I honestly wouldn't even want to deal with an agency that let's you go bare just because it's your money. You have to remember that it'd mean that they let everyone else go bare too, haha.
Printable View
I honestly wouldn't even want to deal with an agency that let's you go bare just because it's your money. You have to remember that it'd mean that they let everyone else go bare too, haha.
[QUOTE=TheeeGentleman; 1384667]Bareback is like playing Russian roulette. Nuts! Anyone doing that with kids to take care of. Selfish.
Be Safe.[/QUOTE]If you think about it, Kissing, DATY, and BBBJ-all involve exchanging bodily fluids in some way. If you were going to catch anything, it would be at the very moment your body fluids meet. Right?
So I don't think it really matters after you've done all that, if you BBFS.
Just my opinion, I'm not a doctor, just my 2 cents.
OS
[QUOTE=OriginalSin; 1384884]If you think about it, Kissing, DATY, and BBBJ-all involve exchanging bodily fluids in some way. If you were going to catch anything, it would be at the very moment your body fluids meet. Right?
So I don't think it really matters after you've done all that, if you BBFS.
Just my opinion, I'm not a doctor, just my 2 cents.
OS[/QUOTE]For herpes: yes, you can get herpes from kissing, DATY, BBBJ.
For HIV: NO, it is possible, but very very unlikely (.001%)
Why? The mode of transmission is different, HIV is usually not in saliva, and if it is, the viral load is extremely small on the other hand herpes can be transmitted by skin to skin contact.
[QUOTE=OriginalSin; 1384884]If you think about it, Kissing, DATY, and BBBJ-all involve exchanging bodily fluids in some way. If you were going to catch anything, it would be at the very moment your body fluids meet. Right?
So I don't think it really matters after you've done all that, if you BBFS.
Just my opinion, I'm not a doctor, just my 2 cents.
OS[/QUOTE]Even though all of those acts you mentioned involve the exchange of bodily fluids, the level of risk of catching something potentially deadly varies widely. The least risky from a monger standpoint would be kissing and BBBJ. I would say it's next to impossible to catch HIV with those two. BBBJ is alot more riskier to the provider especially if it involves CIM due to the fact that the gums are very susceptible to sustaining cuts and tears from everyday brushing and flossing providing an entry point into the bloodstream. DATY would be present the same risk to the monger since vaginal fluid is known to carry a high concentration of of the HIV virus. And, while BBFS surely presents a danger to the giver, it's much more riskier to the one on the receiving end.
Just a heads up that an unusually strong vaginal odor can be the sign of Gonorrhea. Could also be poor hygiene of course but better to be careful out there.
[QUOTE=OldPumper; 1385205]It's not even three months into 2012, but with this much hard work and effort FD I for one will cast my vote for you as monger of the year!
Thanks a million Sir for sharing your encounters with the fresh talent you've found out there!
It's nice to see a monger sharing relevant info and reports on fresh finds.
Keep um coming, nice job! If I can help you out in any way just shot me a PM!
Also you are so right about Isabella! Nice tall gal but her body Oder in her snatch area was more than a bit funky for sure.
By the time the Oder hit me, I was in to deep and already had the smell of dead fish on my rod so I held my breath and pumped it out till the end.
Her sexy pictures in the stripper outfits drew me in to go see her a while back!
But when I got there she was dressed in average everyday wear and looked plan Jane ish.
Anyways, thanks again bud for the awesome reports! Happy Hunting, and stay safe! OP[/QUOTE]
Since you're discussing the subject of STD's here's a bit of information that you may not want to know. If so, please turn away now.
I was diagnosed with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the head and neck (throat and glands) and given a year or less to live w / o very invasive and aggressive cancer treatment. When all was said and done the 98% most likely possible cause was from acquiring the Human Papalona virus from. You guess it. Oral sex. I got cancer from eating pussy. I took treatments for both and am now diagnosed clean.
[QUOTE=Pinoboy;1385419]Even though all of those acts you mentioned involve the exchange of bodily fluids, the level of risk of catching something potentially deadly varies widely. The least risky from a monger standpoint would be kissing and BBBJ. I would say it's next to impossible to catch HIV with those two. BBBJ is alot more riskier to the provider especially if it involves CIM due to the fact that the gums are very susceptible to sustaining cuts and tears from everyday brushing and flossing providing an entry point into the bloodstream. DATY would be present the same risk to the monger since vaginal fluid is known to carry a high concentration of of the HIV virus. And, while BBFS surely presents a danger to the giver, it's much more riskier to the one on the receiving end.[/QUOTE]I agree with most of what you said, but you forgot to mention Herpes, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis and Syphilis. HIV is more of the extreme, not very likely to catch. Unless of course you have relations with a "sick" person or a drug addict, basically a person who has a VERY low and weak immune system. HIV is like the common cold, by that I mean, they are both viruses and neither (supposedly) have no cure. And yes, the common cold can be deadly in the "right" person.
