Sugarbabies?

Profile is now deactivated.

[QUOTE=MuffCob;5866824]IttyBitty: Is this a guy? Possibly, based on PII. Fake pic? Name is Connor. Wants 200 at the first meeting but willing to give oral at that time. Agreed to 100 and will drive to me. Lives past Urbana several hours away.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]

I actually know her. Have met several times. We have no intimate relationship but I know she is real. She is hot. Thin with small tits if that's your thing. It's definitely my thing. But very good looking. Looks way much better in person than that pic she posted. Very nice girl, but she is your typical pretty white girl who likes the thug black guys. Dime a dozen ya know. But you I don't think you'll have any issues hooking up with her. She's cool.[/QUOTE]

Stunning profile picture (LOL wth lmao).

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/030f5f3c-8355-f88d-92f5-b4a63b49e638[/URL]

I finally had a session with Feral and Fun a middle aged MILF. It was a non rushed two and a half hour experience unlike anything I've experienced with another young lady from the site. Everything was made available. She is active in the swinger lifestyle so use your imagination. I explored everything with her and she really got into it. Be aware: She is a squirter so make sure you have plenty of towels.

Netspend and it works for SA.

[QUOTE=BarnesMike32;5867041]My vanilla prepaid card no longer works for SA b / c it will no longer add your zip code to it (I think that is why it won't work). Can anyone suggest either a card that will work or another service (Adult Friend Finder? Ashley Madison?) that will accept a US prepaid card that is decent? Thank you!

Mike B.[/QUOTE]

Anyone else had a car date with this one? Had a good time but I think she got a new number. Hoping anyone has update on her if she's still in it.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/db1375bc-d5dc-47f9-83b4-23e85455e3a8[/URL]

Okay, so I've been banned from SA and not sure why but whatever. I tried again with a different email and as soon as I uploaded a picture I was banned immediately. Never mentioned exchanging anything for money. The first time I think I said something along the lines of don't ask me to send anything up front or something vague like that but I guess they took that as a violation. So now I'm thinking my pics were flagged they got some facial recognition program or something. Even uploaded different pics so idk. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Doing okay on SB but I know there's a lot more action on SA LOL.

[QUOTE=AtlEyez;5872200]Okay, so I've been banned from SA and not sure why but whatever. I tried again with a different email and as soon as I uploaded a picture I was banned immediately. Never mentioned exchanging anything for money. The first time I think I said something along the lines of don't ask me to send anything up front or something vague like that but I guess they took that as a violation. So now I'm thinking my pics were flagged they got some facial recognition program or something. Even uploaded different pics so idk. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Doing okay on SB but I know there's a lot more action on SA LOL.[/QUOTE]They could have flagged your system information; machine name / serial number, your router system info, etc.

Here are some recent suspicious profiles:

Cherryfromthetree: catfish? Using pictures of pornstar? [URL]https://hdporn.pics/user/cherryfromthetree;[/URL] check hand tattoo.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5da7ae51-14c7-4bb1-9bb4-814e9a907cdd[/URL]


Jennadontcare: Is this a high school chick or a foreign scammer?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d12c26f6-fd37-40d5-a356-8fb6b84ad97a[/URL]


CuteLover: led with her number.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dc8e828c-e9ac-41b4-b903-f85ed97b2753[/URL]


HumorousDame: classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/33f5ebb1-8f60-4fd5-9ecb-18b1477d3bd1[/URL]


Creativeprincess, 23?, says Columbus was Cinti, UTR, repeat profile. She was on Seeking and USAG several years ago, I cannot find my notes on her but I recall she sent me some really hot private pictures. I never pulled the trigger because her overbite is a bit of a turnoff for me.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/791e01bb-2e0e-4c06-85ac-f72e41a71848[/URL]


Petitebabygirl: Could not get her to engage at first. When she finally answered, she declined my offer. Said she needed 3 K per month. When I wished her the best of luck she came back offering to sell me pictures and videos.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/120e2c43-cbe8-4528-95cf-5a13b48b089b[/URL]


Oxjbabyjxo: Been around before. Hangs with the Gala crowd. Agreed to my offer and gave her number, later ghosted. I have her PII for contributing seniors.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/067b5e53-0daa-4c8c-936d-fb2ada381963[/URL]


BAM.

I finally saw her earlier this week.

Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.

Kissing ok.

Great vocals.

Really gets into it.

Sweet sexy voice.

Large huge breasts.

Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.

Pretty girl, with long natural hair.

Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.

Drove a bit to meet me.

Brought a sexy outfit to play in.

Bad: Has gained weight since pics.

Is self conscious about weight gain and stretch marks.

Late.

Some smoke smell.

I will likely not repeat due to negatives, but glad I saw her.

[QUOTE=AtlEyez;5856742]How is she overall? Is she a mess or does she have it together? We've been texting and I'm seriously considering this one. For $. 4 how long does she hang out for? TIA.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5872473]I finally saw her earlier this week.

Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.

Kissing ok.

Great vocals.

Really gets into it.

Sweet sexy voice.

Large huge breasts.

Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.

Pretty girl, with long natural hair.

Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.

Drove a bit to meet me..[/QUOTE]Glad you had a good time. She will start texting for repeat dates or money. She will also swear up and down that you are the only one she is seeing now. That's what she told me Tuesday when I told her I couldn't meet this week. Just texted me again two hours ago wanting to meet today.

Do you have a link for this one?

[QUOTE=Goo3215;5870441]I finally had a session with Feral and Fun a middle aged MILF. It was a non rushed two and a half hour experience unlike anything I've experienced with another young lady from the site. Everything was made available. She is active in the swinger lifestyle so use your imagination. I explored everything with her and she really got into it. Be aware: She is a squirter so make sure you have plenty of towels.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5872808]Do you have a link for this one?[/QUOTE][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a70c7bd0-ec2d-456c-9a46-53f7430195eb[/URL]

Here are today's discoveries:

Lindseeh: shows login from the Bahamas. Could be nothing but also says: 'looking for something unique kinda".

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/27eb2d2a-a361-4777-8229-5ded545daf40[/URL]


Highgoddess: into bdsm, has her own dungeon, looking for simps to worship her. Go ahead; I don't judge. Using a voip # from the Detroit area.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/48fd0510-29ea-4350-9609-1a6e7bea24b6[/URL]


StunningLady: 35/HOT!, age-pic mismatch, crypto-scammer language! Two year old stolen pictures of Carina Ibsen: [URL]https://www.instagram.com/carinaibsen/.[/URL] Will the profile still be active when I post this?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5fd8050c-2084-43ac-91a3-f50c78cf56f8[/URL]


Princess: cute chick but something is off. Pic is fuzzy and of a shorter girl than the 5'11" height given. Still testing.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/180195f0-f26a-4c47-9e32-12666815a1e4[/URL]


Lilpetitething: is the a repeat for MiPetite? I think it could be. Mipetite is gone for me. She was a hoodrat style rinser who led with her SC and IG if I recall correctly. In any case, she has engaged and says she is new. I may be wrong about this one.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f1f4adc9-5929-48e3-8734-a5ae008f52e8[/URL]


ObscureHottie: age and fuzzy pic make me suspicious but the word salad profile clinches the deal: crypto-scammer!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a512568-0697-489f-ad51-0fb741fc4243[/URL]


Wildhottie: not a scammer per se but feels an awful lot like a rinser! This girl packs more attitude in a smaller space than most similar profiles. She claims to have experience on Seeking but I do not recognize her. Need to check the Columbus board to see if anyone knows her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cda824b1-8b6a-4290-b2a8-9c8f04206d37[/URL]


AlluringChick: hot pic but age 35 are a mismatch, profile is sparse but written like a crypto chick. Still testing this one. Profile deleted or did she block me? Profile slowly disappearing.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d056117c-56c8-43db-8037-f85d17d3ea03[/URL]


MysteriousCutie: shows 21 on Seeking but 18 on SB. SB pictures look even younger. Be wary!

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/30a187860f160642[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/83ac55bf-2a81-406c-94a2-baa56ebd0cce[/URL]


BAM.

Bam Bam,

I notice you usually post about girls that have been on the site for a day or two. Do you find that your success rate is better in the first few days they are on the site or if you wait a week? I always wonder if they are more overwhelmed in the first few days or if that is the best time because they have no expectations?

[QUOTE=BamBam;5874523]Here are today's discoveries:

Lindseeh: shows login from the Bahamas. Could be nothing but also says: 'looking for something unique kinda".

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/27eb2d2a-a361-4777-8229-5ded545daf40[/URL]
[/QUOTE]

She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5872473]I finally saw her earlier this week.

Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.

Kissing ok.

Great vocals.

Really gets into it.

Sweet sexy voice.

Large huge breasts.

Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.

Pretty girl, with long natural hair.

Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.

Drove a bit to meet me.

Brought a sexy outfit to play in.

Bad: Has gained weight since pics.

Is self conscious about weight gain and stretch marks.

Late.

Some smoke smell.

I will likely not repeat due to negatives, but glad I saw her.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fd544012-7f08-4aa2-a159-cb8a5f716ddc[/URL]

Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5874784]Bam Bam,

I notice you usually post about girls that have been on the site for a day or two. Do you find that your success rate is better in the first few days they are on the site or if you wait a week? I always wonder if they are more overwhelmed in the first few days or if that is the best time because they have no expectations?[/QUOTE]

I post suspicious profiles as soon as I get whiff of anything 'off.' The earlier people get a warning, the more value it has. However, I am sometimes wrong. Don't let my warnings scare you away. Test them yourself and just use a little extra caution.

If you can reach profiles really early, there is an improved chance of them actually reading your message. Especially if they are a PYT. These profiles get buried in a thousand DM's and they cannot read all of them. I see a lot of my messages go unread even if I reach out within a day or so of their arrival. In such a case, I usually wait until they disappear for a week or more and then re-approach when they return and the message deluge has diminished. If you have limited time to invest, it may also pay to wait a couple of weeks or more before sending a message. A lot of the UTR's and scammers get deleted by then and you do not waste your time on unwanted people.

Happy hunting!

BAM.

[QUOTE=Bkbh1;5875360][URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fd544012-7f08-4aa2-a159-cb8a5f716ddc[/URL]

Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.[/QUOTE]Your link is to your message box. Here is the original:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5da7ae51-14c7-4bb1-9bb4-814e9a907cdd[/URL]

It no longer works for me. Either I am blocked or she is gone!

BAM.

[QUOTE=TickleJay;5874949]She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.[/QUOTE]I say try again. She just texted me yesterday asking for a meet.

Either that, or just an outright scammer:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/798e24db-9c2d-4158-b02c-c6d7f7be46d6[/URL]

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5875885]Either that, or just an outright scammer:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/798e24db-9c2d-4158-b02c-c6d7f7be46d6[/URL]

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.[/QUOTE]A less than 20 year difference between a 36 year old woman and a guy up to 56 why / o is not a Sugar Baby relationship. That's just dating. Regular dating.

A sugar baby relationship is legal, but socially inappropriate. "Half plus 7" is the accepted social convention. If a guy is 50,32 and above would be socially acceptable age. For a 56 year old, 35 and above. She's within the range of a socially acceptable date.

For her, a sugar daddy needs to be AT LEAST 59 years old to qualify as a sugar daddy.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5875885]Either that, or just an outright scammer:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/798e24db-9c2d-4158-b02c-c6d7f7be46d6[/URL]

She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:

"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".

I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.[/QUOTE]I am going to go with extreme GPS. I doubt a scammer would put that much effort into wording of a profile. She gives her age as 36. A scammer would use lower. I am guessing she is slightly over 40 based on the middle-aged backside in the profile picture. However, she probably likes to dress up and look at herself in a mirror. Why else post ten (!!!) private pictures? I suspect she is looking for a unicorn and will bitterly curse most of the guys on here. Based on her gift list, she likes to be spanked. Can someone lead with that and try to get her private pictures. I would love to see what such a deserving woman looks like in real life.

BAM.

SB video verification feature sure does reveal, in some cases, the profile pics are TGTBT.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/5b1ee14326a09230[/URL]

This simply illustrates why we should insist on a video chat for ANYONE prior to making an offer, be it for a MnG or for an allowance. The hottest chicks invariably are scammers who cannot do video or more normal chicks who look a lot less attractive than their pix. Having done more than my fair share of MnG's, I would say 1 in one hundred is better than their pics show.

