Seeking Arrangement and Other Dating Site Reviews

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7355116]Yes, that explains it. Seems like we're looking for very different things. My dates are typically multi-hour events, often including a nice relaxed meal afterwards. For me, it's closer to a regular date. That's how I like it, when I have the time. And if I don't have the time, then I don't bother. I've lot interest in the STG-type quickie sessions I used to do before I discovered SA and the UTR world.[/QUOTE]1. You feed these chicks? That's ridiculous.

2. Calling it a Date is cringe-worthy.

3. I agree on the multi hour piece. But only for a select few.

In the words of Snoop Dogg:

Niggas be brown-nosing these hoes and shit. Takin' bitches out to eat, and spendin' money on these hoes.

I treat a ***** like 7-Up, I never have, I never will.

I tell a ***** like this.

"*****, you without me is like Harold Melvin without the Bluenotes; You'll never go platinum".

[QUOTE=PoolPlayInTool;7355911][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e47df5da-4f99-4eee-b553-4c77f04398ed[/URL]

I messaged her 6 months ago, never met up because at the time her age range maxed at 59.

Upon a deep photo search it led me to her LinkedIn page where she is a Doctor but does not live in West Hartford.

Then there was another link to a Tutor page with her photo.

I am pretty sure its a fake profile.[/QUOTE]She's legit.

You think GB would let a new one slide through? Nope. Was already there!

First name starts with "are".

Like I said, different strokes for different folks. I do what makes me happy. Spending casual time in public with a beauty you just banged for several hours is super hot to me. If you have an issue with spending a few bucks with her at a restaurant or bar, you might match up better with the pros on Eros. The ladies on SA are often total UTRs. You can enjoy the complete 360 experience inside and outside the bedroom. You might start to realize the sheer thrill of that once you evolve a fit further in this hobby.

[QUOTE=GlenBenton;7357238]1. You feed these chicks? That's ridiculous.

2. Calling it a Date is cringe-worthy.

3. I agree on the multi hour piece. But only for a select few.

In the words of Snoop Dogg:

Niggas be brown-nosing these hoes and shit. Takin' bitches out to eat, and spendin' money on these hoes.

I treat a ***** like 7-Up, I never have, I never will.

I tell a ***** like this.

"*****, you without me is like Harold Melvin without the Bluenotes; You'll never go platinum".[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7357346]Like I said, different strokes for different folks. I do what makes me happy. Spending casual time in public with a beauty you just banged for several hours is super hot to me. If you have an issue with spending a few bucks with her at a restaurant or bar, you might match up better with the pros on Eros. The ladies on SA are often total UTRs. You can enjoy the complete 360 experience inside and outside the bedroom. You might start to realize the sheer thrill of that once you evolve a fit further in this hobby.[/QUOTE]I've had numerous SA ladies. Reviewed the vast majority of them too. Haven't seen many of your SA girl reviews.

You only started posting around last year, so I don't know how much of a veteran you are or are not. Over the last few years I really started to enjoy the "civilian experience". Seeing the girl in her natural habitat, dressed in day to day clothes. Once I know that we hit it off in the bedroom, getting to know the person when she's not putting on a show in the bedroom wearing lingerie etc really turns me on. Sort of like running into her at the supermarket, maybe with another guy. It also demonstrates that neither of us cares who sees us together in public. My preferences have changed over time. I used to do very minimal quickie style dates. In the STG world, that's still what makes the most sense. But when I switched to SA many years ago, I slowly started to enjoy longer multi-hour dates and then gradually extended them to outside the bedroom. But hey, you do you. That's what makes this world so fascinating. Every individual is unique.

[QUOTE=GlenBenton;7357566]I've had numerous SA ladies. Reviewed the vast majority of them too. Haven't seen many of your SA girl reviews.[/QUOTE]

My SA subscription ends in a couple days, and I've been polite for a whole month. Time to go out in a blaze of glory. I random fired the following message at most of Connecticut and some of Westchester County (e. G. , most of the hot links posted here, any other selfie verified links):

"You do look like a lot of fun. I'd love to connect. The best thing about me is I like to give bomb-ass head. ".

The responses have had me in stitches. Some early candidates for favorite response:

Carol.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9ae66ceb-166f-4a7d-b761-6f1ef6f6e16c??locale=en_USS[/URL]

"The only head I'm interested on is Benjamin's Franklin".

