Bareback Beauties. OC style

Has anyone seen Happi or Caramel from Vipkgirl on hx? [URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/vipkgirl[/URL].

Has anyone had BBFS with either of them? Been wanting to tryout this agency but just haven't decided to pull the trigger yet.

[QUOTE=Dragoth01;3852249]Has anyone seen Happi or Caramel from Vipkgirl on hx? [URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/vipkgirl[/URL].

Has anyone had BBFS with either of them? Been wanting to tryout this agency but just haven't decided to pull the trigger yet.[/QUOTE]Seen caramel before under different name, nice tight body and tits but no BBFS.

[QUOTE=JungleFun;3852381]Seen caramel before under different name, nice tight body and tits but no BBFS.[/QUOTE]I've been banging with Caramel since she was Asami at IoA ( 10 yrs). Although, I like her tight bod and pussy, and have greatly enjoyed the way she gives me head, I still feel she's standard K AAMP fare.

And, yeah, no BBFS has ever been offered or have I been able to coax it out of her. In fact, she gets very concerned of slippage and precum wetness when we do intense P2 P.

[QUOTE=themole;3851838]Acccording to the LA board, she's aka Tinkerbell.

She's got messed up teeth and is a little female (<5' tall) with a squarish bod and big tits. Zero English!

Nice pro service, though. I fucked her slow for my first CIP. The second nut took some effort and I had to bang her hard at times for another nice CIP release. I'll repeat only because of her wet, tight box and BBFS being available. Note that if you have a long dick, you will bottom out with this tiny girl, easily.[/QUOTE]Yeah she is CIP and it was good her face is not so great though.

Can confirm that C. Kimmy does not provide BBFS, at least not on the first meet. She's nice so I might try her again and see if I can get BBFS with a second meet up.

I can also confirm Cindy-Star is BBFS but some days she won't let you CIP. Maybe it depends on her mood. YMMV.

[QUOTE=GaijinMan;3853053]Can confirm that C. Kimmy does not provide BBFS, at least not on the first meet. She's nice so I might try her again and see if I can get BBFS with a second meet up.

I can also confirm Cindy-Star is BBFS but some days she won't let you CIP. Maybe it depends on her mood. YMMV.[/QUOTE]Hmm when I asked cindy-star about her menu cip was on it. I didn't know it was an on / off thing.

[QUOTE=AlexXela;3853419]Hmm when I asked cindy-star about her menu cip was on it. I didn't know it was an on / off thing.[/QUOTE]Yeah sometimes she says she's not on the pill and then you have to pay more LOL. Recently this hasn't happened though.

Anyone able to coax one of these two into BBFS?

[URL]www.humaniplex.com/profiles/TokyoGirls[/URL]

[QUOTE=themole;3852668]I've been banging with Caramel since she was Asami at IoA ( 10 yrs). Although, I like her tight bod and pussy, and have greatly enjoyed the way she gives me head, I still feel she's standard K AAMP fare.

And, yeah, no BBFS has ever been offered or have I been able to coax it out of her. In fact, she gets very concerned of slippage and precum wetness when we do intense P2 P.[/QUOTE]Would you please give me a rundown of the menu and pricing (just what you remember is fine). PM is fine.

I really don't want to sign up with my info anywhere, but been looking for a K girl. (I would have preferred younger and at a K MP, but.) Appreciated.

J.

For those of you longtime AAMPers, Janice at IAzn was fka Bri or Britney. She took a few years to be a K-Mistress and is now back to servicing multiple erections in LA and OC. Her pics are the same from back in the day.

Currently, she has jet black hair (extensions) and is a little bit heavier than her cut athletic days (10# or so). She's full on GFE, is a great kisser, and likes to finish me CIMWS. Her inverted nipples and tasty box are fully available for a good lick. I like her because she has always been built with a good ass and big bolt-ons.

No BBFS.

[QUOTE=Winger537;3854707]Anyone able to coax one of these two into BBFS?

[URL]www.humaniplex.com/profiles/TokyoGirls[/URL][/QUOTE]Pictures are so fake!

[QUOTE=Dakegg;3855030]Pictures are so fake![/QUOTE]I've frequented this agency multiple times and they have almost always used accurate pictures, so I don't think that's the case here.

[QUOTE=Dakegg;3855030]Pictures are so fake![/QUOTE]Fake photos all the way-The booker is coy on answering Questions: Not worth the hassle.

