BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=Jariles10;2025898][URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-elite-latina-companion-sweetest-treat-youll-ever-meet-19/25836239[/URL]

Reviews look solid in other parts of the country. Posting a lot. Anyone have experience? PMs are cool if preferred.

By the way, I'm surprised with the Emma love. I thought she was a no-go? What about Cassie? Has she been confirmed as ok?[/QUOTE]Emmas a sweet heart. I enjoyed her company very much. Cassie in Brockton is also a great value if she likes you and you can get in to see her. She's very selective.

[QUOTE=Jariles10;2025898][URL]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-elite-latina-companion-sweetest-treat-youll-ever-meet-19/25836239[/URL]

Reviews look solid in other parts of the country. Posting a lot. Anyone have experience? PMs are cool if preferred.

By the way, I'm surprised with the Emma love. I thought she was a no-go? What about Cassie? Has she been confirmed as ok?[/QUOTE]Cassie is legit for sure. I had a good time with her but a little too petite for me. I like a little more meat on the bones. She did all she said and more though and in a pinch would see her again.

WM.

[QUOTE=TDevil;2025739]Didn't experience anything like that on my visit so not sure what's up with that. I had the privilege of seeing Emma as arranged but did meet Jackie when I was there. She was as attractive as Emma and wouldn't have minded seeing her when I was there but as I set the appointment with Emma that's who I saw. Since you saw Jackie how about a heads up on how he date went? How was her service? Let us know, thanks.[/QUOTE]The date with Jackie went fine. However I was a bit disappointed to get the switch pulled because I read so many great things on Emma. Plus although still petite it appears Emma has a little more meat on the bones than Jackie. I like a nice juicy bum and Emma appears to have that. I will try again for sure but will make sure of who I am getting. I was also kind of taken a back of the other people in the house. Plus it was not far from where I actually live so that was another thing on my mind.

WM.

Somebody posted this last night in the SC BP section. Surprised I didn't see it posted here as it sounds like some of us on this forum.

[URL]http://southcoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/leo-sweep-in-brockton-20/25885079[/URL]

'LEO made provider sweeps through Brockton this weekend and collected a few girls and their phones. If you call a girl in Brockton for the next few weeks you may not be talking to the girl but to her aunt LEO looking to make examples under the new john laws recently enacted in MA. Be careful and always play safe'.

[QUOTE=Werm2011;2029697]Somebody posted this today in the SC BP section. Surprised I didn't see it posted here as it sounds like some of us on this forum.

[URL]http://southcoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/leo-sweep-in-brockton-20/25885079[/URL]

'LEO made provider sweeps through Brockton this weekend and collected a few girls and their phones. If you call a girl in Brockton for the next few weeks you may not be talking to the girl but to her aunt LEO looking to make examples under the new john laws recently enacted in MA. Be careful and always play safe'.[/QUOTE]I'm surprised as well. I can't find anything in the Enterprise about it so it would appear someone has some specific knowledge possibly obtained from one of the girls themselves. Additionally are we to assume this involved backpage stings involving LE contacting published BP ads in the Brockton area? I spoke to a Brockton SW yesterday and she hadn't heard of anything involving the street girls. It is certainly a time for added caution on our part in Brockton.

[QUOTE=Werm2011;2029697]Somebody posted this last night in the SC BP section. Surprised I didn't see it posted here as it sounds like some of us on this forum.

[URL]http://southcoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/leo-sweep-in-brockton-20/25885079[/URL]

'LEO made provider sweeps through Brockton this weekend and collected a few girls and their phones. If you call a girl in Brockton for the next few weeks you may not be talking to the girl but to her aunt LEO looking to make examples under the new john laws recently enacted in MA. Be careful and always play safe'.[/QUOTE]As of now LE must give them back (unless it's stolen property), not looking to debate the issue or start shit storm of debate by others, but if you look at the source it's a BP post & I don't know how much validity that carries for anyone but it means very little to me.

The NSA probably already knows the contents of all our phones anyways!

According to this (& I'm not saying they are correct) Mass is a state where police need to get a warrant to take a look the information inside your cell phone.

[URL]http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/07/31/a-map-of-where-police-can-search-your-phone-when-they-arrest-you/[/URL]

More info here: [URL]http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/19/doj-files-cert-petition-in-wurie/[/URL].

[URL]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6569410415947950387&scilh=0[/URL]

At this point I'm not losing sleep over it.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2029765]
According to this (& I'm not saying they are correct) Mass is a state where police need to get a warrant to take a look the information inside your cell phone.
[/QUOTE]I can tell you for a fact that they will use arrested girls' phones to try to entrap. Twice I have gotten text messages on my monger phone from girls who I later found out were arrested and it was Uncle LEO texting. The first time was so obviously not the girl I knew texting, and I ignored it. The second time a few years later they were much more subtle, but when I called they wouldn't answer, so I didn't bite. Both times I changed monger phones after it happened.

Smart girls will have passwords on their phones to hinder such activity (among other things). Uncle LEO does have access to devices they can hook up to the phone to download contacts, text, recent calls, pictures, etc. But so far as I know, they aren't in common use around here.

Now you may be able to get an arrest thrown out, but you still got arrested, they know who you are now, so they still win.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2029765]As of now LE must give them back (unless it's stolen property), not looking to debate the issue or start shit storm of debate by others, but if you look at the source it's a BP post & I don't know how much validity that carries for anyone but it means very little to me.

The NSA probably already knows the contents of all our phones anyways!

According to this (& I'm not saying they are correct) Mass is a state where police need to get a warrant to take a look the information inside your cell phone.

[URL]http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/07/31/a-map-of-where-police-can-search-your-phone-when-they-arrest-you/[/URL]

More info here: [URL]http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/19/doj-files-cert-petition-in-wurie/[/URL].