Cassie.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/aeabef9c-4dd1-4927-837d-4cd4bbd69508[/URL]

"I need bomb ass money can you give tht".

Others who may not have read my message clearly:

Alice.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/89f90ebe-5632-4807-8345-e934a2a4759b[/URL]

"Hey, I really appreciate that".

Maria.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c1680a94-4d23-421e-b3be-5db34e2ea775[/URL]

"Oh wow".

[QUOTE=RalphReilly;7357827]My SA subscription ends in a couple days, and I've been polite for a whole month. Time to go out in a blaze of glory. I random fired the following message at most of Connecticut and some of Westchester County (e. G. , most of the hot links posted here, any other selfie verified links):

"You do look like a lot of fun. I'd love to connect. The best thing about me is I like to give bomb-ass head. ".

The responses have had me in stitches. Some early candidates for favorite response:

Carol.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9ae66ceb-166f-4a7d-b761-6f1ef6f6e16c??locale=en_USS[/URL]

"The only head I'm interested on is Benjamin's Franklin".

Cassie.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/aeabef9c-4dd1-4927-837d-4cd4bbd69508[/URL]

"I need bomb ass money can you give tht".

Others who may not have read my message clearly:

Alice.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/89f90ebe-5632-4807-8345-e934a2a4759b[/URL]

"Hey, I really appreciate that".

Maria.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c1680a94-4d23-421e-b3be-5db34e2ea775[/URL]

"Oh wow".[/QUOTE]Carol. Best response.

[QUOTE=Tommy13;7356488]Anyone ever meet her? Says she had an SD before. Seems legit and DTF.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=73296571[/URL][/QUOTE]Talked to her also. Guatamaielan. Too far for me up in Ridgefield. She started at 1000. Haha. Yeah right. Let us know if you land and the price. Bet she is smaller than her pictures seem.

SDM = Ragtag bunch of hood rats. LOL.

Has anyone had the pleasure of seeing Chloe? What is she charging?

Not sure if she's a bot or not LOL.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f62d1095-110f-4074-b2a1-5693d6684f8b[/URL]

[QUOTE=Batman203;7358306]Has anyone had the pleasure of seeing Chloe? What is she charging?

Not sure if she's a bot or not LOL.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f62d1095-110f-4074-b2a1-5693d6684f8b[/URL][/QUOTE]I haven't seen her but she's real, she sent me her snapchat and posts on her story all the time. She quoted me 1 k so I never met her.

[QUOTE=Batman203;7358306]Has anyone had the pleasure of seeing Chloe? What is she charging?

Not sure if she's a bot or not LOL.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f62d1095-110f-4074-b2a1-5693d6684f8b[/URL][/QUOTE]Quoted 1 k.

[QUOTE=Chudakkad;7358336]Quoted 1 k.[/QUOTE]Thanks everyone for your responses. I am in contact with her, and going back-and-forth with her just chit chattin. Wow is it $1 k for like full on service?

I have not discussed numbers with her yet. Just trying to fill her out. I'll let you know how things go.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fad7839c-61c9-43fc-be7c-0deb3edcb488[/URL]

Was trying to meet her (she sent me some more pics through text and she's cuter than the pics on the site) but she wouldn't budge below 700 ppm. GPS. I told her I couldn't do more than 4 or 5 and she told me she has someone who does 1 k. Crazy.

I think that 4 is perfectly reasonable. These girls are getting ridiculous offers.

[QUOTE=Tommy13;7356488]Anyone ever meet her? Says she had an SD before. Seems legit and DTF.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73296571[/URL][/QUOTE]Not bad looking, glad she posted a few full-body shots. But I wouldn't go more than $3-400 for her.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7358542]Not bad looking, glad she posted a few full-body shots. But I wouldn't go more than $3-400 for her.[/QUOTE]1 k is wild.

[QUOTE=Jonma;7358477][URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fad7839c-61c9-43fc-be7c-0deb3edcb488[/URL]

Was trying to meet her (she sent me some more pics through text and she's cuter than the pics on the site) but she wouldn't budge below 700 ppm. GPS. I told her I couldn't do more than 4 or 5 and she told me she has someone who does 1 k. Crazy.

