I agree with you in wishing it's real
[QUOTE=JmSuttr;3801336][URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?3882-Escort-Reports&p=3798927[/URL]
Lots of discussion about "DH" although I'm guessing those prices might just be the house fee. I didn't read back beyond the first page so I don't know for sure. As far as prices, it is Queens so I'd certainly expect it to be significantly less than either Manhattan or Brooklyn.
My reason for posting was just for fun but also because I'd love to have a place nearby with a genuine lineup and with real pics in their ads.
P.S. Welcome back BB![/QUOTE]And that we had something like it.
It's good to see your name, and to be back in the room. Now I know what it's like to be in exile, LOL. I missed the information available here, and the connection with other like-minded fellows. Now let's reconnect with all the ladies we've been struggling to find.
Was that so terribly difficult?
[QUOTE=Figrindan;3805085]For those of you unable to use Google, the prices are on their website which is [url]nicesense.us[/url].[/QUOTE]Since I've been posting on this board it's generally been considered good form for the poster providing the info to include basic information, such as the ad link, rather than making others search for it. When you think about it, it's just common courtesy since the poster knows exactly what they're talking about and presumably has the information right at their fingertips.
Three minimum requirements for a decent ad site
[QUOTE=Utwogood;3805200]I didn't like CityXguide because there seemed to be too much spam for my taste. I thought Liveescorts had promise, but I have been hung up on three times. They acted like they had no idea their number was attached to an online ad.
Adultsearch had promise too, but no one knows when those ads were put on, and the girls don't have the sense to put their visiting dates on, or take their photos off when they leave town.[/QUOTE]1. Timestamp for each ad. Otherwise there's no way to know whether the ad is stale or not. Knowing when the ad was posted helps avoid wasting the time of both provider and client.
2. Location. This is trickier since too broad and too narrow are equally unhelpful. BP's DC location breakdown was fine, since the District is not that big. But S. Maryland and Northern Virginia were a little too broad. OTOH, I've seen at least one site which makes you search for individual cities (ex. Falls Church, Arlington, Alexandria) which is cumbersome. The best I've seen was how BP handled NYC. In Manhattan, for example, you could view all or select Uptown, Midtown, and other areas, all with a couple of clicks. It was super-easy to find relevant ads.
3. Minimize fake ads. BP had its share of fakes but they were relatively easy to spot and didn't overwhelm the site. Unfortunately, quite a few new sites seem to be mostly fake ads.
Of course, there are other "nice to have" features I can think of, like premium ads, ad templates that encourage providers to list rates and services offered, etc. But the above three are the bare minimum for a decent ad site, IMHO. Right now I can't think of any site that's doing a good job.
Good to see BB in the room.
[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;3801422]And that we had something like it.
It's good to see your name, and to be back in the room. Now I know what it's like to be in exile, LOL. I missed the information available here, and the connection with other like-minded fellows. Now let's reconnect with all the ladies we've been struggling to find.[/QUOTE]Welcome back. Miss the intel here.