Sugarbabies?

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6235339]I have yet to see a report where someone has actually had a meet with her. This is her third or fourth profile in about six months. Anyone have any Intel other than she works at Cheeks?[/QUOTE]No other than when I asked earlier a senior reached out to me and said she was good to go. Just FYI. Always be aware even if a senior says good. YMMV.

[QUOTE=Weekender69;6233909]So sorry, my report is for seductive red head, not princess navi. I have not met with princess navi. I must have clicked on her link by mistake and I didn't think my original post went through is why there is two. If I could delete my navi post I would. Sorry for the confusion.[/QUOTE]Newbie,

There is a problem with your explanation. As I said in my reply to you, you didn't have a link in your post. Also, you actually wrote " Princess Navi " in the subject line of your second post.

TP.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6277b6f-fffe-4a1f-85fd-710b2431fe00[/URL]

This one looks familiar. I recall seeing her around Hyde Park back in 2015 ish. Can someone confirm that she's the same one?

If yes, she's put on good weight. Much needed I guess. In 2015 ish, she was a heavy user and had lost a lot of weight. That's why I never looked back and didn't repeat.

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;6235450]Newbie,

There is a problem with your explanation. As I said in my reply to you, you didn't have a link in your post. Also, you actually wrote " Princess Navi " in the subject line of your second post.

TP.[/QUOTE]Listen cut a guy a break, both posts were next to each other. I actually thought princess navi was seductiveredhead bc I read both earlier and just got mixed up thinking seductiveredhead had a new name (as a lot do). Then I saw bams reply and had to go back and check myself. And as you so kindly pointed out that I did not include a link because if I had I would have realized they were different. Just to clarify I saw seductiveredhead (see my post / s below) I know nothing about princess navi. I will try better next time. I appreciate ya'll.

Weekender69.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6235217]Profile picture, age, marital status oozes scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3ee9b011-6dba-470b-9444-c9b14d2003f3[/URL][/QUOTE]I have her on my scammer list too! That picture contains some Cyrillic writing (on the sidewalk) which suggest it was taken in Eastern Europe. The super wide street is very reminiscent of Moscow.

BAM.

Yes, she's an established stripper and I don't deal with them. Ever! Its just not worth it unless you are super rich and are ok to squander $$ bills with not much in return. Strippers have a very different mindset and having sex with a client and given 'them' pleasure is NOT on the list of priorities for them. Their priority is to 'EXPLOIT' every penny out of you they can. My 2 cents on this. Which should be common wisdom on this platform that's full of informed and high IQ people I am sure.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6235219]That's the cheeks locker room in one of her profile photos FYI if you want to drop in and see her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6235685][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6277b6f-fffe-4a1f-85fd-710b2431fe00[/URL]

This one looks familiar. I recall seeing her around Hyde Park back in 2015 ish. Can someone confirm that she's the same one?

If yes, she's put on good weight. Much needed I guess. In 2015 ish, she was a heavy user and had lost a lot of weight. That's why I never looked back and didn't repeat.[/QUOTE]I also believe I recognize the pictures. I almost saw her back in that period but backed off when the drug reports surfaced. She is cute but not for me.

BAM.

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6235708]Yes, she's an established stripper and I don't deal with them. Ever! Its just not worth it unless you are super rich and are ok to squander $$ bills with not much in return. Strippers have a very different mindset and having sex with a client and given 'them' pleasure is NOT on the list of priorities for them. Their priority is to 'EXPLOIT' every penny out of you they can. My 2 cents on this. Which should be common wisdom on this platform that's full of informed and high IQ people I am sure.[/QUOTE]I would add to your exclusion list female bartenders for much the same reasons. They are used to being hit on by intoxicated males which leaves them jaded about men in general. They also are in the business of milking every situation for tips.

BAM.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ae202046-cb3c-4775-a0c6-847876c48760[/URL]

And on SB as MsMina-438.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/89889fba0fba1759[/URL]

Anyone have any info?

Haven't been able to get her off of the site messaging.

No, she hasn't replied to me either.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/73917997-6fac-4264-9c83-b73207f71e2c[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc8b3322-a3b1-478c-9609-9344863287c7[/URL]

These two are a total waste of time. I am guessing noobie Rinsers. They both have their typical sob stories lined up. One is struggling with Mom's job loss and the other one is short of money that you must send or else she will be evicted etc.

Happy bowling!

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;6237752][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ae202046-cb3c-4775-a0c6-847876c48760[/URL]

And on SB as MsMina-438.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/89889fba0fba1759[/URL]

Anyone have any info?

