Printable View
[QUOTE=BamBam;5904143]Can you share a link? I do not see her.
BAM.[/QUOTE]See if this gets you there. She had 3 pics earlier then moved one to hidden late last week. We been quoting back and fourth the week or so but ae has not excepted my price.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/eQwL3daOJLXobGwJVWNXKjk6[/URL]
[QUOTE=Joe999;5904218]See if this gets you there. She had 3 pics earlier then moved one to hidden late last week. We been quoting back and fourth the week or so but ae has not excepted my price.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/eQwL3daOJLXobGwJVWNXKjk6[/URL][/QUOTE]I see her now. I sent her an approach but she did not bite. Has she said where she lives? There are some neighborhoods where I would not go and others where I would not worry.
BAM.
Here is my most recent list:
PrincesK: taking me straight to SnapChat. Not a good sign. Offers to sell nudes but they count against her fee to meet. I'm out.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/652caf79-eeba-4529-9b68-06e5fc5ae340[/URL]
Ffeebee cutie: This is her second profile in as many days. She told me her name is Phoebe. They totally nuked her. She is either underage or a particularly noxious scammer. She is using pics of: [URL]https://onlyfans.com/kandibabyxofree.[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e48f07f4-7373-45a9-a6ce-b39889b7cb8d[/URL]
SexySav33: repeat profile. On the site a long time. UTR good with 200-300 ppm, Will go straight to the FC. Lives in Florence. Can host?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c14f9749-bd9a-48fe-8c66-6198204d166b[/URL]
Theelovelyvalentinaa: Claims she has been on the site for over three years. If she is really 20 that would have had her on the site when 17 or under. Sneered at my offer and said I was cheap. Not going to label her GPS just yet but trending in that direction.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9e77691a-f807-4883-9065-93486c5e1808[/URL]
Cutie dragon pie: Was Shybaby and reported her as a rinser back in March. Wants allowance to start at MnG and continue until she "gets comfortable" citing sexual trauma. I think she changed her profile name for the same reason escorts do. RINSER!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9f1e294-3397-47e5-8215-cb873e2db4c7[/URL]
Lynn999: Are those nines prophetic? Says "her" name is Tracy. Goes straight to text. Sends lot of pictures of Italian porn star, Valentina Nappi. Her pics also show up in escort ads all over the country. She doesn't do that much for me but she is undeniably popular. In any case, "Tracy" needs money immediately to avoid car repossession.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c4c273a3-1b27-41c5-b154-cc30ac11ca73[/URL]
Alenadobrexoxo, TGTBT?, Her name sounds very East European. "My boyfriend was recently murdered. " Could be a dangerous job. Tattoos make her look local. No family. Chatting by text. Trying to get her to video chat. She keeps making excuses and refuses to meet. Pure time-waster.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f7cb6e0-a754-4495-8455-3c230301c900[/URL]
ElegantDancer: they appear to be learning but not very quickly. Mid-30's, single picture, classic crypto-scammer profile language.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dc38b24a-52e9-4759-91f2-86b964f3f0b1[/URL]
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5905343]I see her now. I sent her an approach but she did not bite. Has she said where she lives? There are some neighborhoods where I would not go and others where I would not worry.
BAM.[/QUOTE]Lives in Eastgate.
