TroublePlay your inbox is full also
[QUOTE=Goo3215;6429717]Thanks. I freed up space.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the PM. I tried responding but it says your inbox is full also. LOL.
Troubleplay inbox is full
[QUOTE=Goo3215;6430222]Thanks for the PM. I tried responding but it says your inbox is full also. LOL.[/QUOTE]Inbox is full.
Brooke of Discreet Desires (Todd's review)
I am a little bit overdue with this review for Brooke of Discreet Desires. But here goes. This review refers to my appointment of about a month ago.
As some background, I saw Brooke for the first time back in 2008. At that time, she was in her mid-20's, and absolutely smoking.
But, lo and behold, 15 years make a big difference. Brooke is now about 40 years old. There have been some significant changes. You should know about these before you set up an appointment. She does have photos on the DD website (link below), but these are at least seven or eight years old.
[URL]https://www.yourdiscreetdesires.com/companions[/URL]
On the plus side, Brooke has a great (general) attitude. She is super friendly, in a general sense. For a woman who has been in the male entertainment business for so long, she has no bitterness. There is nothing "hard" about her.
She is funny, and would probably be enjoyable to hang around with in real life. At my age (55), she is the kind of girl I would like to meet for a girlfriend, were I in the market for one.
But as a paid companion, she leaves something to be desired. Like I said, she's now 40 years old. She isn't obese, but she definitely has a typical forty-something body, minus strict dieting and gym sessions. She is carrying some extra weight. Like most 40 year olds, of either sex.
Also, as has been noted before, she isn't a GFE. This means that, despite her (general) friendliness, there is still no kissing. You will endure an initial examination of your johnson, to make sure there are no cuts or lesions. She will check your equipment at various times during the act, to ensure that the protection is still securely in place. And yes, the only BJ is a CBJ.
That might be tolerable with a young super-hottie. With a woman in her 40's, well, let's just say that it's a subpar experience.
I suppose my final verdict would be the old familiar, "I had an OK time, but I wouldn't repeat. ".
Before making your decision, though, you should remember that I am generally not a fan of MILFs, especially as paid companions. And Brooke has definitely entered MILF territory. (She really needs updated photos on the website.).
Tiffany Teigan's response time
[QUOTE=LonelyKing;6439976]Has anyone had success in contacting her? I know her screening is pretty thorough; and I didn't give her much an advanced notice the first time, but I'm contacting her like two weeks out ATM and can't seem to get a response other than some auto email she has set up.[/QUOTE]TT seems to be an ambivalent provider. She's taken several extended (multi-month) breaks due to "nerve issues". She's also been slow on her response time in the past. So what you are reporting is not unprecedented.
Oh, and she recently raised her hourly rate to $500.
If fewer guys were eager to pay that, she might be more responsive and the rate might come down. But that would require coordinated action and self-control on the hobbyist side, something that I'm not optimistic about.
Brooke of DD and the now common problem of old photos
[QUOTE=TroublePlay;6432867]As you know, Todd, I don't mind a hot MILF. A few extra pounds are okay, because of the skill and passion that often come with age and experience.
However, based on your report, Brooke lost me at "no kissing" and "no BBBJ. ".
I mean what's the point?
Thanks for your honest, transparent report, friend.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your feedback. For me, a few extra pounds are *not* okay, if they are deliberately concealed with outdated photos. I would not have made the appointment based on her current weight / fitness level.
I'm old enough to remember when taking photos was a minor ordeal. Now everyone has a high resolution camera in their pocket. There is no excuse for using photos that are more than a year old, when you're selling your appearance.
But this is likely to become a consistent problem, as we now have so many local providers who have been on the scene since the Obama administration.
For example, Tiffany Teigan (recently discussed) now has reviews going back to 2015. Are her photos current? I'm sure some of the ones on her Tryst profile have been around for at least 4 or 5 years.
Asian Janae started on the local scene in 2009.14 years ago. The photos she's presently using are at least half a decade old.
Natane Marie has reviews going back all the way to 2010.13 years ago. I would bet dollars to donuts that none of her photos are current.
I've asked several of the "golden oldies" for current photos. None of them has responded positively.
If you are considering a first-time appointment with a lady who has been on the scene for a while, you should probably consider this issue in advance.