[URL]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6569410415947950387&scilh=0[/URL]

At this point I'm not losing sleep over it.[/QUOTE]I don't know about info on the phone and warrants but I do know they don't need a warrant to answer the phone. This was done a few years back in another town where LEO started answering a girls phone and nabbed a few unsuspecting hobbyists. They got two girls and a big number of guys that called the phones. Wish I could remember the town. It was def on the south shore.

[QUOTE=HoHunter328;2029816]I can tell you for a fact that they will use arrested girls' phones to try to entrap. Twice I have gotten text messages on my monger phone from girls who I later found out were arrested and it was Uncle LEO texting. The first time was so obviously not the girl I knew texting, and I ignored it. The second time a few years later they were much more subtle, but when I called they wouldn't answer, so I didn't bite. Both times I changed monger phones after it happened.

Smart girls will have passwords on their phones to hinder such activity (among other things). Uncle LEO does have access to devices they can hook up to the phone to download contacts, text, recent calls, pictures, etc. But so far as I know, they aren't in common use around here.

Now you may be able to get an arrest thrown out, but you still got arrested, they know who you are now, so they still win.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.[/QUOTE]I don't know anything about warrants for info on the phones but I do know they can and will answer the phones. This was done a few years ago in a town on the south shore. I wish I could remember the name of the town. They nabbed two girls and a number of unsuspecting hobbyists over a short period of time. Whats this about new laws aimed at "johns"? Anyone familiar with this part of the post?

Madisson aka Rozay appears to have a new name and a new number? She is now Cassie and she is working with another junkie named Emily. Watch yourself guys its definitely her. I'm sure changing her name and number hasn't improved her service or hygiene. She's nasty. Stay safe guys and avoid these two.

[QUOTE=HoHunter328;2029816]Now you may be able to get an arrest thrown out, but you still got arrested, they know who you are now, so they still win.[/QUOTE]View it as you like.

I have been arrested, I did get it thrown out, & I guess they know who I am, (they probably did before I was arrested).

Yet I monger on, troll the streets & pick-up girls, see escorts, UTR girls, CLCE women etc.

Whether one is known or unknown to LE you still have to live your daily life.

I did find this article interesting: [URL]http://www.privacysos.org/node/1206[/URL].

If I was a betting man I would say that the Supreme Court probably will find in favor of Law Enforcement in a ruling that at some point they will have to make.

Until that happens like I said I'm not losing sleep over it.

Definitely not worth losing sleep over. Is it worth being a little extra cautious when making a date with our favorite or not so favorite Brockton piece? Of course.

Even if they don't commandeer the phones, knowing that there 'may' be something going down is worth noting. For example, I've made plenty of dates (with girls I've seen) just by text. Will I do that in be this week or the next? No.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2029765]As of now LE must give them back (unless it's stolen property), not looking to debate the issue or start shit storm of debate by others, but if you look at the source it's a BP post & I don't know how much validity that carries for anyone but it means very little to me.

The NSA probably already knows the contents of all our phones anyways!

According to this (& I'm not saying they are correct) Mass is a state where police need to get a warrant to take a look the information inside your cell phone.

[URL]http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/07/31/a-map-of-where-police-can-search-your-phone-when-they-arrest-you/[/URL]

More info here: [URL]http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/19/doj-files-cert-petition-in-wurie/[/URL].

[URL]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6569410415947950387&scilh=0[/URL]

At this point I'm not losing sleep over it.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TDevil;2029836]I don't know anything about warrants for info on the phones but I do know they can and will answer the phones. This was done a few years ago in a town on the south shore. I wish I could remember the name of the town. They nabbed two girls and a number of unsuspecting hobbyists over a short period of time. Whats this about new laws aimed at "johns"? Anyone familiar with this part of the post?[/QUOTE][URL]http://wgbhnews.org/post/state-effort-target-demand-side-prostitution-stalls[/URL]

That pretty much explains it. Basically Martha's plan was for tougher penalties on the demand side of prostitution.

[QUOTE=TDevil;2029844]Madisson aka Rozay appears to have a new name and a new number? She is now Cassie and she is working with another junkie named Emily. Watch yourself guys its definitely her. I'm sure changing her name and number hasn't improved her service or hygiene. She's nasty. Stay safe guys and avoid these two.[/QUOTE]


Two Cassie's in Brockton now? I think that's your fault. LOL.

[QUOTE=Werm2011;2030052][URL]http://wgbhnews.org/post/state-effort-target-demand-side-prostitution-stalls[/URL]

That pretty much explains it. Basically Martha's plan was for tougher penalties on the demand side of prostitution.




Two Cassie's in Brockton now? I think that's your fault. LOL.[/QUOTE]The second Cassie is Madisson aka Rozay. She changed her name and number again. Very telling I think. Different name and number same crappy unsanitary disgusting service.

[QUOTE=Yardape08;2029707]I'm surprised as well. I can't find anything in the Enterprise about it so it would appear someone has some specific knowledge possibly obtained from one of the girls themselves. Additionally are we to assume this involved backpage stings involving LE contacting published BP ads in the Brockton area? I spoke to a Brockton SW yesterday and she hadn't heard of anything involving the street girls. It is certainly a time for added caution on our part in Brockton.[/QUOTE]Same here. I browsed the enterprise and didn't read anything about it either. I even asked some in the know and they weren't aware of anything either. Maybe the same person that posted that has posted this or similar the past couple of weeks?

[URL]http://southcoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/before-you-call-anyone-please-look-here-first-1st-21/25803744[/URL]

Kinda quiet on main today even with the warm weather. Oh well.