You'd be better off seeing.
[QUOTE=Ginzo666;6264031][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dd83496e-7537-45e0-a1f8-e186db9828aa[/URL]
Unfortunately, I had to decline her generous offer of a $400 MnG.[/QUOTE][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d698290d-8b12-4b27-af20-10de5600775d[/URL]
Slightly more coin and guaranteed.
Time and Coin Wasters on SB
Feel free to waste your time and coin on these profiles.
LeahHoney68.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/897615f5c2f96264[/URL]
Cc855 muscular female or trans.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/c2da8478e8c7c734[/URL]
KittyKate212.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/6c26df5d2b1f79e0[/URL]
Ashleyyyyyyyyi.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/1abc3cc16bd497ea[/URL]
AngelxBaby18 x.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/87774c35f24734e5[/URL]
What Is Up With These Broads!
"Met" both of these birds on SA:
Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.
Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.
These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.
Seeking is unlikely to improve until the job market weakens
[QUOTE=RockaBillyRiot;6270005]"Met" both of these birds on SA:
Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.
Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.
These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.[/QUOTE]As for simps: There have always been guys willing to pay exorbitant rates. But they are limited in number.
Our problem right now is not one of demand, but of supply.
When I started on Seeking in 2011, I was meeting recent UC grads who were working hourly jobs at Starbucks and Panera to make ends meet. Unsurprisingly, I was getting some very high-quality women at reasonable prices.
I was typically offering college girls $300 ppm and doing very well. I was sometimes able to go as low as $200.
Needless to say, some rejected those offers, but I was always able to go on to the next one. I *never* had to go much above $350.
This is a different environment. We now face a situation not where college grads are working at Starbucks, but where corporate employers are foregoing college degree requirements to get workers. One of my friend's daughters is a recent UC grad hauling down $90 K at P&G. She's not an idiot, but she's no valedictorian, either. About average. We aren't likely to see her on Seeking.
IMHO, the girl market is going to suck until the job market dips, or at least normalizesaside from the old women, the druggies, and the skanks.
I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's, and I've observed a clear trend: the hobby gets better in inverse proportion to the job market.
When unemployment is very low, the selection, quality, and pricing of girls in the hobby is worse. When the job market weakens, more women are willing to consider opportunities in male entertainment: not only as SBs, but also as escorts. In 2011, there were lots of good escorts, too.
The escort market is often a good indicator of how Seeking is going to go. Right now, most of the escorts available to us are pre-pandemic women, most of whom are older, and some of whom have been around since the early 2010's. There is no new crop of 21-32 year old escorts. As a result, the few girls who are young and conventionally attractive (refer to recent discussions about Tia Taylor and Tiffany Teigan) can practically double their rates.
Similarly, I've also noticed that the younger generation of college students and recent college grads is largely "missing" from Seeking. (You may have noticed that a disproportionate number of the women on Seeking nowadays are older.) The economic reality is that relatively few 23-year-olds are going to want to hook up with guys their dads' age for cash, when they can make $90 K at P&G. And if they *are* on Seeking, their expectations are *very* high.
I'm not saying you should stop looking. Just don't *expect much* when the unemployment rate is 3. 7%, as is currently the case. In 2011, a great year on Seeking and in the escort market, the unemployment rate was 8. 5%. Therein lies the difference.
I'm not interested in older women or skanks, and I don't want to pay $500 just to get a mid-level SB or escort. Nor do I want to spend 30 hours per week on Seeking, sorting through fake profiles. This is why I'm biding my time for now.
Post Christmas Surge 12-27-22
I am seeing lots a new profiles. Sadly, many of them appear to be scammer of one sort or another.
DesirableDuchess: more crypto-royalty? They are recycling names now? This Duchess lives in Atlanta, owns a clothing store and is originally from Russia. I speak Russian and she responded almost immediately with some copy-paste Cyrillic.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e31f0cb4-52bc-4fc5-85c8-0d572afff4fa[/URL]
Vaan90: Crypto-scammer. Had me fooled initially.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/19057b43-61f8-45f5-955a-a66f976e57a9[/URL]
InnocentMama: Online pic seller, taking me straight to snap. Ghosted quickly.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d5fd796d-d681-4892-a21f-7d369328d19c[/URL]
DesirableDuchess: Classic crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0c009515-d287-4efb-bdee-0976e06d59d1[/URL]
CuteSocialite: Classic crypto-scammer, a lazy one, will not last long. [URL]https://www.instagram.com/nargiza_kassenova/?hl=en[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/503a8c07-a0c4-4b64-8f50-72e60a355d17[/URL]
BAM