Haven't been able to get her off of the site messaging.[/QUOTE]

I think I remember her previous profile was throatgoat or throatqueen and she was discussed here but can't find it. She worth meeting? Wants to do a car date.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0006c1c2-ca64-4128-9561-e1724d7ca5f8[/URL]

I'm not a fan of car dates, but throat goat is an appropriate name for her! What's the damage for the car?

[QUOTE=HotLcndyt;6238588]I think I remember her previous profile was throatgoat or throatqueen and she was discussed here but can't find it. She worth meeting? Wants to do a car date.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0006c1c2-ca64-4128-9561-e1724d7ca5f8[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FeloniousMonks;6238763]I'm not a fan of car dates, but throat goat is an appropriate name for her! What's the damage for the car?[/QUOTE]Are you saying you've experienced her throat?? She quoted 125.

[QUOTE=HotLcndyt;6238588]I think I remember her previous profile was throatgoat or throatqueen and she was discussed here but can't find it. She worth meeting? Wants to do a car date.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0006c1c2-ca64-4128-9561-e1724d7ca5f8[/URL][/QUOTE]Head skills above average, but not world class. She has some weird PTSD shit where she covers her face during mish. She's NOT having a good time with that. She's cute, but nothing special. Pass IMO.

At $$ for FS. Lives on the westside.

[QUOTE=HotLcndyt;6238876]Are you saying you've experienced her throat?? She quoted 125.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/89356671-7165-4067-be27-f88a683d6537[/URL]

Apparently wanted to meet today. And chatted on snap. When I asked for a call. Phone isn't working. Sure! I dig that. NOT!

Beware!

[QUOTE=FeloniousMonks;6239023]At $$ for FS. Lives on the westside.[/QUOTE]She's nice, not worth it though. Maybe if she were less or if I just got the head. I was feeling spicy (as usual) and gave her 300, because she had her own place and I wanted to creampie that young pussy. She said she'd buy her own Plan B, so I didn't. She wanted me to hit it from the back but I told her I had to see my dick working on her. Paid her on her back, she covered her face, and I drove in deep and emptied. Felt great, truly. But I wouldn't do it again.

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6237881]No, she hasn't replied to me either.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/73917997-6fac-4264-9c83-b73207f71e2c[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc8b3322-a3b1-478c-9609-9344863287c7[/URL]

These two are a total waste of time. I am guessing noobie Rinsers. They both have their typical sob stories lined up. One is struggling with Mom's job loss and the other one is short of money that you must send or else she will be evicted etc.

Happy bowling![/QUOTE]Yep, the 1st one replied to my 1st message with "I'm so stressed out" that's the instablock for me.

Asked about this one a while back as she seems to orbit Cincy, Lex & Louisville.

She'll respond to PMs, just have never gotten anywhere with her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1...f-12e2c5540b52[/URL]

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...c9d9878ea221dc[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=70316894[/URL]

Ace0086 : [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4dc22636-3c3a-4ed0-9cf1-94cd9119df52[/URL] . Super waste of time. Never closes communication, prolongs hope, but never talks (FC is not even a remote possibility).

SweetGirl - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cae63c6a-ddb6-40ce-b29b-9cae0dac6d55[/URL] (is broke, hungry and tries to sell videos. Who knows what's true or not).

Renee: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5ee23d9f-6791-465d-9488-12e633fac2a3[/URL].

MissPhD: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/079421c5-ada2-474e-bb9b-55536cfbba2b[/URL] (massive ego perhaps. Even tho she's dealing with other PhDs here likely LOL).

Havefunwkay [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2c4d6420-6002-4b48-9dd3-3a30884b8b39[/URL] (mostly on platform for self validation it seems).

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6243047]Ace0086 : [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4dc22636-3c3a-4ed0-9cf1-94cd9119df52[/URL] . Super waste of time. Never closes communication, prolongs hope, but never talks (FC is not even a remote possibility).

Renee: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5ee23d9f-6791-465d-9488-12e633fac2a3[/URL].[/QUOTE]Ace is actually a scammer who plays a long con. She hit me up out of the blue for like $35 to buy "baby formula. " BLOCKED.

Renee lives way out in the boonies (like 2 hours away) and wanted to meet halfway. No thanks.

I apologize for the length. I was traveling and unable to log on for the last week or so. I suspect more than a few of these are already gone but I am too lazy to sort through them after I capture them on my list.

