Wow! I am about to go flying!
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/b-_-e-_-a-_-u-_-t-_-i-_-f-_-u-_-l-_-23/10862620[/url]
Printable View
Wow! I am about to go flying!
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/b-_-e-_-a-_-u-_-t-_-i-_-f-_-u-_-l-_-23/10862620[/url]
[blue]Greetings everyone,
I am investigating the reports of members receiving spam emails from Fling to their email address in their membership profile.
Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page of this website to report additional related issues.
Please DO NOT post these observations in the forum.
For the record, I DO NOT and have NEVER sold or released the email addresses of the forum members.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue]
[QUOTE=Sway2012;1516667]I am just curious, how long does it take for your posts to show? It usually takes over 24 hours or more for my posts to appear. I understand posts have to be screened but I was just curious to know if this is normal.[/QUOTE][blue]Hi Sway2012,
I appreciate your position.
First, please recognize the the purpose of monitoring reports it not to aggravate you but to keep the forum free of SPAM. It is specifically because I put in the work to monitor posts that The Forum is relatively SPAM free. I don't like all the work, but I know from experience that there's no other option.
Second, if I lowered the Senior Member requirements to 6 months OR 25 reports, I would have spammers specifically posting 25 posts within a few days to get the senior member status, and then start spamming the forum. That's what did happen ALL THE TIME a couple of years ago when I once had the either / or criteria.
Third, the Forum is a compendium of reports, not a chat room. I care about the reports, not the chit-chat. Therefor, I don't think it's really that big of a deal if, for example, a report is visible at 6pm or not until a few hours later?
Fourth, I strongly disagree with your contention that "It usually takes over 24 hours or more for my posts to appear". I moderate and approve all new reports at least twice per day, and sometimes several times a day. The average delay is less than 6 hours. I know because I watch the statistics every day. The only time the delay is more than 12 hours is on those few days when I have some issue that prevents me from getting to a computer, such as a day when I may be flying between continents. Even then, I usually find an internet cafe at the airports so I can approve the pending reports before I get on my flight and again when I land.
Personally, I think you should be commending me for doing such a great job of managing the forum instead of commenting that I don't do it fast enough.
Thanks,
Jackson
========================================================[/blue]
Jackson,
Thanks for your response. I was not critizing you. I simply asked if it was normal for posts to take that long to appear. I appreciate your work and I know you do important work. I started this hobby way when we did not have helpful forums like this. Forgive me if my comment came off as if I was questioning your management.
Thanks
[QUOTE=Admin; 1519306][blue]Hi Sway2012,
I appreciate your position.
First, please recognize the the purpose of monitoring reports it not to aggravate you but to keep the forum free of SPAM. It is specifically because I put in the work to monitor posts that The Forum is relatively SPAM free. I don't like all the work, but I know from experience that there's no other option.
Second, if I lowered the Senior Member requirements to 6 months OR 25 reports, I would have spammers specifically posting 25 posts within a few days to get the senior member status, and then start spamming the forum. That's what did happen ALL THE TIME a couple of years ago when I once had the either / or criteria.
Third, the Forum is a compendium of reports, not a chat room. I care about the reports, not the chit-chat. Therefor, I don't think it's really that big of a deal if, for example, a report is visible at 6pm or not until a few hours later?
Fourth, I strongly disagree with your contention that "It usually takes over 24 hours or more for my posts to appear". I moderate and approve all new reports at least twice per day, and sometimes several times a day. The average delay is less than 6 hours. I know because I watch the statistics every day. The only time the delay is more than 12 hours is on those few days when I have some issue that prevents me from getting to a computer, such as a day when I may be flying between continents. Even then, I usually find an internet cafe at the airports so I can approve the pending reports before I get on my flight and again when I land.
Personally, I think you should be commending me for doing such a great job of managing the forum instead of commenting that I don't do it fast enough.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Admin; 1519306][blue]Hi Sway2012,
I appreciate your position.
First, please recognize the the purpose of monitoring reports it not to aggravate you but to keep the forum free of SPAM. It is specifically because I put in the work to monitor posts that The Forum is relatively SPAM free. I don't like all the work, but I know from experience that there's no other option.