BAM.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5876703]SB video verification feature sure does reveal, in some cases, the profile pics are TGTBT.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/5b1ee14326a09230[/URL][/QUOTE]

All I have is a short list today:

SeductiveTemptress: crypto-scammer. Why are there so many in our area? Why do they remain so obvious?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ff4041ca-2d76-4c6d-b2a7-da5271491168[/URL]


TabiBaby: "... Help me with a small amount first, then go from there." "So initial, I'd text a fun picture of my assets, to check is 200 and then after meeting my weekly ranges from 1,000 - 3,000." I think, she thinks, she is being clever. She softens up with a bit of sweet talk but still not my type. At least she is real. She will eventually share picks by text.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4e7632d0-00d7-41b8-9b6b-ceda3420fd5a[/URL]


FineAphrodite: One pic: check, mid-30's age: check, sparse profile: check, ethnicity mixed: check (for an average white girl?) I think I am going to go with scammer on this one. A lazy scammer at that!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04af9e4b-453d-4445-b4a2-d7e40b32eead[/URL]


IllBeHomeInMay: This is a creative new twist!. I love her creativity! She says she is a senior at PSU. She just wants online support for two weeks and then she will meet May 7th when she returns to Cinti. BUT. I dunno. Graduating at age 20?? Also, the pictures have tattoos that come and go. She looks closer to 30+ than 20. I am going to offer to visit her in Happy Valley.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/32811de5-3077-4a46-9344-e4332bd15482[/URL]


BAM.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4e7632d0-00d7-41b8-9b6b-ceda3420fd5a[/URL]

Classic "will do a mng for $50, but you have to pay up front".

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2cc0ef9-fc13-4700-aed7-13ca383cfb5f[/URL]

I've been chatting with this one and we are scheduling a meet. I could have sworn there was discussion in regards to her but can't find it.

Does anyone have any history?

Profile name and profile pics don't ring the memory bell. May have missed this one. Looks unfamiliar. Could be wrong.

[QUOTE=Anvil;5879284][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2cc0ef9-fc13-4700-aed7-13ca383cfb5f[/URL] I've been chatting with this one and we are scheduling a meet. I could have sworn there was discussion in regards to her but can't find it. Does anyone have any history?[/QUOTE]

Reported this scam artist last year. Never actually met but she is nucking futs, threatened me multiple times, did not post my own photo or name, but she claimed she tracked my cell and address and was coming to my house several times, all this after I politely declined to meet d / t her exaggerated request. [URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/aXdyBZx98JOeMYQ0NYVKQEML.[/URL].

She also professed to "work" at a well known hotel chain front desk, make of that what you will. Stay safe and more importantly stay away from this ding bat.

Here is the most recent list:

Jade_798: was on Seeking using the same picture but her profile lasted less than a day. They completely nuked her. This is treatment typically reserved for profiles they think are underage. Be careful.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9d4b5222df139de5[/URL]


WildloveChild: online only, no meetings. Her profile name will get her IG and both OF profiles.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b282cb26-5634-43c2-b7b8-5281c8da1ac8[/URL]


HumorousEnthusiast, 31, Classic crypto-scammer, not trying very hard.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d5fdfdd3-15e2-4d14-99a6-bbe84a78bdd4[/URL]


ConfidentCharmer: using stolen (and old) pictures of fashion model, Morgan Avery. These pictures were already used a few weeks ago on the site by a profile named ClassyDancer. That profile was weak and is now gone. This one will not last long.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e07fa105-82fe-4699-90bf-a7171c892fe5[/URL]


Lolita: someone has a fine sense of humor. Hot pictures but: "Yes, but I need proof. I have too many messages of people saying the same stuff over and over. I need someone real and trustworthy. " Feels like I am about to be asked to prove my worthiness by sending her some money. I haven't got the request yet but she refuses to video-chat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9cc3600b-e424-419d-bca0-6d70a0805e8d[/URL]


I see these profiles online close together. I cannot help wondering if they are all sisters:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3c384784-f2a3-49c2-b894-24155a7e8f34[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c3cfceb2-c9dc-42dc-8788-94e5e316f613[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/41c6da5a-f116-4336-be49-0373c400c714[/URL]


BAM

[QUOTE=BamBam;5881337]Here is the most recent list:

Jade_798: was on Seeking using the same picture but her profile lasted less than a day. They completely nuked her. This is treatment typically reserved for profiles they think are underage. Be careful.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9d4b5222df139de5[/URL]


WildloveChild: online only, no meetings. Her profile name will get her IG and both OF profiles.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b282cb26-5634-43c2-b7b8-5281c8da1ac8[/URL]


HumorousEnthusiast, 31, Classic crypto-scammer, not trying very hard.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d5fdfdd3-15e2-4d14-99a6-bbe84a78bdd4[/URL]


ConfidentCharmer: using stolen (and old) pictures of fashion model, Morgan Avery. These pictures were already used a few weeks ago on the site by a profile named ClassyDancer. That profile was weak and is now gone. This one will not last long.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e07fa105-82fe-4699-90bf-a7171c892fe5[/URL]