[URL]https://www.xoc.ch/oh-cincinnati-downtown/[/URL]
Did anyone use this site in past? I see providers visiting Columbus.
I used the site in the past when I was in Columbus the provider was hot. I asked them why there are no providers visiting Cincinnati from your site. They said there is no voting in Cincinnati.
I see a lot of them here spending $$$ on not-so-hot chicks. But some providers listed on the site are good-looking.
If anyone used this site before happy to hear their thoughts. And start voting for Cincinnati.
https://www.xoc.ch/
Pamella: busty blonde Brazilian
Had a good time with Pamella.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/7409046.htm[/URL]
Rate is 440/ hr, 340/ hh. Easy to set up as we are both on p411. But she did not send address on time. Apparently overslept. We moved appt 30 min later. I got to her mid-scale hotel and she did not reply at first, then after a while said to wait a while longer until housekeeping was not nearby. 30 min after the reschedule time she was ready. She looked great. Very similar to the pics, which I suspect are a few years old. Very short (4' 11" ?) but very nicely proportioned. Fantastic DDs. I think they are natural. Perfectly intermediate between soft and firm, big nipples. Cute face, and very friendly personality. I told her I had to switch to hh because we were behind schedule. Fine with her.
We got comfortable and explored each others' bodies. She kisses, but not dfk and not really into it. Turns out extra 100 for BBBJ instead of CBJ. I had the 100 so made the upgrade. Very good BBBJ, lots of tongue, lots of eye contact.
She stimulated herself with a vibrator while I gave a lot of attention to her tits. She provides a lot of dirty talk, which enhanced the session. Suited up for cfs which was really good.
Told me today is her last day. She is based in Miami.
It was a very good session, but quite pricey.
LucyDream is a Todd Cincy "no go" for now
[QUOTE=SmokeyGringo;6480963]I "think" she's real. The tattoos add up but I disagree with Todd. She does look rougher from Tryst compared to her monkey site pics. Could be cause they look semi-professional al. These chicks with their deposits as is they are having their time wasted that much. I'm sure there is a lot of tires kickers but seriously, this shit has got to end. Wish sites had the balls to say no deposits allowed and if it's reported back, you'll get kicked off. And $500 an hour. Nope.
But let us know if you do Todd.[/QUOTE]BAM:
A good call on the phone number (that really does freak me out, how similar the number is to the LE number). Good work finding her on the monkey site, as those photos look a lot rougher.
As for the deposit: I have yet to *ever* send money via the Internet to anyone I don't know. I'm not saying that I *never* would, but I *probably* never would. (Honestly, I hadn't gotten to that point yet. I was focused on whether or not she is legit.).
SMOKEY GRINGO:
I am always glad to meet a man on this board who is more discriminating than me, both in terms of expecting a higher caliber of lady, and a better deal.
SUMMARY:
I am still laying low. I am not going to spend my money on rough women, old women, or providers who have old photos and reviews going back to 2010. Especially not at the current price levels.
I would also support a collective "no deposit" policy. I don't think any of us likes doing that.
If we stopped paying, the prices would go down, and the unreasonable demands would taper off. As for me: I'm still looking, but I'm *not* buying until the selection and prices improve.
This girl is premium but at what price?
[QUOTE=MambaForevaa;6481284]Scheduled H with this beauty and I'm happy to report not only is she real but good at what she does!
I love GFE with a 10/10 and she absolutely delivers. I felt like I was with a GF of mine and that's precisely what I expect when I book H with higher end girl off of Eros. The BJ is covered if that's a dealbreaker for you but honestly the CBJ was amazing that I couldn't careless if it was covered. Amazing conversationalist on top of it. Gave me a massage in between rounds.
She's in town for a few more days so definitely go see her. Her donation is $500/ HR which is comparable to beautiful eros and tryst traveling providers. She is worth every penny IMO and selfishly I'd like her to make more trips to Cincinnati. We need more beautiful traveling providers that provide an actual GFE service not half ass kiss and BJ and tell you to stop after 10 seconds in DATY.
I'm running out of praises so go experience her for yourself and hopefully she comes back regularly. Cheers!
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/1185145.htm?cat=3859[/URL][/QUOTE]Completely Hot girl. This girl is premium but at what price?
I'm guessing she was 6-8 presidents range. Anybody want to call and inquire or should I?