GorgeousSocialite: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/25e249b5-ae4e-48aa-a9f5-904822d6772f[/URL]


SharpHottie: Classic but lazy crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/78de8ac7-3f81-47fc-b011-74a96d6ad8bd[/URL]


Clever90: Three scammers in a row!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/69cb5d69-4e1b-4bcd-b230-15a1776ddab2[/URL]


PhotogenicActress: Another classic crypto-scammer! Two in a row!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cb62fdea-ef68-4fb6-8348-8a8dedc9e9e5[/URL]


EducatedSiren: Age pic-mismatch, TGTBT, Crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2cf13f93-18e2-4427-b86c-e116e145b3a7[/URL]


WiseSeductress: also witty actress?? Classic Crypto-scammer, No True Love?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/24e276d1-a004-4cb4-b295-af01f54a7686[/URL]


Sweetie: taking me straight to SC, stolen pic.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/89356671-7165-4067-be27-f88a683d6537[/URL]


BrilliantDancer: Three!, Three crypto-scammers in a row.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0b844e32-3f2d-4a96-97b8-021ab6f6a540[/URL]


BraveSocialite: Another crypto-scammer! That's three in a row within an hour of each other. Pics of Dove Cameron?.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6414505b-ae99-4510-8757-a46278b2b574[/URL]


FriendlyDiva: Posted almost immediately after Loving Dame and both appear to be classic crypto-scammers. Are they traveling in pairs now?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/74e4f49d-f30d-482b-91d9-f1c54b77c148[/URL]


LovingDame: Classic Crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4cb87b92-1347-48a0-a074-1f747b1ea922[/URL]


Softluvr: Odd profile, hot pics, since 4-21 but first appeared in Dayton / Cinti recently. Now shows location as Pittsburgh, says OSU for college. Turned down a MnG.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd360ae0-fc27-4537-a3a2-091acfad21d4[/URL]


Wressd: Crypto-scammer, fuzzy pic somewhere in Eastern Europe, terse.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3ee9b011-6dba-470b-9444-c9b14d2003f3[/URL]


TraveledDiva: Confirmed crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0c4f51fb-9c26-4f93-b68f-521fee0a131d[/URL]


BAM.

I have joined seeking in the past by paying with a one time purchase visa vanilla card which has no activation fee or I'd requirement.

I bought similar card to join secret benefits but the card didn't work. In correspondence with SB, they seemed to indicate that a credit card needed to be accepted internationally and not limited to USA.

I can't find any card like that.

For those that have successfully joined, what card do you use?

Thanks.

[QUOTE=Kc148;6245346]I have joined seeking in the past by paying with a one time purchase visa vanilla card which has no activation fee or I'd requirement.

I bought similar card to join secret benefits but the card didn't work. In correspondence with SB, they seemed to indicate that a credit card needed to be accepted internationally and not limited to USA.

I can't find any card like that.

For those that have successfully joined, what card do you use?

Thanks.[/QUOTE]Secret Benefits is credit based messaging system too but the CTC is a flat credit amount. Number of conversations you can have is based on the number of credits you buy. Everything is an upsell on SB. Charges to start a conversation. Charge to see private pics. Charge to see message read receipts. Charge to send pics thru message system. Credits are burned up very fast. And while there is not direct proof many conversations have been had on this site in other forums covering SB use of bots and / or fake accounts to entice purchases.

Also see post #6643 in this section.

Your call of course. Good luck.

Anyone have any dealings with this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9e7ed38e-c11d-4e6e-9490-19adf869e11a[/URL]

I texted her a few times prior to tgiving. She wanted half up front. I immediately ghosted at that point.

But she would occasionally text me "how are you doing" a couple times over the next couple of weeks.

[QUOTE=Almighty;6245508]Anyone have any dealings with this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9e7ed38e-c11d-4e6e-9490-19adf869e11a[/URL]

I texted her a few times prior to tgiving. She wanted half up front. I immediately ghosted at that point.

But she would occasionally text me "how are you doing" a couple times over the next couple of weeks.[/QUOTE]I don't have any experience with her. Have you asked her to do a MnG? In addition to wanting a deposit, refusing a MnG is a pretty big red flag.

Thanks for the warning.

I have read the negative posts but am willing to spend $60 for a one time credit purchase.

Does anyone know a credit card I can use?

Thanks.

