Massage Parlor Reports

No, not me quoting you, Aprilia Rsv:)! Fitzpatrick quoting Donna Hughes.

[QUOTE]Hughes said, “I refuse to jump on this bandwagon of ‘close the loophole’ as if that’s the solution.” State prosecutors have not made use of a new human trafficking law, and Rhode Island is one of only three states where there have been no federal prosecutions for human trafficking since 2000, she said. “They could make a lot of progress by using the existing laws.”[/QUOTE]

Could it be that "there have been no federal prosecutions for human trafficking since 2000" in Rhode Island because there hasn't BEEN any "human trafficking" in Rhode Island? (Or a low enough level to put Little Rhody behind 47 other states, at least?) And could *that* maybe be explained by the non-criminal status of indoor sex work in Rhode Island?

As always, Hughes's agenda is obvious, and it ain't what she says it is. If it was, there's already an amendment to the US constitution that makes slavery illegal, right? She and her a-hole cohorts won't be happy until there's another Prohibition amendment that makes sex work illegal.

[QUOTE=VilunyaChert]No, not me quoting you, Aprilia Rsv:)! Fitzpatrick quoting Donna Hughes.



Could it be that "there have been no federal prosecutions for human trafficking since 2000" in Rhode Island because there hasn't BEEN any "human trafficking" in Rhode Island? (Or a low enough level to put Little Rhody behind 47 other states, at least?) And could *that* maybe be explained by the non-criminal status of indoor sex work in Rhode Island?

As always, Hughes's agenda is obvious, and it ain't what she says it is. If it was, there's already an amendment to the US constitution that makes slavery illegal, right? She and her a-hole cohorts won't be happy until there's another Prohibition amendment that makes sex work illegal.[/QUOTE]

I heard her speak at the RI symposium on "Trafficking" at the Marriott a couple of years ago and went up to her after the meeting and asked about that: what evidence there is, if any, of ANY actual trafficking in RI--I told her the sex workers I knew clearly denied any. She got furious at me at the term "sex workers" and said she refused to answer the question. That was a clear answer to me. She has done absolutely NO real research on her own about this, even though she is a URI professor. All she does is select from the writings of others elsewhere and write biased essays which pass as information.
Unfortunately, though, local authorities and local womens' rights groups and bleeding heart help-the-downtrodden groups believe her and lobby legislators. All a tempest in a teapot, whatever.
I know this is really for the General section, but I had to respond to this important thread. In the future, I'll write about this stuff there.
Be safe, gents.

Has anyone been to the new DT? Also I called FarEast to schedule an appt with Yuri, she is on vacation, hmmm. So I did'nt make an appt. Just wondering if anyone knows whether she is on vacation at. DT.

Thanks for any help.

[QUOTE=Meeso Horny] Did ask for payment up front, and was disappointed with $.40, stating "we start out at that, but now we $.60." I tell her that is all I have, she says OK, be right back.


Is this in addition to the house fee, or is that included in the $140. or $160? ( enough with the freakin money heiroglyphics!! Drives me nuts.)

[QUOTE=Strike2][url]http://thephoenix.com/classifieds/providence_pdf.pdf[/url][/QUOTE]I love Photoshop and Illustrator.

I agree, the "code" for the dollars spent on here is silly! Just put 160, 140, 100 or whatever it is....If you want to add $ sign at the beginning then all the better!



[QUOTE=Jolly Rocks][QUOTE=Meeso Horny] Did ask for payment up front, and was disappointed with $.40, stating "we start out at that, but now we $.60." I tell her that is all I have, she says OK, be right back.


Is this in addition to the house fee, or is that included in the $140. or $160? ( enough with the freakin money heiroglyphics!! Drives me nuts.)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=VilunyaChert]No, not me quoting you, Aprilia Rsv:)! Fitzpatrick quoting Donna Hughes.



Could it be that "there have been no federal prosecutions for human trafficking since 2000" in Rhode Island because there hasn't BEEN any "human trafficking" in Rhode Island? (Or a low enough level to put Little Rhody behind 47 other states, at least?) And could *that* maybe be explained by the non-criminal status of indoor sex work in Rhode Island?

As always, Hughes's agenda is obvious, and it ain't what she says it is. If it was, there's already an amendment to the US constitution that makes slavery illegal, right? She and her a-hole cohorts won't be happy until there's another Prohibition amendment that makes sex work illegal.[/QUOTE]

Everytime this useless piece of crap newspaper prints an article she is always quoted and repeats the same old tired line. Yes there maybe some of it going on and yes there are laws already on the books to prevent it. Use the current laws and stop whining about it. And once again this bill will never get anywhere. The ACLU (as much as I don't like them) will jump on this (like we do when we find a great provider lol) and use this as one of their high profile cases. Not to mention that the industry will just disappear underground which would make it worse for the providers and owners. At least out in the open it gets somewhat regulated.
And I still say that the locals and states that are getting revenue from license fees and other taxes from the buildings and businesses are unlikely to cut off this source of revenue. At least not in this economy. It is hard to get any revenue from an empty building.
What this chic needs is for all of us to line her up against the wall and show her what we think of her rhetoric one at a time.

