Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=PhxMarker;4414182]Going crazy to look some of these names up![/QUOTE]Just look up her girls on them.

M.
Cona, Lucia, Nikki, Hannah................. WLA.
Lacey (she's back)............................................. PV
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lacey-escort-los-angeles-492495[/URL].

Sunny.
Glow, Lyn.......................... WLA.

Newtopasian.
Eden, Ruby, June, Min............. WLA.

Heidi. Available today.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4414552]Heidi. Available today.[/QUOTE]Does M have a website?

Heidi's pics look so fake. I would be surprised if M had a girl good looking like that.

Lacey never left LA, right?

When you say Nikki has a slim build, is she like a stick with no curves? How does she compare to Chanel's face and body?

I like to see some hip curves and some ass curves.

[QUOTE=AngelPena;4414576]Does M have a website?[/QUOTE]No Just find her girls on THEM.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;4414652]Heidi's pics look so fake. I would be surprised if M had a girl good looking like that.

Lacey never left LA, right?

When you say Nikki has a slim build, is she like a stick with no curves? How does she compare to Chanel's face and body?

I like to see some hip curves and some ass curves.[/QUOTE]Nikki isn't that slim, but slimish. She's heavier than Chanel, I would say 30-40% heavier but she's not thick or fat. Chanel's face is more rounder while Nikki is more oval shape. I think Chanel is better, but this is very subjective. Ass, I think Nikki's is far more meat. I don't remember the curves as I wasn't paying attention to that during the session.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4414241]Just look up her girls on them.[/QUOTE]"m" "them".

Hu's on first?!

[QUOTE=PhxMarker;4415018]"m" "them".

Hu's on first?![/QUOTE]I will explain since he didn't explain it thoroughly. M is the name of the booker, short for another name. You can look these girls up on eroticmonkey. Ch. You can search through their database for the girls mentioned here. So, you can look up the current girls working under the names Cona.

Lucia.

Nikki.

Hannah.

Lacey and you will have a contact number. Also mentioned before, even though you can find their profile, the booker is notoriously hard to get into for newbies. Some have gotten in.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4414699]Nikki isn't that slim, but slimish. She's heavier than Chanel, I would say 30-40% heavier but she's not thick or fat. Chanel's face is more rounder while Nikki is more oval shape. I think Chanel is better, but this is very subjective. Ass, I think Nikki's is far more meat. I don't remember the curves as I wasn't paying attention to that during the session.[/QUOTE]Fair enough.

Would you say Nikki's face is as cute as Cona's?

I mean Cona's face is plain, but I wouldn't kick her out of the bed.

Sasha is back with M in PV.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4414552]Heidi. Available today.[/QUOTE]Is heidi's pics for real? Looks so hot but fake.

Thanks for any info.

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4407380]January is a Booker who has girls out of in a DTLA location, I've used her service before, she's a very friendly Booker. They have a cute young Kgirl named Niki that just recently returned. I reviewed her here [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/ella-escort-los-angeles-464538-review-662943[/URL].[/QUOTE]Saw her the other day, and although cute I think it's different Niki? She said just arrived here for first time ever.

Serena. Starts today.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4415857]Serena. Starts today.[/QUOTE]Does M have an HX Handle? I would like to connect with her but looks like she wouldn't respond to new clients txts.

Less than 3 wks then she'll be off to NY.

If you want easy bb go check her out.

Avg in looks but 10 in performance and attitude.

After 6 months of being away, I'm finally coming back to LA.

I missed Megan by a hair, so I'm looking for someone who can deliver some good BBFSCIP.

I'm booked with Cona, but wanted your thoughts on a girl who's loves going hard.

Recommendations?

[QUOTE=LundonFrog;4416137]After 6 months of being away, I'm finally coming back to LA.

I missed Megan by a hair, so I'm looking for someone who can deliver some good BBFSCIP.

I'm booked with Cona, but wanted your thoughts on a girl who's loves going hard.

Recommendations?[/QUOTE]Don't miss Lucia.

[QUOTE=MayoKr;4415938]Does M have an HX Handle? I would like to connect with her but looks like she wouldn't respond to new clients txts.[/QUOTE]Just text the number and keep your fingers crossed.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4416236]Don't miss Lucia.[/QUOTE]Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.

[QUOTE=LundonFrog;4416317]Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.[/QUOTE]Having been with all three I can't even make that choice. Close your eyes and put a pin on a name and go for it. It's a great choice to have to make.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4411231]Exactly. Bet it wasn't your first time seeing her either right Hapa?[/QUOTE]Saw Amber 9 years ago in LA. I guess we're due for a reunion.

