General Reports

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1680365]"Providers": a few notes on words one sees (often incorrectly) used in advertising.

Stallion: So, when I see a provider advertising as a "stallion" (and it is always black providers, for some reason) , my first reaction is "oh, it must be a TS", and my second reaction is "ignorant h o e!" A stallion is a MALE horse; the word you're looking for is "filly" (if young) or "mare" (if mature).

O.[/QUOTE]Oz, in some cases it may be truth in advertising if the woman does resemble a stallion moreso than a woman, especially in the second to last pic: [url]http://atlanta.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/60-510-155-pounds-jamaican-stallion-all-nite-speacials-60-18/16063372[/url]

[QUOTE=Niteluvr; 1680543]Oz, in some cases it may be truth in advertising if the woman does resemble a stallion moreso than a woman, especially in the second to last pic:

[url]http://atlanta.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/60-510-155-pounds-jamaican-stallion-all-nite-speacials-60-18/16063372[/url][/QUOTE]"Heifer" is the correct term for THAT, I think.

O.

O,

Your post reminds me of something very wise my Father told me when I was like seven years old and had incorrectly used a bunch of dirty words I'd heard older kids use on the school bus:

"Don't use words unless you know what they mean. Doing so is a sure way to make a fool of yourself."

[QUOTE=Niteluvr; 1680543]Oz, in some cases it may be truth in advertising if the woman does resemble a stallion moreso than a woman, especially in the second to last pic:

[url]http://atlanta.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/60-510-155-pounds-jamaican-stallion-all-nite-speacials-60-18/16063372[/url][/QUOTE]You know, sometimes you'd be surprised. A chic like that would be the one with the good pussy. She doesn't look like much, meaning she's not used up and her snatch still got some good grip left on it. Don't sleep on those type of chics. Sometimes those types of chics will give you the business as opposed to a pretty sexy ***** who thinks she's all that.

[url]http://atlanta.backpage.com/BodyRubs/explosive-body-rubs-70-special-until-midnight-21/14940688[/url]

Any info on this one? She is advertising in my area now but I can't find any reviews on her anywhere even though she has an extensive posting history.

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1680365]Stallion: So, when I see a provider advertising as a "stallion" (and it is always black providers, for some reason) , my first reaction is "oh, it must be a TS", and my second reaction is "ignorant h o e!" A stallion is a MALE horse; the word you're looking for is "filly" (if young) or "mare" (if mature).

So, a 19 year old. 4'10", heavy-set girl might call herself a "cubic filly", but not a "fun-sized stallion", you see?

Finally, there's the "provider who's bad at Spanish"; she's "Latino" or "Filipino", she's "Columbian" or "Porto Rican", or maybe a "Brazilian Latina". If you'd gone to school, you wouldn't be rental pussy, so don't play at pretension! I'll add "well-education provider" to this list, just to round out the "irrelevant qualifications" aspect of provider advertising.[/QUOTE]Thank you! I'm glad you pointed out the misuse of "Stallion". Ignorant hoe, indeed.

I have a rule: if you claim a specific ethnicity but can't properly spell it (I'll use your example of "Porto Rican"), I won't see you because you're a liar. A stupid one, at that.

[QUOTE=Johnny Mapalo;1681000]You know, sometimes you'd be surprised. A chic like that would be the one with the good pussy. She doesn't look like much, meaning she's not used up and her snatch still got some good grip left on it. Don't sleep on those type of chics. Sometimes those types of chics will give you the business as opposed to a pretty sexy ***** who thinks she's all that.[/QUOTE]I understand your point, but her basic looks would make my dick go limp.

With all due respect, if I had that rule I wulda missed out on some very good times. Not seeing them for their brains. Agreed they may be lieing but what provider dosn't? I know what you saying tho got to laugh at some of the sales tactics they come up with.

[QUOTE=StarFleet; 1681196]Thank you! I'm glad you pointed out the misuse of "Stallion". Ignorant hoe, indeed.

I have a rule: if you claim a specific ethnicity but can't properly spell it (I'll use your example of "Porto Rican") , I won't see you because you're a liar. A stupid one, at that.[/QUOTE]

I was just reading a couple of T E R reviews, one of which was the very common "it wasn't the girl in the pics" but "I went through it anyway".

So, I go to a steakhouse, and I order an 8oz filet mignon.

The waiter brings me a grilled salmon salad. It looks good, but it's not what I *came* for.

Do I:

1. Say "well, it looks good", and go ahead and eat it, still, really, wishing I were eating steak?

2. Say "oh, this isn't what I wanted" and leaving the restaurant, but leaving the waiter a $20 tip,"for his trouble".

3. Say "hey, I wanted steak", and leaving to go someplace where I will be fed STEAK? AND mentioning to people that you need to go elsewhere if you want steak?

See, I think (3) is the correct response, but there's way too much (1) and (2) going on.

Fairly ridiculous, isn't it?

O.