I think that 4 is perfectly reasonable. These girls are getting ridiculous offers.[/QUOTE]Sorry I think I accidentally copied my messages link, here's the link to her profile:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/01d47db9-0de4-417c-a1f1-b144871f144c[/URL]

[QUOTE=Jonma;7358821]Sorry I think I accidentally copied my messages link, here's the link to her profile:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/01d47db9-0de4-417c-a1f1-b144871f144c[/URL][/QUOTE]$700 is not unreasonable as an ask, many of these girls would rather be low volume with the PPM's.

I found her socials, she is cute. She has been on Seeking for 6 Years, she definitely did not start at $700.

I have said this before, if you are a really good looking younger guy then some of these girls will lower their prices.

[QUOTE=PoolPlayInTool;7358924]$700 is not unreasonable as an ask, many of these girls would rather be low volume with the PPM's.

I found her socials, she is cute. She has been on Seeking for 6 Years, she definitely did not start at $700.

I have said this before, if you are a really good looking younger guy then some of these girls will lower their prices.[/QUOTE]A lot of these girls are starting at 5 these days now. Can still get most of them down to 3 I've found but 2 is becoming harder and harder unless you already have a long relationship with them and that's what you have been doing.

From their perspective though I get it. One guy at 7 is better than two guys at 3 but for a lot of them it's also better than three guys at 3. So they can be picky and still get spoiled and not have to put as much effort into it. There are just too many guys in this game now compared to before. Ten years ago it was like 10 women to 1 guy on seeking or something crazy like that. Now I imagine there are more guys than women on there so they have a lot more bargaining power. Simple economics ever in the sugar baby market LOL!

[QUOTE=PoolPlayInTool;7358924]$700 is not unreasonable as an ask, many of these girls would rather be low volume with the PPM's.

I found her socials, she is cute. She has been on Seeking for 6 Years, she definitely did not start at $700.

I have said this before, if you are a really good looking younger guy then some of these girls will lower their prices.[/QUOTE]This is VERY true. I've seen some prices here on some girls as to what people have agreed to with them and I have not had to pay nearly as close to that but sometimes it might be better to bite the bullet and consider it the "cost of entry" and work your way down for there. I have a "roster" now and give them gifts every so often here and there as a "friend".

Good luck and stay safe!

I disagree. You have to keep in mind that the lady you're engaging with might not be what you thought at all. So, you have to hedge. This is what GB doesn't seem to get. When you gain entry to the gate and realize that you had an above average experience, why wouldn't you then extend that experience to a civilian outing like a restaurant, or bar, or casino, or whatever to show appreciation and extend your own pleasurable engagement with that lady?

[QUOTE=Batman203;7359485]This is VERY true. I've seen some prices here on some girls as to what people have agreed to with them and I have not had to pay nearly as close to that but sometimes it might be better to bite the bullet and consider it the "cost of entry" and work your way down for there. I have a "roster" now and give them gifts every so often here and there as a "friend".

Good luck and stay safe![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;7359495]I disagree. You have to keep in mind that the lady you're engaging with might not be what you thought at all. So, you have to hedge. This is what GB doesn't seem to get. When you gain entry to the gate and realize that you had an above average experience, why wouldn't you then extend that experience to a civilian outing like a restaurant, or bar, or casino, or whatever to show appreciation and extend your own pleasurable engagement with that lady?[/QUOTE]Easy there Dark Clouds.

I've taking down 90% of the seeking girls in CT that are actually good looking. All for far less than the numbers being thrown out below.

If you have to pay a girl to go to dinner with you (before or after fucking them), I'm sorry. That's sad.

These ladies are not your wife or your girlfriend. They are civilians accepting cash to fuck.

For me, it's about variety. I'm not looking for a night on the town. That is reserved for my SO.

In short, I guess you're looking for a quasi-relationship with these girls and I am not.

But if you want to start swinging dicks about our seeking successes, I guarantee my roster puts yours to absolute shame.

[QUOTE=GlenBenton;7359588]Easy there Dark Clouds.

I've taking down 90% of the seeking girls in CT that are actually good looking. All for far less than the numbers being thrown out below.

If you have to pay a girl to go to dinner with you (before or after fucking them), I'm sorry. That's sad.

These ladies are not your wife or your girlfriend. They are civilians accepting cash to fuck.

For me, it's about variety. I'm not looking for a night on the town. That is reserved for my SO.

In short, I guess you're looking for a quasi-relationship with these girls and I am not.

