General Reports

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;5158006]You called it "easy plausible deniability" - now that's what I'm talking about. Whether in person in a store, or by text or email, or on the phone, there is nothing wrong with asking questions like: are you open minded, do you know anybody that does housekeeping, or even- do you know anyone that's trying to make some extra money? Since you don't mention sex for money you could easily claim that you needed a housekeeper or gardening advice. Yes anyone could say "but we know what you meant". But that's impossible to prove. If the girl knows what you mean then it's mission accomplished. If anyone else hears about it just deny it all day long.

I tried using our code word roses in another forum to ask how much certain jobs pay. I was trying to ask without actually referring to money. They didn't understand the reference and told me that nobody gets paid in roses.

GB40.[/QUOTE]It's not what you know, it's what you can prove.

I definitely record and try to keep pics. I only got 6 last year because of rona. I had 20 the year before. I had a scare with a lady who got blood all over my balls. I had a condom and The dr said it was low risk, but I sweated about it for 6 months. Happy to report I was clean.

[QUOTE=Bouinage;5158482]So not sure how many of you do this; I have known a few mongers to track their mongers over the year. One guy I know kept a detailed spread sheet LOL. I don't go to that extent but I do track who and when. It all started when a cover broke while with a provider with questionable hygiene. You know that feeling, your doing the deed and all of a sudden it starts feeling really good, then you bust a big nut. You pull out and see that rubber ring at the base and your cock is all shiny with the mixed juices LOL. That was a sinking feeling for me and I was worried about STDs, so I recorded the date and her name. I came up clean but the habit stuck. I know alot of guys on here have SO so that's not a good idea, but its just me. So last year I made 95 recordings (obviously not all reported on here) I was stunned when I did the math at what I had spent. Any one else keep track of their visits or is this crazy and I should stop doing it immediately LOL. Don't think it would really prove anything in court if it came to that, my text messages are way more detailed lmao.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;5158006]

I tried using our code word roses in another forum to ask how much certain jobs pay. I was trying to ask without actually referring to money. They didn't understand the reference and told me that nobody gets paid in roses.

GB40.[/QUOTE]It's not a hill worth dying on, but I think people's use of code online is just hilarious. Authorities can't convict you based on you saying "this girl charges $300 for sex" or even that you paid that much for sex. It's not solicitation, it's just an after the fact report. And there's strong legal precedent against them being able to link a person to web activity anyway.

Also, people are kidding themselves if they think law enforcement doesn't know what all of these dumb codes mean. It takes about 3 minutes of reading context and an IQ over 60 to understand what's written here.

Personally I just see absolutely no reason to use code, and I think the stupid nomenclature people have adopted here to represent money spent is not only a waste but often confusing. Like roses is fine, but insisting on saying "$$.5" instead of just 250 is beyond silly. It's not a huge deal, but I get the idea that a lot of people on this forum are simultaneously incredibly cautious with what they write, which is pointless, but won't hesitate to text a girl and ask if she does BB for an upcharge. Which will land you in jail.

[QUOTE=CuriousGeor;5161610]It's not a hill worth dying on, but I think people's use of code online is just hilarious. Authorities can't convict you based on you saying "this girl charges $300 for sex" or even that you paid that much for sex. It's not solicitation, it's just an after the fact report. And there's strong legal precedent against them being able to link a person to web activity anyway.

Also, people are kidding themselves if they think law enforcement doesn't know what all of these dumb codes mean. It takes about 3 minutes of reading context and an IQ over 60 to understand what's written here.

Personally I just see absolutely no reason to use code, and I think the stupid nomenclature people have adopted here to represent money spent is not only a waste but often confusing. Like roses is fine, but insisting on saying "$$.5" instead of just 250 is beyond silly. It's not a huge deal, but I get the idea that a lot of people on this forum are simultaneously incredibly cautious with what they write, which is pointless, but won't hesitate to text a girl and ask if she does BB for an upcharge. Which will land you in jail.[/QUOTE]I agree 100%. They are a lot smarter than some give them credit for. This is one reason why I try to stick with my regulars until they get tired of me. When you do lose a regular and you find another provider who interests you, just call or text her and ask for a QV without asking for any specific favors. You will know after your first visit if there is a connection. If there is a connection, you can have a specific discussion about her services for your next and future visits.

[QUOTE=AnthonyMarc;5160117]I definitely record and try to keep pics. I only got 6 last year because of rona. I had 20 the year before. I had a scare with a lady who got blood all over my balls. I had a condom and The dr said it was low risk, but I sweated about it for 6 months. Happy to report I was clean.[/QUOTE]Yea I've had that happen, it starts getting super gushy and you look down and its all red! Glad you got a clean bill of health. The picture part is a good idea and I may start doing that. Are you taking a pic of them when you meet them or just a screen shot of the ad? As an FYI, I wasnt trying to be boastful, just curious about if any one else tracked their conquests.

