Escort Reviews

[QUOTE=Wingman Todd; 1090441]Lookie,

Let it rest and see what "Jackson" responds to my request. BTW, you spelling is bad! LOL!

WM. [/QUOTE]Lookee here. Apologies to Jackson. As things can get light around here at times, this was only an attempt at humor, albeit a poor one. I mistook Jackson's serious post to be a stab at humor, himself. The post I read had the word criticize misspelled, and was quickly corrected by Jackson, to his credit. So my post was a reply to the original, and hope the explanation (and apology) clears things up for all. And makes some kind of sense, LOL.

Lookee

Just an attempt to get this forum back to reporting on escorts. Yes I do sometines misspell words deliberately just to have fun. Guess I can"t do that anymore.

Wingman your such a suck up! LOL I already have spell check on my computer. And used it on this post.

Also I will be seeing Kristina from Dayton today and will report on it later.

BTW Wingman did you mean cunsult in your report? If you did you misspelled it.

Wdm.

[QUOTE=Wingman Todd; 1090438]Whodey is my best friend, as you probably know by now. I consul all the time about his grammer and spelling as does Professor Jry Wild! I do appreciate your comment as it is a pain in my side as well! Anyway you can somehow add a spell check to this forum? Not saying that some of these "bone heads" would use it, but for those of us who like to be gramically (SP) correct, we would! Just a suggestion, otherwise you are doing a great job!

WingmanTodd.

[quote][blue]Hey Whodeyman,

Me, I give a shit, that's who.

Caligulaxxx is absolutely correct to criticize your pathetic and quite probably deliberately poor spelling.

Frankly, the rest of us do not appreciate having to read and thus interpret your special version of the English language.

Get it?

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue][/quote][/QUOTE]

*Laughs* Thank you Caligula. Even the "spelling police" hav a cents of humoUr (Heaven help me for writing like that. LOL) Although, I figured your misspellings were caused by something like that. I love my iPhone 4, but [B][I]sometimes[/I][/B] it burns me the same way.

Regardless, I AM glad you wrote your report. You should not feel guilty for it. [B][I][U]Everyone's[/U][/I][/B] opinion is valuable and valid. Those that have reported previously on Sady [B][I]may not[/I][/B] have been intentionally misleading. Everyone has their likes, dislikes, and preferences and they are not always congruent with other people's opinions. Furthermore, every day is different. A good experience on one day, may not be the same experience the next day, or a month later. We need all sides of the story so that we might make the best, most informed decisions. It is unfortunate when those opinions lead someone else to an unfortunate experience. I'm sorry that you had a "sad" experience.

JR.

[QUOTE=Caligulaxxx; 1090254]The fone misspelling above is on purpose, and so was the odur from the report. I thought the you added some flavoUr. The other things are my I phone trying to tell me what to do all the time. I was using it yesterday when I wrote my report.

I do feel guilty about the writing though I thought it the thing that should be done. False reports or misleading reports cost all of us money.

Its all in guud fun and by golly so is this hobby. Keep it lite and keep it up! [/QUOTE]Love you too, Whodeyman. You should have quoted [B][I]me[/I][/B], [U]not[/U] Caligula for your bash about "self appointed moderators" that just want to do spell check and call the guy out, since I am said "self appointed moderator." Don't worry, I can take your bashing and return in kind. If you don't have a sense of humor and can't take a little fun on this forum. Don't read the posts. This forum [B][I]is [/I][/B]for more than just reports on "pieces of ass". Just [B][I]my[/I][/B] humble [spelled correctly] opinion.

Have fun with Sara (again) *rolling eyes*

And, Whodey, I see [B][I]my [/I][/B]ATF tomorrow and [B][I]I [/I][/B]have never seen better! =P LOL! Marvel at that!

[QUOTE=Whodeyman; 1090342]These froums are for the purpoes of reporting your time with escorts. Not for self apppointed moderators that just want to do spell check and call the guy out. Who gives a flying fuk how its spelled as long as its legible.

