Asian Providers

[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5484684]Saw her earlier as well, I echo most of the review. Really beautiful face, tall and model like, not so much a landing strip but the perfect amount of bush. Awesome and enthusiastic service, somewhat uncommon for this agency and Thai ladies. The only ding, and it really didn't matter, a good amount of cellulite on her ass. She's here for two weeks, I would repeat.[/QUOTE]So this all sounds good? However, the girls at Sandra99 are notorious for being completely non-GFE.

Is she honestly a GFE provider. Enthusiastic BBBJ, fully engaged DFK, willing to do ACG, Doggie, not just laying on their back unenthusiastically waiting for you to finish then rush you out the door?

Also curious if their real, or MM breasts (if MM, hopefully not rock hard).

[QUOTE=Gbrand;5485983]So this all sounds good? However, the girls at Sandra99 are notorious for being completely non-GFE.
Is she honestly a GFE provider. Enthusiastic BBBJ, fully engaged DFK, willing to do ACG, Doggie, not just laying on their back unenthusiastically waiting for you to finish then rush you out the door?
Also curious if their real, or MM breasts (if MM, hopefully not rock hard).[/QUOTE]Gbrand, your inbox is full. I will send you an update.

[QUOTE=SirBishop;5486022]Gbrand, your inbox is full. I will send you an update.[/QUOTE]Would really appreciate any input that you have on this particular girl from Thailand. The entire purpose of this message board is to share information.

[QUOTE=Gbrand;5485983]So this all sounds good? However, the girls at Sandra99 are notorious for being completely non-GFE.

Is she honestly a GFE provider. Enthusiastic BBBJ, fully engaged DFK, willing to do ACG, Doggie, not just laying on their back unenthusiastically waiting for you to finish then rush you out the door?

Also curious if their real, or MM breasts (if MM, hopefully not rock hard).[/QUOTE]Since the k-girl talent here has been pretty static I saw Emily yesterday. Here's my review:

P: Pics are her but she didn't have as much makeup when I saw her. Very cute face and youthful looking.

L: 5'9 with pear shaped body with wide hips. Average build, not super toned but not fat either. Manmade full C's that are firm but not rock hard, still nice to grab and play with. She had her hair straightened instead of curly like in pics. Small Bush down below, not excessive. As mentioned by Hiro, a bit of cellulite in thighs but her plump ass made up for it imo. Didn't notice any tattoos.

E: Ok English, she understood everything I asked for but I had a bit of trouble understanding her Thai accent, also had the music very loud which didn't help.

A: Playful, accommodating, and very GFE. She was a bit concerned about my size (a bit above average) but still went through many positions. Lots of DFK and smiling throughout the session. Keeps her tongue sort of stiff when kissing and will jam it down your throat.

S: BBBJ was mediocre, made no attempt to DT. She gave me a short cat bath then I went in for some DATY which she was very receptive to and got her really wet. Hat on, she rode me first in CG and ACG, had good stamina but looked like she struggled a bit with size. During session also did spoon, mish, doggy, standing dog, and lazy dog. Got a good workout in for a good 15-20 min. Knew how to kegel well when she could tell I was close to finishing. She's very tight, hat almost got stuck when I pulled out.

E: 2. 0 hhr / 3. 0 hr / 0. 2 upcharge for MSOG.

Are: Maybe, leaning toward yes. I think k-agencies are a better bang for the buck but she's a nice change of pace from k-girls. She's only here for 2 weeks.

[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5484684]Saw her earlier as well, I echo most of the review. Really beautiful face, tall and model like, not so much a landing strip but the perfect amount of bush. Awesome and enthusiastic service, somewhat uncommon for this agency and Thai ladies. The only ding, and it really didn't matter, a good amount of cellulite on her ass. She's here for two weeks, I would repeat.[/QUOTE]Saw her a couple days ago as well, she is a looker, very beautiful. Beautiful body, despite the cellulite ass mentioned here. Did not detract from my experience at all. Kissing was ok, but I wouldn't call it a passionate make out session, but she was willing. I am way bigger than average on girth and yes she was tight, but with a bit of grimacing she took it like a champ and at times seemed to be liking it. Very playful and seems to enjoy making a guy happy. The highlight was staring at her beautiful face in missionary. Her petite facial features make epic fuck faces.

[QUOTE=Apharmd;5486611]Since the k-girl talent here has been pretty static I saw Emily yesterday. Here's my review:

P: Pics are her but she didn't have as much makeup when I saw her. Very cute face and youthful looking.

L: 5'9 with pear shaped body with wide hips. Average build, not super toned but not fat either. Manmade full C's that are firm but not rock hard, still nice to grab and play with. She had her hair straightened instead of curly like in pics. Small Bush down below, not excessive. As mentioned by Hiro, a bit of cellulite in thighs but her plump ass made up for it imo. Didn't notice any tattoos.

E: Ok English, she understood everything I asked for but I had a bit of trouble understanding her Thai accent, also had the music very loud which didn't help.

A: Playful, accommodating, and very GFE. She was a bit concerned about my size (a bit above average) but still went through many positions. Lots of DFK and smiling throughout the session. Keeps her tongue sort of stiff when kissing and will jam it down your throat.

S: BBBJ was mediocre, made no attempt to DT. She gave me a short cat bath then I went in for some DATY which she was very receptive to and got her really wet. Hat on, she rode me first in CG and ACG, had good stamina but looked like she struggled a bit with size. During session also did spoon, mish, doggy, standing dog, and lazy dog. Got a good workout in for a good 15-20 min. Knew how to kegel well when she could tell I was close to finishing. She's very tight, hat almost got stuck when I pulled out.