KC.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6245379]Secret Benefits is credit based messaging system too but the CTC is a flat credit amount. Number of conversations you can have is based on the number of credits you buy. Everything is an upsell on SB. Charges to start a conversation. Charge to see private pics. Charge to see message read receipts. Charge to send pics thru message system. Credits are burned up very fast. And while there is not direct proof many conversations have been had on this site in other forums covering SB use of bots and / or fake accounts to entice purchases.

Also see post #6643 in this section.

Your call of course. Good luck.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/c18a71e3-5ee0-49b8-9667-a065e96260ca[/URL]

Does anyone have any input on her?

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6246710][URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/c18a71e3-5ee0-49b8-9667-a065e96260ca[/URL]

Does anyone have any input on her?[/QUOTE]I recommend you put the profile name in the subject box. You also have given a link your message inbox not to her profile. It's no big deal; we all do it occasionally. However, you will have to start over if you want any help.

BAM.

Apparently the impending holidays have the scammers working overtime just like everyone else!

Lunaa: Lazy scammer using pictures of Luna Sobrino. Will not last long.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8dcaf364-0974-4731-9d4e-72ff212ca6bc[/URL]


FineSire: Fourth crypto-scammer in a row using pictures of ugly girl on the Burj Khalifa. BTW, I've been there, stunning building!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b1c25ca5-01d5-410d-a28e-8cf243ccbe41[/URL]


AlluringGambler: Three crypto-scammer posted in a row.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2ed90571-4896-4169-b3cc-3613224af31a[/URL]


Anna: single name, Loveland Park?, nah, scammer!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c11958db-fa83-40a0-af28-421c66fcc571[/URL]


FoxySocialite: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6029c36-c348-4b21-b717-8d1262443038[/URL]


Seductive: Slim, hot but with two kids?, Widowed? I recommend caution. Says her phone is turned off, using a texting app with AC from Grand Rapids, MI.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ba6c876e-023c-4530-8415-c0cc99dabd40[/URL]


HumorousBabe: Poor English, using picture of Vanessa Merrill. Sent pix by text of girl who is in escort ads all over the country.Offers to meet for 300 in Troy but insists it has to be today!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bf568a04-d173-4584-8ee2-bbd8a6938019[/URL]


TraveledChick: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/846b80a4-8cec-460b-9d6b-5bfb3d36a074[/URL]


BAM!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5b75feca-22f9-4970-aa38-779a36abbebc[/URL]

Thanks Bam. I messed up royally LOL. Here's the correct link.

Prettysugar is also interested (GPS syndrome, ok with FC) but never comes on the call. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97[/URL].

Shilo: wants high balling sugar daddies who can throw 100s of thousands at her... GPS syndrome. https://members.seeking.com/member/2f23c409-8ef5-4790-9e40-be552556a161

[QUOTE=BamBam;6246721]I recommend you put the profile name in the subject box. You also have given a link your message inbox not to her profile. It's no big deal; we all do it occasionally. However, you will have to start over if you want any help.

BAM.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6246826][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5b75feca-22f9-4970-aa38-779a36abbebc[/URL]

Thanks Bam. I messed up royally LOL. Here's the correct link.

Pretty Sugar is also interested (GPS syndrome, ok with FC) but never comes on the call. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97[/URL].

Shilo: wants high balling sugar daddies who can throw 100s of thousands at her... GPS syndrome. https://members.seeking.com/member/2f23c409-8ef5-4790-9e40-be552556a161[/QUOTE]Pretty Sugar has been around a long time. She is a Pro SB (meaning lots of guys have seen her.) In my experience and that of others she is a one and done. Someone recently praised her body. She is a scholarship athlete. Just not very good in bed.

Shilo has GPS and a very lousy attitude. She has also been around a long time. With her attitude, I am not sure why she bothers. The pictures are from a better day. I have her PII for contributing seniors.

BAM.

[QUOTE=BamBam;6246859]Pretty Sugar has been around a long time. She is a Pro SB (meaning lots of guys have seen her.) In my experience and that of others she is a one and done. Someone recently praised her body. She is a scholarship athlete. Just not very good in bed.

Shilo has GPS and a very lousy attitude. She has also been around a long time. With her attitude, I am not sure why she bothers. The pictures are from a better day. I have her PII for contributing seniors.

BAM.[/QUOTE][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97[/URL]

To chime in on BAM's comments:

I've seen Pretty Sugar. On paper, she meets the Todd Cincy Standard, insofar as she is young and conventionally attractive. She's not the prettiest girl on Seeking, but she's many notches above the grannies, fatties, and druggies the guys on the escort board all rave about.

