-
[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5846016]No sir. There have been many very positive reviews I've read here which recounted amazing sessions with providers that didn't seem over the top, even pertaining to providers whom I've fucked myself and didn't have comparable results. That's to be expected, as we all have different personalities and preferences etc. YMMV and all that. No, the over the top thing is kinda like the difference between a mediocre painting and a good painting: not easy to explain but you know it when you see it. (Well at least I do).[/QUOTE]One man's house painter is another's Michelangelo. Just got to give them the tools, desire and inspiration to work with.
-
SFK Lucy 411
Anyone have a go at her yet?
-
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5846022]Don't worry, I seldom speak for others, but I think people know exactly what you're talking about. I certainly do.[/QUOTE]And at least they know you're reading their reviews. Mission accomplished.
-
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5845936]I want to start of by saying LAV is my favorite agency. The booker is very responsive and personable.
I TOFTT because of LAV's phenomenal track record for picking girls. Eunji, Remi and Nicole with Allie thrown in, could be my rotation. I had some good experiences with a couple of upcharge girls. For me the main differences are that the upcharge girls I've seen are a little bigger, but none of them engage as well as the good flat rate girls.
LAV / PKL is usually pretty good with P.S. Pictures of the actual girls, but Saige's pictures don't have any thing to do with the actual woman. I put Saige into her late 30's or early 40's. She is pretty good looking, but has a bit of snagletooth going on. She's another shorty, maybe sub five feet. Her boobs were soft, large B's. She had a shapely ass and firm legs.
She gave an intensive extended bedside BBBJ. I had to pull her off because I thought there was a chance I might pop. While groping her when she stood up she put me in for a bit, the pushed me back on the bed and got on for CG. After that I got her out to the edge of the bed for DATY, which she really got into. During that, and the standing MISH that followed, she spent much of the time rubbing her clit. I then told her to put her head on the pillow and went at various MISH positions. When I got tired and laid back, she got between my legs and gave more extended BBBJ. I figured I better go for the gusto before I ran out of energy and put out her back in MISH for the sticky-icky..[/QUOTE]Well the good news is that's she's a service queen. The bad news? Don't think there is any. I saw her when I visited Nicole and yes she is good looking with a good body but she can't be anywhere near late thirties or early forties. I know we all see things from our own perspective but I've been in the hobby for a long time and most of the girls are late twenties to early thirties with a few exceptions whose names I won't disclose and Saige is certainly in that category. There isn't much difference between late twenties and early thirties so if that age category is in your wheelhouse she certainly deserves a visit. I made up my mind to see her based on what I saw.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL]
-
Excellent Review.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5845805]Side note: On this particular morning, the line-up of dudes outside the callbox was redics. Myself included, each one of us looking shady af and seedier than the next. We legit looked like all the bad guys from Robocop.[/QUOTE]Excellent review! I like the self - depreciation and references to 80's stuff, especially the one about the assholes from Robocop. I was so happy when Alex Murphy stabbed Clarence Boddicker in the neck with his data spike.
Anyway, the part about eating out Hana and getting a face full of her pussy juice was also great.
Thank you for the intel.
-
Tuesday March 29
M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL].
[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Lucy, Dana, Tiana.
[URL]https://kbliss.net/[/URL] Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.
-
[QUOTE=NObserver;5845829]She's pretty old. Might be around 45+. When she started in LA last year, she had tremendous breasts: round, bloated and veiny. Unfortunately, she went on a massive diet and shrunk them down a few cup sizes -- from DD to C+.
Her pussy remains shallow, however. Once you get her worked up, she will let you go full bore on her snatch. Her preference is to control the amount of penetration through CG.
She's around 4'10, 90 lbs. She's not beautiful, but I find her attractive for her age.
On top of that, she's pretty friendly and willing to let you guide the action.
Ps - Her BBBJ is horrible.[/QUOTE]Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.
-
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846023]One man's house painter is another's Michelangelo. Just got to give them the tools, desire and inspiration to work with.[/QUOTE]One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.
-
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5847099]Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.[/QUOTE]I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.
-
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846281]And at least they know you're reading their reviews. Mission accomplished.[/QUOTE]Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.
Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.
I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".
Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.
Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.
Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.
How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.
How tight is she. How are her Kegels.
How good is she in services skills-wise. Does she has stamina to ride in acg long? Does she provide a deep BJ, does she dt, does she bls, does she rim.
How's her attitude, is she a porn actress, a shy collegemate, a goof fob or a dead fish with gps.
If she's BBFS, how's cip and msog. She allow FIA or DATY / O. Is she a clock watcher or a staller.
Each of these provide very specific information that can be used to make an evaluation of whether a girl is worth seeing.
Many over-the-top reviews, not all. But at least a majority. Sound more like pump-and-dump hype to me then actual attempts at objective evaluation. Again, not all. There are some super verbose over the top reviews that are exceptionally detailed and describe the girl to a tee, including specific tats and real age and her filling on her 29th tooth. Those are excellent. It's like reading a good Balzac novel. But I believe Mr Sexorcist wasn't talking about those, but rather about, well, IYKYK.
-
Nicole
[QUOTE=SharingHer;5847273]I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.[/QUOTE]I agree too. Saw Nicole recently. Cute face and hot body! Loved her big veiny boobs with big nipples! I liked her BBBJ too. Appreciated that she took time and effort to take me deeper and deeper into her mouth and throat. Not full on DT but she sure tries.
-
[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5847168]One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.[/QUOTE]That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.
-
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5847304]Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.
Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.
I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".
Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.
Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.
Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.
How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.
How tight is she. How are her Kegels.[/QUOTE]Why do you think we write reviews? To be read which would be more appropriate on a Korean agency BB discussion board than your verbose response.
-
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5847469]That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.[/QUOTE]Exactly! Why buy a used car from a dealer who is "possibly" selling you a lemon when you can eschew the guesswork and seek a more earnest and trustworthy purveyor of automotive transportation? Glad we can resolve this exchange in agreement. Good day.
-
Saige
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846547]M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL].
[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Lucy, Dana, Tiana.
[URL]https://kbliss.net/[/URL] Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.[/QUOTE]Looking forward to reading feedback on Paige. I won't TOFTT but may be an early adopter with a good review from a trusted handle.