So use these forums for what they were ment for. Just my hummble openion.

BTW I see sara today and never seen better! [/QUOTE]Thank you, Jackson. I completely agree with you.

[QUOTE=Jackson; 1090420][blue]Hey Whodeyman,

Me, I give a shit, that's who.

Caligulaxxx is absolutely correct to criticize your pathetic and quite probably deliberately poor spelling.

Frankly, the rest of us do not appreciate having to read and thus interpret your special version of the English language.

Get it?

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue][/quote]

I recommend firefox web browser. It has a built in spell checker. It isn't the greatest, but it helps me when my fingers can't keep up with my thought process as I type.

A bit of spelling entertainment:

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?

The paragraph above has been around for quite some time. As to the authenticity of it's claimed origins, I can't readily verify that bit of information. But I still find it funny.

[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1090226]The word I believe you were striving for was "alliteration"."Illiteration" (if there were such a word) would be some conjugation of "illiterate" or "someone who is unable to read or write". Which is a rather humorous mix-up.

[/QUOTE]Of fabulous satire, in reference to the misspellings in Mr. Caligulaxxx's post. I probably should have used quotes.

[QUOTE=Lookee; 1090430]

JacksonHey Jackson,

(omitted) Are we allowed to criticize the administrator's spelling skills? (omitted) Lookee[/QUOTE]Lookee, no, we are not allowed to criticize Jackson's spelling. Jackson does not spell incorrectly, leave typos or have dangling participles.

Not all of the bugs have been worked out of the new software and that's what you notice. It's the software, not Jackson.

Anyway, you don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger and you don't mess around with Jackson.

Mozilla Firefox (Internet Explorer's biggest competitor) does have spell check. It is free and very similar to IE. I blog on Foxfire and do everything else on IE.

This was forwarded to me by a Provider who received it this morning. All instances of the website name was altered by me due to USASG policies.

[quote]Subject: e dot com Policy Change (please read)

Hello,

E dot com is in the process if revamping our policies.

ALL Free Registered Members will need to be age verified in order to post a profile.

All current NON PAID listings will be removed 11/11/10.

In order to reactivate your profile:

You must log in and enter a valid credit card. Your credit card will NOT BE CHARGED.

It will be validated and if good, your profile will be back on line.

We repeat that your credit card WILL NOT BE CHARGED, unless of course you choose to purchase a VIP Plan which allows your contact information to be displayed to non paying guests.

Thanks You,

E dot com[/quote]I have not received this email even though I am a "Free Registered Member". I suspect it is a phishing scam email, but wanted to check with the rest of you to see if you had received it or have heard anything about this. The timing of something like this seems questionable considering the recent raid. And, it seems like such a "generic" email that I find it questionable. Regardless, what do you all know?

Also, e dot com is down for "scheduled maintenance" right now, so you cannot verify anything on their site.

JR

Just so you all know. E dot com is back up. And, apparently the email was correct, but only affects Advertisers / Providers, which explains why I did not receive the email. I logged in but was not asked to provide credit card information. However, the Provider who forwarded me the email says that she WAS. We don't know if this credit card can be a pre-paid card at this point or if it has to be a legitimate credit card tied to you, your address, etc. (me? paranoid about giving out too much personal information? who wants to know? LOL)

Again, this is an interesting development in light of the raid. Since, I agree with Caligula that the FBI / IRS raid was not really to catch Providers and Mongers, I'm not quite sure what this is about. I would think it would make more sense for [B][I]ALL [/I][/B]free registered members to have to be verified (as the email states) not just the Providers.

Sorry, I should have posted this in the General Reports thread with the other e dot com stuff, but can't move it myself now.

