Cuddle Comfort

Glad to hear your recent experience was great. Maybe what she's offering now is akin to what I was expecting last year. I'll check her out again at some point.

Also crazy that she got banned so quick. I guess the mods really do check this site or she broke one of the ToS for CC.

[QUOTE=Mrmcmahon619;7288476]I had more recent experience with Corinne since she became a low volume provider and thought I would share my perspective. I visited her twice in the last two weeks and had a great time. Booking was easy over text. Her space is really nice, it's a big loft in a private building.

She greeted me in a silk robe, no bra, and a thong. Her body exceeded my expectations. Her curves are in all the right places. I'm a sucker for thick thighs and a big, round ass. She wasn't wearing the wig from her older pictures, her hair looked natural which is exactly the look I like.

Massage was good. She was responsive to what I wanted. She's a nice girl and we were having a great conversation when she reminded me the massage was mutual touch. When I started rubbing her she started to get even more into it. She's very sexy and the finish was amazing.

From my perspective, I plan on seeing her again and would recommend. She also gives great hugs. Now that she got outed on Cuddle Comfort, try booking her directly.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Soulandis;7288960] Also crazy that she got banned so quick. I guess the mods really do check this site or she broke one of the ToS for CC.[/QUOTE]No the mods don't spend their days checking this site. When the CC site admin sees the see inbound traffic being referred from USA they ban the profile right away. Likely in an automated manner too.

Why'all need to stop posting direct url links to cc on this board so girls stop getting banned all the time. Just post the profile name the url isi just url / profilename couldn't be easier.

[QUOTE=PauFord;7289074]No the mods don't spend their days checking this site. When the CC site admin sees the see inbound traffic being referred from USA they ban the profile right away. Likely in an automated manner too.

Why'all need to stop posting direct url links to cc on this board so girls stop getting banned all the time. Just post the profile name the url isi just url / profilename couldn't be easier.[/QUOTE]It's not automated or automatic at all, I've talked with a CC mod about it. When they see an incoming link from USASG (and a couple of other "red flag" sites), a mod actually goes and reads the post. If it says "hey, this girl wouldn't give any extras, everything was platonic" they leave her alone.

If on the other hand, the report on here is positive for any type of sex work, or even topless / nude cuddling, the girl is instantly banned.

But your second point is correct -- people should absolutely not be posting direct CC URLs on here. And if they do, no one should be clicking them. Copy and paste.

Interesting, that would explain the inconsistency / mystery in bans. Now I fear that most of the SWs have been hit on that site, which would explain why this thread has been mostly dead / inactive / useless lately. Tragic but such is life.

[QUOTE=MarkStory99;7292176]It's not automated or automatic at all, I've talked with a CC mod about it. When they see an incoming link from USASG (and a couple of other "red flag" sites), a mod actually goes and reads the post. If it says "hey, this girl wouldn't give any extras, everything was platonic" they leave her alone.

If on the other hand, the report on here is positive for any type of sex work, or even topless / nude cuddling, the girl is instantly banned.

But your second point is correct -- people should absolutely not be posting direct CC URLs on here. And if they do, no one should be clicking them. Copy and paste.[/QUOTE]

No FS? What was the damage?

[QUOTE=Mrmcmahon619;7288476]I had more recent experience with Corinne since she became a low volume provider and thought I would share my perspective. I visited her twice in the last two weeks and had a great time. Booking was easy over text. Her space is really nice, it's a big loft in a private building.

She greeted me in a silk robe, no bra, and a thong. Her body exceeded my expectations. Her curves are in all the right places. I'm a sucker for thick thighs and a big, round ass. She wasn't wearing the wig from her older pictures, her hair looked natural which is exactly the look I like.

Massage was good. She was responsive to what I wanted. She's a nice girl and we were having a great conversation when she reminded me the massage was mutual touch. When I started rubbing her she started to get even more into it. She's very sexy and the finish was amazing.