[QUOTE=TapThat;5904157]Is this the lady you are referring too?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4e90e387-46a9-4246-89ea-d84fbe31eab2[/URL][/QUOTE]This is the one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e[/URL]
[QUOTE=BamBam;5905349]Here is my most recent list:
PrincesK: taking me straight to SnapChat. Not a good sign. Offers to sell nudes but they count against her fee to meet. I'm out.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/652caf79-eeba-4529-9b68-06e5fc5ae340[/URL]
Ffeebee cutie: This is her second profile in as many days. She told me her name is Phoebe. They totally nuked her. She is either underage or a particularly noxious scammer. She is using pics of: [URL]https://onlyfans.com/kandibabyxofree.[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e48f07f4-7373-45a9-a6ce-b39889b7cb8d[/URL]
SexySav33: repeat profile. On the site a long time. UTR good with 200-300 ppm, Will go straight to the FC. Lives in Florence. Can host?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c14f9749-bd9a-48fe-8c66-6198204d166b[/URL]
Theelovelyvalentinaa: Claims she has been on the site for over three years. If she is really 20 that would have had her on the site when 17 or under. Sneered at my offer and said I was cheap. Not going to label her GPS just yet but trending in that direction.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9e77691a-f807-4883-9065-93486c5e1808[/URL]
Cutie dragon pie: Was Shybaby and reported her as a rinser back in March. Wants allowance to start at MnG and continue until she "gets comfortable" citing sexual trauma. I think she changed her profile name for the same reason escorts do. RINSER!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9f1e294-3397-47e5-8215-cb873e2db4c7[/URL]
Lynn999: Are those nines prophetic? Says "her" name is Tracy. Goes straight to text. Sends lot of pictures of Italian porn star, Valentina Nappi. Her pics also show up in escort ads all over the country. She doesn't do that much for me but she is undeniably popular. In any case, "Tracy" needs money immediately to avoid car repossession.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c4c273a3-1b27-41c5-b154-cc30ac11ca73[/URL]
Alenadobrexoxo, TGTBT?, Her name sounds very East European. "My boyfriend was recently murdered. " Could be a dangerous job. Tattoos make her look local. No family. Chatting by text. Trying to get her to video chat. She keeps making excuses and refuses to meet. Pure time-waster.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f7cb6e0-a754-4495-8455-3c230301c900[/URL]
ElegantDancer: they appear to be learning but not very quickly. Mid-30's, single picture, classic crypto-scammer profile language.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dc38b24a-52e9-4759-91f2-86b964f3f0b1[/URL]
BAM.[/QUOTE]Lovelatina is way past 20 IMHO.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5886651]I have now had two encounters with this profile. The first sent my spidey sense tingling. The second set off the submerge klaxon! Dive, dive dive!
Itty Bitty: gives name as Connor, is self-proclaimed "bad girl," led with "her" #, refuses to video chat, will not have sex at the first meet but will do car oral. Asks 200 but agrees to 100, Twice tried to schedule a MnG with me. But does not meet for free. Insist on money for oral. I agreed but said we need to meet inside Panera first. Refused that, said "she" wanted to just jump in my car on arrival. Hmmm, no video chat, name is Connor, profile says 27 but pics say 37, no fixed address except parents in Saint Paris out past Urbana, likely couch surfing in the Franklin / Middletown area, number traces to a Connor but no gender identity or social media anywhere. I looked twice and pretty hard. There are a few women named Connor but they are rare and none live in rural Ohio. Feels like a set up to me. When I said attempted muggings and blackmail have forced me to adopt certain safety precautions, "her" language went to hell: "I don't need to mug you I make hella money LOL and blackmail? Idgaf about your life or what you got going on I'm tryna make money smh but yeah you doing to much" I reluctantly passed on the opportunity. Anyone want to TOFTT?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]
BAM.[/QUOTE]I always pass on 1 pic profile definitely some kinda scam.
[QUOTE=RickMann;5906442]I always pass on 1 pic profile definitely some kinda scam.[/QUOTE]I avoid saying "always" or "never" when I can just do some easy tests. It all depends on how crowded the market is that day.
BAM.
She messaged me out of the blue and quoted me 5 Benji's a pop LMAO, GTFO.
Even without the bad reviews I wouldn't provide that, does she have brain damage? She's a 200 type of arrangement, MAX!
[QUOTE=Goo3215;5905529]This is the one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e[/URL][/QUOTE]
No joke. Sunni2day. 53. Props to her for giving Seeking a try for whatever reason she has for doing so.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e9fa9b00-61cd-45bb-859a-ebee9d6f6bc0[/URL]
[QUOTE=IGiveVitaminD;5906905]She messaged me out of the blue and quoted me 5 Benji's a pop LMAO, GTFO.
Even without the bad reviews I wouldn't provide that, does she have brain damage? She's a 200 type of arrangement, MAX![/QUOTE]$500 A POP? I'm not gay, but $500 is $500.
[I](for those who are handicapped without a sense of humor, that was a joke designed to highlight the absurdity of asking $500 for 1 orgasm; something you can accomplish with one hand tied behind your back. Sometimes, it's because you have one hand tied behind your back.).[/I]
Spotted this one out in the wild at a popular wing place on the river. Looks good in uniform.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/67114615488ffb54[/URL]
[QUOTE=IGiveVitaminD;5906905]She messaged me out of the blue and quoted me 5 Benji's a pop LMAO, GTFO.