[QUOTE=Jack926;3855343]Fake photos all the way-The booker is coy on answering Questions: Not worth the hassle.[/QUOTE]Surprised to hear that IoA is using fake pics. They used to be the OC standard for quality of location, high level of service, and the hottest girls in the circuit.

Not surprised that Tim is coy with your questions. He has always been very careful and, at times, curt to the basics. Probably the reason they have been able to stay safe all these years.

[QUOTE=themole;3855390]Surprised to hear that IoA is using fake pics. They used to be the OC standard for quality of location, high level of service, and the hottest girls in the circuit.

Not surprised that Tim is coy with your questions. He has always been very careful and, at times, curt to the basics. Probably the reason they have been able to stay safe all these years.[/QUOTE]I've been trying to get screened for forever by that agency, they never reply for it.

[QUOTE=Dakegg;3855030]Pictures are so fake![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jack926;3855343]Fake photos all the way-The booker is coy on answering Questions: Not worth the hassle.[/QUOTE]I've seen many of their ladies over the course of time. All have been the girl in the pics. Which girl exactly did you see and the pics were not the girl in the pics?

It's been quite some time, I think there has been an occasion or two in the past where this agency used 'representative pics' and called them out as such. Otherwise, the pics have been straight from the girls portfolio, has been my experience.

[QUOTE=OcAmper;3855857]I've seen many of their ladies over the course of time. All have been the girl in the pics. Which girl exactly did you see and the pics were not the girl in the pics?

It's been quite some time, I think there has been an occasion or two in the past where this agency used 'representative pics' and called them out as such. Otherwise, the pics have been straight from the girls portfolio, has been my experience.[/QUOTE]I find that most korean AAMPs just use heavily doctored / photoshopped pics but the pics are "close" enough.

[QUOTE=Dakegg;3855030]Pictures are so fake![/QUOTE]I know they have used 'representative' pics a few times; but I would say 95% of the time are accurate (with some photoshop of course). Tim is a stand up guy and runs a smoth operation. Top choice when in OC.

As for BBFS, a few have done it, but I do not see any current selection of those. Of course=YMMV.

Has anyone seen Dia from KDolls? I haven't seen anyone up in OC yet, but I am looking to come up and see her if they do BBFS.

[QUOTE=Cjg1988;3856173]Has anyone seen Dia from KDolls? I haven't seen anyone up in OC yet, but I am looking to come up and see her if they do BBFS.[/QUOTE]I've seen Dia twice and NO bb.

[QUOTE=RoyEmbd99;3856167]I know they have used 'representative' pics a few times; but I would say 95% of the time are accurate (with some photoshop of course). Tim is a stand up guy and runs a smoth operation. Top choice when in OC.

As for BBFS, a few have done it, but I do not see any current selection of those. Of course=YMMV.[/QUOTE]I agree. Only ones using fake photos are the low end Chinese agencies with really old women charging $100/ her, afaik.

[QUOTE=Jack926;3855343]Fake photos all the way-The booker is coy on answering Questions: Not worth the hassle.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RoyEmbd99;3856167]I know they have used 'representative' pics a few times; but I would say 95% of the time are accurate (with some photoshop of course). Tim is a stand up guy and runs a smoth operation. Top choice when in OC.

As for BBFS, a few have done it, but I do not see any current selection of those. Of course=YMMV.[/QUOTE]I am not saying that all the girls at that agency have fake photos; some actually do use real photos and some don't. From what I gathered, those that do not use their real photos from portfolio, the depicted photos are different than the girls.

And yes, it is true that the owner is good and careful but sometimes he should answer the basic questions rather than being so coy about it. Basic question such as: "How close does she resemble the photos?" The answer of: "I have not seen the girl and I don't know" is a bizarre answer.

[QUOTE=Wanpo;3855282]I've frequented this agency multiple times and they have almost always used accurate pictures, so I don't think that's the case here.[/QUOTE]Kaamp used to post very close to real pictures, at least the agencies in LA that I had visited in the past. In OC, not many kaamps are posting real or even close. Not ugly by any means, but majority is about 6-7 out of 10 where 10 is the best. I've been to several agencies in the past, I find the cheaper Chinese does post real pictures. Not sure what had changed, but not many agencies post real pictures anymore.

As far as Fiona from kcupid, I finally visited her. Like many others review, she is easy for BBFS, just say no to condom and she is down to whatever you want. Had to used google translate to communicate with her. She isn't bad looking, but def not the girl in the picture. Kinda cute when she is laying down. Fake boobs as you can see the scar underneath, but damn nice though. Easy going lady, quick massage in the shower before leaving.