E: 2. 0 hhr / 3. 0 hr / 0. 2 upcharge for MSOG.

Are: Maybe, leaning toward yes. I think k-agencies are a better bang for the buck but she's a nice change of pace from k-girls. She's only here for 2 weeks.[/QUOTE]Thanks for contributing. This is useful information.

[QUOTE=TheDudeInSd;5486716]Thanks for contributing. This is useful information.[/QUOTE]Just echoing the sentiment on Emily. Tall, pretty, enthusiastic girl. Seems to like kissing, and yes very tight pussy. I think the booker indicated CIM was on the menu, but she said (at least to me) she does not like that. Pictures are her. Love her wide hips, don't mind the cellulite at all.

[QUOTE=TheDudeInSd;5484614]New Chinese girl in town for a few weeks. Went to the familiar apartment in UTC and was greeted by a mid 30's lady with a nice tone body. She took me to the room and I went face down for some nice soft massaging which led quickly to tickling my balls. I was getting hard so I flipped over and she started licking my balls. She then took my dick in her warm mouth for a high quality BBBJ with some nice light DT. Pulled her top down to reveal some 34 C all natural boobs. Let her go on for 10 minutes and I was getting close so I pulled her up to me and started grinding her wet pussy on the little Lebowski. She was nice and wet and then mounted me BBFS. Watched her bounce up on down for a bit and then flipped her over for some mish and side straddle. Nice moans with her licking my nipples while I plowed away and filled her up. Took a shower and left $$$ for the hour. She does not speak English but the service was great.

[URL]https://sandiego.rubratings.com/238607[/URL]

Cheers.[/QUOTE]Thanks for posting this. Was her rate 200 and you donated an extra 100?

CC.

[QUOTE=CobraComander;5487365]Thanks for posting this. Was her rate 200 and you donated an extra 100?

CC.[/QUOTE]Yes, she did not ask for it but felt it was fair for the extra service.

Went last Friday to try Hunna my review:

P: Pics are her very cute face nice looking.

L: 5'2 with nice booty and nice C-D size cup. Body was tone. Shaved below. Body was very appealing imo.

E: Ok English, she likes joking around.

A: Playful, accommodating, and very GFE. DFK and smiling throughout the session.

S: She gave me a short shower then on for bed BBBJ was very good with DT. Hat on, she rode me first in CG, mish, doggy, legs up over my shoulders. She's very tight kegel was good.

E: 220.0 hhr.

Are: yes. And looking to try Emily.

Happy Hunting.

[QUOTE=TheDudeInSd;5487504]Yes, she did not ask for it but felt it was fair for the extra service.[/QUOTE]Well done. Pictures accurate?

[QUOTE=Waylay;5487130]Just echoing the sentiment on Emily. Tall, pretty, enthusiastic girl. Seems to like kissing, and yes very tight pussy. I think the booker indicated CIM was on the menu, but she said (at least to me) she does not like that. Pictures are her. Love her wide hips, don't mind the cellulite at all.[/QUOTE]Another one for Emily. She is really pretty and had Disney mom hips LOL. She said she will be around for 2 weeks.

[QUOTE=Kwaze;5487631]Went last Friday to try Hunna my review:

P: Pics are her very cute face nice looking.

L: 5'2 with nice booty and nice C-D size cup. Body was tone. Shaved below. Body was very appealing imo.

E: Ok English, she likes joking around.

A: Playful, accommodating, and very GFE. DFK and smiling throughout the session.

S: She gave me a short shower then on for bed BBBJ was very good with DT. Hat on, she rode me first in CG, mish, doggy, legs up over my shoulders. She's very tight kegel was good.

E: 220.0 hhr.

Are: yes. And looking to try Emily.

Happy Hunting.[/QUOTE]Maybe Sandra99 girls are realizing they need to offer more GFE experiences. I have not seen Hunna but definitely think she's cute. She's not as pretty like Kimberly (my fav Thai provider). The reason I haven't scheduled with Hunna is her mixed reviews.

Now, Emily is definitely a looker. I'm glad she is offering GFE experiences.

Hopefully, Sandra99 bring more talents like Emily.

[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5487979]Maybe Sandra99 girls are realizing they need to offer more GFE experiences. I have not seen Hunna but definitely think she's cute. She's not as pretty like Kimberly (my fav Thai provider). The reason I haven't scheduled with Hunna is her mixed reviews.
Now, Emily is definitely a looker. I'm glad she is offering GFE experiences.
Hopefully, Sandra99 bring more talents like Emily.[/QUOTE]RC you bring up a very good question. Where do these agencies find the ladies? For the other two agencies we have a pretty good idea that ladies will travel between OC, LA, SF, San Diego, Texas and Boston. Seems like K-Girls have a pretty tight community. It seems easy for them to change locations on a regular basis. A few years ago the Thai ladies were also in a rotation of sorts between OC, LA and SD. Not so much now and it's very hard to find Thai ladies even up in OC! Who has insight or profound thoughts about the inner workings of agencies?

[QUOTE=SirBishop;5488062]RC you bring up a very good question. Where do these agencies find the ladies? For the other two agencies we have a pretty good idea that ladies will travel between OC, LA, SF, San Diego, Texas and Boston. Seems like K-Girls have a pretty tight community. It seems easy for them to change locations on a regular basis. A few years ago the Thai ladies were also in a rotation of sorts between OC, LA and SD. Not so much now and it's very hard to find Thai ladies even up in OC! Who has insight or profound thoughts about the inner workings of agencies?[/QUOTE]A lot of them get in through friends or sometimes family who also work or have worked at these agencies. They see how much money their friend is bringing home and get curious.