Hope they didn't bust S... my favorite one.
I think it happen because of that provider kill happened a couple of months ago. Probably LE got order to clean area.
[QUOTE=Rockhard 441]Have you guys all read abouet the series of busts in SGV at some of the AAMP's? They even got some of the CL girls who were working out of motels. The story said that two of the girls even jumped out a second story window and got away. Here's the story...
[url]http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_7765967[/url]
Rockhard 441[/QUOTE]
Find a dictionary, or learn to spell, too!
[QUOTE=CautiousOne]MARLOWE, oh very senior guy on this board... NO FLAME IS INTEDED, but if I ever posted and came off a little "jerkish" I would expect to be called on it. Did your responses to my post on Honey really add anything to the thread? Did it really help the board members who I was trying to warn about a provider who does not deliver as promissed?
For the benefit of those that hold you in high regard I will add.
My little quick bit of information was intended to save others who may have been intersted in her from suffering the same lousy service that I suffered through. I advised the board of a TER review in the event that any of them cared to check.
Though I am not as senior as you Marlowe, I am a senior member none the less and with that comes some credability. I am not a pimp or any of the other things that SO CAL ASIAN mentioned. My handle is known and my reviews on TER and elsewhere are usually held in pretty decent regard for being true to both the letter and spirit of the the rating system guidelines.
I have about 40 reviews posted on TER. TER has its problems and I have heard the stories about some nasty stuff there. I am always bringing BS reviews to the administrators attention and calling their attention to reviews that look self writtten. However, with all its issues I still find it a good resource. I am not the only one here that does. Some highly regarded guys from here post reviews on TER as well. I can also say that some reviews posted her have made me question the standards of the reviewers. IE the reviewers are TOO EASY.
If you had read my review on TER you would have understood that I did not meet this girl on CL and had actually seen and talked to her before I ever saw her post on CL. It was a result of our conversation that I desided to go see her.
Yes, MARLOWE, I did get some pussy. IT WAS LOUSY PUSSY and what was promissed was not delivered.
I really don't give a crap about how much it cost. Was the agreed upon donation paid by me? Yes. Was the agreed upon service provided? NO. Based on that she is not an honorable person to do business with and a LOUSY FUCK at that. If the board doesn't care for that kind of information then I am mistaken.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely no flame intended (nor in the other post for that matter) but dude your spelling is atrocious! All I suggested is that you tell us in this forum, the one we frequent for general info what was wrong with this provider.
Instead you DECIDED (no s in this word) to take offense. Your bad, not mine.
Oh, BTW, thank you for sparing all of us the wasted time and money on her. A bad provider as such deserves to be outed at all times. I just wanted more info, since I'm not a VIP TER member, the parts of your review that were accessible to me, didn't tell me much.