I saw Pretty Sugar multiple times a few years back, and quickly became exasperated with her.

She tries to get you in and out (pun fully intended) in as little time as possible. The last time I saw her, she showed up right after eating Mexican (I could taste it on her), and she claimed that she could only stay a brief while because she had to pick up her sister. I had 15 minutes to get the job done.

I don't think I ever had an encounter with her that lasted much more than 25 minutes.

Finally, don't give her more than 3 Benjamins. She will always ask for 4, but she will take 3.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6247687][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97[/URL]

To chime in on BAM's comments:

I've seen Pretty Sugar. On paper, she meets the Todd Cincy Standard, insofar as she is young and conventionally attractive. She's not the prettiest girl on Seeking, but she's many notches above the grannies, fatties, and druggies the guys on the escort board all rave about.

I saw Pretty Sugar multiple times a few years back, and quickly became exasperated with her.

She tries to get you in and out (pun fully intended) in as little time as possible. The last time I saw her, she showed up right after eating Mexican (I could taste it on her), and she claimed that she could only stay a brief while because she had to pick up her sister. I had 15 minutes to get the job done.

I don't think I ever had an encounter with her that lasted much more than 25 minutes.

Finally, don't give her more than 3 Benjamins. She will always ask for 4, but she will take 3.[/QUOTE]I've noticed this pattern with many SBs: They get lazier as the arrangement progresses. Maybe they stop wanting to give you head, etc. They don't have time for the lunch anymore. They're really busy with school right now and only can see you for X amount of time. They're applying regular dating patterns to something you pay for, which is 100% BS. I think it's best to just refuse to see them again at the first sign of this crap. I don't think there's any good way to discuss this with them without them trying to bamboozle you by throwing a tantrum. Not to mention you can't scold someone into being more attracted to you. Best to just move on without explanation IMO.

Thansk Todd and Bam for the additional perspective. She' s relentless man. Wants 4 minimum and I was like 'why' LOL.

Would love to get some commentary on existing profiles so I don't waste time on them.

(1) BellMmb [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6231e641-4a2e-4ed0-a4e1-ec82a9aec021[/URL] .

(2) GorgeousBabe - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/af68cd8a-41f5-4790-b651-3ece877f22a2[/URL] . This one reminds me of Princess who used to be on Rt4 a couple years back when she was still in her teens. Dreamt with her so many times that I lost count LOL. Anyone see the similarity?

(3) beautifulbae - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1347a8f7-a01e-422e-b50a-3e39079adbd4[/URL] . Only keeping me busy on texts but never make plan time to talk. Just keeping me hopeful.

(4) Teagan93 -- [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/41c0749f-bef6-4a66-8f40-49039cc23226..[/URL] seems like a cool cat but pics maybe outdated? Very sporadic in replies like most of them are.

(5) ReXoxo - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/16a6121f-c585-47bb-a116-87c1214bc8e4[/URL] . Never replies after confirming her interest one time.

(6) tt - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fbfa925b-2112-4759-8455-1c7ae8d72295...[/URL] very spotty. Dry / sarcastic and not so good attitude.

(7) Brooklynfinest19 - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a86ed8b-332a-419a-b628-65aae7d51d65[/URL] I bet her pics are a decade old. Gives out digits but goes in silent mode.

(8) FinaDiva [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/adc302fe-3199-46fd-8921-8c910d13ac4b[/URL] . Wants to schedule but ghosts later.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6247687][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97[/URL]

To chime in on BAM's comments:

I've seen Pretty Sugar. On paper, she meets the Todd Cincy Standard, insofar as she is young and conventionally attractive. She's not the prettiest girl on Seeking, but she's many notches above the grannies, fatties, and druggies the guys on the escort board all rave about.

I saw Pretty Sugar multiple times a few years back, and quickly became exasperated with her.

She tries to get you in and out (pun fully intended) in as little time as possible. The last time I saw her, she showed up right after eating Mexican (I could taste it on her), and she claimed that she could only stay a brief while because she had to pick up her sister. I had 15 minutes to get the job done.

I don't think I ever had an encounter with her that lasted much more than 25 minutes.

Finally, don't give her more than 3 Benjamins. She will always ask for 4, but she will take 3.[/QUOTE]

Seems the one and only benefit of Seeking Vibe is that it reveals girls, whose profile pics look pretty good, when seen without makeup in these vids, are barkers. What do you think of the Seeking Vibe feature?

