When I last saw her she said she was going to another agency and not coming back. Didn't get a chance to ask which agency though.
[QUOTE=MaxwellEsq;5467235]I request from time to time for her to come back. Would be interested as well.[/QUOTE]
Printable View
When I last saw her she said she was going to another agency and not coming back. Didn't get a chance to ask which agency though.
[QUOTE=MaxwellEsq;5467235]I request from time to time for her to come back. Would be interested as well.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5465514]Suri has had a bunch of different names and always mediocre reviews. Can't remember what Dori's name was in OC but there's a few reports of her in the Seattle forum where she went by Boa. Reports are positive in terms of her service but it sounds like she's on the curvier / heavier side.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?32857-KAngels-Discussion&p=5347592&viewfull=1#post5347592[/URL][/QUOTE]With a deep dive into photos, Dori was here in March as Tami. Same photos but her menu then has BB Friendly, not now. Discussion on Tami in this thread was not positive. She is probably one of those YMMV type of ladies. Yea, her pics look hot and probably not her.
[QUOTE=Dmzhost;5466589]Thanks for the heads up. I tried to PM you about those details, but I think your inbox is full.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the heads-up that my inbox is full. Just cleared it.
+1 for Vietnamese Nana. Just saw her about an hour ago and can confirm she's worth the visit. Nice discreet incall in UTC and setup was easy. Started with a bit of nipple play then moves quickly to CBJ, CG, ACG with finish in the latter. Very bubbly and great personality, but speaks very little English. Will see again but maybe start with DATY in case that's the key to getting BBBJ.
[QUOTE=TheDudeInSd;5467073]Vietnamese Nana. Clean and fun.
[URL]https://sandiego.rubratings.com/228463[/URL]
We rarely get Vietnamese providers in SD but was super surprised when I saw Nana. She greeted me at the familiar UTC location and was all smiles. Really bubbly lady with great service. She is brand new to the business and let me know if I had any suggestions haha. Started with her just taking her clothes off and sticking her beautiful all natural boobs in my mouth. I would say she is a solid B cup with tiny pink nipples. I rarely get to eat Vietnamese kitty (which is so yummy) so I had her sit on my face for a good 10 minutes until she O'd in my mouth. After resting for 45 seconds or so she started a BBBJ which was a totally different technique that I am used to. She has serious suction, like Karlie. I lightly pushed the back of her head and she took the hint and just engulfed my cock DT all the way down. I was about to explode so asked for the condom and went to town. CG, ACG, RCG, Mish and then doggie and that is where I realized how nice her ass was, just a perfect size to grab and then I lost it. So good to have a yummy Viet girl in SD.
Highly recommend. $240 1 hour.
Cheers.[/QUOTE]
I saw Dori and Violet too a few weeks ago.
They both are not the girls in the pics obviously LOL. Dori is on the heavier side, but she did give me a really nice BJ. And she looked like she was enjoying it more. She was tight too. I assume they both are in their 30's. I felt like the session with Violet was rushed, but I did have a hhr session with her, so that is prolly why. Overall both were okay, but Dori was better imo.
Also, it looks like it is way way harder to make an appt with SDAG than FEC. Is there a big difference those 2 K-agencies in term of their talents?
Both SDAG and FEC have their gems. SDAG used to be virtually 100% reliable: hot or attractive providers with great skills. FEC has always been more hit and miss. Today I'm inclined to say that SDAG has slipped in terms of their talent pool. It could be the impact of Covid and a lesser number of girls coming over on tourist visas. Whatever the cause, I always wait until I've found a recommendation from a trusted fellow hobbyist before I take the plunge. Its a pity really, and I'm hoping as we slowly return to normal things will improve. My impression is that the booker at FEC is a good guy. That's in contrast to the booker (s) at SDAG who can be very curt, entitled, and can even try to intimidate guys who write honest reviews on other websites.
[QUOTE=StrikeOne;5469602]I saw Dori and Violet too a few weeks ago.
They both are not the girls in the pics obviously LOL. Dori is on the heavier side, but she did give me a really nice BJ. And she looked like she was enjoying it more. She was tight too. I assume they both are in their 30's. I felt like the session with Violet was rushed, but I did have a hhr session with her, so that is prolly why. Overall both were okay, but Dori was better imo.