From my perspective, I plan on seeing her again and would recommend. She also gives great hugs. Now that she got outed on Cuddle Comfort, try booking her directly.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MarkStuntMan;7292889]No FS? What was the damage?[/QUOTE]$200 50 min L1. $100 nude. L2& L3 are available for more. She is big, not quite BBW. For those prices you can get a much better looking provider. Won't repeat.

I looked at her on X didn't look big. But I'll take your word for it.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;7293702]$200 50 min L1. $100 nude. L2& L3 are available for more. She is big, not quite BBW. For those prices you can get a much better looking provider. Won't repeat.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SmileySam;7293702]$200 50 min L1. $100 nude. L2& L3 are available for more. She is big, not quite BBW. For those prices you can get a much better looking provider. Won't repeat.[/QUOTE]Saw her pre / early covid and shad was at most a size 5 in women's probably closer to a 3.

[QUOTE=SmileySam;7293702]$200 50 min L1. $100 nude. L2& L3 are available for more. She is big, not quite BBW. For those prices you can get a much better looking provider. Won't repeat.[/QUOTE]I agree. She wasn't bad, just felt she was a tad over priced. Def not BBW, not even close. A bit thick / chubby is how I'd describe her.

[QUOTE=MarkStuntMan;7293985]I looked at her on X didn't look big. But I'll take your word for it.[/QUOTE]I saw her recently based on her X pics and was disappointed. Her X pics hide her weight very well and make her appear much lighter skinned than she really is.

[QUOTE=Jayp80;7294041]Saw her pre / early covid and shad was at most a size 5 in women's probably closer to a 3.[/QUOTE]I saw her once in that time frame too. That was along time ago she's put on more than a few lbs since then.

[QUOTE=Member#6849;7193181]I got this message from some random guy.

Cat fish alert: ńğ289;316;Ħvě324; 88 in stream wood.

Says she's 32 but she's 38. Criminally transmitted Hpv to her previous partners too. Don't get caught up in it bruv.[/QUOTE]So is somebody out to hurt her reputation or is this person a problem?

What is weird in my opinion is that the listing for SnuggleHaven88 clearly states that an overnight session will be sensual. Never seen anybody else get away with that kind of thing on cuddlecomfort.

I'll be in Chicago for a couple days this week. Since posting profiles will get them banned, if anyone knows of any cuddlers who are currently active with extras and are seniors, can you share through direct message? Thank you in advance.

[QUOTE=ViagraN;7298197]So is somebody out to hurt her reputation or is this person a problem?

What is weird in my opinion is that the listing for SnuggleHaven88 clearly states that an overnight session will be sensual. Never seen anybody else get away with that kind of thing on cuddlecomfort.[/QUOTE]The listing on CC is her's. The weird text or any other comm denigrating her is a former boyfriend trying to fuck with her life.

[QUOTE=ViagraN;7298197]So is somebody out to hurt her reputation or is this person a problem?

What is weird in my opinion is that the listing for SnuggleHaven88 clearly states that an overnight session will be sensual. Never seen anybody else get away with that kind of thing on cuddlecomfort.[/QUOTE]Yeah, agreed. I can't believe she's getting away with calling her overnight session "platonic / sensual" and mentioning "hot oil massage. " Those are usually red flags the CC mods find right away.

You can't do "hot oil massage" and still be playing within CC's clothing rules. Or I guess technically you can, but hot oil only on your lower legs and your arms wouldn't be that appealing.

So has anyone actually seen her? I have seen a fair amount of girls from the site, so have more than enough to trade. Feel free to message directly.

[QUOTE=MarkStory99;7303484]Yeah, agreed. I can't believe she's getting away with calling her overnight session "platonic / sensual" and mentioning "hot oil massage. " Those are usually red flags the CC mods find right away.

You can't do "hot oil massage" and still be playing within CC's clothing rules. Or I guess technically you can, but hot oil only on your lower legs and your arms wouldn't be that appealing.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ViagraN;7298197]So is somebody out to hurt her reputation or is this person a problem?[/QUOTE]ViagraN, your inbox is full.