saying that I don't think the "invitees" will be seeing the real Annie from EGG. If I'm wrong, I'll be the first to admit it but I will try to verify for sure this weekend...

This is the 2nd best news I've heard in a while (don't ask).
Your service/you were tops in Boston, honey!

A soon to be 2nd generation EGG customer,
J


[QUOTE=Geisha69]Hi everyone this is Chanelle and I have seen lately that people think EGG is back up and running here in Boston with Annie. In fact me and Annie have gone our separate ways and I have nothing to do with any services she has provided or in contacting you. Also the pictures she has used in her ads were from when she worked at EGG which is no more. I am taking a break right now and will open up again on august 22. I will let all of you know the new website and new telephone number as soon as everything is ready. Again I want to state that Any Services or Anything Annie has done does NOT REPRESENT ME. I look forward to see all of you lovely gentlemen this August. - Chanelle[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Geisha69]Hi everyone this is Chanelle and I have seen lately that people think EGG is back up and running here in Boston with Annie. In fact me and Annie have gone our separate ways and I have nothing to do with any services she has provided or in contacting you. Also the pictures she has used in her ads were from when she worked at EGG which is no more. I am taking a break right now and will open up again on august 22. I will let all of you know the new website and new telephone number as soon as everything is ready. Again I want to state that Any Services or Anything Annie has done does NOT REPRESENT ME. I look forward to see all of you lovely gentlemen this August. - Chanelle[/QUOTE]Just one question, how did the "new Annie" get many of our phone numbers in order to send out those baiting text messages last week? If it was you (who else could it be??), please use more discretion in the future. It makes me wary about how you may conduct business. If the source of the #s sharing wasn't you, and New Annie got that info thru serendipity, then I apologize.

Here's the new pics of Michelle I promised. I'm also supposed to be getting together with Kat and [i]another[/i] new girl today for a shoot. Kat's been busy recruiting to replace the girls that weren't working out.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]While I know there are fans of Royal Touch on this site I would like to add a couple points.

1.) Very few reviews here

2.) The VAST majority, including tonight's, reviews on The othEr boaRd, are bad.

I welcome input and flames![/QUOTE]


PW Herman,

I am not looking for trouble so I have not brought it up before but my understanding is that the Royal Touch photos are retouched. Stretch marks, belly bumps and some tattoos removed.

I know that HO Hunter and Kat are pushing the girls, which is admirable as business partners but at least represent the girls correctly. And Ho Hunter ----thinking that you are in some way blinding us to the fact that you have a part in running/recruiting for Royal Touch is laughable. Just tell it like it is - the board can deal with that.

[QUOTE=Nikonman61]PW Herman,

I am not looking for trouble so I have not brought it up before but my understanding is that the Royal Touch photos are retouched. Stretch marks, belly bumps and some tattoos removed.

I know that HO Hunter and Kat are pushing the girls, which is admirable as business partners but at least represent the girls correctly. And Ho Hunter ----thinking that you are in some way blinding us to the fact that you have a part in running/recruiting for Royal Touch is laughable. Just tell it like it is - the board can deal with that.[/QUOTE]Can't wait to see Ho Hunter's response.

I've seen two girls from RT. One (Jen) who is no longer there, and one (Sandy) who still is.

Both did not look like pictures. Both were significantly heavier now. Jen said that the picture was when she used to strip and her weight fluctuates a lot (which makes some sense given other variables). Jen, however, looked very good anyway and was a good overall experience (despite her need for a 'vacation').

[QUOTE=Nikonman61]PW Herman,

I am not looking for trouble so I have not brought it up before but my understanding is that the Royal Touch photos are retouched. Stretch marks, belly bumps and some tattoos removed.

I know that HO Hunter and Kat are pushing the girls, which is admirable as business partners but at least represent the girls correctly. And Ho Hunter ----thinking that you are in some way blinding us to the fact that you have a part in running/recruiting for Royal Touch is laughable. Just tell it like it is - the board can deal with that.[/QUOTE]

Where do I start, I suppose the photos are the best place.

Are the photos retouched? Yes and no. I don't do anything that couldn't be done with makeup. Other than blurring of faces obviously. Although I will remove tattoos if the girl requests it to preserve her anonymity. I certainly don't do anywhere near the kind of photoshop magic that I could, that would be unethical in advertising.