But if you want to start swinging dicks about our seeking successes, I guarantee my roster puts yours to absolute shame.[/QUOTE]Easy here fellas. I think we're all here for the same thing but have different preferences. LOL. Some like the more direct and NSA approach, some like the more relational approach. And that's all good. Everyone is entitled to spend their money however they please!

Truth is, girls are preferential. In the same way that I'd be willing to spend more on some girls based on different preferences (looks, experience, etc) not all are created equal and that's just the truth. Let's keep this board as it was intended for, for helping our hobby.

Thank you to all those for helping me out in the past. You know who you are! I’ve learn so much and have had so much success. :)

Stay safe everyone and good luck!

[QUOTE=GlenBenton;7359588]Easy there Dark Clouds.

I've taking down 90% of the seeking girls in CT that are actually good looking. All for far less than the numbers being thrown out below.

If you have to pay a girl to go to dinner with you (before or after fucking them), I'm sorry. That's sad.

These ladies are not your wife or your girlfriend. They are civilians accepting cash to fuck.

For me, it's about variety. I'm not looking for a night on the town. That is reserved for my SO.

In short, I guess you're looking for a quasi-relationship with these girls and I am not.

But if you want to start swinging dicks about our seeking successes, I guarantee my roster puts yours to absolute shame.[/QUOTE]Wow Glen what's wrong with taking a SA girl out for dinner or whatever before having sex, Clouds never said he had to he said he wanted to.

Dude does your real girlfriend actually know what you do on here?? Yea ok kinda dumb question but I had to ask.

Most of us have already figured out that women are very attracted to you and scoring with these girls is easy. Good for you, I was once really good looking until I added 45 years!! .

[QUOTE=PoolPlayInTool;7359840]Wow Glen what's wrong with taking a SA girl out for dinner or whatever before having sex, Clouds never said he had to he said he wanted to.

Dude does your real girlfriend actually know what you do on here?? Yea ok kinda dumb question but I had to ask.

Most of us have already figured out that women are very attracted to you and scoring with these girls is easy. Good for you, I was once really good looking until I added 45 years!! .[/QUOTE]All you senior members, remember what this site is about. Intel! Also, you need to remember To Each His Own. Some mongers are going to wine and dine, some are going to only want sex and to get in and out, some like old, young, fat, spinner, some of us are single, some married, some with gfs. We all have our own taste and we should be respectful of that. My fellow mongers on here, I think you are all amazing and your intel is priceless! Thank you for all you do and let's keep sticking to intel and refrain from judgement. Have safe fun boys! -Lucky.

Sheila. Agreed to 300 ppm and appears to be DTF. We shall see.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=74035348[/URL]

Jocey. Young, somewhat shy and unsure but she is convenient. We exchanged numbers and will see if she pans out.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=72976592[/URL]

If anyone has any insights, replies would be welcome.

[QUOTE=Tommy13;7361982]Sheila. Agreed to 300 ppm and appears to be DTF. We shall see.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=74035348[/URL]

Jocey. Young, somewhat shy and unsure but she is convenient. We exchanged numbers and will see if she pans out.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=72976592[/URL]

If anyone has any insights, replies would be welcome.[/QUOTE]Not much to go on for Jocey, do wish she more than one photo, but at least it's full body. Looks like a typical student with a messy dorm room.

Sheila looks more like my type, and she's got a few more photos, which is good. I get a UTR vibe, more just a girl who's been doing this for awhile. Love her natural picture with her friend holding the camera and some other girl hanging out in the toilet behind her haha.

If anyone is looking for some new girls to try out, these might be good bets. Lia7969 is still on, she's been reviewed, wants $400 though, the other two are newish but seem like they want to meet-up.

Usually I'm looking for any kind of text that sounds like they want to meet-up and not some vauge "princess treatment"

Jess4783,26, Manchester.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73895544&nsp=1[/URL]

"looking for help with bills and such. I do NOT travel. I can host. I do not meet at hotels or anywhere other than my apartment. ".

Lia7969,24, Hartford (still around, some more pictures, definitely pro vive).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=72846915[/URL]

Review: [URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26376-Seeking-Arrangement-and-Other-Dating-Site-Reviews&p=7294572&viewfull=1#post7294572[/URL].