Also, it looks like it is way way harder to make an appt with SDAG than FEC. Is there a big difference those 2 K-agencies in term of their talents?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RolfTorren;5470144]Both SDAG and FEC have their gems. SDAG used to be virtually 100% reliable: hot or attractive providers with great skills. FEC has always been more hit and miss. Today I'm inclined to say that SDAG has slipped in terms of their talent pool. It could be the impact of Covid and a lesser number of girls coming over on tourist visas. Whatever the cause, I always wait until I've found a recommendation from a trusted fellow hobbyist before I take the plunge. Its a pity really, and I'm hoping as we slowly return to normal things will improve. My impression is that the booker at FEC is a good guy. That's in contrast to the booker (s) at SDAG who can be very curt, entitled, and can even try to intimidate guys who write honest reviews on other websites.[/QUOTE]
Great overview of the 2 agencies; I couldn't agree with you more. Yes, the FEC booker is friendly, always thanking me for my "friendship and patronage. " The SDAG booker is mostly brief and curt. Maybe they are so in high demands that customer service is not a priority for the booker.
I'm like you, I don't rush to book with every girl on their lineup. I do my research and wait to talk with trusted mongers or see their recommendations. Because I follow this process I have never had a bad experience.
[QUOTE=RolfTorren;5470144]Both SDAG and FEC have their gems. SDAG used to be virtually 100% reliable: hot or attractive providers with great skills. FEC has always been more hit and miss. Today I'm inclined to say that SDAG has slipped in terms of their talent pool. It could be the impact of Covid and a lesser number of girls coming over on tourist visas. Whatever the cause, I always wait until I've found a recommendation from a trusted fellow hobbyist before I take the plunge. Its a pity really, and I'm hoping as we slowly return to normal things will improve. My impression is that the booker at FEC is a good guy. That's in contrast to the booker (s) at SDAG who can be very curt, entitled, and can even try to intimidate guys who write honest reviews on other websites.[/QUOTE]RT, your probably right about the bookers as I have experience similar chats. As for the talent pool here, the girls seem to be deciding on when to come here and I'm sure they talk among themselves. San Diego is a tough spot for the girls to get the calls since we have a smaller population of hobbyists vs Orange County, Bay Area, Texas and Boston. Timing also is a problem. I've seen girls arrive on Monday and leave on Saturday because it's too slow for them. Why? Either no one knew they were here on such an early week arrival or it wasn't payday for us. Up on the OC it's monger heaven for them and no lack of calls every day. Maybe the bookers should be posting on their websites "Coming Soon" to give us all a heads up?
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5470460]Great overview of the 2 agencies; I couldn't agree with you more. Yes, the FEC booker is friendly, always thanking me for my "friendship and patronage. " The SDAG booker is mostly brief and curt. Maybe they are so in high demands that customer service is not a priority for the booker.
I'm like you, I don't rush to book with every girl on their lineup. I do my research and wait to talk with trusted mongers or see their recommendations. Because I follow this process I have never had a bad experience.[/QUOTE]Yo king, thank you for the message. I replied but your inbox is full. Appreciate you bro!
[QUOTE=Waylay;5470630]Yo king, thank you for the message. I replied but your inbox is full. Appreciate you bro![/QUOTE]Sorry, brother. I lost track of how many messages I sent back the past week or so. I don't think you could go wrong with any of those Latina hotties. Well, I'm a bit bias because I love women with boobs and round apple booties.
[QUOTE=MCHammerHang;5469010]+1 for Vietnamese Nana. Just saw her about an hour ago and can confirm she's worth the visit. Nice discreet incall in UTC and setup was easy. Started with a bit of nipple play then moves quickly to CBJ, CG, ACG with finish in the latter. Very bubbly and great personality, but speaks very little English. Will see again but maybe start with DATY in case that's the key to getting BBBJ.[/QUOTE]I decided to give this Vietnamese girl "Nana" a try after the 2 previous fairly glowing reviews. There was absolutely no BBBJ to speak of. She definitely seemed like she knew how to suck a dick but at the end of the day any CBJ is borderline unenjoyable, regardless of technique. She was a missionary "dead fish" only type. She began with what I guess what she would consider a massage. However, it was mostly her just pinching my skin in different locations. The DATY action may have been on the table but she had a pretty nasty looking Bush and I'm just not about that life. Her one saving grace was her mediocre tits, but they have some miles on them. She is no spring chicken. During the session, which was in no way intimate nor sensual, she would randomly spew out some Vietnamese or completely unintelligible English. To say the session was rushed would also be an understatement. I arrived at 4:00 and she was pretty much rushing me out the door at 4:25 during 1 hour session.
