Rinsing scams exist in all online dating (Seeking Whit, etc.)
We've had a lot of posts about rinsers of late, including the one I mentioned, SeekingWhit.
Here's some additional perspective on the timeworn rinsing game, and a final tip for outsmarting the rinsers.
I haven't vanilla dated for quite some time. But some years ago I read an article about single women in Chicago, LA, and NYC who would use Match to get free dinners every night from different guys, using Match as their hunting ground.
In other words, rinsing is ubiquitous in the online dating world, not just on sugar sites.
Rinsing also existed prior to the Internet. One of my old female acquaintances (now in her 50's) was a hot young thing in NYC in the early 1990's. She told me that when she went to bars, she never took her wallet, because she knew that guys would be buying her drinks. (Today, at 54, she would have difficulty pulling that off, of course.) She wasn't gloating; but she admitted to accepting drinks from guys who had *zero* chance of getting in her pants.
We should therefore not be surprised that rinse scammers proliferate on Seeking like dandelions on a suburban lawn in May.
The moral is: always break off communication when a Seeking SB asks for an upfront fee at the MnG. There is a 99.999% that you will be immediately blocked, and lose your $100.
The *only* exception is when you ask a girl to come to your neck of the woods, and *you* offer *her* a reasonable travel fee.
For example: I live in the Beechmont / Amelia area. I am going to ask a girl who lives in West Chester to drive to meet me at a Starbucks on Beechmont. I will probably offer her $20 to $30 for driving down here. I've done that before. Last winter I offered a girl $30 to drive out of her way to meet me on the east side.
But that's different. $20 or $30 isn't enough for a scammer to turn into a business model. $100 is an amount that adds up quickly. And $150 certainly is.
One final tip: If you are comfortable doing so, use the videochat feature for as much pre-screening as you can.
Scammers will always avoid videochats, because they don't want to be seen. SeekingWhit used every excuse she could think of to dodge a videochat. This was because she knew that she couldn't charge for it.
Interesting take on the "best" SB criteria
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?18813-Sugarbabies-and-Arrangements&p=6220762&viewfull=1#post6220762
Splendababy622 Truth in advertising?
And looking for a Splenda daddy LOL.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/0f74d53be943339c[/URL]
11/27/22 Bad Girls, Bad Girls. Whatchoo Gonna Do?
Whatchoo Gonna Do when they Scam for you?
AdorableActress: Not a perfect fit highly likely to be a crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1b380af2-547f-4301-8759-df7ae11a1de5[/URL]
HonestLover: Classic crypto-scammer!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f7b55b98-6fd8-4c12-85f3-7fdfb5f427c3[/URL]
StunningDame: TGTBT, age-pic mismatch, classic crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/43bac8ea-2a4d-4365-83cb-ff61ee05e8ad[/URL]
MysteriousPrincess: Likely crypto-scammer!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/39c7e09a-3561-4ea6-bb13-6f6958ad4256[/URL]
Educated Temptress: Crypto scammer using pic from Shanghai:
[URL]https://twitter.com/RAtlMEOnCOwqMI2/status/1593084328866885632[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ec2330d0-302a-453b-beea-fd03095b63cb[/URL]
DesirableMusician: Very likely a crypto-scammer but not conclusive.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/90e82fbc-6965-46b5-9ee8-6b50c4cc3773[/URL]
Endearing Punk: Login from PI, pics of Cherry White, PI model / racer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a6cf3be-2dab-4575-b103-58b9675b9c0d[/URL]
BAM.
She is back on escort alligator
[QUOTE=PowerTool;6014486]Saw her yesterday. She's real. Nice body and good GFE service. Looks a little better than her pics. $250 not a clock watcher, one pop. Pretty sure she's got a habit. Might repeat when I'm back in town. Used to advertise in the old USA advertising section.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/766daa73-bd4a-4e82-b110-21d18b697da6[/URL][/QUOTE]Definitely a user and has a fiancé.
Princessnavi or seductiveredhead
[QUOTE=Weekender69;6232633]Connected with this one at a notell a few months ago. When I first got there, there were a few knocks at the door in which she explained they were asking for rent, LOL. She answered the door but they went away. She definitely has demons and kept nodding off before anything got started. Ended up leaving, saw a few guys down the hall but not sure they were with her. Will not being repeating.[/QUOTE]
This is a very odd post. About two hours earlier, you posted the following about Seductiveredhead: "She is real, saw her a few months ago at a notell in colerain. She is definitely a user. Had some knocks at the door while we were together asking for "rent". The situation was a little sketchy and I ended up leaving. She was also nodding off LOL. I haven't repeated especially not for 250. ".
This looks like almost identical language for two separate women. Since we already had a report on Navi saying she is online only, can you clarify? She is also brand new on Seeking. Did find a link to her elsewhere?
BAM.
I need to post more often to keep them from piling up: 11-29-22
Here is my recent list:
SensualGambler: "We will save you time and help you filter through the BS And match you with the potential partner suiting your unique needs. We have engineered about 8 active arrangement / relationship here And we are opened to help you. " This sounds like a new type of scam!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/20a6df46-3ad0-4820-9292-2e984bd5e2fc[/URL]
KindFan: KY, KY for location?, Using pic of porn star Ashley Adams.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a04d6532-a803-4f45-8b83-255582235fd7[/URL]
ElegantChickie: Likely crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a9abae1d-6b56-4f2c-8746-e8b807524f76[/URL]
PhotogenicAngel: Pic seller!!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e14dde14-3224-4dcf-af36-4601de700471[/URL]
Kitten21: Pic seller! I have her PII if anyone is interested. Confirmed by another SD.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/edfb23e0-eb30-496f-9a56-5f3bfc75d909[/URL]
Lilly: Real, premium using edu email, TGTBT, joined in Cinti but immediately switched location to Miami, dtf traveling coed?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3fef178e-6404-493b-9388-4199301964cc[/URL]
BAM.
Back in the saddle for now.
Thanks Bam for your contributions over the years. Its good to see everyone still at it. I was out for a good 5-6 years but now have new found freedom so hope to make the most of it.
SensualGambler is definitely bad news. They asked me to come to snap, asked to send 100 $ to prove my interest and then sent me screenshots of other suckers who had sent them $$.
Urdreamgirl - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc8b3322-a3b1-478c-9609-9344863287c7[/URL].
[QUOTE=BamBam;6233939]Here is my recent list:
SensualGambler: "We will save you time and help you filter through the BS And match you with the potential partner suiting your unique needs. We have engineered about 8 active arrangement / relationship here And we are opened to help you. " This sounds like a new type of scam!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/20a6df46-3ad0-4820-9292-2e984bd5e2fc[/URL]
KindFan: KY, KY for location?, Using pic of porn star Ashley Adams.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a04d6532-a803-4f45-8b83-255582235fd7[/URL]
ElegantChickie: Likely crypto-scammer.[/QUOTE]