Lolita: someone has a fine sense of humor. Hot pictures but: "Yes, but I need proof. I have too many messages of people saying the same stuff over and over. I need someone real and trustworthy. " Feels like I am about to be asked to prove my worthiness by sending her some money. I haven't got the request yet but she refuses to video-chat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9cc3600b-e424-419d-bca0-6d70a0805e8d[/URL]


I see these profiles online close together. I cannot help wondering if they are all sisters:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3c384784-f2a3-49c2-b894-24155a7e8f34[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c3cfceb2-c9dc-42dc-8788-94e5e316f613[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/41c6da5a-f116-4336-be49-0373c400c714[/URL]


BAM[/QUOTE]CatV has been around SA for awhile. I recall she likes to chat and then disappears when it comes to scheduling a meeting.

[QUOTE=BamBam;5876721]All I have is a short list today:

SeductiveTemptress: crypto-scammer. Why are there so many in our area? Why do they remain so obvious?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ff4041ca-2d76-4c6d-b2a7-da5271491168[/URL]


TabiBaby: "... Help me with a small amount first, then go from there." "So initial, I'd text a fun picture of my assets, to check is 200 and then after meeting my weekly ranges from 1,000 - 3,000." I think, she thinks, she is being clever. She softens up with a bit of sweet talk but still not my type. At least she is real. She will eventually share picks by text.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4e7632d0-00d7-41b8-9b6b-ceda3420fd5a[/URL]


FineAphrodite: One pic: check, mid-30's age: check, sparse profile: check, ethnicity mixed: check (for an average white girl?) I think I am going to go with scammer on this one. A lazy scammer at that!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04af9e4b-453d-4445-b4a2-d7e40b32eead[/URL]


IllBeHomeInMay: This is a creative new twist!. I love her creativity! She says she is a senior at PSU. She just wants online support for two weeks and then she will meet May 7th when she returns to Cinti. BUT. I dunno. Graduating at age 20?? Also, the pictures have tattoos that come and go. She looks closer to 30+ than 20. I am going to offer to visit her in Happy Valley.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/32811de5-3077-4a46-9344-e4332bd15482[/URL]


BAM.[/QUOTE]Not unless PSU moved to Baltimore Maryland LOL which is what her profile says now.

[QUOTE=RickMann;5883611]Not unless PSU moved to Baltimore Maryland LOL which is what her profile says now.[/QUOTE]I told her I was in Happy Valley and would give her 500 if we could meet in between classes. She agreed but gave me a voip number from the Huntsville, AL area. Then she ghosted. LOLOLOLOl.

BAM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/32811de5-3077-4a46-9344-e4332bd15482

It is always slow until Sunday then le deluge:

Jade No Meet Ups: was jadewrxcked. I reported on her previously as follows:"Jade_798: was on Seeking using the same picture but her profile lasted less than a day. They completely nuked her. This is treatment typically reserved for profiles that are detected as underage. Be careful." The fact that they restored her means she was able to prove NOT underage. However she changed her profile name. I have Twtr, OF and Reddit that may or may not be her.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9d4b5222df139de5[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/453a25fa-b75c-48f6-8947-b77e7388bac0[/URL]


FineAphrodite: age-pic mismatch. Classic Crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0bc99f2d-4ad4-436a-b3c3-af22b53478db[/URL]


Merdare10: TGTBT? Fuzzy pics, minimal profile, no WL.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5eecbaed-e1ce-41d6-9287-42e9585a1e75[/URL]


Sweets: led with her number. Was Cinti, now St. Pul, Minn. She's bouncing around. I wonder what that means? She is real. She did a video chat. She is in St. Paul and is a BBW. Complete waste of time and bandwidth.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87071943-014e-4e91-b17f-fd7a25fd5f01[/URL]

BAM.

I have now had two encounters with this profile. The first sent my spidey sense tingling. The second set off the submerge klaxon! Dive, dive dive!

