Sugarbabies?

This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

[QUOTE=Ginzo666;6094140]I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.[/QUOTE]

[quote=toddcincy;6095086]seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so.

More discretion should be used when talking about the seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my sbs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off seeking.[/quote]amen!

Bam.

Five days worth and a lengthy haul:

Fungirl: Pic seller with a nasty attitude. Shares her real number which gets her PII.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/30f25e07-1e83-41c2-9e2c-eb2938925d12[/URL]


OpenToIdeas: Says she is not living in Cinti. Will move here in the Fall. Wants an arrangement between now and then.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cd56d00e-e728-4975-919c-edd2ed7ee3cb[/URL]


BrilliantCutie: Very odd profile! Married, 30, 6+ kids, 4'7", mixed, true love but profile shows FB verification.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3db58eb2-5c37-486d-b55d-b51747587173[/URL]


Baileykits: Likely Kenyan pic seller. Lazy and using a pic of Ireland Baldwin. Won't last long.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/856e9b2d-b660-4adf-8fb6-8108363e1d13[/URL]


SurprisedDancer: scammer language, poor English.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1fb76886-faa2-4050-af04-9304720ec39d[/URL]


CulturedMusician: Pic seller! Using a number from Iowa. If you call you get a girls voicemail but the message is unclear. Shares hot pics but using a guys paypal.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/03eeeb09-bf8e-4361-9d92-06333ab6f0fc[/URL]


Indianababy: Pic/video seller. Repeat profile. Got banned once before.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/42569187-e3fd-4a5d-aff6-55a2bce2a4af[/URL]


HumbleGorgeous: "I do a down deposit of $50 and anything after that I'm free game" YMMV?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/680756eb-ca32-4e44-81e1-e8f9a7507bad[/URL]


BrilliantModel: Classic crypto-scammer, told me we have chatted before and that I am repetitive. I apologized.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a4775b0-82a3-4bf0-a96f-79f3d3c5b523[/URL]


Sexy: recent login = Australia, picture is all over the place: [URL]https://www.regional-kleinanzeigen.de/professioneller-elite-escort/5500.[/URL] Offered to do sexy FT for a pmt to her cash app. Blocked me when I declined. [URL]https://www.tiktok.com/@elizabethanthony21?lang=en[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/db2b50f7-7c25-467f-8afd-91f8ffe0a0ad[/URL]


BAM

[QUOTE=AlanDodson;6095268]This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.[/QUOTE]The photos she sent me look like the little red discussed just a few posts down as having a new profile.

She might be doing multiples. Or it's her sister.

Any insight on this?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9c92e8f-fc90-415e-aaea-f7b90d73ace5[/URL]

Anyone had any experiences with this one thinkin about takin the plunge? Think she is on fb too, I found her in SA.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87d26080-429f-4322-a7c4-7ed5e56e2188[/URL]

[QUOTE=Weekender69;6098810]Anyone had any experiences with this one thinkin about takin the plunge? Think she is on fb too, I found her in SA.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87d26080-429f-4322-a7c4-7ed5e56e2188[/URL][/QUOTE]She has had multiple profiles since 2017. We met for a MnG several years ago. She comes and goes. She is real, pretty cool and cute but may or may not be a bit heavy. Per her SM she lost weight.

I will send PM.

BAM.

Here is the current list before it gets too long:

MysticalModel, Classic crypto-scammer!.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bf1b9f2b-c606-421e-9cf0-3046a36d0726[/URL]


FoxyNerd: Hot Asian PhD grad working in office admin?? "I am very happy to use seeking, I want my dream girl to appear soon" "I am not looking for sugar daddy".

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/69c82e16-419e-472d-96ff-93eb9abd6ddd[/URL]


BeautifulVenus: Lena, classic crypto-scammer, taking me straight to text, very poor English, [URL]https://mobile.twitter.com/yunxi1988[/URL], loves to chat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6634f4ba-c413-4302-b8d4-7915072e46c2[/URL]


LovingDancer: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/75e2abd3-1ff3-4f50-8289-2d60075acdfc[/URL]


Vera was SmartMadame: Dumb scammer. Using pictures from Elsa Jean for the second time in recent memory. [URL]https://www.twpornstars.com/ElsaJeanxxx[/URL], location is now Grand Rapids. Gave me a Kenyan Paypal. I am surprised she is still active. Seeking is slow this week.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bf9cbd12-7e9e-4e81-ad0d-3248232560bd[/URL]

BAM.

Is it me or has the selections on Seeking been really bad lately. Lots of older women and escort types. Not as many young hotties. Isn't this the time when all the young college girls should be getting on Seeking?