Keeping the information flowing,

JR

If you have not yet had the pleasure of Karla I would like to highly recommend her to you. I had the pleasure of visiting with her a couple of weeks back for the first time in a while. I had seen her almost exclusively for a couple of years and was needing a little variety. I came back to her with a smile on my face. She is my ATF so far. Always sweet and accommodating, including some of my own predilections.

You can learn more about her by checking her website: [url]http://karla.escortwww.com.[/url]

Seniors can PM for more info from me.

Had another fantastic visit with Stace yesterday. She was gracious enough to see me on short notice and fit me in, literally, before another commitment. It was short and very sweet with no spilled milk, if you get my drift. Good hunting gentlemen.

Two things that stand out about this to me. First off, the FBI & IRS raid not being given anything officially for a 'has concluded amicably', and secondly, that the site now wants a CC that can be tied back to the individual provider. A prepaid card wouldn't work, as it'd have to be verifiable through a bank's records to prove age and such. Those 2 combined means that IF the IRS still has accessible inroads into the ecom site database, it would therefore have access to real names, addresses, and can subpoena bank and tax records accordingly. Legality can be poo-pooed aside too, by claiming that somewhere in the thousands of lasses on the site, there 'could' be a means of laundering money for terrorist activities. If I was a lass, I'd be very, very, VERY leery about giving the site any such info, ever. Maybe the type of card that you can get that is loadable AND has your name on it MIGHT work, but, I bet it'd get rebuffed as the 'verification process' concluded. Anyway... that's my thoughts on it. Talk amongst yourselves.. :)

Jay


[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1090678]Just so you all know. E dot com is back up. And, apparently the email was correct, but only affects Advertisers / Providers, which explains why I did not receive the email. I logged in but was not asked to provide credit card information. However, the Provider who forwarded me the email says that she WAS. We don't know if this credit card can be a pre-paid card at this point or if it has to be a legitimate credit card tied to you, your address, etc. (me? Paranoid about giving out too much personal information? Who wants to know? LOL)

Again, this is an interesting development in light of the raid. Since, I agree with Caligula that the FBI / IRS raid was not really to catch Providers and Mongers, I'm not quite sure what this is about. I would think it would make more sense for [B][I]ALL [/I][/B]free registered members to have to be verified (as the email states) not just the Providers.

Sorry, I should have posted this in the General Reports thread with the other e dot com stuff, but can't move it myself now.

Keeping the information flowing,

JR[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1090678]Just so you all know. E dot com is back up. And, apparently the email was correct, but only affects Advertisers / Providers, which explains why I did not receive the email. I logged in but was not asked to provide credit card information. However, the Provider who forwarded me the email says that she WAS. We don't know if this credit card can be a pre-paid card at this point or if it has to be a legitimate credit card tied to you, your address, etc. (me? Paranoid about giving out too much personal information? Who wants to know? LOL)

JR[/QUOTE]Would also explain why some of the providers are MIA on the site today.

Exactly ! Thankfully Dawn posted on the General Info forum. I hope the other ladies will read. I have copied and pasted to several ATF for their knowledge. It is getting too complicated out there for all of us!

WM.

[QUOTE=Stockinghunter;1090806]Would also explain why some of the providers are MIA on the site today.[/QUOTE]

The following was forwarded to me by a provider friend:

[QUOTE] From: Sabree Johnson <[email]providersvoice@gmail.com[/email]

Subject: Provider's Voice Alert. Escorts. Com.

To: REDACTED.

Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 2:46 PM.

Escorts. Com was raided by the FBI, and IRS, on Oct. 27th They are now cooperating with the FBI, and allowing clients' profiles to be taken over. This is an ongoing investigation, and everyone's information has been compromised. We will inform you of the outcome, but it looks as if the FBI may curently be running the site.

Please refer to the following link.

[url]http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20101028_Porn-center_offices_raided_in_Center_City.html#ixzz13rD4rSkZ[/url]

Be Safe and Aware,

Lisa Wolf.

Empowerment Coordinator.

Provider's Voice [/QUOTE]FYI.

Cincy