Jackson,

Your formatting tweaks aren't making stupid posters look smart, they're making smart posters look stupid.

If posters want to use "chatspeak", poor grammar, incorrect punctuation and the like, LET them: that's actually valuable information for the rest of us, because it helps us evaluate the likely value of their post.

Dashes, commas, and other forms of punctuation CAN be correctly used, but it's VERY irksome to write a grammatical and correctly-punctuated and formatted post, only to find it mangled after submission. You are punishing good writers.

Just let people WRITE!

O.

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1681997]Jackson,

Your formatting tweaks aren't making stupid posters look smart, they're making smart posters look stupid.

If posters want to use "chatspeak", poor grammar, incorrect punctuation and the like, LET them: that's actually valuable information for the rest of us, because it helps us evaluate the likely value of their post.

Dashes, commas, and other forms of punctuation CAN be correctly used, but it's VERY irksome to write a grammatical and correctly-punctuated and formatted post, only to find it mangled after submission. You are punishing good writers.

Just let people WRITE!

O.[/QUOTE]What he said!

And when I see an autocorrect-mauled post the only one I think that looks silly is whoever came up with all the silly autocorrect "enhancements" the board has.

Ticket George, get in touch with me, your e-mail is bouncing.

Wet Dreams, PW

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1681990]I was just reading a couple of T E R reviews, one of which was the very common "it wasn't the girl in the pics" but "I went through it anyway".

So, I go to a steakhouse, and I order an 8oz filet mignon.

The waiter brings me a grilled salmon salad. It looks good, but it's not what I *came* for.

Do I:

1. Say "well, it looks good", and go ahead and eat it, still, really, wishing I were eating steak?

2. Say "oh, this isn't what I wanted" and leaving the restaurant, but leaving the waiter a $20 tip,"for his trouble".

3. Say "hey, I wanted steak", and leaving to go someplace where I will be fed STEAK? AND mentioning to people that you need to go elsewhere if you want steak?

See, I think (3) is the correct response, but there's way too much (1) and (2) going on.

Fairly ridiculous, isn't it?

O.[/QUOTE]I need an option for complain that this is not what I ordered. Tell them this is an inconvience of my time. Eat it anyway while getting my meal either comped or highly discounted.

Now I have a taste for steak. My order better not get messed up!

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1681990]I was just reading a couple of T E R reviews, one of which was the very common "it wasn't the girl in the pics" but "I went through it anyway".

So, I go to a steakhouse, and I order an 8oz filet mignon.

The waiter brings me a grilled salmon salad. It looks good, but it's not what I *came* for.

Do I:

1. Say "well, it looks good", and go ahead and eat it, still, really, wishing I were eating steak?

2. Say "oh, this isn't what I wanted" and leaving the restaurant, but leaving the waiter a $20 tip,"for his trouble".

3. Say "hey, I wanted steak", and leaving to go someplace where I will be fed STEAK? AND mentioning to people that you need to go elsewhere if you want steak?

See, I think (3) is the correct response, but there's way too much (1) and (2) going on.

Fairly ridiculous, isn't it?

O.[/QUOTE]Yea your right but look at the provider, Fine, for example. Everybody and their momma knows that Fine is using fake pics. Does it matter? Apparently not because she's got like 18 reviews on another site and a couple on this board. If a girl is putting in the work most men could care less if its the girl in the pics or not. Plus, a guy is thinking "I done drove waay out here already, might as well sample the goods". Most guys would go through with it if the chic is decent looking enough. I did it once when I first started doing this thing and it was a bust. I overpaid for a cheap trick who wasn't trying to do anything but get them in and out as quickly as possible. I learned my lesson from then about messing with fake pic chics. To each his own.

In your example, option 3 is the obvious choice but only if somewhere close by sells the kinda steak you like, that you can get a seat in that restaurant at the last minute and that the price for steak in the other restaurant is similar.

If there is no steak stair restaurants close by, or you can't get a reservation or the steak the is much more expensive. Then you may choose to go hungry or choose just to eat salmon and not go back again.

Fundamentally, In a restaurant you think with your stomach and head, not your dick. .

[QUOTE=Ozymandias; 1681990]I was just reading a couple of T E R reviews, one of which was the very common "it wasn't the girl in the pics" but "I went through it anyway".

So, I go to a steakhouse, and I order an 8oz filet mignon.

The waiter brings me a grilled salmon salad. It looks good, but it's not what I *came* for.

Do I:

1. Say "well, it looks good", and go ahead and eat it, still, really, wishing I were eating steak?

2. Say "oh, this isn't what I wanted" and leaving the restaurant, but leaving the waiter a $20 tip,"for his trouble".

3. Say "hey, I wanted steak", and leaving to go someplace where I will be fed STEAK? AND mentioning to people that you need to go elsewhere if you want steak?

See, I think (3) is the correct response, but there's way too much (1) and (2) going on.

Fairly ridiculous, isn't it?

O.[/QUOTE]