[QUOTE=Jake1950]Has anyone been to the new DT? Also I called FarEast to schedule an appt with Yuri, she is on vacation, hmmm. So I did'nt make an appt. Just wondering if anyone knows whether she is on vacation at. DT.

Thanks for any help.[/QUOTE]

Go to the next page. There is a review of the new DT on post 2425. I'm guessing that there have been many more visits and some might be holding back on us! Let's go guys bring on those reviews!

[QUOTE=Tp1701]I second that. Took a ride to Fuji's myself. Like Daddy said, across the street from City Hall AND it's sandwiched between a deli and a bank on a busy street. Maybe at night, but noway in the daytime.[/QUOTE]

I've gone by once or twice and found the door locked and no answer. I've also called and gotten a sexy voice to tell me to leave a number and they would get back to me. They haven't. It's also odd that they advertised once back on 1/4 and haven't since. maybe a permit issue or something.

[QUOTE=Stressed Out]Everytime this useless piece of crap newspaper prints an article she is always quoted and repeats the same old tired line. Yes there maybe some of it going on and yes there are laws already on the books to prevent it. Use the current laws and stop whining about it. And once again this bill will never get anywhere. The ACLU (as much as I don't like them) will jump on this (like we do when we find a great provider lol) and use this as one of their high profile cases. Not to mention that the industry will just disappear underground which would make it worse for the providers and owners. At least out in the open it gets somewhat regulated.
And I still say that the locals and states that are getting revenue from license fees and other taxes from the buildings and businesses are unlikely to cut off this source of revenue. At least not in this economy. It is hard to get any revenue from an empty building.
What this chic needs is for all of us to line her up against the wall and show her what we think of her rhetoric one at a time.[/QUOTE]

I don't know, I hope you're right, but I fear eventually lawmakers will have to do something. AMP's are opening at a fast and furious pace. Although this competition can be a good thing for us customers, it may eventually ruin things. Too many will just help the argument that RI is becoming a sex mecca. That news article also mentioned the strip clubs. Like I said I hope you're right but I think the do-gooders & the press will eventually force them to clean things up.

If they really cared or thought there was a problem even though things are "legal" indoors, if they had an ounce of worry that there was trafficking going on then they could go in and make sure that everyone was legal.

There doesn't seem to be much trouble busting some warehouse using illegals for less than minimum wage.

I guess as long as taxes are getting paid it doesn't matter?

Personally I would be sick to find out that any of the girls there were forced into doing anything against their will.

[QUOTE=Chd86]Personally I would be sick to find out that any of the girls there were forced into doing anything against their will.[/QUOTE]Over the last month or so, I've taken two session with Cindy at Lily's. I don't recommend her, by the way. She worked hard, but she was so rough and mechanical that the endings were, for me, not so happy. If you need someone to operate a butter churn for you, though, you could not do better.

Anyway, she was grumpy the second time (as I was, eventually), and complained bitterly about her life: learning English, working so many hours, not enough rest. I finally asked her why she did it, and she said that her father is I'll, and that where he is, no money == no doctor. She seemed matter-of-fact about it. It seemed like a responsibility that she accepted (even though she wasn't happy right then about her circumstances).

Is that slavery? It seems more like "wage slavery" to me. If she has no skills and therefore no other way to make money, and the choice was between coming to America and jerking guys off or letting her father die, maybe she felt compelled to make the trip. A hard choice. But still *her* choice.

[QUOTE=Chd86]If they really cared or thought there was a problem even though things are "legal" indoors, if they had an ounce of worry that there was trafficking going on then they could go in and make sure that everyone was legal.

There doesn't seem to be much trouble busting some warehouse using illegals for less than minimum wage.

I guess as long as taxes are getting paid it doesn't matter?

Personally I would be sick to find out that any of the girls there were forced into doing anything against their will.[/QUOTE]I could not agree with you more. Speaking with the girls, I have found that all of the ones I have spoken with are in the country legally, well, at least legal to the letter of the law. The latest one I spoke with told me she had her green card and is in the country as an art student. I am going to presume that the others have similar stories. The owners want the girls to be legal. Further, to a person, they all tell me they have family and send money home to support them. Does not sound like coercion to me, except, sadly, by poverty.

[/quote]personally i would be sick to find out that any of the girls there were forced into doing anything against their will.[/quote]


same here! if these girls are being forced to perform they all should get emmy awards for best actress. i have never met any girl in an amp who showed any sense of being forced! if they are being forced or **** i would be the first in line to help close their doors and send the bastards to jail! consenting is fine, being forced is a whole other story!

Hey guys,

I'm from Ma.

Drove down to 1 spa and saw June. After reading a report on her.

Sweet looking girl nice body but a flat butt.

Great table bath,decent massage but wanted way to much $ for everything.

I was so disappointed after driving an hour. Got my HE and left. Could have gotten that in Ma.