Anaisbabyy7, 29, Bethel (Latino).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=68863773&nsp=1[/URL]

"young single mother looking for something exciting". (single moms seem to be reliable)

Saw this one last week - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d99e9abf-27e2-47a8-818c-49daa1e42f58[/URL].

She's a good time. Asked for surf and turf pricing, settled on Chili's pricing. She has an interesting backstory but was a good time once we got down to it.

Sunday was "funday" with this one - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7ff84799-8809-4156-bd4b-d6409fe82b8e[/URL].

Took her on my boat and had an open-air middle of LI Sound session. Cost was 100 and a boat ride.

[QUOTE=GlenBenton;7362281]Saw this one last week - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d99e9abf-27e2-47a8-818c-49daa1e42f58[/URL].

She's a good time. Asked for surf and turf pricing, settled on Chili's pricing. She has an interesting backstory but was a good time once we got down to it.

Sunday was "funday" with this one - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7ff84799-8809-4156-bd4b-d6409fe82b8e[/URL].

Took her on my boat and had an open-air middle of LI Sound session. Cost was 100 and a boat ride.[/QUOTE]Either open to BBFS?

[QUOTE=Pmanhere;7362301]Either open to BBFS?[/QUOTE]But I don't fuck any of these girls raw.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7362058]Not much to go on for Jocey, do wish she more than one photo, but at least it's full body. Looks like a typical student with a messy dorm room.

Sheila looks more like my type, and she's got a few more photos, which is good. I get a UTR vibe, more just a girl who's been doing this for awhile. Love her natural picture with her friend holding the camera and some other girl hanging out in the toilet behind her haha.[/QUOTE]Sheila seems to be a dry hole, she hit me up for money before our date which is always a huge red flag for me, so I'd advise against it.

Jocey. Gave her my number, waiting to hear back.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7362091]If anyone is looking for some new girls to try out, these might be good bets. Lia7969 is still on, she's been reviewed, wants $400 though, the other two are newish but seem like they want to meet-up.

Usually I'm looking for any kind of text that sounds like they want to meet-up and not some vauge "princess treatment"

Jess4783,26, Manchester.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73895544&nsp=1[/URL]

"looking for help with bills and such. I do NOT travel. I can host. I do not meet at hotels or anywhere other than my apartment. ".

Lia7969,24, Hartford (still around, some more pictures, definitely pro vive).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=72846915[/URL]

Review: [URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26376-Seeking-Arrangement-and-Other-Dating-Site-Reviews&p=7294572&viewfull=1#post7294572[/URL].[/QUOTE]Not sure about the others, but Jess is a pro. 300 ppm seems to be down for whatever, but she came across as a deadfish over text and she lives too far from me to be worth it.

For those of you using SB, do we think there are bots on that site?. Case in point. I had my eye on one member, was deciding if I should message her. Today, she favorited me, with out viewing my profile. Ok, but then I went to see if she was online today, and she was not, apparently not for a long time. Is the site trying to make us waste our credits purposely?. Thanks in advance.

[QUOTE=Hapcj7;7365404]For those of you using SB, do we think there are bots on that site?. Case in point. I had my eye on one member, was deciding if I should message her. Today, she favorited me, with out viewing my profile. Ok, but then I went to see if she was online today, and she was not, apparently not for a long time. Is the site trying to make us waste our credits purposely?. Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]I don't use that site anymore. I did, however, use it briefly and had some success. But, to answer your question, yes it is riddled with fake accts.

Just use your investigative skills (reverse image search, AI search etc.), you'll be able to decipher good from bad.

[QUOTE=Tommy13;7362749]Sheila seems to be a dry hole, she hit me up for money before our date which is always a huge red flag for me, so I'd advise against it.

Jocey. Gave her my number, waiting to hear back.[/QUOTE]Jocey went radio silent.

More on Sheila. At first I thought she was cool, but when we planned a date, she kept pressuring me to meet sooner and sooner and it got kind of annoying. Like we set plans, but then she wants to change, she needs an uber and then she asked "condoms or raw?" and I'm like "raw duh" and she said "I usually charge more for that but I like you. " at that point I was over it and just blocked her. She's most likely DTF and most likely an STG girl or something along that level. She agreed to 300 ppm right off the rip so you can get her for less, just mind the add-ons etc.

