This is the heart of the problem
Fucking 6 guys is EASIER than scheduling 1 guy.
Spoken to a handful of girls and it's always the same, it's not worth the hassle for them. I didn't realize how easy it was a for a girl to get fucked until I spoke to several girls I got semi-close with. Basically, most mongers are older married guys. They'll come in and some will nut within 5 minutes in a BBBJ and leave. At least half of mongers only have one shot in them so even if they get to the pussy they'll maybe fuck for 5 to 10 minutes, drop their nut and be done. Now even the 2 shot guys maybe will fuck for 20 minutes. I'm a 2 shot guy and I'll generally drop my nut within 7 minutes of fucking on the first one and like 10 minutes on the second one. I barely work the girls pussy and I probably put in more work than 75% of mongers.
One higher volume girl told me she has 3 holes which is no match for even 10 guys in a day. Say half the guys are one shot and the other half are two shots. That's 15 nuts that she can spread over 3 holes. Sometimes if her pussy was sore at the end of the day she let guys have at it free anal. Other times she gave a more enthusiastic BBBJ and got the nut there. Others, she just let the guy in BBFS to get the nut over quicker.
I was paying this agency girl 350 plus a 50 tip- and she wouldn't come over to my place for 300 because of the 45 min commute each way and only making 300 vs going to the agency and making $1000 fucking 5 guys at 200 each for her take.
[QUOTE=OFCharlie;6221929]This topic has been discussed before. It's not that easy. In your 350 private deal scenario, who would pay for the hotel room? Someone has to pay. Whoever is paying the room cost is not going to be better off at 350.
Some girls can't or might not want to host. Even if you say you will host, the commute time for the girl to and from your place is at least an hour. Is she really better off at 350 for 2 hours (one hour commute time plus one hour private time) when she could potentially make 450 in 2 hours at the agency. Sure, she would have to fuck 2 guys at the agency, but it's more money.
Also, a girl would need to have work for a while at the agency to build up a clientele. Guys get bored, so the number of guys will drop off slowly. Some girls simply don't want to deal with the hassle. Anyone remembers Autumn from the old MCE days. She was a dental student. She told me she just wants to show up at the hotel, work 6 hours and go home. She was doing this on the side as her main focus was her study. She doesn't have the time to deal with 6 guys to coordinate the logistics. Think about how much time and efforts it takes to coordinate for 6 guys to show up on the same day at 6 different time slots even if she has 100 side deal guys. Working for an agency, all a popular has to do is show up and she will be fully booked. I remember I always had to book Autumn as soon as the schedule comes out on Monday. She was that popular. Working for the agency, all she has to do is tell them which days and what hours she wants to work. Remember time is money too.[/QUOTE]
Agree Agency Not as easy as it sounds but.
[QUOTE=DMichaels69;6221959]If you read the SA section there are a lot of scammers, time wasters, guys getting ghosted and the funniest is guys getting banned by SA. Not sure that would be the correct place to look.
Also opening up an agency probably isn't as easy as it sounds.[/QUOTE]True but it's unbelievable the poor service I've received from agencies. Just a couple of things, one booker will have me wait 20 minutes over my scheduled time and tell me to fuck off if I can't wait and I still don't even get the full hour. I just have to take it since I only have limited agency privileges. One booker will put completely fake pics, have completey non GFE service, I'll drop a nut in 10 minutes and just have to leave because the girl is ugly / boring and I won't even complain because if I do dare complain I"ll just be told "well fuck off and don't book with us".
I've complained a couple of times or left bad reviews and gotten perma bans at least 2 agencies.
Spa Girls can get a pretty decent deal for themselves.
[QUOTE=Witness2002;6221503]Damn, is it really a 50% take for the agency? That's ridiculous itself.
For those seeing Alexandra (former AC girl), is she charging $225 while being Indy?[/QUOTE]I am pretty close to a spa girl that I have been seeing regularly for about a year now. We have exchanged numbers and text back and forth here and there. We have become quite close and even had a couple good cries together during our friendship. While together we were talking one day and she was asking about my career, what I do and what kind of money I make to afford to keep seeing her, and so I had the chance to ask her about the kind of money she makes as well. She didn't give me an exact number, she says it varies a bit, sometimes the spa is not very busy sometimes very busy. She said most guys just want a massage, or a massage and L1, some ask for L2 and a few ask for L3 so it's a mix that is always changing, she said some guys see her once, most a few times, and barely any are long term repeats of more than five or so visits, but she doesn't travel to other spas either and is happy in one place making what she makes. She said it was enough to cover her needs, send some home to her mom and dad in China, and to pay for her teen child's schooling. She said she was offered to make much much more if she went to New York City and did the spa circuit doing L3 all day long there, but she said she didn't go that route because she does not want to abuse her body with all that fucking every day. I was surprised when she said here she gets 50% of the spa house fee for whatever time block is purchased she also keeps 100% of her tips. I always figured the house took 100% of the house fee as well as some of a girl's tips. It was nice to see at least where she is at it doesn't seem she is being taken advantage of and she is not being expected to abuse her body any more than she is willing.
TP.
I would greatly appreciate connecting with Alexandra
I'm not sure if this note is accurate, but if it is, please DM me so that I can get in touch with her.
I'm very interested. I had a good connection with her. If you need to trade information let me know what you're looking for so I can see if I know something.
Happy hunting.
[QUOTE=ThanksMan;6217313]Hey guys,
Heard from a few that Alexandra is back but selective.
If anyone has her info, I can share contacts of some previous and current agency. (With the girls' approval).[/QUOTE]
ECE Tourist 6 - Thanks for the heads up
[QUOTE=Hater;6227793]Tourist 6 is hot. She's the Polish girl next door you wanted to bang. (YMMV) LFK, DFK, BBBJ, DATY.
If you want PSE she's not for you. She's new to business so guys take easy on her.[/QUOTE]Thank you, will put her on my list. Absolutely love the Polish GFE. Also have Karina and Bogna on my list that I need to see. Karina especially looks hot as hell but I haven't had good luck getting GFE with Russians.
ECE for me has been a pretty good no nonsense reliable agency. Tip for the booker. Only send short messages day of only. Who you want to see and when. Don't cancel and don't ask a bunch of questions or put in a bunch of complaints if you want to have access to his girls.
Have seen the following there for multiple visits except Maggie, Emilia who I wouldn't repeat with.
Rayna. Excellent, one of my ATF.
Natalia. Very good esp. BBBJ that went down south with rimming. Decent CFS.
Maggie BB. OK, decent BBBJ. Got Greek with no upcharge but not GFE, no dfk.
Audrey. Very good. Totally open menu except for greek.
Emilia. Hot but not GFE, barely even lfk.
Reports on Valentina (CCG)?
Anyone have a report on Valentina from CCG? Website shows her here from 11/25 through 12/13 so I'm guessing she's from out of town and pops in & out like Vera. Kind of reminds me of Rose Byrne.
[URL]http://www.chicagocovergirls.com/profile_valentina.html[/URL]
[URL]https://twitter.com/ccg69/status/1580172099507093504/photo/1[/URL]
Different Valentina, I think
[QUOTE=Hater;6229352]The other site she has 1 review he's describing different person then the pictures shown. I trust the reviewer he has a lot trusted reviews so I'm not sure. By the review she's not my type for sure.[/QUOTE]I think that may have been a different Valentina from back in July. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I found a Twitter post that matches the appearance on the other site, so I think the link over there might just be bad due to same name?
[URL]https://twitter.com/ccg69/status/1551953968582074369[/URL]