Printable View
[QUOTE=Francescoo;5850029]Usually they say. But these girls aren't.[/QUOTE]The Romanian girl looks very good but I doubt that she could be the real deal. I have been to Romania and she does resemble a Romanian girl that you could see in FKK club, so I am debating this one for now.
FYI, while she does not advertise BB, most Romanian girls in Europe are BB in FKK places.
If you are looking for them (and I will say the pictures are actual pictures, based on actually seeing them). You can get them for much cheaper.
$120 for a half hour.
If you know where to look you will recognize the girls from other agencies. Can't believe the upcharge I am seeing (300 for a half hour) sheeeeeesh.
Pm me. I'm more than happy to share info but please offer something decent in return.
Loved Bree's energy and wanton panting and moaning which reminded me of JAV star Nao Jingugi. Very willing and playful. Pics are different from the ones she used in the bay but she very much resembles them (no catfish).
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5849431]Thank you for the accurate review, and likewise to Bastard Chorum for the review of Zoe. Both Bree & Zoe are USDA Prime to me. Bree looked happy to see me and I was in ecstasy with Bree.
She was the only girl this year who made me feel young again. I suppressed my desire to rec her in HYA thread cause it's bad luck for a girl if I am the first to review LOL.
Bree's contact: [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%B8%8C%EB%A6%AC](click here)[/URL] 5'3" 34 C 115 lbs.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5849276]53 girls available today and 13 more available next 3 days. Booker is good and that's why they book many girls. There are rebrands but only duplicate ads may be Aria = Vixen.
CGLA booker is the best at keeping the site updated. I like knowing when the girls are back so I can plan to see them. It would be more surprising to me if this booker has multiple ads for the same girl. Last time I raised that suspicion in this thread, the duplicate ad was gone the next day.
Easy for me to keep track because I know who I want to see. Booker is honest enough for me.[/QUOTE]Seen them both, they are not the same girl. This booker does not run dual ads
[QUOTE=Ramboy9;5850060]If you are looking for them (and I will say the pictures are actual pictures, based on actually seeing them). You can get them for much cheaper.
$120 for a half hour.
If you know where to look you will recognize the girls from other agencies. Can't believe the upcharge I am seeing (300 for a half hour) sheeeeeesh.
Pm me. I'm more than happy to share info but please offer something decent in return.[/QUOTE]Is it the Chinese agency that starts with 626-233-xxxx? If I am wrong, do you mind PMing the digits? Thanks mate.
[QUOTE=Ramboy9;5850060]If you are looking for them (and I will say the pictures are actual pictures, based on actually seeing them). You can get them for much cheaper.
$120 for a half hour.
If you know where to look you will recognize the girls from other agencies. Can't believe the upcharge I am seeing (300 for a half hour) sheeeeeesh.
Pm me. I'm more than happy to share info but please offer something decent in return.[/QUOTE]The one thing I do not like recently about Candy Girl is the pricing recently. They have too many girls at their highest rate (420, 440, or 450) and the quality is just absolutely not there, and then the girls disappear / change names quickly. I used to take their pricing as a signal of how hot the girl is. After numerous subpar experiences, it is starting to feel like a cash grab. Now the pricing is not a signal of how hot the girl is or how good the service is. They still have hot girls but it will cost you about $2200 (at about 20% hit rate) to find one good enough to repeat with if you TOFTT or blindly follow first week hype reviews which are becoming way too common. Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb.
[QUOTE=Ramen25;5849557]Yes looks like CGLA is bringing some international flavor to their roster (Romanian / Columbian).
Just curious, anyone have prior experience with these Amazonian women LOL? (Listed at 5'7" / 5'10").[/QUOTE]I will need to bring my own step stool to be able to doggy these Amazonians.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5849626]or the real face on a superimposed photoshopped body with rare exceptions.
This protects the girls anonymity and enhances their market appeal.[/QUOTE]I'll say that that a real face with a fake PSd body does not increase the girls anonymity, but rather decreases it. Face recognition works. Body recognition doesn't as long as tats and excessive metal are psd out.
A fake face with a real body would actually increase anonymity. But of course, orgs / girls are more interested in selling some fake body than the truth.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5847568]This. It's the hyperbole for me. If one follows this board as much as I do -which is to say way too fkn much- one should know who's suspect for lacking objectivity. And they'll recognize how quick some will counterbalance a review that reads anything less than a strong recommendation. And in those cases, it's always the guy's fault for a poor session, never the girl. It's where 'YMMV' becomes weaponized ad nauseam.
