Escort Reports

[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2897039]Glad you had a nice time but there are so many GFE options out there at around $300, not sure what Tiffany offers that's worth an extra $.

FWIW, the Eros GFE section has quite a few hotties at the 300 level and, with a little homework on this forum and the oThER site, you should be able to find even better values.

[URL]http://www.eros.com/washington_dc/sections/washington_dc_gfe_escorts.htm[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for the advice but I'm happy with my choice and hope members appreciate the contribution. I've posted many reviews on the other site as well so that we all can review and make our own informed choices.

My experiences with matchless have gone downhill. I used to visit almost weekly. My last experience withBonnie was a bit of a disappointment. Asked for $$ up front no problem. However her demeanor changed once in hand. She was sweet and flirty at first. Changed to hurry up mode after. Don't do that. Are you going to come yet. Would fight me with her legs to not get deeper penetration. Their first stable of girls were great. Eastern European with great attention attitude and service. Not sure what went wrong.

[URL]https://matchlessbeauties.com/escorts/bonnie/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Sfrancis118;2897154]Thanks for the advice but I'm happy with my choice and hope members appreciate the contribution. I've posted many reviews on the other site as well so that we all can review and make our own informed choices.[/QUOTE]Just to clarify, nothing in my post was intended to downplay either your experience or your contribution. And, as I said, I'm happy you had a good session. But one of the great benefits of this forum is to share intel not only about specific providers but also about how to get the most for our hard-earned $.

IMHO, when it comes to the higher price levels, the differences between $300-$400-$500+ GFE providers become much more intangible. That's because, assuming they provide the services that qualify them for the GFE label, after that it mostly comes down to appearance and whatever type of ambiance or connection there is between provider and client. But the tricky part about such intangibles is how much they can vary from individual to individual, and even from session to session with the same provider.

If you think of high-priced GFE escorts in the same way as Michelin 3-star restaurants, the differences are similarly intangible and individual. In your post you provided a stellar review of one such establishment. In my post I'm adhering to your advice about making informed choices by pointing out that there are others who may provide a similarly wonderful experience for less.

Of course, as always, every hobbyist will check out the available marketplace options and spend their money as they see fit.

[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2897221]Just to clarify, nothing in my post was intended to downplay either your experience or your contribution. And, as I said, I'm happy you had a good session. But one of the great benefits of this forum is to share intel not only about specific providers but also about how to get the most for our hard-earned $.

IMHO, when it comes to the higher price levels, the differences between $300-$400-$500+ GFE providers become much more intangible. That's because, assuming they provide the services that qualify them for the GFE label, after that it mostly comes down to appearance and whatever type of ambiance or connection there is between provider and client. But the tricky part about such intangibles is how much they can vary from individual to individual, and even from session to session with the same provider.

If you think of high-priced GFE escorts in the same way as Michelin 3-star restaurants, the differences are similarly intangible and individual. In your post you provided a stellar review of one such establishment. In my post I'm adhering to your advice about making informed choices by pointing out that there are others who may provide a similarly wonderful experience for less.

Of course, as always, every hobbyist will check out the available marketplace options and spend their money as they see fit.[/QUOTE]Fair enough. With that said, maybe we post a value chart by price range and include some recommendations. For example rank providers in the 100-200,200-300,300-400, and 400+.

I've had varied experiences at different price points. Recently found an agency at 200 (see Baltimore) that has proven to be a great value. At 300 some success with [URL]Ame.com[/URL]panionfiles, jennifersmodels, and flawless. Downhill experiences with matchless. (See below).

IMHO could prove insightful.

[QUOTE=Sfrancis118;2898059]Fair enough. With that said, maybe we post a [B][red]value chart by price range[/red][/B] and include some recommendations. For example rank providers in the 100-200,200-300,300-400, and 400+.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately, while such an endeavor might seem feasible, it's doomed to failure and frustration.