Second, if I lowered the Senior Member requirements to 6 months OR 25 reports, I would have spammers specifically posting 25 posts within a few days to get the senior member status, and then start spamming the forum. That's what did happen ALL THE TIME a couple of years ago when I once had the either / or criteria.
Third, the Forum is a compendium of reports, not a chat room. I care about the reports, not the chit-chat. Therefor, I don't think it's really that big of a deal if, for example, a report is visible at 6pm or not until a few hours later?
Fourth, I strongly disagree with your contention that "It usually takes over 24 hours or more for my posts to appear". I moderate and approve all new reports at least twice per day, and sometimes several times a day. The average delay is less than 6 hours. I know because I watch the statistics every day. The only time the delay is more than 12 hours is on those few days when I have some issue that prevents me from getting to a computer, such as a day when I may be flying between continents. Even then, I usually find an internet cafe at the airports so I can approve the pending reports before I get on my flight and again when I land.
Personally, I think you should be commending me for doing such a great job of managing the forum instead of commenting that I don't do it fast enough.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]I commend you. Most probably do not realize the work involved.
Traveler
Here here my fellow.
I would like to say thanks for doing that what you do. No doubt the task of maintaining this site is daunting at times and can mentally get real old and dreaded.
Thank you for doing what you do for us perverts!
Thank you, Jackson.
Brass
A quick story for ya'll. I called my utr,"K", who does not have her own phone. I called her through her gf "C" (the girls are lesbian in their private life, but like meeting "sugar daddy" men). C told me they had split as a couple, and thus I could not get in touch with K. That was disappointing; I had a need. A few minutes later I got another text from C, the ex-gf. She had heard from K that I was a nice guy, so would I like to meet? Sure, why not? She sent me some pics and she is medium build, but absolutely lovely. Two hours later I was rolling in the hay with C, and had a very nice time.
I don't have numbers to share, but there is a moral to the story. References are a great way to meet girls. But it only works if you treat people well-which, in this arena, means respectfully. Remember, even Jackson's 22 rules end with: "Be friendly. As has been noted in other threads, these are people with feelings, not just automaton sex dispensers. If you're friendly, chatty, and warm, she'll open up, relax, and probably be more generous with her service, in all the little ways that matter most."
And maybe even tell nice things about you to her friends which leads them to give you a call.
Peace out, CK
I'm with CK on this. I know that being myself, funny and respectful, gets more outside the hobby, so why not employ the same rational within? So far, I have several providers that sometimes just want to hang out with me. Not bad. For the ego either. .
BD69.
[QUOTE=Crazykev; 1519610]A quick story for ya'll. I called my utr,"K", who does not have her own phone. I called her through her gf "C" (the girls are lesbian in their private life, but like meeting "sugar daddy" men). C told me they had split as a couple, and thus I could not get in touch with K. That was disappointing; I had a need. A few minutes later I got another text from C, the ex-gf. She had heard from K that I was a nice guy, so would I like to meet? Sure, why not? She sent me some pics and she is medium build, but absolutely lovely. Two hours later I was rolling in the hay with C, and had a very nice time.
I don't have numbers to share, but there is a moral to the story. References are a great way to meet girls. But it only works if you treat people well-which, in this arena, means respectfully. Remember, even Jackson's 22 rules end with: "Be friendly. As has been noted in other threads, these are people with feelings, not just automaton sex dispensers. If you're friendly, chatty, and warm, she'll open up, relax, and probably be more generous with her service, in all the little ways that matter most."
And maybe even tell nice things about you to her friends which leads them to give you a call.
Peace out, CK[/QUOTE]
I have never quite understood the "rough'them up" approach to SWs calling them names, even beating them. I guess some mongers get off on abusing and name calling. But I am with CK 100. Something about the Golden Rule?
By the same token, you must appreciate the environment they are living in, and not place too much temptation in front of them. Many's the time, as a newbie, I have had a "friend" SW walk off with a fee before the event was completed (think especially Kat, but also Sonja and Sarah). Do NOT front $, even tho you regard them as feeling human beings. Often the drug need or the abuse from previous mongers has made it impossible to resist the urge for "cash and dash".
I was looking for a previous post I made years ago of suggestions of how to treat SWs, including cautions, but I cannot find posts from earlier than 2010.