Even without the bad reviews I wouldn't provide that, does she have brain damage? She's a 200 type of arrangement, MAX![/QUOTE]She also is now on her third profile name. That's always a reliable warning. Just to be sure, here is a link:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e[/URL]
I tried to also attach a picture but couldn't. For some reason, she has not figured out that she needs to change those also (or worse make a new profile.) I think this is already at least her second profile.
BAM.
Pulpy: Not sure about this one but the pictures is stolen: [URL]https://twitter.com/basicvalentina_[/URL]
[URL]https://twitter.com/basicvalentina_/status/1403181725333655552/photo/4[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/870ab191-eb46-47c3-b1e0-52864d577ec0[/URL]
EducatedPrincess: classic crypto-scammer profile. They used a much hotter picture this time.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9ee40d42-9020-46ee-8113-e1de7e07cc02[/URL]
WiseChickie: "like to start with on line chat a bit share my hot pic and videos for some Benny then later meet up for FWB NSA, interested?" You decide!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9f428962-f59c-4fcb-b1e4-269e2af0e71d[/URL]
SexyLaura4 u01: classic crypto-scammer. Seeking "True Love!" taking me straight to gmail.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0ea366fe-1829-498b-909b-c0d39456f909[/URL]
AdorableEnthusiast: mid 30's, single pic, thin description, seeking "True Love." Sounds like another crypto-scammer, Princess Bride.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e51b8e93-1917-4204-93e2-e1927b202d2b[/URL]
PrettyPrimaDonna: Classic crypto-scammer. Don't waste your time.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/048dfcd1-d5e1-4eec-846e-aba865d3b465[/URL]
I just noticed that some of these profiles do not even last 24-48 hours for me to post them. Sorry but I just add them to the list whenever I first view them. I then just copy the list here. Sometimes they are already gone.
BAM.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bcc2a466-055b-4b38-a1bb-5214f941bb54[/URL]
Got PMd by this one and I've seen her come and go off of SA over the last few years.
Anyone have any info.
Was gone for awhile but just popped up again today. Here is my earlier warning:
Itty Bitty: Connor is self-proclaimed "bad girl," led with "her" #, refuses to video chat, will not have sex at the first meet but will do car oral. Asks 200 but agrees to 100, Twice tried to schedule a MnG with me. But does not meet for free. Insist on money for oral. I agreed but said we need to meet inside Panera first. Refused that, said "she" wanted to just jump in my car on arrival. Hmmm, no video chat, name is Connor, profile says 27 but pics say 37, no fixed address except parents in St. Paris out past Urbana, likely couch surfing in the Franklin/Middletown area, number traces to a Connor but no gender identity or social media anywhere. I looked twice and pretty hard. There are a few women named Connor but they are rare and none live in rural Ohio. Feels like a set up to me. When I said attempted muggings and black mail have forced me to adopt certain safety precautions, "her" language went to hell: "I don't need to mug you I make hella money LOL and blackmail? Idgaf about your life or what you got going on I'm tryna make money smh but yeah you doing to much" I reluctantly passed on the opportunity.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]
BAM
[QUOTE=BamBam;5909522]Was gone for awhile but just popped up again today. Here is my earlier warning:
Itty Bitty: Connor is self-proclaimed "bad girl," led with "her" #, refuses to video chat, will not have sex at the first meet but will do car oral. Asks 200 but agrees to 100, Twice tried to schedule a MnG with me. But does not meet for free. Insist on money for oral. I agreed but said we need to meet inside Panera first. Refused that, said "she" wanted to just jump in my car on arrival. Hmmm, no video chat, name is Connor, profile says 27 but pics say 37, no fixed address except parents in St. Paris out past Urbana, likely couch surfing in the Franklin/Middletown area, number traces to a Connor but no gender identity or social media anywhere. I looked twice and pretty hard. There are a few women named Connor but they are rare and none live in rural Ohio. Feels like a set up to me. When I said attempted muggings and black mail have forced me to adopt certain safety precautions, "her" language went to hell: "I don't need to mug you I make hella money LOL and blackmail? Idgaf about your life or what you got going on I'm tryna make money smh but yeah you doing to much" I reluctantly passed on the opportunity.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]
BAM[/QUOTE]Can we get a link without signing in? PB.
[QUOTE=Passnby;5909841]Can we get a link without signing in? PB.[/QUOTE]Browsing is free. You have to register a profile but you can do that with any kind of gmail account. I have a report from another monger. He says she is a real woman located in Springfield. However, she is living in a car with a GF and her two year old son. Both women are bi-polar with anger issues and they are armed. Tough call which scenario might be worse!