PRICE is entirely an [U]objective[/U] measure, while VALUE is largely a [U]subjective[/U] measure (even with multiple metrics attached). The PRICE that a person is willing to pay for a commodity or service depends on the VALUE that one attaches to it. Different people will attach different values to various and sundry commodities or services, which is the Free Market in unhindered operation. The market will determine the optimum PRICE that a commodity or service can command, via the countless voluntary individual transactions that occur (all of which depend on the particular VALUE that those individuals place on the commodity or service).

Sellers also attach value to the commodity or service they are offering, and that will dictate their asking price. In all likelihood, the value they attach and the value a potential buyer attaches will differ, but their respective acceptable price ranges might overlap. If those ranges [U]do[/U] overlap, then a negotiation ensues. If a seller is astute, he or she will adjust the asking price to the point that best maximizes the number of transactions [U]within the price range he or she is willing to accept[/U] for the commodity or service (again, based on the perceived value).

The point is, since we all (the potential buyers) have different values that we attach to even the same BP providers, attempting to categorize providers into a [B]value chart by price range[/B] will be an exercise in futility. If each of us is satisfied with the price we each pay for a provider's services, then we've obtained "good value. " That's about the best you'll be able to do, IMO.

Now, that said, one [U]can[/U] produce a chart that groups providers by PRICE vs. SERVICES, both of which are objective measures. However, one will still be left with the question of QUALITY of said services. Absent specific metrics to adjudge those services, even this sort of ranking system will fail. Besides, who among us wants (or is able) to think about objective metrics when some provider has either pair of her lips wrapped around Junior? I know my focus won't be on objective metrics at that point; I'll be focused on subjective matters. But maybe other mongers can compartmentalize thinks, in a Mr. Spock-like manner, while a session is in progress. Who knows? Who cares?

Good luck, though, should you attempt such a chart and ranking system. I'll be interested in seeing its implementation.

[B]Roman[/B]


P.S. - By the way, when you think about it, the USASG basically is already doing what you're seeking to do: rank the relative Price-Value of any given provider. It's just that the USASG does it in a much more thorough way, via the various discussions and reports. For any given provider, our community is able to thresh out approximately where that provider is located in the Price-Value continuum.

[QUOTE=RoaminRoman;2902117]Unfortunately, while such an endeavor might seem feasible, it's doomed to failure and frustration.

PRICE is entirely an [U]objective[/U] measure, while VALUE is largely a [U]subjective[/U] measure (even with multiple metrics attached). The PRICE that a person is willing to pay for a commodity or service depends on the VALUE that one attaches to it. Different people will attach different values to various and sundry commodities or services, which is the Free Market in unhindered operation. The market will determine the optimum PRICE that a commodity or service can command, via the countless voluntary individual transactions that occur (all of which depend on the particular VALUE that those individuals place on the commodity or service).

Sellers also attach value to the commodity or service they are offering, and that will dictate their asking price. In all likelihood, the value they attach and the value a potential buyer attaches will differ, but their respective acceptable price ranges might overlap. If those ranges [U]do[/U] overlap, then a negotiation ensues. If a seller is astute, he or she will adjust the asking price to the point that best maximizes the number of transactions [U]within the price range he or she is willing to accept[/U] for the commodity or service (again, based on the perceived value).

The point is, since we all (the potential buyers) have different values that we attach to even the same BP providers, attempting to categorize providers into a [B]value chart by price range[/B] will be an exercise in futility. If each of us is satisfied with the price we each pay for a provider's services, then we've obtained "good value. " That's about the best you'll be able to do, IMO.

Now, that said, one [U]can[/U] produce a chart that groups providers by PRICE vs. SERVICES, both of which are objective measures. However, one will still be left with the question of QUALITY of said services. Absent specific metrics to adjudge those services, even this sort of ranking system will fail. Besides, who among us wants (or is able) to think about objective metrics when some provider has either pair of her lips wrapped around Junior? I know my focus won't be on objective metrics at that point; I'll be focused on subjective matters. But maybe other mongers can compartmentalize thinks, in a Mr. Spock-like manner, while a session is in progress. Who knows? Who cares?

Good luck, though, should you attempt such a chart and ranking system. I'll be interested in seeing its implementation.