Giani.
[QUOTE=Crazykev; 1519610]A quick story for ya'll. I called my utr,"K", who does not have her own phone. I called her through her gf "C" (the girls are lesbian in their private life, but like meeting "sugar daddy" men). C told me they had split as a couple, and thus I could not get in touch with K. That was disappointing; I had a need. A few minutes later I got another text from C, the ex-gf. She had heard from K that I was a nice guy, so would I like to meet? Sure, why not? She sent me some pics and she is medium build, but absolutely lovely. Two hours later I was rolling in the hay with C, and had a very nice time.
I don't have numbers to share, but there is a moral to the story. References are a great way to meet girls. But it only works if you treat people well-which, in this arena, means respectfully. Remember, even Jackson's 22 rules end with: "Be friendly. As has been noted in other threads, these are people with feelings, not just automaton sex dispensers. If you're friendly, chatty, and warm, she'll open up, relax, and probably be more generous with her service, in all the little ways that matter most."
And maybe even tell nice things about you to her friends which leads them to give you a call.
Peace out, CK[/QUOTE]
I treat the SW's like little queens. In return they share their best friends with me and hook me up with other hotties. I in turn discreetly share their contact info with other fellas that treat SW's with respect. If a monger prefers to rough the gals up, he won't get any help from me. With experience comes smarts on how to avoid scammers. Of course, I have been "robbed" but for the most part I get more hot, juicy, young, tender, sweet giners than there are days in a week. And I have more numbers to dial than tiime to ring them up.
By all means, treat the gals like queens and you will be buried in more pussy than can be humped or munched. Be safe and good hunting. MW
I for one applaud your efforts, and want to thank you for such an awesome place to share info, rant and sometimes air grievances. Like any forum, or family for that matter, a little drama is expected, and I enjoy being here, and my new hobby friends. Thank you for all that you do!
BD69.
[QUOTE=Admin; 1519302][blue]Greetings everyone,
I am investigating the reports of members receiving spam emails from Fling to their email address in their membership profile.
Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page of this website to report additional related issues.
Please DO NOT post these observations in the forum.
For the record, I DO NOT and have NEVER sold or released the email addresses of the forum members.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]
If I'm not mistaken I recall that Jackson (or at least this site) resides in Canada. Is this correct?
If so, we should have a party in Jackson's honor. USASG is a service that ought to be recognized as such. The only reason why the activities we dream about are illegal in this country is simply because the government doesn't make money from it (as in taxing it). Nevada has it right.
Thank you Jackson.
Harry
[QUOTE=Admin; 1519302][blue]Greetings everyone,
I am investigating the reports of members receiving spam emails from Fling to their email address in their membership profile.
Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page of this website to report additional related issues.
Please DO NOT post these observations in the forum.
For the record, I DO NOT and have NEVER sold or released the email addresses of the forum members.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]
I have had a couple of experiences in this hobby myself and I have gotten more out of friends than I had ever thought. Please know if you are not kind and the next is who is going to get the better deal and all the things wanted. Please all play safe cause if you don't and share, we all get it. Thanks in advance, PLEASE play safe. Rock on.
[QUOTE=Crazykev; 1519610]A quick story for ya'll. I called my utr,"K", who does not have her own phone. I called her through her gf "C" (the girls are lesbian in their private life, but like meeting "sugar daddy" men). C told me they had split as a couple, and thus I could not get in touch with K. That was disappointing; I had a need. A few minutes later I got another text from C, the ex-gf. She had heard from K that I was a nice guy, so would I like to meet? Sure, why not? She sent me some pics and she is medium build, but absolutely lovely. Two hours later I was rolling in the hay with C, and had a very nice time.
I don't have numbers to share, but there is a moral to the story. References are a great way to meet girls. But it only works if you treat people well-which, in this arena, means respectfully. Remember, even Jackson's 22 rules end with: "Be friendly. As has been noted in other threads, these are people with feelings, not just automaton sex dispensers. If you're friendly, chatty, and warm, she'll open up, relax, and probably be more generous with her service, in all the little ways that matter most."
And maybe even tell nice things about you to her friends which leads them to give you a call.
Peace out, CK[/QUOTE]