Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748340]This is the post that I refer to. This is what happens when screening is not good enough. Yes it's not a perfect system but I would much rather the bookers take as many precautions as possible if it lessens the chance of something like this ever happening again. Why don't these out of towners visit the Bay Area instead? It's much cheaper and there's virtually no real screening.[/QUOTE]Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.

I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5748396]Yes, protect the girls and the mongers. Screen as needed to ensure this.

However, I believe having a track record of booking 50+ appointments per year, for many years (without issue) and with reputable agencies that have been in business for over 5 yrs. Is the best reference you can have for another agency. I have found that many kgirl agencies already have relationships with each other or have done competitive intelligence on other kgirl orgs.

Most bookers will only verify a longtime client and they do it as a favor to that client, not because it adds to their own business.[/QUOTE]I'll add that it could add to their business because 1) it reinforces and cements the trustworthiness of each other during screening and 2) it becomes a two lane highway for potential clients as mongers have the ability to move between the two if they find girls they want to see.

[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5749218]Daisy looks like those Korean college girls you want to nail. Real cute, def recommend if you like younger. Body is closer to Pink but with full B cups. I haven't seen her since her return but booker told me she has lost some weight. I will revisit to see how she looks. You can't go wrong with her.[/QUOTE]Slimmer than before, couple of new small tattoos, new hair cut (length has stayed the same), but everyone else has remained the same. Sessions with her is unique, feels more like a coed fuckbuddy than anything else causes she just so goofy at times.

[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;5749377]I find it a little bit of a red flag with the 'new' girls coming into M's stable working elsewhere at upcharge agencies and changing prices. I actually did have an issue with Miso / Minnie wanting an upcharge for MSOG when I booked her through M. Instead of CG / Losangelesasian, luckily I have been a regular of hers long enough to be let off the hook. I told her at M. I was never charged that (but I did not complain to M). I thought (or so it has was in the past), that M's girls were always a little more exclusive and offered non-upcharge BBFS MSOG 'perks'.

So I'm a little ambivalent about it. Might TOFTT based on reports.[/QUOTE]If you're ambivalent about what services will be provided just be upfront with any booker you choose to deal with. Rather than it left being up in the air until showtime, it's better to just ask what exactly you're getting and at what price. It's part of the bookers responsibility to clearly convey and confirm this with the client. No need to be coy or beat around the Bush about it either.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5750010]I'll add that it could add to their business because 1) it reinforces and cements the trustworthiness of each other during screening and 2) it becomes a two lane highway for potential clients as mongers have the ability to move between the two if they find girls they want to see.[/QUOTE]Trust is earned not given. If they do for me then I do for them and both win.

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

For girls that grew up overseas especially that don't consume a western or americanized diet they tend to be smaller is size and stature. Especially Asian girls, just look at the Asian girls that grow up here, bigger chest, taller, and rounder bootys. It's not like the agencies get a giant pool of select taller girls to choose from.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged Kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]Rumor from a S. Korean girl is that and. Korean girls are short.

Totally understand why she was called Tiny. Looks young until shower time and then the age shows. Good service. Definitely not 20's. My guess is mid to late 30's or early 40's.

[QUOTE=BobLove;5750726]Rumor from a S. Korean girl is that and. Korean girls are short.[/QUOTE]I think previous poster meant to say is that rumor is that these super short girls are from North Korea. South Korean women are tall, maybe very tall depending on your reference. 5'8"+ is not unusual. I'd say 5'5" is about average for 25 and younger.

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

Sicca at Bookergray.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw&wr_id=2639[/URL] (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5749999]I'm not sure what you have against out of towners to be so biased against their inclusion to be screened. Whether a potential client is worthwhile to screen or not will fall onto each booker / agencies' requirements and their particular situation. There's no telling where or when a bad apple will appear but all else being equal, the likelihood of one being an out of towner or a local is the same. Being a local or out of towner does not inherently make you a bad apple. Furthermore, there's theoretically a higher chance of a bad apple appearing in the local client pool than out of towners due the sheer numbers involved. Screening isn't perfect and not up to the task of evaluating how a monger will act so there will be a few who fall through the cracks.

Everyone will have different opinions but my take on helping newcomers is simple. I'll help anyone who wants to genuinely enter the kgirl scene by pointing where to find contact information and what they can expect and need to provide for screening. Whether they are local or not matters not to me. It'll be up to what references they already have, what they are willing to disclose, and the bookers evaluation of them to see if they get access or not. My helping them does not affect whether or not they will get cleared, it only eliminates a step in the process that they can do on their own by browsing here or on other forums. In addition, bookers worth their salt knows that they need to keep increasing their client pool to combat losses from attrition (mongers leaving the kgirl scene and competition / favoring other agencies) to keep their girls booked as much as possible.

I'm not sure how price increases fits into all of this in from your perspective. But price increases has been a long time coming given how flat rates have been for years. Take a moment to ponder that they increased prices during a pandemic and economic downturn. This flies in the face of any sane business model. We can only speculate on why but I think increased overhead costs started to eat at their margins or simple greed works too. Regardless, it would be naive to think it would remain the same.[/QUOTE]Sorry bud but good luck in getting into the stables we partake in!

Wish me luck, will let everyone know my thoughts. She's been so hyped up I'm curious. My favorites are Eunji and Viki so curious if she'll be added.

[QUOTE=TempletonRat;5743993]Saw NAV Pearl, and have no clue if she was the SA Sarah I saw in WLA like a year ago.

I asked about WLA and she said yea, but then asked if she was Sarah and she said "No, Pearl![/QUOTE]Could you report your experience with NAV pearl?

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5751125]When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

Sicca at Bookergray.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw&wr_id=2639[/URL] (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.[/QUOTE]She is SMART-Look at her RATE at BookerGray.

* Sicca Rate.

30 min / 240 roses.

30 min B /340 roses.

1 hr / 300 roses.

2 shots / 340 roses.

B / 320 roses * (Cheaper).

B2 / 360 roses.

30 minutes appointment is more expensive than 60 minutes appointment and that means she realized that for $20 less, she will not get cum dumped every 30 minutes.