[QUOTE=Decatur21;6099808]Is it me or has the selections on Seeking been really bad lately. Lots of older women and escort types. Not as many young hotties. Isn't this the time when all the young college girls should be getting on Seeking?[/QUOTE]The "regulars" started showing up over the last week or so, its not that they aren't there, the sheer volume of the others outweighs them and if they haven't changed anything on their profile since they previously disabled their account it they will not show up as new.

Just out of the blue suspended by seeking. Can't imagine why. I haven't spoken to anyone in months just getting a lot of hits from fake ads supposedly from other countries. Strange.

I have been in discussion with her and getting to know each other over social media for a bit. She went dark for a couple months and looks like she is on the hunt again as she just reached out. Have not met for a meet and greet yet but we had agreed to high level terms. You can reach out to me for details.

[QUOTE=RobPeters513;6098254]Any insight on this?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9c92e8f-fc90-415e-aaea-f7b90d73ace5[/URL][/QUOTE]

I reached out but no response. She said she's a dancer and it looks like that's where her pic was taken.

Anyone see her dance anywhere around here before?

Forgot the link:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd45580d-fda6-45df-82f1-e0194f358f64[/URL]

[QUOTE=AlanDodson;6101072]I reached out but no response. She said she's a dancer and it looks like that's where her pic was taken.

Anyone see her dance anywhere around here before?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AlanDodson;6101073]Forgot the link:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd45580d-fda6-45df-82f1-e0194f358f64[/URL][/QUOTE]I'm in contact with her right now. A little too aggressive in wanting to meet right away. Something just seems off.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bbaa32df-39ed-4959-ae97-7a3f708cc6c4[/URL]

Anyone seen her? I would appreciate any info. In contact with her. Feel free to pm me if you don't want to post.

[QUOTE=EndlessBanquet;6100731]I have been in discussion with her and getting to know each other over social media for a bit. She went dark for a couple months and looks like she is on the hunt again as she just reached out. Have not met for a meet and greet yet but we had agreed to high level terms. You can reach out to me for details.[/QUOTE][URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/jEwkR6MnA8BEkda5yWeGx7dQ[/URL]

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6101540]I'm in contact with her right now. A little too aggressive in wanting to meet right away. Something just seems off.[/QUOTE]Straight up hustle. Doesn't seem very experienced in the SB world. Goes immediately to talk of sex. Wants 250 for sex but that doesn't include oral, that's an extra 200. Might be legit but I'm skeptical. And even if real, the upcharge for what would be an otherwise basic thing is not my cup of tea.

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6101557][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bbaa32df-39ed-4959-ae97-7a3f708cc6c4[/URL]

Anyone seen her? I would appreciate any info. In contact with her. Feel free to pm me if you don't want to post.[/QUOTE]Seemed very eager to do ppm for 300! I can't remember if she can host or not.

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6101540]I'm in contact with her right now. A little too aggressive in wanting to meet right away. Something just seems off.[/QUOTE]She messaged me first and wanted to meet tonight. Maybe she just needs money? Yeah, I'm not down for meeting that fast usually.

Ok, so I have another month on this auto-renewed POS. How do I take a look at the girls who have been around for awhile? I've just been looking at the new entries and some of the featured ones. But I got to take a deeper dive and see if I can get an ROI.

[QUOTE=TickleJay;6101940]Ok, so I have another month on this auto-renewed POS. How do I take a look at the girls who have been around for awhile? I've just been looking at the new entries and some of the featured ones. But I got to take a deeper dive and see if I can get an ROI.[/QUOTE]Good question. Along the same lines, is there anyway we can adjust the search to exclude all new accounts that were created in the last 3 or 6 months so we get someone real.

99% of the new (less than 1 month old) accounts I communicated with are spammers. I think after few days / weeks of spamming, the accounts will be banned.

Asking for half up front. 2 bills and then more later. Tempting but and'ah.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5c094804-4d02-4cd8-bebc-0ba717ece8b8[/URL]

[QUOTE=AlanDodson;6101073]Forgot the link:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bd45580d-fda6-45df-82f1-e0194f358f64[/URL][/QUOTE]I was talking with her. Wide open menu for upcharge. Decent prices imo. Seems legit.

[QUOTE=AlanDodson;6101072]I reached out but no response. She said she's a dancer and it looks like that's where her pic was taken.