[QUOTE=Hapcj7;7365404]For those of you using SB, do we think there are bots on that site?. Case in point. I had my eye on one member, was deciding if I should message her. Today, she favorited me, with out viewing my profile. Ok, but then I went to see if she was online today, and she was not, apparently not for a long time. Is the site trying to make us waste our credits purposely?. Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]To mirror what Glen said absolutely. Tons of fakes and probably from the site itself trying to get you to spend credits. Definitely have to do some investigating before deciding to message. I've met quite a few from there but I've definitely been suckered by some bots too into wasting 10 credits LOL.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7362091]If anyone is looking for some new girls to try out, these might be good bets. Lia7969 is still on, she's been reviewed, wants $400 though, the other two are newish but seem like they want to meet-up.

Usually I'm looking for any kind of text that sounds like they want to meet-up and not some vauge "princess treatment"

Jess4783,26, Manchester.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73895544&nsp=1[/URL]

"looking for help with bills and such. I do NOT travel. I can host. I do not meet at hotels or anywhere other than my apartment. ".

Lia7969,24, Hartford (still around, some more pictures, definitely pro vive).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=72846915[/URL]

Review: [URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26376-Seeking-Arrangement-and-Other-Dating-Site-Reviews&p=7294572&viewfull=1#post7294572[/URL].

Anaisbabyy7, 29, Bethel (Latino).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=68863773&nsp=1[/URL]

"young single mother looking for something exciting". (single moms seem to be reliable)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tommy13;7362750]Not sure about the others, but Jess is a pro. 300 ppm seems to be down for whatever, but she came across as a deadfish over text and she lives too far from me to be worth it.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the tip about Jess, yeah I can see her being a pro. Thanks.

Probably going to be taking a break from seeking when my membership lapses. Increased price and there just aren't that many new profiles anymore. Think I will just keep seeing some of my regular girls for a bit and see how things so with the site in the future. So this might be my last batch of reviews for a little bit but we will see LOL.

Lex [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a940ef22-67c5-43af-88b7-89ab8c8096a2[/URL].

You can tell she is thick from her photos and she is a little thicker in person but still cute. Not my ideal type and saw her a couple of times but probably done for now. She can host if that's important to you and she is definitely sexual. Nice when you can tell they are enjoying it for real and not just pretending for you. 6/10 only because I tend to prefer them more petite.

Rachel [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4c842352-ea96-4c07-b684-0521a7d243d7[/URL].

Went for dinner and she gave me head in the car after. Cute for sure, friendly, and it was decent head and not too much of a splurge. I will probably see her again but it wasn't anything mindblowing. 8. 5/10.

Stephanie [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/28eb8bba-89ee-4365-a7d9-fc575e6a38a9[/URL].

Meh. Fun. Cute. Older looking for sure. Not expensive but also not the best communicator. Took a bit to set up a meet but I see she has been on the site for a long time so she may be more sporadic at times. 6/10.

Ash [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/afdf25e3-0bba-4e54-86a9-007b9e7fbd73[/URL].

Pretty but while I like them petite I almost feel like she was too skinny. Sweet but very much to the point. She was really tight though which was nice. A bit on the higher end though so probably a one and done for me but otherwise a pretty good experience. 8/10.

Miranda [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/25dfd827-a976-42a4-8be0-15209258d35b[/URL].

Very petite and cute but definitely talks a lot. If you like a spunky personality she would be a good fit for you. A little above average in bed for me so I will probably keep seeing her once a month or so. 7. 5/10.

Natalie [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/696164a0-1879-4fd7-80ba-a0c437221b81[/URL].

Definitely older photos and she is a bit bigger than her pics but not overly so. She hosts and is decent in bed. Saw her twice but not one I plan to repeat again. 6/10.

Autumnrosebaby [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/4985eef82839c100[/URL].

Thick but cute and very friendly. Would not surprise me if she is a pro though. Always wary about Waterbury girls LOL but we had a quick car meet at a park and ride so that was a little exhilarating. I don't usually do car play because I can host and get nervous about being caught but every once in awhile why not. 5. 5/10 just because it felt so pro-like but if you like that probably a 7.

Kaylaayac [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/a3c3d7a1bf83052d[/URL].

Annoying voice but great with her mouth otherwise. Pretty energetic in bed too. Hasn't been active in a bit so might not be worth the credits until she is active again but definitely real at least. Which I know is half the struggle on that site so wanted to at least mention that she is a real profile LOL.