It speaks volumes when one can predict how hyperbolic a review's conclusion will be by who the author is. "As good as it gets. " "Can't ask for more. " "You will get all you want and probably more than you expected. " "Can't be beat. " Are just a few random examples that sound awfully like that damn My Pillow Guy.
But who am I to talk. My writing approach always applies alliteration, like some horn dog high schooler in a creative writing class.[/QUOTE]I prefer to approach it from another side.
I simply ask myself whether there are any conflict of interest, double standards or uneven distribution of a reviewer's profile.
Can someone post an objective review if all their reviews are positive? Answer is no.
Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they deal with her OTC? Answer is no.
Can someone post an objective review of a girl if they are OK with excessive praise but not OK with excessively negative review? Answer is no, it's a double standard.
In your case, ask yourself if people using excessive hyperboles for glowing reviews do the same for negative reviews, if they even have any. If the answer is no, then they aren't putting anything even close to objective reviews. If any wet hole of Korean origin constitutes an amazing experience, what are reviews even about?
An objective review doesn't hold back. In an objective and honest review, one doesn't need to think about "being too harsh" or worry about any consequences of the review on girls or bookers business. As long as it's honest, it really doesn't matter what happens to the girl or business. An objective review is as easily written about a bad product as about a good product.
Just my two cents.
[QUOTE=GardenBae;5850013]Correct me if I'm wrong. Saw two of them on the site (one Romanian and the other Colombian). Anyone know if their BB?[/QUOTE]I just got a confirmation so I won't waste my time.
[QUOTE=SharingHer;5850227] The one thing I do not like recently about Candy Girl is the pricing recently. They have too many girls at their highest rate (420, 440, or 450) and the quality is just absolutely not there, and then the girls disappear / change names quickly. I used to take their pricing as a signal of how hot the girl is. After numerous subpar experiences, it is starting to feel like a cash grab. Now the pricing is not a signal of how hot the girl is or how good the service is. They still have hot girls but it will cost you about $2200 (at about 20% hit rate) to find one good enough to repeat with if you TOFTT or blindly follow first week hype reviews which are becoming way too common. Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb.[/QUOTE]My sentiment exactly. You wrote: "Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb."
Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5850375]If any wet hole of Korean origin constitutes an amazing experience, what are reviews even about?[/QUOTE]Agreed. Which goes back to your earlier comment about reviews that say "go buy. " To call them “reviews” is far less accurate than to call them infomercials with a paid actor.
Deflecting blame through questions like, "Why do you read them then," or "Why not just ignore" are convenient ways to absolve themselves from taking responsibility for what they write.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5850509]My sentiment exactly. You wrote: "Extremely nice booker, but the quality of the girls is getting poorer, with them pushing rising prices even with diluted product. Feels like a cash grab and they might think I am dumb."
Fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me.[/QUOTE]It's more like fool me twenty times, shame on me. And now that I have discovered their 440 or 450 girls are absolutely not worth it for the most part, I am less likely to even try the 420 girls, since I now assume they must be horrible if they do not get the 440 pricing. Also at the 420+ range, it is less cool to me to use blatantly fake pictures. Just blur the face at this range. There are pics of 440 and 450 girls that completely misrepresent their body type and age. Anyways, despite wanting to support this booker, I have been seeing a lot more of the PKL girls and the KTE girls who get the Baby name. Now I'll pretty much just wait until there is a proven star like Sweet to see a 420+ Candygirl.
Anyone here that is a long time viagra / sidenafill user? Has it affected your vision at all? I have been using it on and off for the last year and I feel my vision is getting worse at a fast rate.
[QUOTE=SharingHer;5850635]It's more like fool me twenty times, shame on me. And now that I have discovered their 440 or 450 girls are absolutely not worth it for the most part, I am less likely to even try the 420 girls, since I now assume they must be horrible if they do not get the 440 pricing. Also at the 420+ range, it is less cool to me to use blatantly fake pictures. Just blur the face at this range. There are pics of 440 and 450 girls that completely misrepresent their body type and age. Anyways, despite wanting to support this booker, I have been seeing a lot more of the PKL girls and the KTE girls who get the Baby name. Now I'll pretty much just wait until there is a proven star like Sweet to see a 420+ Candygirl.[/QUOTE]It keeps my dick happy, that's all the matters.