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5909927]Browsing is free. You have to register a profile but you can do that with any kind of gmail account. I have a report from another monger. He says she is a real woman located in Springfield. However, she is living in a car with a GF and her two year old son. Both women are bi-polar with anger issues and they are armed. Tough call which scenario might be worse!.[/QUOTE]Hey,
I can confirm she is real. She is absolutely not LEO! For the past couple years she has been staying at her loser thug bf's house in east Dayton. I think we all know what that means. Not a pot to piss in. She is definitely 27, very good looking, spinner body. Again typical cute white girl with ghetto issues. Dime a dozen right? Par for the course these days. If they only knew. As far as the friend you say she is staying with in a car, she is a cute red head. Both DTF. I've never known either to be armed and dangerous, as you say. LOL. I am not a client of either one, or ever have been, I just know them thru a 3rd party. Met both in person several times. Just giving info that I know. Not my first post on here. Just started a new account. Both have family north of Springfield. Both spend a lot of time in Springfield. Hope this helps.
I am pretty certain I am under attack by the scammers. I guess they did not appreciate my reports or something. In any case, I got an email saying I was banned due to phishing or scamming behavior. A few minutes later, I got an email telling me my suspension was lifted. A few minutes after that, I got a 72 hour suspension for "spamming. " I had to read the TOS again and watch their video. Completing that begins my 72 hour suspension. I have been on the site for nearly ten years with few problems. I suppose I was reckless to a degree. Once back on, I will have to adjust my behavior to completely steer clear of the scammers. I may still detect and report them but no more engagement to try to confirm what they really are. Sigh. At least it was not an actual permanent ban.
BAM.
Since I am suspended, I will no longer be able to offer any analysis. Here is what I am holding as of now.
YourFavoriteMadison: I don't recall if I reported on her before. Attitude and GPS but may be softening. I say that because she has moved her upper age limit to 60+. Let them eat cake! I have her PII for contributing seniors.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8636be2d-e75f-451e-bbc5-bc067c786915[/URL]
Taylormd: This is chick has been on the site since 7-15 when she first turned 18. Has moved around. I have chatted with her off and on since she joined. I was never able to close the deal. As far as I know, she is real. Has anyone ever met her. Care to share?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f8e39c40-7fb8-0250-75f8-d014ba656320[/URL]
PrivateSavvy: chatted with me at length. Eventually took me to snap. On snap, shared cute (no nudes) video and sexual banter but will not meet. However, has not hit me up for any money. Eventually, she steered me towards her over-priced OF profile. [URL]https://onlyfans.com/savvysohn[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bef4fecb-fe44-4123-93aa-ab47269394c0[/URL]
TallDancer: I am pretty sure this person is a tease and time-waster. I have PII and a story for contributing seniors.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/e17ef44f77b176d3[/URL]
CreativeGirl: Age is 35, pic is 25 tops, no profile content, I say SCAMMER! Lazy SCAMMER. Are these guys working on a piecework basis?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/05ee7f64-fee6-49e9-8d10-688480de05c8[/URL]
Krystclear: Said her name was Susan then Krystal. Wanders all over the place. Agreed to meet then gave an address in Louisville. Confused messages. Either a scammer, druggie or just GU.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/06b930a7-69c0-43eb-afc2-16d452844d0d[/URL]
I suspect I was reported by a profile named Maria Rose, 22, 439***7440 in the Houston Area Code 832. Pushed super hard for money immediately over cashapp. Use caution.
BAM
She's legit; girl next door type, she's pretty, a good conversationalist and a very sweet girl, just a bit too vanilla for me personally.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1533e7ef-4da8-443f-8df6-4b35e34c8a66[/URL]
[QUOTE=BamBam;5911629]I am pretty certain I am under attack by the scammers. I guess they did not appreciate my reports or something. In any case, I got an email saying I was banned due to phishing or scamming behavior. A few minutes later, I got an email telling me my suspension was lifted. A few minutes after that, I got a 72 hour suspension for "spamming. " I had to read the TOS again and watch their video. Completing that begins my 72 hour suspension. I have been on the site for nearly ten years with few problems. I suppose I was reckless to a degree. Once back on, I will have to adjust my behavior to completely steer clear of the scammers. I may still detect and report them but no more engagement to try to confirm what they really are. Sigh. At least it was not an actual permanent ban. BAM.[/QUOTE]72 hour suspension seems like a new twist. Never encountered this. In past, you get banned, appeal, watch vid, agree to terms, back on you go.
