A couple agencies well reviewed here
[QUOTE=Soco21;4495335]My fellow mongers I have had an itch for a Latina with a GFE experience does anyone have any advise for me? Feel free to pm if necessary thanks and good luck.[/QUOTE]Both Elite Models and book-a-latina have mostly positive reviews on here. I've had more experience with Elite, but have had mostly positive experiences with both.
Lost track of Lily's former handler
After Lily switched handlers, I went to see a few of the girls working for her old handler, YiYi. One of them (Mia) was very good and one (Sophia) was just so-so, but this was a sure thing to scratch the itch while Lily is away.
A month ago, she stopped responding, and the number is now out of service.
This ad shows the old phone number: 5 xx-279-353 l.
[URL]https://escortindex.com/ad/washingtondc/571-279-3531/52/2924077/ter[/URL]
This ad with a different number came up when I followed a link to an old ad, so I think it may be her new ad at a permalink, but no one's answering. The potential new numbers are 7 xx-231-0 o95 and 34 x-75 l-94 l9.
[URL]https://cityxguide.net/ads/permalink-12830314[/URL]
Does anyone have intel, or an updated number for her?
Cindy. A bit different. With switch?
This was also posted to the massage forum. This was more than a massage.
Cindy has been reviewed her before. Search for Cindy.
[URL]https://escortfish.ch/ad/view/limgam...n-lady/7134110[/URL]
To confirm the previous reviews, if you are looking for a 20 something raving beauty to pound, it is not Cindy.
I dreamed of a Chinese MILF with an interesting approach. She has very good and somewhat unusual massage skills, provided a bit of cowgirl domination, and a prostate BBBJ CIM experience to die for.
Most providers take a submissive approach with rules. Cindy took control. I am not deeply into dominance or submission, but I will say it was fun to have Cindy tell me she was going to ride me hard. She did. Note that she does not like to be pounded, but she was ok with doing it to me!.
The massage was good with some backdoor teasing that felt like a tongue but probably was not. This was followed by a hard all over rub down. After the cowgirl ride, she pulled off the cover and gave me a great long lasting BBBJ with her finger massaging deep inside my butt. She was VERY good at this combo. I will say it was one of the longest continual stream of eruption I have had in a long time. It may take a week to refill those tanks.
After. I showered and she scrubbed me down from outside the tub. Unusual again but good.
If you like what I dreamed, I would recommend. Damage $1. 8 full hour of services for this dream.
P.S. She is looking for a room mate -.
Had you used Google Image Search
[QUOTE=BallAllDay;4498777]This Angie visits here and has a real pussy but can't or won't take the dick. Pics may be her if not it's an acceptable catfish. I luv curvs and she has nice ones. A tummy too but it's firm. Great legs. Nice butt. Small boobs with responsive nipples. Cover went on as soon as the door shut. No DATY. CBJ. Pulled down her bra lifted up her skirt and pulled panties to the side. Kept her hand down on my dick the whole time. She made a surprise face when I went in. Not used to a magnum. Couldn't tell if she liked it or not. Mish only. No doggy. No riding. Tried to keep me from goin all the way in. Finally threw her legs together up in the air and pounded it out. 80 qv So maybe that's why all the shortcuts but damn it was a fight to the finish. I won't repeat. Unless, if you read this Angie and tell me you'll do better next time. Then maybe. Still looking for a reliable regular when I'm up your way 2 or 3 times a month. Feel free to share if you have one that's not High Dollar or Agency prices. Sorry. Lookin for that unicorn. LOL In the mean time I'll keep TOFTT and keep you posted.
[URL]http://northern-virginia.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/sexy-blonde-sweet-doll-new-in/410578243809[/URL][/QUOTE]You would have found that she just pulled random torso pictures from different sites on the internet.
I feel like a broken record saying "Google Image Search. Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search" over and over and over, which I've been doing for the past 7-8 years, but it seems that no matter how times I say it, people here continue posting that they got catfished, or that the pix "may not" be the girl, or that they want to know if the pictures in an ad are real.
You don't have to be a Norman Einstein to learn how to use image search. Search every picture every time before going to see a new girl, and you'll find the truth about her at least 80% of the time before setting out to meet her, and you won't have to roll the dice so often when TOFTT.
Agree about image search. Real & accurate pics are the exception, not the rule.
[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;4499315]You would have found that she just pulled random torso pictures from different sites on the internet.
I feel like a broken record saying "Google Image Search. Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search, Google Image Search" over and over and over, which I've been doing for the past 7-8 years, but it seems that no matter how times I say it, people here continue posting that they got catfished, or that the pix "may not" be the girl, or that they want to know if the pictures in an ad are real.
You don't have to be a Norman Einstein to learn how to use image search. Search every picture every time before going to see a new girl, and you'll find the truth about her at least 80% of the time before setting out to meet her, and you won't have to roll the dice so often when TOFTT.[/QUOTE]More often than not provider ads feature pics that are blatant fakes, or taken years (or many lbs) ago, or taken using such flattering angles (or lighting) that they don't accurately represent the woman who will answer the door.
Not sure why anyone would make any kind of decision based on ad pics without doing enough homework to establish whether they're worth a damn. And, while Google Image Search is an essential starting point, it won't protect against pics that fall in the "real, but misleading" category. Only homework that checks for reviews and forum reports can do that.