I've done some research in the past when HIV was supposedly a "pandemic" and found out that in reality, HIV was / is not as common as the media made you believe. HIV is man made, not naturally occuring. Yes, it is made by man, originally designed to be a (racial) bioweapon for Eugenics purposes. There is actually a very big conspiracy on this subject that is connected to big pharma, but that is another subject and I digress.
Bottom line, Herpes, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis and Syphilis are the more common STD's that most anyone could catch who is sexually active. And that is through any means, whether touching, kissing, DATY, BBBJ, CIM, COF, COB and BBFS, but more so through the exchange of bodily fluids. Fortunately, these diseases can be treated and / or cured. In the "right" person, they can be deadly. All I was trying to point was, if you're participating in kissing, DATY and BBBJ, you are basically having BBFS.
To each their own I guess, you are ultimately responsible for yourself. I for one prefer BBFS, but I am VERY, VERY, selective. .
Take care,
OS
[QUOTE=OriginalSin;1385714]I've done some research in the past when HIV was supposedly a "pandemic" and found out that in reality, HIV was / is not as common as the media made you believe. HIV is man made, not naturally occuring. Yes, it is made by man, originally designed to be a (racial) bioweapon for Eugenics purposes. There is actually a very big conspiracy on this subject that is connected to big pharma, but that is another subject and I digress.[/QUOTE]HIV virus is not man made, and it is not a racial bio-weapon. It is descended from an African virus that infects chimpanzees and gorillas. It jumped from chimps to humans via wounds sustained by butchers of "Bush meat". Don't discontinue your research. You're liable to stumble on some facts.
[QUOTE=Indypball;1003229]So I've been dabbling in this hobby for a while now, usually just HE's at the parlor, but on a recent trip I got a CBJ. The provider asked if I had a condom and when I said no she left and came back with a square of saran wrap or clear garbage bag. She performed about 5 minutes of oral then cleaned me up. I went home and showered immediately, but the next day I was having discomfort and felt like the the head of my penis was warm and maybe redder than usual. After a few days that subsides, but I can't tell if I'm urinating more often than before and if I'm just more conscious or my genitals due to anxiety. Two weeks after this I decide to go to a clinic and get checked out, I tell them of my experience and they do a visual examination and tell me everything is fine and a full blown test would be a waste of time and money. Now right after visiting I have a discomfort on the side of my penis. It seemed to last two days and felt like a dull pain, but it didn't really start until right after I left the clinic. I was told there was practically no risk in what I did yet I'm crazy paranoid. I've put off sex with the wife due to my paranoia so I guess I'm just wondering could anxiety be causing all this?[/QUOTE]Yep, for sure, it could be anxiety and guilt. If you had something nasty most likely you wouldn't have any doubt about it. Like maybe smelly discharges and extreme burning during urination. You probably need a shrink, but whatever you do, don't get so tripped out and tell your wife until you know for sure.
The conspiracists believe that HIV was invented in a lab at Ft Detrick Md using DNA recombinant techniques. The purpose was to research ways to prevent and cure bio terrorist activity if ever encountered. To test the virus, the Army went to Haiti and victimized a few women. Cases rapidly got out of control and soon the African highway was full of the disease and in the US a gay carrier airline flight assistant spread the disease from Denver across the country to Atlanta. The Center for Disease Control could only track the cases because at that time it was not fully understood.
Now in 2012 alot more is known about HIV treatment and survival is improving. The gay population is alot smarter today, however, uneducated 3rd world populations continue to struggle with widespread HIV disease and death from all kinds of diseases. So is it man made or did the viral DNA naturally recombine to just pop up out of nowhere? Hmm.
George Bush senior (former CIA director) said on 60 minutes,"There are just some things that the public cannot know about".
[QUOTE=Photonx; 1386059]The conspiracists believe that HIV was invented in a lab at Ft Detrick Md using DNA recombinant techniques. The purpose was to research ways to prevent and cure bio terrorist activity if ever encountered. To test the virus, the Army went to Haiti and victimized a few women. Cases rapidly got out of control and soon the African highway was full of the disease and in the US a gay carrier airline flight assistant spread the disease from Denver across the country to Atlanta. The Center for Disease Control could only track the cases because at that time it was not fully understood.