[QUOTE=Jack926;3856783]Basic question such as: "How close does she resemble the photos?" The answer of: "I have not seen the girl and I don't know" is a bizarre answer.[/QUOTE]I don't think he was being coy, I bet that was an honest answer. He probably has never seen the girl in person. These girls hop around from house to house. They show up, the girl leaving rotation lets the new girl on rotation into the house and girl leaving rotation leaves.

The booker is totally hands off, and never see's the girl.

Not all work this way, but the majority of the ones I've been to sure seem to work this way.

Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.

[QUOTE=OcAmper;3857182]I don't think he was being coy, I bet that was an honest answer. He probably has never seen the girl in person. These girls hop around from house to house. They show up, the girl leaving rotation lets the new girl on rotation into the house and girl leaving rotation leaves.

The booker is totally hands off, and never see's the girl.

Not all work this way, but the majority of the ones I've been to sure seem to work this way.[/QUOTE]This booker has been in this business for a long time and I think he is just tired of all the questions he gets. I think his attitude is all the information is on the website. I think he doesn't want to have any dialogue going which I don't blame him.

[QUOTE=JimMSmith;3857238]This booker has been in this business for a long time and I think he is just tired of all the questions he gets. I think his attitude is all the information is on the website. I think he doesn't want to have any dialogue going which I don't blame him.[/QUOTE]What website are we talking about? Idk any Booker / Agency websites in the OC area.

[QUOTE=VeryInterest;3857235]Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.[/QUOTE]Early 40's wow. Usually girls at this AAMP have been 30 or younger, from my experience at least.

[QUOTE=VeryInterest;3857235]Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.[/QUOTE]Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.

[QUOTE=NoClue02;3858140]Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.[/QUOTE]Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.

[QUOTE=SpikeBites;3858142]Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.[/QUOTE]The story was all over the internet.

[URL]http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sex-trafficking-ring-southern-california-20170526-story.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=SpikeBites;3858142]Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.[/QUOTE]There was a big bust on thai agencies not too long ago. Not sure if the one in scp was one of them or not, but they no longer post. I did saw couple girls posted under diff agencies up in SGV area for a short period of time afterward but now is all gone.

[QUOTE=NoClue02;3858140]Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.[/QUOTE]Same experience with Fiona. Not the best looking but decent body. She is Short! Probably not even 5'.

The booker says Dia has "similar service" - Can anyone confirm?

[QUOTE=AngelFreak;3863462]Same experience with Fiona. Not the best looking but decent body. She is Short! Probably not even 5'.

The booker says Dia has "similar service" - Can anyone confirm?[/QUOTE]I saw Dia on her last visit. She was cute, mid 20's. At the time she had a really short hairdo, it was one of the things that I found attractive on her. Typical KGirl GFE Service. She was playful and I had a great time. I've only had CFS with her.

Does anyone use K-town escorts? Are they legit and are the pictures real or at least close?

Seniors PM me if you want the URL.

[QUOTE=AsianPussy;3864126]Does anyone use K-town escorts? Are they legit and are the pictures real or at least close?

Seniors PM me if you want the URL.[/QUOTE]To other "none senior". Here the URL. Sharing is caring.

[URL]http://ktownescort.com/all_models[/URL]

[QUOTE=AngelFreak;3863462]Same experience with Fiona. Not the best looking but decent body. She is Short! Probably not even 5'.

The booker says Dia has "similar service" - Can anyone confirm?[/QUOTE]Just heard from a monger in HX said there's a guy on EM who is positive and went BBFS with fiona back in around May. Anyone heard of this? I'm hoping this is bs. Anyone got tested recently?

[QUOTE=NoClue02;3864317]Just heard from a monger in HX said there's a guy on them who is positive and went BBFS with fiona. Anyone heard of this? I'm hoping this is bs. Anyone got tested recently?[/QUOTE]Positive for what?

[QUOTE=EastHornDog14;3864365]Positive for what?[/QUOTE]Hopefully this is some bs review but the poster is posted as HIV positive. I couldn't find much info on this so wonder if you guys hear anything afterward

[QUOTE=NoClue02;3864733]Hopefully this is some bs review but the poster is posted as HIV positive. I couldn't find much info on this so wonder if you guys hear anything afterward[/QUOTE]One of her first reviews in LA as Tinkerbell. I say it was bs also, was on the wave of trolling reviews when them started taking them.