Anyone see her dance anywhere around here before?[/QUOTE]She sent me a message out of the blue yesterday: "$200 specials today. " I did not respond. Dangerous pro behavior by message suggests even more dangerous behavior elsewhere.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Moszlak01;6102063]Asking for half up front. 2 bills and then more later. Tempting but and'ah.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5c094804-4d02-4cd8-bebc-0ba717ece8b8[/URL][/QUOTE]Wonder how many guys fall for that bs?

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6101557][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bbaa32df-39ed-4959-ae97-7a3f708cc6c4[/URL]

Anyone seen her? I would appreciate any info. In contact with her. Feel free to pm me if you don't want to post.[/QUOTE]Met her for a date about 2 years ago. She's legit, a nice girl. Fun was had by all and she was anxious to get together again for more fun, but I declined. No major reason other than she just wasn't my type.

CFG.

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;6103679]Met her for a date about 2 years ago. She's legit, a nice girl. Fun was had by all and she was anxious to get together again for more fun, but I declined. No major reason other than she just wasn't my type.

CFG.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I asked for a recent picture and she's gained quite a bit of weight. Not sure if I am going to follow through but she seems like a nice girl through our conversations.

Check out this profile from a 43-year-old woman:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2bfc78be-9a02-43a1-af3c-64c27552c9cb[/URL]

Here is the key sentence:

"I prefer an old-fashioned courting relationship. But that will come in time. ".

This woman is legit, by all appearances, and not bad for a 43-year-old. (And keep in mind, I'm the guy who doesn't like older women, as a rule.).

She's looking for men in the 40-55 age range. Nothing wrong with that, either. Like most 40-somethings, she seems to be at least somewhat financially independent. (I. E. : she doesn't need your $300.).

But here's the *bigger* problem: that's a reasonable profile, for Match or eHarmony.

I don't blame her for being on Seeking. I blame Brandon Wade's "rebranding" of the site this past February.

We all joined Seeking years ago to meet college girls who were looking for tuition money. Or maybe the occasional young single mom looking for extra financial help. Almost none of us joined Seeking for conventional dating. (Why do that, when there's already plenty of vanilla dating sites?

I can't imagine that woman finding what she wants on Seeking.

Likewise, we have all been wondering, "where are the new 19 to 21-year-old college girls?" But a 19-year-old college girl, who was maybe in elementary school during the glory days of Seeking Arrangements, will likely be confused when she finds herself at the new site.

The whole "dating up" proposition is designed to appeal to 35- to 50-year-old women who are looking to land a trophy husband. *Not* college girls looking for $300 to pay their sorority dues.

When I deleted my last Seeking account, I checked as my reason, "I don't like Seeking's new direction".

The situation is the same in other cities. There are Reddit threads filled with complaints about what the rebranding has done to the site, which was already battered by the pandemic.

This is more than a complaint post; it's a question:

I recall back in 2011, I started sugar dating on SugarDaddieForMe (SD4 M), which eventually died, as Seeking Arrangements took over. I let my SD4 M account languish, and focused all of my attention on Seeking Arrangements.

Fast-forward to 2022. We're all stuck on Seeking because we remember the glory days of 2011 to 2018. We want those days back.

But maybe we're stuck in the past. Maybe it's time for us to explore other apps and venues. TikTok might be a good place to start, given the youthful demographic there. Maybe there's an effective Seeking alternative that we aren't aware of yet. Maybe there is someplace online where the college-age girls are talking about it. Just a thought.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6104970]Check out this profile from a 43-year-old woman:

She's looking for men in the 40-55 age range. Nothing wrong with that, either. Like most 40-somethings, she seems to be at least somewhat financially independent. (I. E. : she doesn't need your $300.).

I can't imagine that woman finding what she wants on Seeking.

[/QUOTE]Of course she won't find what she wants. She's 15 years too old to be a trophy wife.

This weekend I've preemptively blocked the delusional: the old, the obese, the not-that-attractive. These types should be in conventional dating. No reason at all to pay them!

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6104970]But maybe we're stuck in the past. Maybe it's time for us to explore other apps and venues. TikTok might be a good place to start, given the youthful demographic there. Maybe there's an effective Seeking alternative that we aren't aware of yet. Maybe there is someplace online where the college-age girls are talking about it. Just a thought.[/QUOTE]Brandon Wade's "rebranding" was a result of the cracking down on sites that alluded to paying for sex. Same thing that shut down Backpage and changed CraigsList. Also credit card companies are wielding more power and forcing sites to change or lose their services (Pornhub and OnlyFans). I used to find women on Ashley Madison and Tinder but over the last few years it has become impossible to meet people on those sites. So many scammers. The high financial expectations is another problem. I thought after the pandemic it would be easier to find SB's but it has gotten way harder. I think it is political, corporate and the laziness/gps of the younger generation. Also on reddit you read all the issues the SB's are having with fake/cheap SD's, so there is that too.