Now in 2012 alot more is known about HIV treatment and survival is improving. The gay population is alot smarter today, however, uneducated 3rd world populations continue to struggle with widespread HIV disease and death from all kinds of diseases. So is it man made or did the viral DNA naturally recombine to just pop up out of nowhere? Hmm.
George Bush senior (former CIA director) said on 60 minutes,"There are just some things that the public cannot know about".[/QUOTE]You got it! But it is also tied to big pharma-It is man-made!
[QUOTE=Masonm;1385720]HIV virus is not man made, and it is not a racial bio-weapon. It is descended from an African virus that infects chimpanzees and gorillas. It jumped from chimps to humans via wounds sustained by butchers of "Bush meat". Don't discontinue your research. You're liable to stumble on some facts.[/QUOTE]I don't want this to turn into an argument and I hope it doesn't. You would be proper to follow your own advise as well. .
The establishment media told us it came from chimps and it passed on to humans and blah, blah, blah. The research I looked into early on, came mostly from European health documents and most of the findings were inconclusive as to the origins of the virus. They could not confirm that the deadly strain originated from an animal and they could not confirm it came from a human. They DID confirm that it was not from nature! They already confirmed that most animals, buy nature, carry the virus, but it is a very subtle form of it, nothing that kills. The deadly strain that came out, have been mutated in a way that makes it grow (multiply) rapidly. So if you kill one, five or ten more replace it.
Over the years, including today, doctors and scientists are leaning more towards an artificial virus- aka man-made. There are documents that back that up and big pharma is involved! There was a major conference in 2010 about the HIV / aids virus and its true origins. Many doctors and scientist worldwide argued that HIV / aids is mostly a hoax and they had PROOF! It was / is a MAN-MADE (racial) bioweapon for a eugenics project.
Sounds crazy? Look it up! You can believe me or not believe me, I'm not concerned either way. Just realize that there is more going on behind the scenes than you're being told.
Take care,
OS
[QUOTE=OriginalSin;1385714]HIV is man made, not naturally occuring. Yes, it is made by man, originally designed to be a (racial) bioweapon for Eugenics purposes. There is actually a very big conspiracy on this subject that is connected to big pharma, but that is another subject and I digress.[/QUOTE]This is racial conspiratorial insanity and ignorance at its absolute worst. This lie is promulgated throughout Africa and the Arab world to blame the West and whites.
There are a lot of "very big conspiracies" on a variety of subjects, almost all of which are the province of lunatics.
HIV was invented by whites as racial warfare. 9/11 was carried out by the Bush White House, and tinfoil hats will protect you from the government control rays.
[QUOTE=Photonx;1386059]So is it man made or did the viral DNA naturally recombine to just pop up out of nowhere? Hmm.[/QUOTE]DNA naturally recombines, changes, mutates, and adapts a million times a day. That's why last year's flu vaccine doesn't work against this year's flu. It's also why there are so many varieties within one species.
Unless, of course, you believe that all life is permanently fixed in one form, and that no mutations or changes are possible.
WoW,
Anyone been tracking Magic Johnsons HIV progression, or did it just fade away. Isaiah Thomas the basketball player knew something no one else did and probably was paid quite handsomely to stay mum. In the early 1990s, alot of politically motivated propaganda on the HIV dilemma was bouncing around in the US, so it was anyones guess what the facts were. I definitely enjoyed the refreshing science on the matter coming from Europe (Lancet) where the subject was not as politically charged as it was in the US. I did purchase a book from a wall street journal science writer called "the myth of heterosexual aids" by michael fumento. It was a refreshing read, but the last time I checked, the WSJ was somewhat right wing oriented. The gay community was and still is quite active to paint HIV as everyones problem, not just select subgroups. Government money was being held in the balance. But anyway, last time I checked, HIV is a very weak virus that needs a perfect environment to survive and can't survive for any substantial length of time without that perfect environment (rectum or direct blood). I still can't fathom the connection with metal to blood HIV transmission (intravenous drug needles) it just seems too much like a pinpoint target subgroup. Hepatitis on the other hand can survive outside the human body for weeks and still get transmitted without having had the hospitable environment to survive. Also, another two topics is sub-saharan africa scarification rituals spreading HIV and "haitian birth control" (BB anal sex). I would love to read from the enlightened USASG on those two topics. Also, it is not easy to avoid calling ugly names in a heated debate so if it goes on, it was really innocent, just difficult to avoid.