[B]Roman[/B]


P.S. - By the way, when you think about it, the USASG basically is already doing what you're seeking to do: rank the relative Price-Value of any given provider. It's just that the USASG does it in a much more thorough way, via the various discussions and reports. For any given provider, our community is able to thresh out approximately where that provider is located in the Price-Value continuum.[/QUOTE]As you mentioned, the hobby is an interesting mix of the commodity (pussy) itself + appearance + service and I think there are some interesting parallels to similar markets. One that comes immediately to mind is the market for hotel beds (or even airline seats). The bed itself is the commodity but it's the difference in the appearance, convenience and service factors that work together to determine the price.

Just like with hotels, there are 5-star providers at the top and a wide variety going all the way down to 1-star at the bottom. And just like with hotels, every buyer in the market wants to get the most value for their hard-earned dollar. Nobody wants to pay 5-star prices for a 2-star experience and that's why there are so many hotel price search and review sites.

But a huge difference between these two markets is that the hotel industry has pricing down to a science so they know exactly when they can charge more and when they need to offer a discount. Unfortunately, most providers either copy other girls or they may develop "Golden Pussy" syndrome and simply assume the price should be whatever they think they're worth (and that mongers should be happy to pay it). IMHO there are a few reasons why some providers can get away with charging above-market prices. For one, they may be part-timers who don't need a steady income from the hobby. Also, there will always be mongers who are too busy (or lazy or newbies or whatever) and, if they happen to have the $, they will pay the higher fee. And finally, there's the dreaded little-head-itis, when the urge hits and you have a limited window of opportunity and your gonads tell you to just go for it.

But what's crazy to me is that some of the same guys who will scour sites like Expedia and Kayak and TripAdvisor for the very best value in a hotel room too often don't put forth the same effort when it comes to finding an escort. When you think about this site (Hey, we're the TripAdvisor of Pussy!) and oThERs, it's not that heavy a lift. Of course, every monger has their own preferences (young vs MILF, spinner vs stacked, GND vs exotic, etc.) but that's where good homework comes in to make sure you're comparing apples to apples.

Here's one example as an illustration (these NOVA sites have similar offerings, young hotties for "private viewing" sessions):

[URL]http://bluegems.com/the-ladies/[/URL]

[URL]http://www.secrettemptation.com/page4.html[/URL]

[URL]http://www.edenmodelsva.com/gallery/[/URL]

They all used to charge 120 for a hh session until bluegems raised it to 140. From my perspective (full disclosure, I haven't visited any of them) unless I had an especially good report about a particular bluegems girl, I'd see no reason to pay the higher fee. I absolutely understand it's only $20, but if you found a hotel room for $20 less than another that was in the same neighborhood and comparable in every respect, what's the justification for the higher price?

The bottom line is that the more info that's out there about price + service + all the other relevant factors mongers care about, the more efficiently the market will function. But all the resources in the world won't help if hobbyists don't engage the big head and use them.

Visiting for the week, would love for someone to save me a lot of time researching. .

[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2915643]The bottom line is that the more info that's out there about price + service + all the other relevant factors mongers care about, the more efficiently the market will function. But all the resources in the world won't help if hobbyists don't engage the big head and use them.[/QUOTE]Whether hotels, airlines, clothing, or restaurants, there are always people who will pay the going rate without doing any legwork, either out of laziness, ignorance, or status seeking. We here can pat ourselves and each other on the back for participating in the hobby's TripAdvisor (or are we Yelpers?, LOL), knowing that we're mostly getting better prices, service, and value, with less risk, than the average lunk out there.

There will always be someone getting a free room or a free meal, but if you're consistently beating the rack rate and getting good value (satisfactory return on expenditure), the suckers who are overpaying are their own problem. If anything, by spending their time and money on the bad deals, they're leaving the better deals available for us.

Who remembers the Syms clothing store's motto? "An Educated Consumer is our Best Customer".

Visiting for a week, can anyone recommend a good provider?

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]JazonArgos.

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i]

I banned your old user for being an asshole and it doesn't look like you're learning anything.