[QUOTE=CuriousGeor;5161610]It's not a hill worth dying on, but I think people's use of code online is just hilarious. Authorities can't convict you based on you saying "this girl charges $300 for sex" or even that you paid that much for sex. It's not solicitation, it's just an after the fact report. And there's strong legal precedent against them being able to link a person to web activity anyway.

Also, people are kidding themselves if they think law enforcement doesn't know what all of these dumb codes mean. It takes about 3 minutes of reading context and an IQ over 60 to understand what's written here.

Personally I just see absolutely no reason to use code, and I think the stupid nomenclature people have adopted here to represent money spent is not only a waste but often confusing. Like roses is fine, but insisting on saying "$$.5" instead of just 250 is beyond silly. It's not a huge deal, but I get the idea that a lot of people on this forum are simultaneously incredibly cautious with what they write, which is pointless, but won't hesitate to text a girl and ask if she does BB for an upcharge. Which will land you in jail.[/QUOTE]Yea that is an excellent point, any mention of a sex act and money is the illegal part. I think code of using $$ for money was a convention that used to be set by the board? Not really sure though. Some of the code words l like cause it makes writing / reading easier, BBBJ, cfs, BBFS, its absolutely clear what he means, because often enough its difficult to understand what that monger is trying to say, but then again I'm no Hemingway. I really do wonder how much LEO pay attention to this board? Sure they could gather intel on hot parts of town, or maybe track particular mongers, or search out for missing persons, but agree 100% they know exactly what we are saying. I guess intel is intel. I remember a piece of advice an older monger gave me, never say, do, or write anything that you wouldn't want to explain to a judge (or your mom) LOL. That may be why some mongers are cagey about what they say, and honestly, in this type of hobby a healthy does of fear probably goes a long way to watching your 6. In reality we probably have more to fear from the religious zealots on a crusade doing what they think is best for everybody concerned by trying to out mongers to the community and stop the oldest profession. America is very 3rd world when it comes to this game, many countries have this biz regulated and provide health screening and help to ladies (and some men) who do this, just seems more pragmatic. It would be an interesting read to see a comparison of countries that have this legal vs not legal. We know it goes on, lets use that to our advantage and tax it, regulate it, maybe it will help cut down on sex trafficking? Look at alcohol and how it is regulated in some form or fashion all over the country and alcohol kills more people than STDs. According to the CDC, 95,000 people die each year from alcohol. Soapbox moment over.

I mainly have pics from ads, but I've also gotten pics from them. I know some allow videos during the act, and I'm kicking myself for not asking that more. The SC walkers seem to be more willing based on past reviews. Summer cums to mind as allowing pics of action. Speaking of SC, I swung by McD's there and saw Summer and two other WSWs and a couple BSWs. I was going to skip breakfast because one was wearing a green miniskirt or short dress (around 9 am) by the hotel on Reagan. I turned around but she got scooped by a lucky monger. So close.

[QUOTE=Bouinage;5161931]Yea I've had that happen, it starts getting super gushy and you look down and its all red! Glad you got a clean bill of health. The picture part is a good idea and I may start doing that. Are you taking a pic of them when you meet them or just a screen shot of the ad? As an FYI, I wasnt trying to be boastful, just curious about if any one else tracked their conquests.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CuriousGeor;5161610]It's not a hill worth dying on, but I think people's use of code online is just hilarious. Authorities can't convict you based on you saying "this girl charges $300 for sex" or even that you paid that much for sex. It's not solicitation, it's just an after the fact report. And there's strong legal precedent against them being able to link a person to web activity anyway.

Also, people are kidding themselves if they think law enforcement doesn't know what all of these dumb codes mean. It takes about 3 minutes of reading context and an IQ over 60 to understand what's written here.

Personally I just see absolutely no reason to use code, and I think the stupid nomenclature people have adopted here to represent money spent is not only a waste but often confusing. Like roses is fine, but insisting on saying "$$.5" instead of just 250 is beyond silly. It's not a huge deal, but I get the idea that a lot of people on this forum are simultaneously incredibly cautious with what they write, which is pointless, but won't hesitate to text a girl and ask if she does BB for an upcharge. Which will land you in jail.[/QUOTE]I agree, the use of code words here is kinda stupid. We all know what we're talking about. Hell, the name of the site is SEXGUIDE so what else would we be talking about. And yes the $$1. 50 or $$$ is more confusing than helpful. What's wrong with saying 150 and 200 dollars for a fuck & suck.

I guess using code words and saying I dreamed about fucking some girl is a way of saying it without really saying it. Its a way to describe what happened without admitting that you actually did it. It's like we're in a club with a secret language.

I like calling it easy plausible deniability which was mentioned in a previous post.

GB40.

