What To Do If You Think Someone Has Something
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3919832]I checked WL today and all I saw was the crazy WSW with the nice body that look crazy nice body but her face tells the story and I'm sure she got herpes bad bc some time her mouth be all broke out with sores and dudes still pick her up. She was broke a little bit today. I was looking at her and she kept turning her head. I saw her one day talking real loud to her self like she was cussing somebody out. I got close to her and she was really broke out and a dude still picked her up.[/QUOTE]I think some guys just don't know how to recognize the symptoms. If I feel like there is a reason to believe someone is "infectious", as in having all sorts of sores on them, or mentally ill, I steer clear of them. And if I somehow didn't notice it at first, and pick them up by accident, I don't touch them when we find a spot. I have them show me the goods, and take care of myself. Not an ideal situation, I know, but better than catching something.
The Real Mistake That Was Made
[QUOTE=JustCurius;3920505]I know, I know, never give the money up front. I was stupid. I was in the area of RF Saturday morning and decided to ride by. Saw a nice looking AA, small BBW in a very short dress walking across the interstate bridge. Hair held up in a knit cap. When she stopped behind Raceway, I offered her a ride. She had a nice smile. I offered 25 and went for 30 when she said gave great service. She told me to take out my muscle and drive. She started a vigorous up and down -- after slipping on a cover with her mouth, something that was not in the agreement. When we got to her spot, she was already complaining that I didn't come fast enough. She asked for my phone, and I thought we were driving to her place to finish. Turn toward apartments on the other side of the bridge, where I first saw her. Then she sees a van passing, gets me to pull over, leaving her drink I just bought her in the cupholder. Says she'll be right back. Jumps in the van and gone. Never gave me her name. Better luck to you wiser guys.[/QUOTE]Although it could be said that the mistake that was made was paying up front, I'd say the real mistake was picking someone up off of RF. Most of the bad experiences I've had related to picking up SWs have been in the RF area, and because of that I may occasionally cruise by RF just to see who is out as a matter of curiosity, but I seldom pick up anyone in that area anymore. Too much non-SW related crime in that area too I think, making it one of the more dangerous SW areas to go into. Not to mention LEOs don't care if you're out to commit a real crime, or just get your dick wet because they see it as all being the same, even though I would say those are two different things. If I was going to pick someone up, it'd generally be somewhere other than RF because of those things.
Correction: Airport Inn Nightly Rate is $75 Approx.
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3921016]Are you serious the airport inn is only 39.95 this chick that post online ask me to help her out and she live at the airport inn said it was 75 dollars and I gave her 80. Are you talking about the one off of 85 behind a real nice hotel??[/QUOTE]It would appear she was telling the truth. I called to double check, and was told the $39.95 rate had been discontinued, and now the nightly rate is $75. Also, the banner that hangs out in front of the lobby carport, that says $39.95 nightly, and $149.95 weekly would be false advertisement as they no longer offer rooms at these prices.
Latest Activity: Hardly Anyone Out
[B]Sugar Creek[/B] - Saw a couple of WSWs out on Reagan, of which one was pregnant. I don't know if the pregnant one was lactating, but she definitely was pregnant, and looked pretty good. A LEO passed by her before I did, and I noticed she turned her head in the opposite direction of the road in response as she continued to walk. But there wasn't anything really to be looking at in the opposite direction, of which I would take as a dead give away of being a SW because it's unnatural behavior.
Granted, they don't want to give a LEO "the look" as to bring unwanted attention to themselves, but walking in an unnatural way isn't that much better as both could be considered giveaways to being a SW. Instead of looking in the opposite direction of LEO when there really isn't any other reason to do so, other than to just avoid looking at LEO, either looking straight ahead, or down at the ground in front as to avoid possibly tripping over something, like a normal person would do, would make so much more sense. It reminds me of the SW that one time thought it a good idea to look directly into the sun as to avoid potentially making eye contact with a passing LEO. It doesn't fool anyone, and just makes them look dumb as a rock.
[B]Woodlawn[/B] - Saw a couple of WSWs sitting next to a black guy (dopehead, bf, whatever) outside of the iHop. One of them was wearing a skirt, and had her legs spread wide open, of which I appreciated the view of as I passed by. Just before that, I sighted LEO parked behind the QT, as they often like to do. Was not comfortable with the idea of doing anything with LEO in the area, and with guy sitting next to her as though he might be a bf, or pimp, or whatever.
[B]Eddleman St[/B] - Saw one rough looking WSW walking down Thomasboro, from where it intersects Eddleman St. The veins in her arms were bulging out pretty bad to the point where I wondered if maybe she was going through some sort of drug withdrawal, or overdose. Not sure what was going on there, but something definitely wasn't right as she seemed pretty angry about something. On the opposite end of Thomasboro, I saw what might have been a tranny WSW. She kind of looked good, but what scared me was not being able to completely rule out the possibility of it being a tranny. She or it, had the body curves of a woman, but the eyes, and contours of the chin struck me as being suspicious. The jaw and the eyes looked a little bigger in size than what I'd expect a woman to typically have. Looked like maybe D cups underneath the shirt being worn, but couldn't tell if they were real breasts as the shirt completely covered them. Looked tight down below, in the short shorts, with no sign of manhood, but I know that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Particularly if there had been an operation to remove the manhood. Needless to say, I passed on that one.
[B]Rozzelles Ferry[/B] - Saw a good looking WSW sitting at the bus stop on RF, in tight, short shorts, with her legs spread wide open, which was nice getting a look at upon passing. She also had what might have been a bf, or handler standing a few feet from her that made me uncomfortable with the idea of doing a pickup. Plus it was a bit too out in the open for a pickup for my liking too as anyone could see it taking place from quite a distance considering how far that segment of RF stretches in a straight line. Too much visibility there as to be able to do anything discreetly.
Airport Inn Appears to Have No Business
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3924038]Thanks for the update I'm wondering did they have a sting at the airport inn bc I no 3 chicks that was there and none of them are responding in over a week.[/QUOTE]I don't know if there was a sting over there or not. I went to check the area out thinking I might find some action over there. What I found was a ghost town. The parking lot was completely empty, and no one was outside their room or hanging out in the parking lot anywhere. It appeared as though the motel did not have any business. So those three chicks may no longer even be there.
I Wouldn't Rule Out The Possibility of Arrest
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3925407]I checked arrest. Org I didn't see their mugshots but something happened to them bc they don't answer their phones. Kinda strange for 3 chicks to vanish at the same time that lived in the same place.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't rule out arrest as a possibility. The arrest. Org. Website has some inconsistencies in it that I believe makes it less than 100% reliable. Meaning, if you see a mugshot, then yeah, it means they were arrested, but if you don't, I think it's still possible that they might have been arrested, and it not show up for some reason.
Some problems with the site I've sometimes noticed are:
* when searching for arrests under a specific charge, such as prostitution, sometimes results without that charge will appear in the results (such as DUI, but no prostitution charge).
* when not doing a search under a specific charge, such as prostitution, prostitution arrests that did not show up in search for that charge, will show up in the more general search results.
* when comparing the number of male arrests against the number of female arrests for prostitution for a month, the numbers don't always match up. Yet, for each incident of prostitution, there should be two arrests as it takes two people for that to happen.
I'm not sure why this is, or if anyone else has experienced it, but because of it, I wouldn't consider the site 100% reliable, and I'd agree, three people disappearing all at the same time is a bit odd.