Remi or Ari of SA or Sophia of Kgirloc
[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;5746950]TLDR: She is worth the reports. Take care of her: quality doesn't come around very often these days.
With Jean gone at the moment and the news of a new skinny bolt-on girl I decided to pre-book. It was well worth it. Obvious large juicy D bolt-ons, 5'3", 110 lbs, slightly skinnier than Ring or Jean but not sickly thin (although I know some of you will think that) and no ass. She is NOT new, but her BBBJ is probably just slightly better than average. Did 69, DATY, FIV, great DFK with a lot of freedom to explore the mouth, gets a little wetter than most girls. Ran through many positions first time with ease: mish, cg, dg, rcg, Russian, standing mish / dg, prone bone, etc. She is very GFE oriented but man she lets you drive. Huge turn on. Only slight downside is that you can't go ham pussydestroyer level 10 on her or even level 8/9 and is a little tighter as some have noted. Those bolt-ons make for great handles. BBFS CIPX3. She will definitely be part of my weekly rotation.
F: 8/10 Has a Filipina / southeast asian look about her.
L: 9/10 Edge over Ring's bolt -ons, and bigger.
A: 9/10 Very accommodating and pleasant.
S: 9/10. (if she could do PSE she would be a 10).
E:$$$
Repeat: A fucking steal at her price point.[/QUOTE]So, I proposed this question in the OC forum and I just want get some input which of the 3 should I invest in? Tia.
Jennie Candygirl Misskgirlla Etc
I thought Jennie looked just like her pictures. Yes her hair and skin is almost luxurious haha. Flawless creamy white skin and pink. Watching her kissing me everywhere and blowing me, this is what it's like to fuck a Kpop star. Tight wet light pink pussy. I don't think she has any ugly on her. She made me feel special for the whole hour. Jennie is top tier.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5686722]I concur to above review 100%: I saw her yesterday and I found her real sweetheart. In regard to her age, I would think that she is in her high 20 years or low 30 but I love her hair and skin. I plan a 2nd visit very soon. A definite sweetheart in term of the attitude and definitely she has a body that is super nice.[/QUOTE].
Why even bother to take the risk
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5748227]I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.
The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.
Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.[/QUOTE]There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.
Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.