Rosiebaby1616 [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/1b789cf28b968bcc[/URL].

On the higher end of the range unfortunately. Very tiny chest if you like that. Was out in New Haven at the same time she was so we decided to have a quick meet to say hello. Bought her and her friends a round of drinks and she flashed me near the bathroom LOL. After that we talked about meeting and doing more but asking 6 and I didn't really feel it was worth it or to try and haggle. But again I can confirm she is real at least so YMMV. Won't rate because nothing happened but if anyone sees her and she is out of this world let me know and I might give it another try.

[QUOTE=CtSpoilGuy;7367488]Probably going to be taking a break from seeking when my membership lapses. Increased price and there just aren't that many new profiles anymore. Think I will just keep seeing some of my regular girls for a bit and see how things so with the site in the future. So this might be my last batch of reviews for a little bit but we will see LOL.

Lex [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a940ef22-67c5-43af-88b7-89ab8c8096a2[/URL].

You can tell she is thick from her photos and she is a little thicker in person but still cute. Not my ideal type and saw her a couple of times but probably done for now. She can host if that's important to you and she is definitely sexual. Nice when you can tell they are enjoying it for real and not just pretending for you. 6/10 only because I tend to prefer them more petite.

Rachel [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4c842352-ea96-4c07-b684-0521a7d243d7[/URL].

Went for dinner and she gave me head in the car after. Cute for sure, friendly, and it was decent head and not too much of a splurge. I will probably see her again but it wasn't anything mindblowing. 8. 5/10.

Stephanie [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/28eb8bba-89ee-4365-a7d9-fc575e6a38a9[/URL].

Meh. Fun. Cute. Older looking for sure. Not expensive but also not the best communicator. Took a bit to set up a meet but I see she has been on the site for a long time so she may be more sporadic at times. 6/10.

Ash [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/afdf25e3-0bba-4e54-86a9-007b9e7fbd73[/URL].

Pretty but while I like them petite I almost feel like she was too skinny. Sweet but very much to the point. She was really tight though which was nice. A bit on the higher end though so probably a one and done for me but otherwise a pretty good experience. 8/10.

Miranda [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/25dfd827-a976-42a4-8be0-15209258d35b[/URL].

Very petite and cute but definitely talks a lot. If you like a spunky personality she would be a good fit for you. A little above average in bed for me so I will probably keep seeing her once a month or so. 7. 5/10.

Natalie [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/696164a0-1879-4fd7-80ba-a0c437221b81[/URL].

Definitely older photos and she is a bit bigger than her pics but not overly so. She hosts and is decent in bed. Saw her twice but not one I plan to repeat again. 6/10.

Autumnrosebaby [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/4985eef82839c100[/URL].

Thick but cute and very friendly. Would not surprise me if she is a pro though. Always wary about Waterbury girls LOL but we had a quick car meet at a park and ride so that was a little exhilarating. I don't usually do car play because I can host and get nervous about being caught but every once in awhile why not. 5. 5/10 just because it felt so pro-like but if you like that probably a 7.

Kaylaayac [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/a3c3d7a1bf83052d[/URL].

Annoying voice but great with her mouth otherwise. Pretty energetic in bed too. Hasn't been active in a bit so might not be worth the credits until she is active again but definitely real at least. Which I know is half the struggle on that site so wanted to at least mention that she is a real profile LOL.

Rosiebaby1616 [URL]https://www.sugardaddy.com/next/profile/1b789cf28b968bcc[/URL].

On the higher end of the range unfortunately. Very tiny chest if you like that. Was out in New Haven at the same time she was so we decided to have a quick meet to say hello. Bought her and her friends a round of drinks and she flashed me near the bathroom LOL. After that we talked about meeting and doing more but asking 6 and I didn't really feel it was worth it or to try and haggle. But again I can confirm she is real at least so YMMV. Won't rate because nothing happened but if anyone sees her and she is out of this world let me know and I might give it another try.[/QUOTE]Miranda looks like a winner.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/56d4ca2a-adf8-46b5-a05a-f58f7b9db271??locale=en_USS[/URL]

Wants to meet where she dances. For a very short time she had an add on Eros.

In the past I saw a couple of reviews where it was mentioned that she never goes past having guys come see her dance.

I asked the same question a couple of months ago seeing if in that time anyone has seen her.