Itty Bitty: gives name as Connor, is self-proclaimed "bad girl," led with "her" #, refuses to video chat, will not have sex at the first meet but will do car oral. Asks 200 but agrees to 100, Twice tried to schedule a MnG with me. But does not meet for free. Insist on money for oral. I agreed but said we need to meet inside Panera first. Refused that, said "she" wanted to just jump in my car on arrival. Hmmm, no video chat, name is Connor, profile says 27 but pics say 37, no fixed address except parents in Saint Paris out past Urbana, likely couch surfing in the Franklin / Middletown area, number traces to a Connor but no gender identity or social media anywhere. I looked twice and pretty hard. There are a few women named Connor but they are rare and none live in rural Ohio. Feels like a set up to me. When I said attempted muggings and blackmail have forced me to adopt certain safety precautions, "her" language went to hell: "I don't need to mug you I make hella money LOL and blackmail? Idgaf about your life or what you got going on I'm tryna make money smh but yeah you doing to much" I reluctantly passed on the opportunity. Anyone want to TOFTT?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]

BAM.

Obvious this is a scammer account? Could be wrong. Pics are to glam. Oh and whomever this is likes understanding the market.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/61a54a86-3a3b-4084-8d17-a5bf3bfa1198[/URL]

Here are the new ones for my list:

FineDiva: Escort discussed on the Dayton board.

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/ohio/dayton/78767180[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/adc302fe-3199-46fd-8921-8c910d13ac4b[/URL]


TransTori: increasing numbers of trans people joining the site. Any ideas what is drawing them? The percent trans in the population is relatively tiny. I am surprised to find such a cluster in Seeking. Is it a movement?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/157809bf-e888-45fc-a383-49b6709058a8[/URL]

Angel Baby: also trans?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9f5c584c-35e9-4cc8-bfc7-78e712dad6f3[/URL]

Wolfeyyy: openly trans and active daily.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9c074ac7-b925-4bd8-a218-95c9d275acf7[/URL]


ElegantHeiress: very odd behavior. The initial profile was dtf, bdsm, and ready to engage, accepted my offer then ghosted. Now it is back with completely different pictures and new wording. I am fairly certain I recognize the profile picture from an earlier profile. Can anyone add anything. Has anyone gotten a number or a meeting?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6b15c1e8-7d5a-4475-a870-5ded608bc6b5[/URL]


CleverMadame: TGTBT?, age-pic mismatch, terse profile, mid 30's.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/705e9e9a-f7ba-46ec-97f2-5520962124c6[/URL]


TraveledTemptress: Already mentioned by WA as a scammer, 43?, investment interest?, TGTBT?, terse profile?, age-pic mismatch, tat the comes and goes?, The pictures are of Latvian model. I could not find her website but did find her as a model on a sportswear site located in Latvia. Gives her name as Linna using a number from the Ithaca, NY area that yields no PII but does not appear to be voip,

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/61a54a86-3a3b-4084-8d17-a5bf3bfa1198[/URL]


Angle46457: Accepted an offer then took me to text Feb 20, 2022. Voip near Mount Gilead past Columbus. Eventually told me no meet ups, Lot's of saucy attitude when I observed most men won't offer money without an in person meeting. Back again 2-22-22.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/244c85ff-d761-4de1-ba8c-89fa12641b01[/URL]


BAM.

[QUOTE=BamBam;5886651]I have now had two encounters with this profile. The first sent my spidey sense tingling. The second set off the submerge klaxon! Dive, dive dive![/QUOTE]FYI.

Itty bitty on Seeking is on Secret Benefits as L B 937 with verification video and more pics.
Second photo with bandana and tattoo on SB is similar to what is shown as profile pic on SA

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087[/URL]

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/12103ecde2e353ad[/URL]

Good Morning,

I recently posted information on two providers on the site. Some of you sent me a private message asking for more information and I responded to your requests. I have been contacted by both providers concerning information I provided and one even told me that she was provided my user name. While I am cautious about the information I share on the site and do not degrade or talk bad about a provider, I still thought info we provided to each other would be used to make informed decisions and not necessarily be shared with the provider, especially user names. Am I wrong to be a little perturbed?

[QUOTE=Goo3215;5888607]Good Morning,

I recently posted information on two providers on the site. Some of you sent me a private message asking for more information and I responded to your requests. I have been contacted by both providers concerning information I provided and one even told me that she was provided my user name. While I am cautious about the information I share on the site and do not degrade or talk bad about a provider, I still thought info we provided to each other would be used to make informed decisions and not necessarily be shared with the provider, especially user names. Am I wrong to be a little perturbed?[/QUOTE]I'll just say it this way, share what you wish, however you need to understand the risks back to you. Build trust slowly with your circle of friends With that said, there are seniors here I can share everything, PII, whatever, with nothing ever coming back to me, and vice a versa. Don't feel bad it has happen to the best of us, including myself!