Rumor has it, if you report accounts to many times you're account gets on their radar and you can get banned for spamming support. Haha. Stories be told some paid accounts have been banned for phishing, spamming, false profile, etc. Right after reporting sugarbaby accounts for the same reason. Its like SA support says oh you are finking on this scammer okay you get banned too.
Gave up reporting crap accounts to SA. Didn't want to stick head out of the mole hole and get wacked by a SA support. Which has happened more than once for no F'ing reason other than reporting bogus accounts to them.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5911629]I am pretty certain I am under attack by the scammers. I guess they did not appreciate my reports or something. In any case, I got an email saying I was banned due to phishing or scamming behavior. A few minutes later, I got an email telling me my suspension was lifted. A few minutes after that, I got a 72 hour suspension for "spamming. " I had to read the TOS again and watch their video. Completing that begins my 72 hour suspension. I have been on the site for nearly ten years with few problems. I suppose I was reckless to a degree. Once back on, I will have to adjust my behavior to completely steer clear of the scammers. I may still detect and report them but no more engagement to try to confirm what they really are. Sigh. At least it was not an actual permanent ban.
BAM.[/QUOTE]Just proves that SA's priority is to get new paying customers, not keeping the site safe for paying customers. Pretty pictures attract new customers, and scammers produce that. SA figures that once in, the paying customers will just accept that there's a certain number of scammers lurking. In SA's eyes, there aren't incentives to clean up the site.
[QUOTE=DNut;5912290]Just proves that SA's priority is to get new paying customers, not keeping the site safe for paying customers. Pretty pictures attract new customers, and scammers produce that. SA figures that once in, the paying customers will just accept that there's a certain number of scammers lurking. In SA's eyes, there aren't incentives to clean up the site.[/QUOTE]This is an excellent analysis! To attract paying males, the site needs a steady flow of new accounts with pretty pictures. The scammers are a reliable source of that supply. That gives Seeking not just an incentive to tolerate the scammers but to positively ease their participation. For the same reason, I notice that when some female profiles get banned or suspended, they are often back up with a new profile using about the same name and exactly the same pictures. The disparity in treatment versus male profiles is explained by the need to keep women around.
I also sparked to the comment by WA about the futility of reporting anyone clearly violating the TOS. My initial reasoning was that I wanted to bell them and then just steer clear. Keeping them visible allowed me to monitor if they were still active. Keeping them active on a known scammer account meant they were not creating new ones for me to stumble over. Since it is now obvious that the site actively WANTS them there, it is doubly important to avoid reporting. In future, I will be blocking a lot more liberally. The scammer is unlikely to know they have been blocked and it doesn't hurt them in any case. In fact, removing experienced SD's from their list of prospects just allows them to focus more easily on their legitimate prey.
For now, I will just ride out my current suspension. They told me this was my "third, documented" violation which prompted the lengthier timeframe. If they were really serious about preventing bad behavior, they would share the specific message or specific examples. They do not. I conclude they don't truly care. They also withhold evidence to protect the profile that triggered the violation. They create the suspension so that, if the reporting profile checks, as I would, it will see that the offending profile is now gone - even if it is only temporary. All this is, again, to create a favorable environment for the female profiles. I am not abandoning, the site but it certainly convinces me that they do not care if they are creating a hostile environment for the actual paying members. We need to caution newbies to that fact. Meanwhile, my unpaid back-up account is still working. It means I can still view profiles and accumulate some data on them. Not sure what I will do with the data but it will allow me to create a list of profiles to immediately block as soon as I am active again.
BAM.
If for whatever reason your account is being suspended, these are some tips could help:
1. Make a new email not similar to the previous one.
2. If your account got banned using your phone internet. Do not use Google to sign on / in. Don't use their app. They can track your IP and ban your new account. Log in using the Google Incognito mode OR download a VPN app to connect to the internet then their site.
If your account got banned using your home WIFI, don't log on / in using home wi-fi without having a VPN software in your computer. They will track your IP again.
3. Don't recycle banned pics, they use face recognition softwares.
4. For payment methods don't use the same old CC that you used in your banned account. They track the CC #.
5. For billing purposes you can use the name as appears on your new card. Use a burner cell phone number because sometimes you need to verify. As for address use the generic address number for your street I. E. Your home address is 1234 yellow st, Cin, 55678 then use 1000 yellow st, cin, 55678 this because most cards use ZIP code for verification.