Do I have a part in recruiting? I suppose I do in a way. If I meet a cute young girl, I will give her one of Kat's business cards. But that is the extent of my involvement. If you want to call that recruiting, then I suppose I do.

Do I have a part in running the company? No. I handle all of their photography obviously, and I will assist with advertising ideas if asked for my opinion. But Kat is running the show. I do also provide transportation on occasion.

Other than that, Kat has become a very good friend of mine and we do spend time together socially. Which is why I don't often comment about her or Royal Touch. I feel (and I'm sure others would as well) that my opinions may be a bit biased when it comes to Kat and her girls.

Any other questions you have, please feel free to ask. If I can answer them I will. I'm sure Kat will be along later today to ad her input.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

If any of you who were with us before at EGG have questions about the whole Annie situation than you can email me at [blue][Email address deleted by Admin][/blue]. I will be happy to share with you.

[u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove email addresses in the text[/u]. Please do not post email addresses in the Forum. Instead, please invite other Forum Members to contact you directly via the Forum's Private Messaging system. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]While I know there are fans of Royal Touch on this site I would like to add a couple points.

1.) Very few reviews here

2.) The VAST majority, including tonight's, reviews on The othEr boaRd, are bad.

I welcome input and flames![/QUOTE]Ok guys, so here's my input from the peanut gallery. So I understand that some of your experiences have been less than desirable, and I do apologize for that. But as far as your opinions towards the girls, I will say this. I've always tried to be as honest as I can in picking out best girls to suit your needs. Obviously, I can't guarantee that it's always going to be exactly what you want. But you can't blame a girl for trying.

As far as the reviews go, you obviously have to take into consideration that sometimes the girls have a bad day, and sometimes their performance isn't what you're looking for. I admit that some of the reviews aren't the greatest, but I know that some have been good (I know mine have been anyway). All of the girls with "bad" reviews, have had several repeat clients. So keep in mind that YMMV often applies. So I hope that a few bad reviews won't deter you from still trying some of my other girls.

I always try to take into consideration all of your comments, and I do forward them to the girls. I have had to let girls go that simply weren't working out (ie Sandy), and I am always trying to find new girls.

As far as what girls do, or don't do, I can only go with what they tell me. For example, if a girl tells me she's GFE, I have no choice but to believe her until one of you tell me otherwise.

It really isn't easy to find young attractive girls, with the proper attitude, and performance to meet my (or your) standards. I can only give them a chance to prove themselves.

All in all, I hope that I can still count on all of your continued business. Thank you for all of the business that you have given me. I know a few of you have been regular clients for quite a while, and I do certainly appreciate it.

xoxo Kat oxox

[QUOTE=Nikonman61]PW Herman,

I am not looking for trouble so I have not brought it up before but my understanding is that the Royal Touch photos are retouched. Stretch marks, belly bumps and some tattoos removed.

I know that HO Hunter and Kat are pushing the girls, which is admirable as business partners but at least represent the girls correctly. And Ho Hunter ----thinking that you are in some way blinding us to the fact that you have a part in running / recruiting for Royal Touch is laughable. Just tell it like it is - the board can deal with that.[/QUOTE]Ho Hunter and I have become very close friends outside of our original business arrangement. He does help me out at times with a few things, but Royal Touch is my company.

xoxo Kat oxox

[QUOTE=Geisha69]If any of you who were with us before at EGG have questions about the whole Annie situation than you can email me at[/QUOTE]

Based on a PM I received from Chanelle I will admit (said I would) that there is a good chance I was wrong about "Annie". That said, also based on the PM I got, I will not be visiting Annie if what I was told is true (and, at this point, I can only assume it is so).

Would still be interesting if SOMEONE would/could see "Annie" just to finally verify...

Oh, what a tangled web we weave...

ND

Perhaps you can enlighten those not fortunate enough to have received a PM from the lovely Channelle

[QUOTE=Newday53].............if what I was told is true ................

ND[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]Perhaps you can enlighten those not fortunate enough to have received a PM from the lovely Channelle[/QUOTE]

As Jackson deleted Chanelle's email I would PM Chanelle...

Thanks for the obvious

Was hoping you would share your info with the Board, not just me.


[QUOTE=Newday53]As Jackson deleted Chanelle's email I would PM Chanelle...[/QUOTE]