[QUOTE=Plastermoon;4189691]Their usual ad on CityX is not running this week, so maybe they are away on a break.[/QUOTE]Yes, meant to say 251 High in 'tham.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Plastermoon;4189691]Their usual ad on CityX is not running this week, so maybe they are away on a break.[/QUOTE]Yes, meant to say 251 High in 'tham.
So I know I have no credibility with you guys, but I'm hoping to help out. I went past tender again today and same suv (tan mountaineer) with same guy in it. I kept driving by and notice LEO parked around corner. Now I drive this way home every day for the last year and never seen LEO parked there. So just a heads up on this place.
This is for those inquiring minds who are wondering what up with the unraveled post about the popular 249/251 High location. "Supposedly" closed for a short time maybe a couple weeks, maybe a couple weeks, because the landlord needs to work on the mechanical systems. Odd thing is that the mechanical system at the center of the problem, is again "supposedly" the a / c system (yeah, in the middle of the winter).
[QUOTE=Saratogahank;4190279]Yes, meant to say 251 High in 'tham.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Trailman44;4182837]Haven't dipped my toe in for a while. Wondering if anyone has been recently. Curious if talent & service is still the same. PM is fine as well.[/QUOTE]Visited Lotus today, everything is as it's been for years.
[QUOTE=Trickster666;4189741]The infamous t-girl returned from China and is back to his / her old ways, ducking first-timers without letting them know that they are dealing with a man. Is that acceptable?[/QUOTE]No, that is not acceptable.
[QUOTE=ChoirBoy;4190910]No, that is not acceptable.[/QUOTE]Definitely not my cup of T (ea).
Any luck on 665 Beacon or 569 Boylston?
[QUOTE=Doon69;4190984]Any luck on 665 Beacon or 569 Boylston?[/QUOTE]I have been to 569 Boylston several times always ok to good massage nothing but standard handshake, girls are ok looking, nothing stunning, I've asked for more, showed a $100 bill, still nothing.
With the closing of 905 in Waltham, Angel's retirement and the disappearance of Mary / Jenna all the best prostate massage girls are gone. Does anyone know Mary / Jenna's whereabouts?
All closed up with no notice. Another one bites the dust.
[QUOTE=ChoirBoy;4190910]No, that is not acceptable.[/QUOTE]In response to PMs, asking who "the infamous t-girl" is, that's Sarah at Linden. I certainly agree, it's uacceptable to duck the first-timers (or anybody else) without letting the takers know that they are dealing with a man. Not sure what to do about it, but a total boycott of this cheating POS might help.
[QUOTE=Chicag0;4191996]All closed up with no notice. Another one bites the dust.[/QUOTE]Ming was same firm as Swan Malden whichlosed a while ago.
Where is the best place anywhere within a 5 mile radius of Copley? Any recomendatins for first timers here?
Quick report:
Getting back into the monger game, but here's a quick one. Went to 56 Kneeland cause I was in the area. Drew a slightly chubby early 30's woman, pretty quick rubdown, lots of teasing. Flip came about ten minutes in, so I had pretty high hopes for what was coming. Kept trying to push for UTC, wasn't interested. Finally talked her down to. 4 for the HE, but pretty standard finish overall. Probably won't go back.
Anyone got any other recs. For bigger women?
[QUOTE=Mapokaplaya;4191697]With the closing of 905 in Waltham, Angel's retirement and the disappearance of Mary / Jenna all the best prostate massage girls are gone. Does anyone know Mary / Jenna's whereabouts?[/QUOTE]As of a couple months ago, across the street at 976 Main. I didn't see her, but I have it from a reliable source and respected senior member of this board.