There you go. Welcome back to the mongering hobby.
[QUOTE=IGiveVitaminD;5912831]If your account got banned using your home WIFI, don't log on / in using home wi-fi without having a VPN software in your computer. They will track your IP again.
[/QUOTE]Does restarting your modem work? Doesn't that give you a new IP?
[QUOTE=Decatur21;5913162]Does restarting your modem work? Doesn't that give you a new IP?[/QUOTE]Not always. DHCP will assign the first free IP address in the subnet. In a lot of areas, most IP addresses are taken, so the first free IP will have a good chance of being the same one that you just released.
But you're assuming that they only use UP address tracking. Cookies, SysID, browser serials, all are unique identifiers that a site can use.
[QUOTE=Decatur21;5913162]Does restarting your modem work? Doesn't that give you a new IP?[/QUOTE]I personally haven't tried that but I feel it won't work because most sites track what it's called public IP address that is given by your internet provider and rarely resets. That public IP gives away your overall location not necessarily your exact location but as close as your zip code.
That's why masking your location using a VPN while connected though home WiFi is what I'd recommend.
I got banned from tinder and had to get a new cheap phone, new email, pre-paid credit card and I was able to start a new account. Still used my wi-fi, although I restarted it. Used the same pictures but used a program (Fawkes) to scrub the photos. Tinder you can use any pre paid credit cards but I believe for Seeking you have to get ones where an address is attached. I imagine the process to get back on Seeking is similar to Tinder.
It's just a matter of time before I get banned from Seeking I imagine. They are going crazy with the banning. That's good they are starting off with the temp ban for BAM. I only heard that you got the permanent ban and it was rare for them to give you access to your account again. Hopefully this is a change they are making since it seems like the girls have a big say in people getting banned.
Tinder is not anything close to what it used to be. Same with AM. That is a big problem with all this, all the other sites are getting harder to use and there is nothing new stepping up.
[QUOTE=IGiveVitaminD;5913380]I personally haven't tried that but I feel it won't work because most sites track what it's called public IP address that is given by your internet provider and rarely resets. That public IP gives away your overall location not necessarily your exact location but as close as your zip code.
That's why masking your location using a VPN while connected though home WiFi is what I'd recommend.[/QUOTE]I don't think they are using any network, browser or OS information to blacklist anyone. I my experience the banning was based on CC info and PIC's. Using a vanillaone visa and different pics should get you past the gatekeepers.
[QUOTE=Decatur21;5913513]I got banned from tinder and had to get a new cheap phone, new email, pre-paid credit card and I was able to start a new account. Still used my wi-fi, although I restarted it. Used the same pictures but used a program (Fawkes) to scrub the photos. Tinder you can use any pre paid credit cards but I believe for Seeking you have to get ones where an address is attached. I imagine the process to get back on Seeking is similar to Tinder.
It's just a matter of time before I get banned from Seeking I imagine. They are going crazy with the banning. That's good they are starting off with the temp ban for BAM. I only heard that you got the permanent ban and it was rare for them to give you access to your account again. Hopefully this is a change they are making since it seems like the girls have a big say in people getting banned.
Tinder is not anything close to what it used to be. Same with AM. That is a big problem with all this, all the other sites are getting harder to use and there is nothing new stepping up.[/QUOTE]Maybe you should stop doing what you are doing or saying to get banned.
Help, I am banned from SA. I was using my desktop through my home wifi. I need more details about this VPN software I need. Where do I get it? What's the cost? Easy to install? Does it impact any thing else?
TIA. P2020.
[QUOTE=Potus2020;5914664]Help, I am banned from SA. I was using my desktop through my home wifi. I need more details about this VPN software I need. Where do I get it? What's the cost? Easy to install? Does it impact any thing else?
TIA. P2020.[/QUOTE]I use Nord and also have Mozilla's VPN. Its really easy to install. The cost ranges from yearly to monthly. Right now Nord is running a 2 year deal for $79 bucks.
[QUOTE=Hooter12;5914449]Maybe you should stop doing what you are doing or saying to get banned.[/QUOTE]I am sure you meant this well but it betrays a complete lack of sympathy or understanding of the banning process. I received a notice that said I was reported for scamming! No example ever given. I have never asked anyone for anything much less money. Which of my behaviors triggered this? I have no idea. I am currently under suspension for spamming. I send similar approach messages to new profiles. Is that spamming? I am cautious to alter my messages but I still got reported. I once suggested someone try OF instead selling online to Seeking members. That got me a warning. I now know to avoid doing that. I know the OF comment triggered things because of how the warning was worded and its close proximity to the message. This knowledge is the exception rather than the rule.