I suggest you learn to use the ignore function.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Sommelier13;2915851]Visiting for a week, can anyone recommend a good provider?[/QUOTE]Well, amigo, your posting history isn't one that would give many long-time members a lot of comfort. Many of your posts are of the "[I]Does anyone know[/I]" variety, rather than posts that provide board members with good, useful intel. Posts that share actionable info from your experiences (both good and bad) help build-up what's known as [B]board cred[/B]. Each monger expends his own hard-earned cash and limited free time to obtain the info that he shares, so when someone with a very thin resume comes along and asks for details, it's not likely to be viewed favorably by those who [U]can[/U] provide the info you seek. You can still obtain some [U]general[/U] info; however, long-time posters still prefer to see a bit more effort on the part of those who ask for info but haven't really contributed much to the forum. The key is [B]participation[/B], my friend.

Now, with that as preface, I can provide you with a few helpful tidbits for your upcoming visit.
[INDENT]
[B](1)[/B] The AMPs in the NoVA area (i.e., south of the Potomac River) are [U]nearly[/U] all HE operations. If you go north of the river, though, you'll find a number (especially in and around Greenbelt and other spots in Prince Georges County) that offer FS. The rates are typically .7 for house fee and $ for FS.

[B](2)[/B] For BP operations, including the "indies", there are the good, bad, and ugly, just as you'd expect to find anywhere. If you check the USASG's BP forums for Northern Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, you should be able to weed out the ugly and, most likely, the bad as well. Here in NoVA, I've found that the Chinese operations are fairly reliable and consistent. And, even though you haven't really contributed much to justify it, I'm going to give you a one-time freebie (not [U]that[/U] type) by pointing you to a place where you should be able to satisfy your desires. Depending on where you'll be staying when you get here, the following ad is an acceptable one. Not the best, but not the worst.

[center][url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/attractive-asian-good-service-703-203-0671-centreville/20304139[/url][/center][/INDENT]
Now, what do I ask in return? Personally, nothing. But, for the other members of the NoVA forum, as well as your fellow USASG members in your home city, I'd only ask that you try to post more than what you've done thus far. Get involved, rather than being basically a lurker who occasionally comes with hat in hand asking for freebies. When you get involved more actively, you'll find that others will be FAR more willing to share their info, especially the gems that we've all discovered but don't necessarily broadcast far-and-wide. Bear in mind, the success of the USASG is largely driven by [U]sharing[/U] and [U]participation[/U]. You'll get out what you put in, and then some. But, if you remain on the sidelines, you'll be depriving yourself and your fellow mongers of a lot of good, useful info.

So, there you have it, amigo. The choice is yours, but think about it: We have a cost-free forum with the USASG, with a [B]ton[/B] of useful info shared daily, yet too many mongers just don't make use of its full potential. So, come on and join the parade. I guarantee you'll have a lot more fun if you do.

[B]Roman[/B]

"The key is participation, my friend. ".

Wow Roamin, you are one patient dude. Most of us had the pin pulled on the grenade. The only thing to add is to suggest A2 put your work on a splash page when new members sign up. Peace.

[QUOTE=Sommelier13;2915851]Visiting for a week, can anyone recommend a good provider?[/QUOTE]Since your posting history centers mostly around Anchorage, I assume you're familiar with this site:

[URL]http://liveescortreviews.com/gallery/anchorage[/URL]

Substitute "nova" for "anchorage" and you'll be well on your way to what you seek.

BTW, it's pretty hard to give recommendations without some specifics (preferences, price range, car vs public transport, incall vs outcall, etc.).

Thai young lady visiting us for a while in NOVA.

Highly recommend.

$$. 6.

Skills 9/10.

Looks 9/10.

Attitude 10/10.

[URL]http://celinajoop.hotprovider.com/profile/[/URL]

PM questions. Happy Hunting.

LTD.

I'm a 30 year old female who is writing about the commercial sex industry.

[blue][Deleted by Admin]

Not just no but fuck no. Every single time, WITHOUT FAIL, that somebody does this they end up lifting shit out of context and portraying commercial sex in the worst light possible.

Be gone

A2[/blue]