Anyways, I would stay far away from this one. Your money will go lightyears further with FEC, SDAG, SDGF and Sandra99 etc.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5470502]RT, your probably right about the bookers as I have experience similar chats. As for the talent pool here, the girls seem to be deciding on when to come here and I'm sure they talk among themselves. San Diego is a tough spot for the girls to get the calls since we have a smaller population of hobbyists vs Orange County, Bay Area, Texas and Boston. Timing also is a problem. I've seen girls arrive on Monday and leave on Saturday because it's too slow for them. Why? Either no one knew they were here on such an early week arrival or it wasn't payday for us. Up on the OC it's monger heaven for them and no lack of calls every day. Maybe the bookers should be posting on their websites "Coming Soon" to give us all a heads up?[/QUOTE]Go see Mila.
She is as young and as good as anyone we have seen in SD in a long time.
[QUOTE=RobReefer;5470972]I decided to give this Vietnamese girl "Nana" a try after the 2 previous fairly glowing reviews. There was absolutely no BBBJ to speak of. She definitely seemed like she knew how to suck a dick but at the end of the day any CBJ is borderline unenjoyable, regardless of technique. She was a missionary "dead fish" only type. She began with what I guess what she would consider a massage. However, it was mostly her just pinching my skin in different locations. The DATY action may have been on the table but she had a pretty nasty looking Bush and I'm just not about that life. Her one saving grace was her mediocre tits, but they have some miles on them. She is no spring chicken. During the session, which was in no way intimate nor sensual, she would randomly spew out some Vietnamese or completely unintelligible English. To say the session was rushed would also be an understatement. I arrived at 4:00 and she was pretty much rushing me out the door at 4:25 during 1 hour session.
Anyways, I would stay far away from this one. Your money will go lightyears further with FEC, SDAG, SDGF and Sandra99 etc.[/QUOTE]Ok, I visit with and am very familiar with the ladies from FEC, SDAG and Sandra99. But what is SDGF?
[QUOTE=RobReefer;5470972]I decided to give this Vietnamese girl "Nana" a try after the 2 previous fairly glowing reviews. There was absolutely no BBBJ to speak of. She definitely seemed like she knew how to suck a dick but at the end of the day any CBJ is borderline unenjoyable, regardless of technique. She was a missionary "dead fish" only type. She began with what I guess what she would consider a massage. However, it was mostly her just pinching my skin in different locations. The DATY action may have been on the table but she had a pretty nasty looking Bush and I'm just not about that life. Her one saving grace was her mediocre tits, but they have some miles on them. She is no spring chicken. During the session, which was in no way intimate nor sensual, she would randomly spew out some Vietnamese or completely unintelligible English. To say the session was rushed would also be an understatement. I arrived at 4:00 and she was pretty much rushing me out the door at 4:25 during 1 hour session.
Anyways, I would stay far away from this one. Your money will go lightyears further with FEC, SDAG, SDGF and Sandra99 etc.[/QUOTE]I tried Nana and her massage was not that bad. She is not professional but it is understandable since she is not a massage therapist. I do not think FEC or SDAG girls are doing any good massage either. I have never tried them in SD but I assume they are from Orange county and I used to see many Korean girls in Garden Grove and Irvine about 5 years ago. I agree that her English is not good but she understood my requests so it's not a problem for me. I think her Bush is natural. I disagree that it is nasty. It is much cleaner than many local AMPs. I had full one hour with her so I have no complaints about time. IMO, I would give her a B or B+ since she is much better than some girls at 108, Mesa Ridge, A spa (before covid, closed now) or Campo in Spring Valley.
[QUOTE=RobReefer;5470972]I decided to give this Vietnamese girl "Nana" a try after the 2 previous fairly glowing reviews. There was absolutely no BBBJ to speak of. She definitely seemed like she knew how to suck a dick but at the end of the day any CBJ is borderline unenjoyable, regardless of technique. She was a missionary "dead fish" only type. She began with what I guess what she would consider a massage. However, it was mostly her just pinching my skin in different locations. The DATY action may have been on the table but she had a pretty nasty looking Bush and I'm just not about that life. Her one saving grace was her mediocre tits, but they have some miles on them. She is no spring chicken. During the session, which was in no way intimate nor sensual, she would randomly spew out some Vietnamese or completely unintelligible English. To say the session was rushed would also be an understatement. I arrived at 4:00 and she was pretty much rushing me out the door at 4:25 during 1 hour session.
Anyways, I would stay far away from this one. Your money will go lightyears further with FEC, SDAG, SDGF and Sandra99 etc.[/QUOTE]What is SDGF?
Thanks.