Net: Men are getting banned and are given little to no explanation of what they did wrong. Given other behaviors by the site, I suspect they chuckle when they can find an excuse to ban someone. They probably know men are jumping through hoops to get back on. Because they keep your money from the first profile and get a new payment from the second, they have an incentive to ban heavy users liberally. SMDH! Is there a real lawyer who needs some class action 'action' here?
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5915866]I am sure you meant this well but it betrays a complete lack of sympathy or understanding of the banning process. I received a notice that said I was reported for scamming! No example ever given. I have never asked anyone for anything much less money. Which of my behaviors triggered this? I have no idea. I am currently under suspension for spamming. I send similar approach messages to new profiles. Is that spamming? I am cautious to alter my messages but I still got reported. I once suggested someone try OF instead selling online to Seeking members. That got me a warning. I now know to avoid doing that. I know the OF comment triggered things because of how the warning was worded and its close proximity to the message. This knowledge is the exception rather than the rule.
Net: Men are getting banned and are given little to no explanation of what they did wrong. Given other behaviors by the site, I suspect they chuckle when they can find an excuse to ban someone. They probably know men are jumping through hoops to get back on. Because they keep your money from the first profile and get a new payment from the second, they have an incentive to ban heavy users liberally. SMDH! Is there a real lawyer who needs some class action 'action' here?.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the supposed "education" but I have been on the site (s) for a long time. Have had multiple conversations and still do. Discuss options and let them know when I think its a scam or when I'm not interested. Never been banned or threatened to be banned. Maybe your clear amount of activity is what is triggering them on you. The reference asking for a "class action" suit made me laugh BTW.
I am not sure why but I am finding fewer obvious crypto-scammers recently. I used to easily spot two or three a day. I have fewer than that for the week now. TGIF!
Waterbaby: I have info on this profile including PII. This is her second time on the site. She does not respond to me. I can highly recommend! Details for contributing seniors.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8577c6e8-bbfa-4714-9ade-ae7471ce833a[/URL]
HotSocialite: lives in Richmond, IN, very hot IRL but no sex!, Rinser, I have PII.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e921360c-8695-4bb2-9aeb-38867372edeb[/URL]
Cheekyrebecca: since 3-20, shared her number, wants online only, will not meet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a6ac4581-8500-4766-a9d1-2cd1cf6ebe34[/URL]
Sugarbaby1: not sure if I reported before. Salena in Englewood, Nando1, tries to get money prior to meeting.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a87c8f4d-e3d0-44f1-b2af-a885ac90c9a4[/URL]
Smith19: seems like a normal profile but using a stolen pic from 2019: [URL]https://twitter.com/MireilleAubert4?[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/20b8c57e-f2b6-4dfc-8741-b4aec1ebb0a2[/URL]
Zoe: Profile says California, KY. Picture is for a chick from Riverside, CA; Probably living now in Florida. [URL]https://twitter.com/itsjaacky_[/URL] ; [URL]https://www.instagram.com/itsjaacky/?https://www.tiktok.com/@itsjaacky?lang=en[/URL].
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/XlOvwWa609PppYg5ozpZgVeD[/URL]
StephanieBird637: Eager to meet. Comes off like UTR. Plays a long game. Made an appointment to meet. Made me pick the place but did not care where it was. Claimed to be picking her car up at the shop then on her way to me. Guess what happened? Her credit card could cover all the bill except $50 which she asked me to send. I offered to bring her the money and a little more if she would give me the address. Aaaaand, ghosting.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/86310930-4ec7-4e73-9b7f-e8803101556b[/URL]
BrilliantSeductress: classic crypto-scammer, my first in several days. I was beginning to think they had dried up.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/af27211d-5e2f-4a3b-b0f5-559344b47ac2[/URL]
Cami Rox: using pictures from 1993! The pics are older than she is.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/49335abc-f924-4c24-bd80-0110e30b9da8[/URL]
Calliespring: not a scammer. She is real and matches her pictures but the pics are misleading. She is a BBW who asks 600-700 per meet just to hang out. I have her PII.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bcc2a466-055b-4b38-a1bb-5214f941bb54[/URL]
ArtisticGambler: 34, Indy?, classic crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e4307ce1-aa27-4608-9848-af67f8fcd0a2[/URL]
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5918037]I am not sure why but I am finding fewer obvious crypto-scammers recently. I used to easily spot two or three a day. I have fewer than that for the week now. TGIF!