I was down in Colombia a few months ago, for a few weeks, and it was so easy finding perfect 10's on Seeking with no effort at all and at a fraction of the cost. Also none of the BS that you have to put up with in these young girls today. It's definitely a US thing. You are right, when reading about SD/SB issues on reddit, it is not just a Cincinnati issue, it is everywhere in the US. Also we are going backwards in this country when it comes to sex and the openness of it. It's getting to the point where I will stop spending money here on women and plan trips to Central / South America where you can get so much more bang for the buck!

[QUOTE=Decatur21;6106153]Brandon Wade's "rebranding" was a result of the cracking down on sites that alluded to paying for sex. Same thing that shut down Backpage and changed CraigsList. Also credit card companies are wielding more power and forcing sites to change or lose their services (Pornhub and OnlyFans). I used to find women on Ashley Madison and Tinder but over the last few years it has become impossible to meet people on those sites. So many scammers. The high financial expectations is another problem. I thought after the pandemic it would be easier to find SB's but it has gotten way harder. I think it is political, corporate and the laziness/gps of the younger generation. Also on reddit you read all the issues the SB's are having with fake/cheap SD's, so there is that too.

I was down in Colombia a few months ago, for a few weeks, and it was so easy finding perfect 10's on Seeking with no effort at all and at a fraction of the cost. Also none of the BS that you have to put up with in these young girls today. It's definitely a US thing. You are right, when reading about SD/SB issues on reddit, it is not just a Cincinnati issue, it is everywhere in the US. Also we are going backwards in this country when it comes to sex and the openness of it. It's getting to the point where I will stop spending money here on women and plan trips to Central / South America where you can get so much more bang for the buck![/QUOTE]Got an army buddy that flies. He saves up all his money and goes to Costa Rica for like a month every year. Its just a month like binge on cheap stunning hookers and even cheaper blow.

[QUOTE=MikeJones1313;6106400]Got an army buddy that flies. He saves up all his money and goes to Costa Rica for like a month every year. Its just a month like binge on cheap stunning hookers and even cheaper blow.[/QUOTE]Been to Medellin. Such a beautiful place. Felt safe 95% of the time. Cheap as can be girls with a mostly pro attitude but the food sucks.

Buenos Aires: incredible city. Italian / German / Latin mix girls everywhere and stunning. Definitely most beautiful overall in quality of appearance. Cheap too. But they're all pros. It's like visiting Toronto with the apartment incall Asians everywhere but even cheaper. Unfortunately they're all pros. But the food is fantastic and cheap. Too bad they're all pros.

San Jose and Jaco, Costa Rica: girls are reasonably hot and friendly. Cheap, but not as much as Colombia or Buenos Aires. Food is mediocre. But if you want the beach vacation with chicas available, Jaco is the best place to visit for a sun and fun vacation.

Panama City: hot girls. Incredible city with beaches and islands an hour away. One of the best food cities I've ver been to (when Europe was suffering horribly -USA too. After the 2008 collapse, chefs from all over left Italy and Spain for the economic boomtown of PC).

Girls tend to be more expensive (but there are some cheap spots like BocaTorena). Always feel safe here. The dollar is the currency and English is common. If you can afford sugarbabies and don't want to fly 10 plus hours, IMO there is no better spot. Hell, I've made the trip just to eat. If you want passion, go for the Panamanian girls and leave the Colombian pros alone. SA works well here and minus 97% of the scams.

Just lying out the territory as I know it.

I didn't even know that this thread existed until I was doing some research on another subject and came across a post referencing this thread. I have been on Secret Benefits for about a year now. There is a lot to learn about this style of mongering. I have managed to see a few girls from the site. Mostly pleasurable, but only one repeat. Looks like most of you are on the SA website. Is it the same with the subscription (credit based) or do they do something different? Is SA more successful than the SB webite?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bbaa32df-39ed-4959-ae97-7a3f708cc6c4[/URL]

Met with Cherry Red today. Communications were great throughout the process and while she was enroute. Very nice young lady. Smelled fresh and clean and very accommodating. Our visit was non-rushed and both of us enjoyed our time together. Definitely going to repeat.