Just started looking at this site for possible candidates. Most seem to be AMPs. Looks like a lot of the others are fake and only a few are ones I recognize. Can someone give a rundown on this site? Trying to figure out if it's worth the time.

You have to weed through it just like the rest of the other sites. A lot of scams, AMP's, fake pics, and there are a few just like on other sites that are real. Not really any difference in my opinion than the other 4 sites that I use. Goodluck!

[QUOTE=GoodTimes35;5168933]Just started looking at this site for possible candidates. Most seem to be AMPs. Looks like a lot of the others are fake and only a few are ones I recognize. Can someone give a rundown on this site? Trying to figure out if it's worth the time.[/QUOTE].

I understand when someone posts that she has demons, it's referring to a drug addict and drug use. I get that.

And that seems to be the norm with many young women that need money. This is how they finance their habit.

It is rare to find a woman who will fuck for money and use the money for something other than drugs.

So, what is the objection to seeing a girl who has demons? Is it not wanting to be around a drug user? Or afraid her behaviour will be shady?

Many girls I know are functioning addicts. Yes they can cause trouble but I think that's just part of the game.

Comments?

GB40.

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;5211082]I understand when someone posts that she has demons, it's referring to a drug addict and drug use. I get that.

And that seems to be the norm with many young women that need money. This is how they finance their habit.

It is rare to find a woman who will fuck for money and use the money for something other than drugs.

So, what is the objection to seeing a girl who has demons? Is it not wanting to be around a drug user? Or afraid her behaviour will be shady?

Many girls I know are functioning addicts. Yes they can cause trouble but I think that's just part of the game.

Comments?

GB40.[/QUOTE]My former and current favorites entertain mongers because that's how both of them make their living. I am very certain that neither one of them are under the influence of demons. I'm also sure there are other escorts out there who only do this for the money. But I do agree that a lot of escorts do this to support their demon habits.

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;5211082]I understand when someone posts that she has demons, it's referring to a drug addict and drug use. I get that.

And that seems to be the norm with many young women that need money. This is how they finance their habit.

It is rare to find a woman who will fuck for money and use the money for something other than drugs.

So, what is the objection to seeing a girl who has demons? Is it not wanting to be around a drug user? Or afraid her behaviour will be shady?

Many girls I know are functioning addicts. Yes they can cause trouble but I think that's just part of the game.

Comments?

GB40.[/QUOTE]Just about all these girls have some sort of problem. Its a rare byrd that doesn' but I have met a few older gals who were just nymphos looking to profit off their vice. With drug use at least we know what the issue is. Sometimes you get to know a girl whose problem you could not see at first and that problem is even worse or more dangerous. Not going to go into any details or stir any pots which some details will do but I will use a cliche to explain it even though I hate cliches. The devil you know is less dangerous that the devil you do not know.

Some of the best sex I have had was with women so high they couldn't tell time or figure out my 20 minute bareback QV went on for hours with multiple creamings. Sometimes I get with girls so desperate to feed the demon that the menu expanded. This is the devil I know, when dealing with a devil I do not know I can spend a lot of money on a lot of visits before I figure out how to go further with a girl. To me its a game of how far can I get a girl to go, it might not even be sexual. I find something they shield and I like to bring their defenses down. I am not a predator or anything so when they let their guard down they are not in danger but I get a rush out of women trusting me. I have better orgasms, and enjoy them that much more. The more of them they share with me the better I treat them too.

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;5211082]I understand when someone posts that she has demons, it's referring to a drug addict and drug use. I get that.

And that seems to be the norm with many young women that need money. This is how they finance their habit.

It is rare to find a woman who will fuck for money and use the money for something other than drugs.

So, what is the objection to seeing a girl who has demons? Is it not wanting to be around a drug user? Or afraid her behaviour will be shady?

Many girls I know are functioning addicts. Yes they can cause trouble but I think that's just part of the game.

Comments?

GB40.[/QUOTE]Agreed. I think 98% of the girls have demons to some degree or another. You get the occasional girl who just needs the extra money and rarer still, the girl who just like to fuck and is smart enough to get get paid to do it.

Some hide it better than others. I just can't deal with someone whose habit is out of control. That can lead to a bad time in more ways than one.

[QUOTE=FunderJ;5211362]My former and current favorites entertain mongers because that's how both of them make their living. I am very certain that neither one of them are under the influence of demons. I'm also sure there are other escorts out there who only do this for the money. But I do agree that a lot of escorts do this to support their demon habits.[/QUOTE]Hate to break it to you but Jess has had the same runny nose sniffles for over 5 years. I can't prove she's on something but my gut tells me different. I remember the first few times I saw her years ago, she had a runny nose and was sniffling like crazy and I immediately thought coke habit.

For old times sake because she had popped recently, I saw her a couple of months ago and she had the same runny nose and sniffles. What are the odds?