Waterbaby: I have info on this profile including PII. This is her second time on the site. She does not respond to me. I can highly recommend! Details for contributing seniors.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8577c6e8-bbfa-4714-9ade-ae7471ce833a[/URL]
HotSocialite: lives in Richmond, IN, very hot IRL but no sex!, Rinser, I have PII.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e921360c-8695-4bb2-9aeb-38867372edeb[/URL]
Cheekyrebecca: since 3-20, shared her number, wants online only, will not meet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a6ac4581-8500-4766-a9d1-2cd1cf6ebe34[/URL]
Sugarbaby1: not sure if I reported before. Salena in Englewood, Nando1, tries to get money prior to meeting.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a87c8f4d-e3d0-44f1-b2af-a885ac90c9a4[/URL]
Smith19: seems like a normal profile but using a stolen pic from 2019: [URL]https://twitter.com/MireilleAubert4?[/URL].
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/20b8c57e-f2b6-4dfc-8741-b4aec1ebb0a2[/URL]
Zoe: Profile says California, KY. Picture is for a chick from Riverside, CA; Probably living now in Florida. [URL]https://twitter.com/itsjaacky_[/URL] ; [URL]https://www.instagram.com/itsjaacky/?https://www.tiktok.com/@itsjaacky?lang=en[/URL].
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/XlOvwWa609PppYg5ozpZgVeD[/URL]
StephanieBird637: Eager to meet. Comes off like UTR. Plays a long game. Made an appointment to meet. Made me pick the place but did not care where it was. Claimed to be picking her car up at the shop then on her way to me. Guess what happened? Her credit card could cover all the bill except $50 which she asked me to send. I offered to bring her the money and a little more if she would give me the address. Aaaaand, ghosting.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/86310930-4ec7-4e73-9b7f-e8803101556b[/URL]
BrilliantSeductress: classic crypto-scammer, my first in several days. I was beginning to think they had dried up.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/af27211d-5e2f-4a3b-b0f5-559344b47ac2[/URL]
Cami Rox: using pictures from 1993! The pics are older than she is.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/49335abc-f924-4c24-bd80-0110e30b9da8[/URL]
Calliespring: not a scammer. She is real and matches her pictures but the pics are misleading. She is a BBW who asks 600-700 per meet just to hang out. I have her PII.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bcc2a466-055b-4b38-a1bb-5214f941bb54[/URL]
ArtisticGambler: 34, Indy?, classic crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e4307ce1-aa27-4608-9848-af67f8fcd0a2[/URL]
BAM.[/QUOTE]Had a similar experience with StephanieBird367. Was suppose to meet and I had to cancel because her car was not going to be done in time. Set up lunch meeting a few days later and thinking was still an issue because car.
Was supposedly still in garage. I got suspicious and asked for selfie with her holding up my name. She then ghosted me. I suspect a scammmer.
[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5908982][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bcc2a466-055b-4b38-a1bb-5214f941bb54[/URL]
Got PMd by this one and I've seen her come and go off of SA over the last few years.
Anyone have any info.[/QUOTE]I included some data on her in my last summary. She is real and somewhat matches her pictures. However, when I met her for a MnG I discovered she is a BBW. In addition, she told me she gets $600-700 per meet just to hang out. Our meeting ended quickly with lot's of politeness on both sides. Maybe, in my case, she just didn't like what she saw and will make a better deal for you.
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;5919400]I included some data on her in my last summary. She is real and somewhat matches her pictures. However, when I met her for a MnG I discovered she is a BBW. In addition, she told me she gets $600-700 per meet just to hang out. Our meeting ended quickly with lot's of politeness on both sides. Maybe, in my case, she just didn't like what she saw and will make a better deal for you.
BAM.[/QUOTE]To me it's pretty obvious she is bigger than what her pictures say. In the third pic she has some badge around her neck and the way she manipulated the picture makes it disappear on the left side. Plus her neck is super thin. I stay away from the ones that obviously manipulate their pics. Plus her first pic she looks super thick.
Seriously, who in the world would pay 600-700 just to hang out?