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6248563]Seems the one and only benefit of Seeking Vibe is that it reveals girls, whose profile pics look pretty good, when seen without makeup in these vids, are barkers. What do you think of the Seeking Vibe feature?[/QUOTE]Can you share a few samples? I don't think I have noticed the feature being used.

BAM.

They are adding up as regular as clockwork. What is interesting is Seeking seems to banning them just as quickly.

CuteAphrodite: Crypto-scammer: [URL]https://www.instagram.com/yoyossavadee/?hl=en[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/47e0eb6e-6fad-4186-9bd1-9a2e0b0fac95[/URL]


BrightFan: Crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/07a36711-13a7-4d35-a5c7-078b90ca41fd[/URL]


TemptingCutie: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/df332a4e-b9c3-4c39-b9d6-47bfe9c92423[/URL]


CheekyMiss: TGTBT, Crypto-scammer!.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/281f970b-32d1-4305-ace0-06fcbae6e94e[/URL]


FunnyMusician: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a656729-0b32-464e-b893-f557d68988db[/URL]


BAM.

[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;6248523]Thansk Todd and Bam for the additional perspective. She' s relentless man. Wants 4 minimum and I was like 'why' LOL.


(1) BellMmb [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6231e641-4a2e-4ed0-a4e1-ec82a9aec021[/URL] . Pro with crazy BF. Exercise extreme caution.

(2) GorgeousBabe - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/af68cd8a-41f5-4790-b651-3ece877f22a2[/URL] . Deleted or I am blocked.

(4) Teagan93 -- [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/41c0749f-bef6-4a66-8f40-49039cc23226..[/URL] Either deleted or blocked me.

(6) tt - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fbfa925b-2112-4759-8455-1c7ae8d72295...[/URL] Deleted or blocked me.

(7) Brooklynfinest19 - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a86ed8b-332a-419a-b628-65aae7d51d65[/URL] Complete pro. Actually looks much like her pictures but older.

(8) FinaDiva [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/adc302fe-3199-46fd-8921-8c910d13ac4b[/URL] Profile deleted or blocked me.[/QUOTE]It takes time to look up and respond to profile requests. As a consequence, it is very easy to get timed out and need to login all over again on lengthy ones. If you break them up, it is easy to label the post by profile name and to respond within a short time or to only respond to the ones on which we have info.

BAM.

I did seeking between May15th and september15th of 2021. It took me the 1st month to learn how to navigate and speak to the girls, then in the next 2 months I was able to play with at least 20 different girls from that 1 site. This is what I learned.

1st you need to be reasonably attractive, I was 50 but in good shape but no one seemed to mind my age, more liked that I was older.

2nd you must have a place to use, these girls are often very young and do not have a place that is not shared.

3rd treat them like ladies, ask about them about how the day was, kids, ect.

4th don't push to hard or act desperate. It very easy to creep them out.

5th always say that you are only looking to meet 1 lady for a long term thing, even if you are not.

Once I decided that I wanted to meet someone who I thought was a serious possibility, I would then offer to send them a gift for being so sweet to me a little I care about your well-being, . 20 using cashapp, I did that because generally their real name was always attached to the cash tag, then I could search and verify that they were actually who they said they were. I was able to weed so many fakes out this way that it saved me time and money. I know some will say that I should have just asked to video chat, and I did at first but many found that to be too much and took it as me being offensive.

Donation. I always asked them what they needed and were looking for. Most would give me a number and respond with dinner and more after if we clicked, I would simply let them know that if I was paying for a nice dinner then I could do about 1/2 of what they were asking, but if they want to just come straight to my place and skip dinner, I could do what they were asking. Which usually ended up being a 2-to-3-hour visit. I averaged between $1. 5 and 2. 0 per visit several were multiple times and even had 3 bring friends over I ended up spending about 5 k in 2 months just on seeking so I stopped and saw a few regulars after that.

6th once you get them to your place have some wine ready, most are younger and it makes them feel really special, let them sip, loosen up and talk to them, listen to whatever they say, they are not used to that. I've learned that many are new to this and nervous, so it helps them relax, I have had girls change their mind and leave without the donation when I was to forward.

7th, don't try this unless you can afford it, and don't apply anything I have said to any specific girl.

8th this is an addition, don't focus on just one girl, this is a numbers game, and you have to be available to talk to as many as possible, to play with 20 I probably communicated with 125 different girls, generally in the evenings i was always talking to at least 4-5 different girls. and they were all the same, i have hours to respond to you, but you only have minutes to respond to me. they always have more options than we do.