[QUOTE=BedtimeStory;6106743]I didn't even know that this thread existed until I was doing some research on another subject and came across a post referencing this thread. I have been on Secret Benefits for about a year now. There is a lot to learn about this style of mongering. I have managed to see a few girls from the site. Mostly pleasurable, but only one repeat. Looks like most of you are on the SA website. Is it the same with the subscription (credit based) or do they do something different? Is SA more successful than the SB website?[/QUOTE]On SA you pay a one-time subscription fee. It varies depending on whether you sign for one month or multiple. Some people enroll for a one month to load up on POTS, then let it lapse. You can also find substantial discounts from time to time. (You can get a 33% discount if you sign up today. Someone should be able to supply the discount code.) However, once you sign up, you can message unlimited numbers of women. As with any of the sugar sites, SA swarms with scammers, predators, time-wasters, rinsers and pic sellers. As a consequence, Seeking is about ten times more effort than SB. However, it is about ten times more productive also. You will read that it has declined in value over time and that may be true. What hasn't? That said, I could easily get multiple MnG's a week and, depending on how much I was willing to offer or how low I willing to set my standards, I could close the deal with most of them. Over time, your abilities using the site can improve substantially. Just remember, the same rules apply here as in other mongering situations. You never pay in advance. You never surrender PII. You never fall in love. You never trust until it has been earned over a long period of time.

I hope this helps.

BAM.

Here is the long weekend collection:

KindGymGirl: Crypto-scammer?? Odd language, Cyrillic lettering? "Your conditions I may not be able to meet you".

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/51dd01f2-a65e-4a1b-8e98-f50fc40098f9[/URL]


SensualModel: Lazy scammer who will not last long: [URL]https://twitter.com/JenniferLuizxx/status/1423686851911577609[/URL] , offering to sell me a picture for $50.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/56362054-2737-4d6a-8ffe-b94b52315934[/URL]


Sweet Gurl: using pictures of two different women. Girl with glasses is Mati Khalifa:

[URL]https://twitter.com/khalifamati?[/URL] (Mia's sister.) Likely a Kenyan pic seller! Now in North Carolina.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ef059d87-0a3e-4ef0-a4b6-5527f13ae076[/URL]


Emberangelb: Since 6-19, Something weird happening here. The pictures are of escort Aubrey Cummings: [URL]https://dayton.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/im-up-and-horny-aubrey-cumming/487241009295;[/URL] However, she is using a number of a completely different woman. The second woman is more consistent with the story the profile is sharing with me. I have PII.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5eafbba7-71ca-4c96-9f54-b97fd678c80f[/URL]


SweetGymGirl: TGTBT, single picture, terse profile. Wants to start by sharing naughty pictures for cash, using voip from Minneapolis, Using pictures of porn star Vic Alouqua.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f91a5052-e485-45ee-8e39-50c5102fe91e[/URL]


BAM.

[QUOTE=BamBam;6108024]On SA you pay a one-time subscription fee. It varies depending on whether you sign for one month or multiple. Some people enroll for a one month to load up on POTS, then let it lapse. You can also find substantial discounts from time to time. (You can get a 33% discount if you sign up today. Someone should be able to supply the discount code.) However, once you sign up, you can message unlimited numbers of women. As with any of the sugar sites, SA swarms with scammers, predators, time-wasters, rinsers and pic sellers. As a consequence, Seeking is about ten times more effort than SB. However, it is about ten times more productive also. You will read that it has declined in value over time and that may be true. What hasn't? That said, I could easily get multiple MnG's a week and, depending on how much I was willing to offer or how low I willing to set my standards, I could close the deal with most of them. Over time, your abilities using the site can improve substantially. Just remember, the same rules apply here as in other mongering situations. You never pay in advance. You never surrender PII. You never fall in love. You never trust until it has been earned over a long period of time.

I hope this helps.

BAM.[/QUOTE]Did you try SDM?

I will never get comfortable with sending my driver license to verify identify. What the hell they thinking? No one wants people to know they fucking around with other girls / hoes. SMH.

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6107090][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bbaa32df-39ed-4959-ae97-7a3f708cc6c4[/URL]

Met with Cherry Red today. Communications were great throughout the process and while she was enroute. Very nice young lady. Smelled fresh and clean and very accommodating. Our visit was non-rushed and both of us enjoyed our time together. Definitely going to repeat.[/QUOTE]She texted me out of the blue over the weekend. She didn't overtly ask me to meet her, but that's obviously what she was getting at. Seems very nice overall. Never detected the slightest bit of attitude from her. My hesitation is I think she may have gained some weight.

[QUOTE=TopGun9;6108078]Did you try SDM?

I will never get comfortable with sending my driver license to verify identify. What the hell they thinking? No one wants people to know they fucking around with other girls / hoes. SMH.[/QUOTE]After the Ashley Madison hack, this should be suicide for any app like this. The whole database including PII was dumped onto the public Internet.