Going to be in the greater Los Angeles area in a couple weeks.
Any recommendations for GFE / PSE provider sites?
Printable View
Going to be in the greater Los Angeles area in a couple weeks.
Any recommendations for GFE / PSE provider sites?
DEf check out the LA board here. I was there last year. THere are a ton of providers and tons of websites. Downside is that all of them want a reference. I've never tried it, but look into getting those believable IDs that people were discussing here few months ago. Out of like 10 bookers I have messaged, they all wanted references. Thank God one of them was willing to contact the GSL booker at the time as a reference.
[QUOTE=Mrzow;6151379]Going to be in the greater Los Angeles area in a couple weeks.
Any recommendations for GFE / PSE provider sites?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PurpleMist;6151123]Did Haru offer the BBFS for extra or did you ask for it? My experience with Lollipop is they don't do BBFS. Or is that YMMV with the girls you see?[/QUOTE]I had to ask for it as she was about to put on the bag. My impression is that it's an off-menu option and YMMV depending on girl if they've done it in the past for other agencies. I saw based on previous TER reviews that she does BBFS so I went for it. Lollipop probably discourages their girls to do it to keep them clean but at the end of the day $ talks.
[QUOTE=Ultimate90;6151798]DEf check out the LA board here. I was there last year. THere are a ton of providers and tons of websites. Downside is that all of them want a reference. I've never tried it, but look into getting those believable IDs that people were discussing here few months ago. Out of like 10 bookers I have messaged, they all wanted references. Thank God one of them was willing to contact the GSL booker at the time as a reference.[/QUOTE]The 2 agencies here do not provide references or take them.
[QUOTE=Ultimate90;6151798]DEf check out the LA board here. I was there last year. THere are a ton of providers and tons of websites. Downside is that all of them want a reference. I've never tried it, but look into getting those believable IDs that people were discussing here few months ago. Out of like 10 bookers I have messaged, they all wanted references. Thank God one of them was willing to contact the GSL booker at the time as a reference.[/QUOTE]Just realize I could have went to the LA board, so thanks for the heads up on references etc.
If you want to see my texts with bookers asking for references, and then accepting me, DM me. Maybe this was with the old GSL booker, DM me regardless for proof if you would like to see.
[QUOTE=Acura8888;6152024]The 2 agencies here do not provide references or take them.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tigger6969;6151216]I tried to see Dana for another session, but as Tiger Balm pointed out, she left early. I ended up seeing Haru and was not disappointed.
I have not seen Bree, Gold, Reah or Alina so I can not provide comparisons. As Haru's TER reviews highlight, expect a passionate session with plenty of DFK with someone who enjoys sex. We clicked and Haru had a body shaking orgasm during 69. She is tight, attractive, provides a talented BBBJ, and a sweet personality.[/QUOTE]How would you compare Haru vs Dana?
In from NYC today and already at it. She is really cute. My kind of cute. Photo's are fairly accurate but touched up. Nice slim figure with good proportions. Soft round butt. She is petite, stands around 5'0". Those that were a fan of KA's fairly recent Apple will like her. Her demeanor is a little stand-offish but when the main event starts, she got into it. LFK with occasional tongue. Good BJ but doesn't take it too deep. She has somewhat of an innie down below. Shaved with stubble today. Her English is decent, so communication was easy enough. I'm already a fan and thinking about another visit. Treat her well.
[QUOTE=Boowoo;6152295]How would you compare Haru vs Dana?[/QUOTE]Both Haru and Dana had excellent service. From my experience: Dana liked to work up to the action with kissing and then foreplay. Haru goes quickly into foreplay (BJ /69) and moved in the action fairly quickly. Dana does more DT but Haru has more suction for BJ. Dana is petite with a tighter box. Haru has curvier hips/butt and bigger bust. Haru might have somewhat of a tan but it was hard to tell due to dark lighting. Both can take it hard. Dana has more of a sexy / sultry look but Haru has more of a pretty / kgirl look. I think both are great, but personally, Dana edges out Haru for me because Dana manufactured better chemistry with her GFE way of doing things.
[QUOTE=AvereageQ;6152967]Both Haru and Dana had excellent service. From my experience: Dana liked to work up to the action with kissing and then foreplay. Haru goes quickly into foreplay (BJ /69) and moved in the action fairly quickly. Dana does more DT but Haru has more suction for BJ. Dana is petite with a tighter box. Haru has curvier hips/butt and bigger bust. Haru might have somewhat of a tan but it was hard to tell due to dark lighting. Both can take it hard. Dana has more of a sexy / sultry look but Haru has more of a pretty / kgirl look. I think both are great, but personally, Dana edges out Haru for me because Dana manufactured better chemistry with her GFE way of doing things.[/QUOTE]I agree with AvereageQ. I'm a big Dana fan. There's a reason why she has over 150 favorable reviews in Southern California on TER (under her 361139 I'd, not the 373341 I'd). [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/dana-3102638948-361139[/URL].
To me, Dana is a more attractive version of the porn star Rae little Black. She is petite (5 feet), slim, patient with you (I pop twice every time we met up), tight, passionate and has a great attitude. I was sad about her early departure and hope she returns again.
I was really tempted to see Dana when she was active in our town. If she returns to Washington as a GFE / CFS only provider, I will see her. Until then, however, I prefer beautiful lve, Ravi, Suzie, Mijoo-Ella, Chloe-Bora, Addison, Amanda, even pre-MILF Gloria than Dana.
[QUOTE=Tigger6969;6152972]I agree with AvereageQ. I'm a big Dana fan. There's a reason why she has over 150 favorable reviews in Southern California on TER (under her 361139 I'd, not the 373341 I'd). [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/dana-3102638948-361139[/URL].
To me, Dana is a more attractive version of the porn star Rae little Black. She is petite (5 feet), slim, patient with you (I pop twice every time we met up), tight, passionate and has a great attitude. I was sad about her early departure and hope she returns again.[/QUOTE]
Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?
Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.
Thanks!
The South Bay Area (LA, CA): Pepper-Sonay.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sonay[/URL]
The Bay Area (SF / SJ, CA): Glamorous Ravi.
[URL]https://top-kgirls.com/ravi[/URL]
[QUOTE=MitchCor;6153465]Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?
Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.
Thanks![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MitchCor;6153465]Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?
Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.
Thanks![/QUOTE]You don't need to travel that far, just head up to Vancouver BC, its has an insane amount of sex providers without the odds of being in a police bust.
[QUOTE=MitchCor;6153465]Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?
Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.
Thanks![/QUOTE]It's been a long, long time (late 90's) since I saw any escorts in the San Jose area, but maybe this link will help:
[URL]https://bayareakoreangirls.com/bay-area-korean-girls-south-bay/[/URL]