[QUOTE=Peter321;4409025]Will do thanks.[/QUOTE]You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.

[QUOTE=LundonFrog;4416317]Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.[/QUOTE]I would choose cona over lucia and sasha.

Cona is a veteran and she looks really hot. Sasha doesn't allow BBFS and her BBBJ hurts because she uses a lot of her teeth. Lucia is an easy BBFS but her face is just meh. If you want a spinner go for sasha or lucia because cona is a bit on the busty side. Overall for me I would go with cona because to me she looks the hottest and have the best body with top notch service but that's just my opinion.

40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.

[QUOTE=Seafor;4417112]You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.[/QUOTE]I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.

[QUOTE=Ddddd21;4417151]I would choose cona over lucia and sasha.

Cona is a veteran and she looks really hot. Sasha doesn't allow BBFS and her BBBJ hurts because she uses a lot of her teeth. Lucia is an easy BBFS but her face is just meh. If you want a spinner go for sasha or lucia because cona is a bit on the busty side. Overall for me I would go with cona because to me she looks the hottest and have the best body with top notch service but that's just my opinion.[/QUOTE]Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4417368]Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.[/QUOTE]I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.

Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.

[QUOTE=Seafor;4417112]You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.[/QUOTE]She is very moody and wonder what her standards to let guys in now and then.

[QUOTE=LundonFrog;4416317]Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.[/QUOTE]Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.

[QUOTE=Slideryyz;4417442]Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.[/QUOTE]Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.

At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.

[QUOTE=LundonFrog;4417467]Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.

At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.[/QUOTE]Yeah its thick in a good curvy way.

She loves getting eaten out. I made her cum like 3 times but beware she allows bbfscip so you might want to avoid giving her daty. She has droopy tits but her body to me is very sexy. I don't really like spinners.

[QUOTE=Kabah;4417396]I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.

Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.[/QUOTE]Honestly there was a bit of shyness at first glance at the door but with some heavy DFK and a good pussy eating to begin our time together she loosened up completely and was as sensual and sexual and as responsive and aggressive as anyone would want. Sometimes it's up to us to bring out the beast that lies beneath that shy and unassuming exterior.

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4417331]I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.[/QUOTE]Most girls are milfy and I can't think of anyone who is youngish that worked there except Diane which was fall of last year. I cannot think of anyone this week that I would like to see. I always wondered if it's worth to fly up north since that is the closest place with the best talent.

[QUOTE=SlimeBall626;4417162]40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.[/QUOTE]Assume BBFS as with standard M?

[QUOTE=SlimeBall626;4417162]40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.[/QUOTE]Damn. I guess she looks nothing like her pics. Is the face at least pretty? 160 pounds? A middleweight?

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4417331]I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.[/QUOTE]I think that is a grand overstatement. Some have hotter bodies. Some have hotter faces. Some have great skills even without BBFS. Sure beats some hot girl who won't give the time of day besides not giving BBFS. There is a happy medium there and M has found it. Her girls is what keeps this thread alive.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4417634]Most girls are milfy and I can't think of anyone who is youngish that worked there except Diane which was fall of last year. I cannot think of anyone this week that I would like to see. I always wondered if it's worth to fly up north since that is the closest place with the best talent.[/QUOTE]Instead of flying up north you may as well find a 400 to 500 girl here instead of paying the plane fare.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4417705]I think that is a grand overstatement. Some have hotter bodies. Some have hotter faces. Some have great skills even without BBFS. Sure beats some hot girl who won't give the time of day besides not giving BBFS. There is a happy medium there and M has found it. Her girls is what keeps this thread alive.[/QUOTE]This. I like my girls a bit curvier, so while a lot of people have been saying cona is thick or pudgy, to me she has the hottest k-girl body next to Alexa that I've ever had the pleasure of putting my penis inside. I've dealt with a lot of the agencies and many a k-girl; hands down M either hires the best actresses or they're the most consistently into the sex. Are some of her girls unattractive? Yeah. Not my type. But that doesn't mean that one isn't going to be catfished by other reputable agencies as well.

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4417331]I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.[/QUOTE]J's agency used to have bb girls. And they were among the hottest.

I got tired of trying the 2nd /3rd tier agencies, and I'm not willing to gamble to find out whether a hot young girl does bb.

If a $50 tip 99% guaranteed bb, I'd do it more often. But at $260 a pop, no thanks. Most girls end up giving plain mediocre service.

Plus, with so many fake photos being circulated by these lower tier agencies, I have no idea what the fuck I'll be fucking.